same-day discharge

当日放电
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:心房颤动(AF)导管消融术后的当天出院(SDD)可能会解决对介入性房颤治疗需求不断增长的社会经济健康负担。本系统综述和荟萃分析分析了与过夜(ONS)相比,房颤消融术后SDD临床结局的当前证据。
    结果:对PubMed数据库进行了系统搜索。预定的终点是短期(24-96h)和出院后30天的并发症,再住院和/或急诊室(ER)-出院后30天就诊,和30天死亡率。包括24项研究(154,716名患者)。随机效应模型用于SDD队列中汇总终点患病率的荟萃分析,以及SDD和ONS队列之间的比较。对SDD后并发症的汇总估计在短期均较低(2%;95CI:1-5%,I2:89%)和30天随访(2%;95CI:1-4%,I2:91%)。SDD和ONS之间的并发症发生率没有显着差异(短期:RR:1.62,95CI:0.52-5.01,I2:37%;30天:RR:0.65,95CI:0.42-1.00,I2:95%)。SDD后再住院/急诊就诊的合并率为4%(95CI:1-10%,I2:96%),SDD和ONS之间无统计学差异(RR:0.86,95CI:0.58-1.27,I2:61%)。SDD后30天合并死亡率较低(0%,95CI:0-1%,I2:33%)。所有研究都存在相关的偏倚风险,主要是由于研究设计。
    结论:在这个包括大量当代队列的荟萃分析中,AF消融术后的SDD与出院后并发症的低发生率相关,再次住院/急诊就诊和死亡率,与ONS相比,风险相似。由于目前证据质量有限,进一步的前瞻性,需要进行随机试验,以确认SDD的安全性,并确定患者和手术相关的成功和安全的SDD策略的先决条件.
    OBJECTIVE: Same-day discharge (SDD) after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) may address the growing socio-economic health burden of the increasing demand for interventional AF therapies. This systematic review and meta-analysis analyses the current evidence on clinical outcomes in SDD after AF ablation compared with overnight stay (ONS).
    RESULTS: A systematic search of the PubMed database was performed. Pre-defined endpoints were complications at short-term (24-96 h) and 30-day post-discharge, re-hospitalization, and/or emergency room (ER) visits at 30-day post-discharge, and 30-day mortality. Twenty-four studies (154 716 patients) were included. Random-effects models were applied for meta-analyses of pooled endpoint prevalence in the SDD cohort and for comparison between SDD and ONS cohorts. Pooled estimates for complications after SDD were low both for short-term [2%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1-5%; I2: 89%) and 30-day follow-up (2%; 95% CI: 1-4%; I2: 91%). There was no significant difference in complications rates between SDD and ONS [short-term: risk ratio (RR): 1.62; 95% CI: 0.52-5.01; I2: 37%; 30 days: RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.42-1.00; I2: 95%). Pooled rates of re-hospitalization/ER visits after SDD were 4% (95% CI: 1-10%; I2: 96%) with no statistically significant difference between SDD and ONS (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.58-1.27; I2: 61%). Pooled 30-day mortality was low after SDD (0%; 95% CI: 0-1%; I2: 33%). All studies were subject to a relevant risk of bias, mainly due to study design.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis including a large contemporary cohort, SDD after AF ablation was associated with low prevalence of post-discharge complications, re-hospitalizations/ER visits and mortality, and a similar risk compared with ONS. Due to limited quality of current evidence, further prospective, randomized trials are needed to confirm safety of SDD and define patient- and procedure-related prerequisites for successful and safe SDD strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全踝关节成形术(TAA)主要在住院患者中进行。然而,随着快速关节置换术方案的出现,TAA已经慢慢转向门诊。因此,本系统综述旨在评估门诊TAA的结局,并将其与住院TAA进行比较.
