BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the effect of unintentional AH Plus sealer extrusion on the outcome of nonsurgical root canal treatment and retreatment in teeth with apical periodontitis (AP) compared to teeth with AP and no sealer extrusion at the 1-year follow-up.
METHODS: In a retrospective case-control study conducted from September 2016 to September 2021, teeth presenting clinical and radiographic signs of AP prior to treatment were included. The study comprised 2 groups: AH Plus sealer extrusion group (n = 60): initial root canal treatment or nonsurgical retreatment with unintentional apical extrusion of AH Plus sealer; and no AH Plus sealer extrusion group (n = 60): underwent the same treatment types without sealer extrusion. Additional factors, including sex, age, tooth type, tooth location, and treatment type, were recorded as potential outcome predictors. At 1-year follow-up, teeth were evaluated clinically and radiographically, and outcomes were classified as favorable (healed/healing) or unfavorable (uncertain/non-healing). Statistical analyses, such as the χ2 test, logistic regression, and Mann-Whitney U test, were employed for data analysis.
RESULTS: A favorable outcome was observed in 88.4% and 85% of the cases of the AH Plus sealer extrusion and no AH Plus sealer extrusion groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of outcomes (P > .05) when analyzed categorically or ordinally. Of independent variables, nonsurgical retreatment showed lower healing of AP in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Unintentional AH Plus sealer extrusion did not affect the healing of AP. However, initial root canal treatment showed better healing of AP than nonsurgical retreatment in the presence of AH Plus sealer extrusion. The analyzed outcome predictors had no effect on treatment outcome.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the intensity of postobturation pain after unintentional apical extrusion of calcium silicate-based root canal sealers (EndoSequence BC Sealer [Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA] and Bio-C Sealer [Angelus, Londrina, PR, Brazil]) with a resin-based sealer (AH Plus; Dentsply Sirona, York, PA).
METHODS: A total of 330 patients referred for root canal treatment on molar teeth with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis were recruited. Root canals were prepared using WaveOne Gold instruments (Dentsply Sirona) in a crown-down technique and irrigated with 2% chlorhexidine gel and saline solution. Next, patients were randomly distributed into 3 groups according to the root canal sealer used (n = 110): AH Plus, BC Sealer, and Bio-C Sealer. Root canal filling was then accomplished with a vertical compaction technique. Patients presenting with an unintentional extrusion of sealers (n = 13/group) were assessed for postobturation pain experience using a visual descriptor scale ranging from 0-10 at 6-, 12-, 24-, and 48-hour and 1-week intervals after treatment. Mixed analysis of variance repeated measures were used to assess the results (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: The extrusion rate was similar for all sealers (~12%). There was no significant difference in the postobturation pain results between the root canal sealers evaluated (P > .05). However, after the time interval of 12 hours, AH Plus (P = .04073) and Bio-C Sealer (P = .04327) demonstrated a significant reduction in pain, whereas BC Sealer did not show differences in pain intensity, even in the maximum period evaluated of 1 week (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of unintentional apical extrusion of calcium silicate-based root canal sealers presents similar postoperative pain results compared with resin-based sealers with low-intensity pain.

The purpose of this systematic review was to qualify and quantify the evidence regarding the effect of extruded sealers on endodontic treatment outcomes. Two reviewers independently conducted a comprehensive literature search. The EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane, PubMed databases, bibliographies, grey literature of all relevant articles and textbooks were searched. Six articles met the inclusion criteria with a moderate risk of bias and were analysed for qualitative and quantitative synthesis. There was moderate-certainty evidence that sealer extrusion can contribute to non-healing outcomes, 95% confidence interval, risk ratio 1.32 (1.12-1.54) and P < 0.05. This indicates that the current authors are somewhat confident the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect. Sealer extrusion had a 32% higher risk of contributing to a non-healing outcome than no extrusion. However, well-conducted research would need to be conducted to confirm this causality claim.

The present report describes a case where sealer extrusion (Sealapex) occurred during root canal obturation of a left lower second premolar tooth, and the patient experienced sudden pain and followed by complete anaesthesia of the lower lip. After 3 weeks of conservative therapy and an unaltered anaesthesia period, piezosurgical removal of the extruded sealer and root-end resection was performed despite the direct contact with the mental neurovascular bundle. At suture removal, 1 week after surgery, there was no improvement in sensation. Two weeks after the operation, the patient reported some changes, including a short paraesthesia period alternating with anaesthesia. At the fourth post-operative week, neurosensory function recovered completely. This case represents successful use of the piezoelectric technique for mental nerve decompression and periapical surgery of a lower second premolar with close contact of the mental nerve.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the intensity of pain after unintentional extrusion of resin-based and calcium hydroxide (Ca[OH]2)-based endodontic sealers as well as their influence on the periradicular tissues.
METHODS: A total of 120 single-rooted teeth exhibiting extrusion of sealer in the postoperative radiographs were included in the study. According to the sealers used, the teeth were divided into four groups (n = 30): Group I - AH Plus®, Group II - Resino Seal, Group III - Sealapex™, and Group IV - Apexit® Plus. Postoperative pain was assessed at 0-6 h, 6-12 h, 12-24 h, and 24-48 h of obturation using Visual Analog Scale. Radiographs were taken at 3, 6, and ≥9 months to 1-year follow-up and compared with baseline radiographs to assess the dissolution of extruded sealers and healing of periradicular tissues.
METHODS: ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and Pearson\'s Chi-square test were used. Statistical significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05.
RESULTS: Postoperative pain intensity was higher in case of AH Plus® sealer followed by Sealapex™ up to 12 h of obturation and was statistically nonsignificant. Apexit® Plus at all time intervals showed statistically significant less pain intensity than AH Plus® and Sealapex™ but not from Resino Seal group. At 9-month follow-up, better healing of periradicular tissues was shown by AH Plus® (48.1%) followed by Apexit® Plus (44.4%) and Sealapex™ (41.2%) with statistically nonsignificant difference.
CONCLUSIONS: In case of periapical extrusion, both resin-based and Ca(OH)2-based sealers caused postoperative pain. Both Ca(OH)2- and resin-based sealers did not influence the treatment outcome.