    于2023年10月23日在PubMed进行了文献检索,Embase,和CENTRAL数据库使用PRISMA指南。如果他们报告了门诊TAA的结果或比较了门诊和住院TAA的结果,则纳入研究。使用随机效应模型计算汇总赔率比(OR)和平均差。使用MINORS标准进行质量评估。
    纳入了12项研究,4个门诊和8个门诊-住院比较研究。门诊病人相对年轻,体重指数较低,与住院组相比,合并症较少。对于门诊和住院TAA,合并并发症发生率为2.6%vs3.6%,再入院率为2.5%和4%,再次手术率为3.6%和5.5%。我们发现并发症的几率显着降低(OR=0.47,CI:0.26-0.85;P=0.01),再入院(OR=0.63,CI:0.54-0.74;P<.00001),门诊和住院组的再手术(OR=0.66,CI:0.46-0.95;P=0.03)。
    尽管此分析受到来自单个研究的数据优势的限制,我们发现,门诊TAA通常对低风险患者进行,并与较低的并发症发生率相关。再入院,与住院患者TAA相比,再次手术。
    UNASSIGNED: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has primarily been performed in the inpatient setting. However, with the advent of fast-tracked joint arthroplasty protocols, TAA has slowly been shifting to the outpatient setting. Therefore, this systematic review aims to evaluate outcomes of outpatient TAA and compare them to inpatient TAA.
    UNASSIGNED: A literature search was performed on October 23, 2023, in the PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases using the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they reported on outcomes of outpatient TAA or compared outcomes between outpatient and inpatient TAA. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences were calculated using a random effects model. Quality assessment was performed using the MINORS criteria.
    UNASSIGNED: 12 studies were included, with 4 outpatient-only and 8 outpatient-inpatient comparative studies. Patients in the outpatient group were relatively younger, had a lower body mass index, and had fewer comorbidities relative to the inpatient group. For outpatient vs inpatient TAA, the pooled complication rate was 2.6% vs 3.6%, readmission rate was 2.5% vs 4%, and reoperation rate was 3.6% vs 5.5%. We found significantly lower odds of complications (OR = 0.47, CI: 0.26-0.85; P = .01), readmissions (OR = 0.63, CI: 0.54-0.74; P < .00001), and reoperations (OR = 0.66, CI: 0.46-0.95; P = .03) in the outpatient vs inpatient group.
    UNASSIGNED: Although this analysis is limited by the dominance of data included from a single study, we found that outpatient TAA was generally performed on lower-risk patients and was associated with lower rates of complications, readmissions, and reoperations compared with inpatient TAA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:门诊手术和当天出院正在发展与现代医疗保健不断变化的需求相一致的领域,通过降低患者对医院感染的易感性,血栓栓塞并发症,医疗错误。当与增强的手术后恢复方案配对时,他们有希望将某些接受颅骨手术的患者安全地过渡到门诊治疗。本研究旨在评估颅内肿瘤切除术和内镜下第三脑室造瘘术(ETV)后手术当天的出院情况,并探讨与麻醉方法的潜在关联。并发症,和再入院率。
    方法:对计划在2020年8月至2023年10月手术当天计划出院的患者进行了回顾性分析。数据包括患者人口统计特征,术前临床缺陷,诊断,在术前和术后MRI上的发现,病变特征,并发症,和再入院率。
    结果:共202例患者纳入研究。平均年龄为56.8岁,117名(57.9%)患者为女性。患者在手术前一天晚上入院,以获得术前清除并接受MRI检查。最常见的诊断是转移(23.3%),脑膜瘤(20.8%),胶质母细胞瘤(12.4%),低级别胶质瘤(10.4%)。开颅手术(46.5%),立体定向针吸活检(35.1),和ETV(6.9%)是最常见的程序。13例(6.4%)患者接受清醒开颅手术,189例(93.6%)外科手术在全身麻醉下进行.1.5%的患者出现并发症,在平均9.3个月的随访中没有观察到永久性并发症。总的来说,179例(88.6%)患者在手术当天成功出院。平均住院时间为26.8小时,术后住院时间中位数为7小时。23例(11.4%)患者在术后第0天被认为不适合出院,而是在术后第1天出院。这些延误的原因包括进一步的临床监测(n=12),社会因素(n=4),和患者偏好(n=7)。年龄与住院时间呈正相关(p=0.006)。总的来说,6.4%的患者在出院后1-30天内再次入院,2.5%的人再次进入神经外科。
    结论:这项研究证明了手术当天出院的安全性和可行性,成功率高,并发症发生率低。早期出院不会增加发病率或再入院率。实施明确的出院协议和全面的患者教育对于神经外科手术中成功的当日出院计划至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: Outpatient surgery and same-day discharge are developing fields that align with the evolving needs of modern healthcare, presenting a notable advantage by reducing patient susceptibility to nosocomial infections, thromboembolic complications, and medical errors. When paired with enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, they hold promise in safely transitioning certain patients undergoing cranial surgery to outpatient care. This study aimed to evaluate discharge on the same day of surgery after intracranial tumor resection and endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and to investigate potential associations with anesthesia methods, complications, and readmission rates.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients scheduled for planned discharge on the same day of surgery between August 2020 and October 2023 was conducted. Data included patient demographic characteristics, preoperative clinical deficits, diagnosis, findings on preoperative and postoperative MRI, lesion characteristics, complications, and readmission rates.
    RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 56.8 years and 117 (57.9%) patients were female. Patients were admitted the evening before surgery to obtain preoperative clearance and undergo MRI. The most common diagnoses were metastasis (23.3%), meningioma (20.8%), glioblastoma (12.4%), and low-grade glioma (10.4%). Craniotomy (46.5%), stereotactic needle biopsy (35.1), and ETV (6.9%) were the most common procedures performed. Thirteen (6.4%) patients underwent awake craniotomy, and 189 (93.6%) surgical procedures were conducted under general anesthesia. Complications occurred in 1.5% of patients, with no permanent complications observed during a mean follow-up of 9.3 months. In total, 179 (88.6%) patients were successfully discharged on the same day of surgery. The median length of hospitalization was 26.8 hours, with the median length of postoperative stay being 7 hours. Twenty-three (11.4%) patients were deemed ineligible for discharge on postoperative day 0 and instead discharged on postoperative day 1. The reasons for these delays included further clinical monitoring (n = 12), social factors (n = 4), and patient preference (n = 7). Age was positively correlated with length of hospitalization (p = 0.006). In total, 6.4% of patients were readmitted within 1-30 days after discharge, with 2.5% readmitted to the department of neurosurgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of discharge on the same day of surgery, with a high success rate and low complication rates. Early discharge did not increase morbidity or readmission rates. Implementation of clear discharge protocols and thorough patient education are crucial for successful same-day discharge programs in neurosurgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    接受卵圆孔未闭(PFO)封堵术患者的围手术期和介入后护理因护理提供者而异。经导管介入术后当日出院(SDD)是一个不断发展的概念。本研究旨在评估使用Gore®心型间隔封堵器(GSO)装置进行心内超声心动图(ICE)封堵PFO的患者当日出院率和并发症发生率。次要目的是分析PercloseProGlide股静脉闭合的疗效。
    在斯德哥尔摩一所大学医院使用GSO设备进行PFO闭合的患者,瑞典,在2017年3月1日至2020年6月30日期间进行回顾性纳入,所有患者均以隐源性卒中作为手术指征.所有患者均在清醒镇静和局部麻醉下进行PFO封堵。所有患者的适应症均为隐源性卒中。所有患者均使用ICE和透视进行围手术期成像。从患者图表中收集患者特征和围手术期数据。患者在干预后卧床休息4-6小时。经胸超声心动图和临床检查,包括腹股沟状态,在出院前进行。干预后当天未进行临床常规随访。手术后两周通过电话进行临床随访,12个月后进行超声心动图随访。使用线性和逻辑回归模型分析数据。
    总共,纳入262名患者,其中246人(94%)患有SDD。166名患者(63%)接受了ProGlide™股静脉通路闭合系统。术后心律失常发生在17例(6%)患者中,血管并发症9例(3%)。随访时的总闭合率为98.5%。264例患者中有25例(9.5%)在PFO封堵后的前八周内必须重新入院。16由于心房颤动需要电复律,一个是由于动静脉瘘手术,四个由于胸痛/进入部位疼痛,四名病人出现发烧。接受ProGlide™的患者与接受ProGlide™的患者之间的SDD没有差异未接受ProGlide™治疗的患者.
    使用GSO装置经导管PFO封堵后,SDD显得安全,手术成功率高。低并发症和再入院率使干预适合这种对患者友好且具有成本效益的概念。
    UNASSIGNED: Periprocedural and postinterventional care of patients undergoing closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) varies significantly across care providers. Same-day discharge (SDD) after transcatheter interventions is an evolving concept. This study aimed to assess the same-day discharge rate and incidence of complications in patients undergoing PFO closure with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) using the Gore®Cardioform Septal Occluder (GSO) device. The secondary aim was to analyse the efficacy of femoral vein closure with Perclose ProGlide.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients who underwent PFO closure with the GSO device at a university hospital in Stockholm, Sweden, were retrospectively included between March 1, 2017, and June 30, 2020, all with cryptogenic stroke as the indication for the procedure. All patients underwent PFO closure with conscious sedation and local anaesthesia. The indication for all patients was a cryptogenic stroke. Periprocedural imaging was performed using ICE and fluoroscopy in all patients. Patient characteristics and periprocedural data were collected from patient charts. Patients were kept on bed rest for 4-6 h post-intervention. Transthoracic echocardiography and clinical examination, including groin status, were performed before discharge. No clinical routine follow-up was performed the day following the intervention. Clinical follow-up was done by phone call two weeks after the procedure, and echocardiographic follow-up was done after 12 months. Data were analysed using linear and logistic regression models.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 262 patients were included, of which 246 (94%) had SDD. 166 patients (63%) received the ProGlide™ system for femoral vein access closure. Post-procedural arrhythmias occurred in 17 (6%) patients, and vascular complications in 9 patients (3%). The overall closure rate at follow-up was 98.5%. 25 out of 264 patients (9.5%) had to be readmitted within the first eight weeks after PFO closure, 16 due to atrial fibrillation warranting electric cardioversion, one due to an arteriovenous fistula that was operated, four due to chest pain/pain at the access site, and four patients developed fever. There was no difference in SDD among patients who received ProGlide™ vs. patients who did not receive ProGlide™.
    UNASSIGNED: SDD appears safe after transcatheter PFO closure with the GSO device with high procedural success rates. Low rates of complications and readmissions make the intervention suitable for this patient-friendly and cost-effective concept.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:传统上,接受开颅手术的患者需要延长住院时间,以加强对潜在并发症的监测和管理.然而,随着手术方法的发展,麻醉,和术后协议,对当日放电(SDD)的可行性和兴趣正在增长。本研究旨在通过对现有文献的荟萃分析,评估当日出院在开颅手术中是否是安全可行的方法。
    方法:遵循PRISMA指南,在Medline进行了全面搜索,Embase,科克伦,和WebofScience数据库从成立到2023年12月。符合条件的研究包括英文报告,其中至少有4名患者接受了开颅手术,并在当天出院。无论是单臂还是与正常放电相比。使用具有95%置信区间(CI)的单一比例分析来汇总研究,并使用具有95%CI的比率(OR)来衡量比较分析中的效果。采用随机效应模型。终点包括预先计划的当天出院的成功和失败,和术后并发症在整个住院期间(直到出院),这些并发症进一步分为主要和次要并发症.此外,需要再次手术,24小时内再入院,24小时后再入院,和死亡率。
    结果:纳入7项观察性研究。单臂分析包括五项研究,包括来自715名患者的数据。包括731名患者的四项研究被纳入比较分析,其中233人在SDD上出院,498人正常出院。分析显示成功率为88%(95%CI,83%-94%),最初24小时内再次入院率为2%(95%CI,1%-2%),24小时后再入院率为1%(95%CI,0%-2%;),术后总并发症发生率为2%(95%CI,1%-4%),主要并发症发生率为0%(95%CI,0%-0%),轻微并发症发生率为2%(95%CI,1%-4%),死亡率为0%(95%CI,0%-0%)。并发症和死亡率的比较分析显示两种方法之间没有差异。
    结论:这项系统评价和荟萃分析确定,选定患者开颅手术当天出院,以及肿瘤切除开颅手术,是高度可行和安全的,成功率很高,低故障,和再操作率。此外,对于选定的患者,与正常出院相比,没有发现当天出院时的损害证据.因此,当天出院可能被认为是一个可行的选择,只要采用适当的选择标准。
    BACKGROUND: Traditionally, patients undergoing craniotomy were subject to extended hospital stays for intensive monitoring and management of potential complications. However, with the evolution of surgical methods, anesthesia, and postoperative protocols, the feasibility and interest in same-day discharge (SDD) are growing. This study aimed to evaluate whether same-day discharge is a safe and feasible approach in craniotomy through a meta-analysis of the available literature.
    METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from inception to December 2023. Eligible studies comprised reports in English with a minimum of 4 patients who underwent craniotomies and were discharged with same-day discharge, whether single-arm or comparative with normal discharge. Single proportion analysis with 95 % confidence interval (CI) was used to pool the studies and Odds Ratio (OR) with 95 % CI was used to measure effects in comparative analysis. A random-effects model was adopted. Endpoints included success and failure of pre-planned same-day discharge, and postoperative complications throughout the hospital stay (until discharge), these complications were further categorized into major and minor complications. Also, need for reoperation, readmission within 24 h, readmission after 24 h, and mortality.
    RESULTS: Seven observational studies were included. Five studies were included in the single-arm analysis, comprising data from 715 patients. Four studies comprising 731 patients were included in the comparative analysis, of whom 233 were discharged on SDD, and 498 were discharged normally. The analysis revealed a success rate of 88 % (95 % CI, 83 %-94 %), readmission to the hospital within the initial 24 h rate of 2 % (95 % CI, 1 %-2 %), readmission after 24 h rate of 1 % (95 % CI, 0 %-2 %;), total postoperative complications until discharge rate of 2 % (95 % CI, 1 %-4 %), major complications rate of 0 % (95 % CI, 0 %-0 %), minor complications rate of 2 % (95 % CI, 1 %-4 %), and mortality rate of 0 % (95 % CI, 0 %-0 %). Comparative analysis for complications and mortality showed no difference between both approaches.
    CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis identified that same-day discharge in craniotomy for selected patients, as well as for tumor resection craniotomies, is highly feasible and safe, with a high success rate, low failure, and reoperation rates. Moreover, for selected patients, no evidence of harm in same-day discharge was identified when compared with normal discharge. Consequently, same-day discharge may be considered a viable option, provided appropriate selection criteria are employed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)后的术后住院时间(LOS)是前列腺癌治疗的一个潜在可改变的方面。我们的目标是评估当天出院(SDD)RARP的使用,并比较这些男性与术后住院患者的术前和围手术期特征。
    接受RARP的患者的围手术期结果从密歇根泌尿外科改善协作(MUSIC)注册评估。男性按医院LOS分类:SDD,1天,和2天。评估了SDD的实践和外科医生水平变化以及SDD使用随时间的变化。主要结果是RARP后30天再入院。
    我们确定了从2018年到2022年在音乐中接受RARP的10249名男性。大多数患者有1天LOS(79.6%),2.8%接受SDD。接受SDDRARP的患者比例从2018年的0.6%上升到2019年的1.2%,2020年至2022年的4.4%。在28例MUSIC实践中的12例(42.9%)和138例泌尿科医师中的52例(37.7%)中至少进行了一次SDD。在多变量分析中,在接受SDD和LOS1日治疗的患者中,30日再入院的几率无显著差异(OR:1.72,95%CI:0.92~3.22,P=.090).限制包括回顾性,基于注册表的观察性研究,SDD利用不均匀。
    尽管从2018年开始进行RARP后有更多的患者接受了SDD,但密歇根州的发病率每年仍<5%。重要的是,与住院患者相比,接受SDDRARP治疗的患者没有明显更多的再入院.对于受这种方法激励的选定患者,SDD似乎是安全可行的。
    UNASSIGNED: Postoperative length of stay (LOS) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a potentially modifiable aspect of prostate cancer care. Our objective was to evaluate the use of same-day discharge (SDD) RARP and compare pre- and perioperative characteristics of these men with those who underwent hospitalization postoperatively.
    UNASSIGNED: Perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing RARP were evaluated from the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) registry. Men were classified by hospital LOS: SDD, 1 day, and 2 days. Practice and surgeon-level variation of SDD and the change in SDD use over time were assessed. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission after RARP.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified 10,249 men undergoing RARP in MUSIC from 2018 to 2022. Most patients had 1-day LOS (79.6%), with 2.8% undergoing SDD. The proportion of patients undergoing RARPs with SDD rose from 0.6% in 2018 to 1.2% in 2019 and 4.4% for 2020 to 2022. At least one SDD was performed in 12 of 28 MUSIC practices (42.9%) and by 52 of 138 urologists (37.7%). In multivariable analysis, odds of 30-day readmission were not significantly different between patients undergoing SDD and LOS 1 day (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 0.92-3.22, P = .090). Limitations include retrospective, registry-based observational study with nonuniform utilization of SDD.
    UNASSIGNED: Although more patients have undergone SDD after RARP beginning in 2018, rates across Michigan have remained < 5% annually. Importantly, patients undergoing SDD RARP did not experience significantly more readmissions compared to hospitalized patients. SDD appears safe and feasible for select patients who are motivated by this approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近几十年来,术后早期当天出院(SDD)的趋势显著增加.开发适当的风险分层工具以指导关于全髋关节置换术(THA)后SDD与长期住院的决策的努力仍未完成。本报告的目的是确定接受THA和全膝关节置换术(TKA)的患者与SDD失败相关的最常见原因和危险因素。根据PRISMA指南对四个书目数据库进行了系统搜索,以比较同一天成功出院的患者和失败的患者。利益的结果是与当天出院失败相关的原因和危险因素。计算二分变量的赔率比(OR),而平均差异(MD)是计算连续变量。采用RevMan软件进行Meta分析。如果有异质性的证据,则使用随机效应。纳入了8项研究,共3492名患者。SDD失败的最常见原因是体位性低血压,其次是身体条件不足,恶心/呕吐,疼痛,和尿潴留。女性是失败的危险因素(OR0.77,95%CI0.63-0.93),尤其是在THA亚组中。ASA评分IV(OR0.33,95%CI0.14-0.76)和III(OR0.72,95%CI0.52-0.99)是危险因素,以及>2名过敏和吸烟患者。全身麻醉失败风险增加(OR0.58,95%CI0.42-0.80),而脊髓麻醉是保护性的(OR1.62,95%CI1.17-2.24)。直接前后入路没有显着差异。总之,直立性低血压是SDD失败的主要原因。骨科手术中SDD失败的风险因素包括女性,ASAIII和IV分类,更多的过敏,吸烟和使用全身麻醉的患者。可以解决这些因素以增强SDD结果。
    In recent decades, the trend toward early same-day discharge (SDD) after surgery has dramatically increased. Efforts to develop adequate risk stratification tools to guide decision-making regarding SDD versus prolonged hospitalization after total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain largely incomplete. The purpose of this report is to identify the most frequent causes and risk factors associated with SDD failure in patients undergoing THA and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A systematic search following PRISMA guidelines of four bibliographic databases was conducted for comparative studies between patients who were successfully discharged on the same day and those who failed. Outcomes of interests were causes and risk factors associated with same-day discharge failure. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for dichotomous variables, whereas mean differences (MD) were calculated for continuous variables. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan software. Random effects were used if there was evidence of heterogeneity. Eight studies with 3492 patients were included. The most common cause of SDD failure was orthostatic hypotension, followed by inadequate physical condition, nausea/vomiting, pain, and urinary retention. Female sex was a risk factor for failure (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.93), especially in the THA subgroup. ASA score IV (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.76) and III (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52-0.99) were risk factors, as were having > 2 allergies and smoking patients. General anesthesia increased failure risk (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.42-0.80), while spinal anesthesia was protective (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.17-2.24). The direct anterior and posterior approaches showed no significant differences. In conclusion, orthostatic hypotension was the primary cause of SDD failure. Risk factors identified for SDD failure in orthopedic surgery include female sex, ASA III and IV classifications, a higher number of allergies, smoking patients and the use of general anesthesia. These factors can be addressed to enhance SDD outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:良性和妇科肿瘤学文献一致报道了当天出院(SDD)的安全性和可行性。然而,SDD在泌尿系妇科人群中的结局很少。本研究的目的是描述阴道子宫切除术和天然组织结肠切除术后SDD的成功,并比较当天出院患者与术后第1天(POD1)的术后不良事件发生率.进一步的目标是比较疼痛,恢复质量(QoR),和群体之间的满意度。
    方法:这是一个单中心,计划SDD患者的前瞻性队列研究。使用标准化的ERAS协议。QoR-40问卷在基线时进行,POD2,以及术后6周的访视。疼痛评分同样被捕获,并在第6周进行满意度调查。主要结局是复合不良事件,定义为任何术后不良事件和/或医疗保健利用。不包括电话,和尿路感染.
    结果:共101例患者纳入研究;99例患者可获得主要结果。76例患者实现了SDD(77.0%);23例患者过夜(23.2%)。复合不良事件的总发生率为20.2%(95%CI,13.5-29.2),两组之间没有差异(26.1%vs18.4%,p=0.42)。此外,POD2和6周时的QoR-40或疼痛评分无差异.患者满意度很高,两组之间相似。
    结论:77.0%的患者成功实现了SDD。经阴道子宫切除术和自然组织结肠切除术后的SDD似乎是安全的,可行,并与良好的QoR和高度的患者满意度相关。
    OBJECTIVE: The safety and feasibility of same-day discharge (SDD) has been consistently reported across the benign and gynecologic oncology literature. However, outcomes of SDD in the urogynecology population are sparse. The objectives of this study were to describe the success of SDD following vaginal hysterectomy and native-tissue colpopexy, and to compare the incidence of postoperative adverse events in patients discharged same-day versus postoperative day 1 (POD1). Further objectives were to compare pain, quality of recovery (QoR), and satisfaction between the groups.
    METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective cohort study of patients with planned SDD. A standardized ERAS protocol was utilized. The QoR-40 questionnaire was administered at baseline, POD2, and the 6-week postoperative visit. Pain scores were captured similarly, and a satisfaction survey was administered at 6 weeks. The primary outcome was composite adverse events defined as any postoperative adverse event and/or health care utilization, excluding telephone calls, and urinary tract infection.
    RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were enrolled in the study; the primary outcome was available for 99. SDD was achieved for 76 patients (77.0%); 23 patients stayed overnight (23.2%). The overall incidence of composite adverse events was 20.2% (95% CI, 13.5-29.2), and was not different between the groups (26.1% vs 18.4%, p = 0.42). Additionally, there were no differences in the QoR-40 or pain scores on POD2 and at 6 weeks. Patient satisfaction was high and similar between the groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Successful SDD was achieved in 77.0% of the patients. SDD following vaginal hysterectomy and native-tissue colpopexy appears to be safe, feasible, and associated with good QoR and a high degree of patient satisfaction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:虽然快速恢复TJA的安全性已经确立,对其对术后护理利用模式的影响知之甚少。我们希望检查当天出院及其相关的医院术后护理和教育的减少是否转化为在一年的恢复期需要更多的术后支持。
    方法:对2020年1月至2023年10月住院时间为0天或1天的1,237例全髋关节置换术(THA)和1,710例全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者进行了回顾性回顾。主要结果是术后一年期间在我们机构接受TJA提供者的随访次数。次要结果包括30天急诊科(ED)的回报,再入院,一年的物理治疗利用率,以及术后6至12个月患者报告的结果测量信息系统身体功能(PROMIS-PF)评分的改善。进行了双变量和多变量分析,以比较0天和1天LOSTHA和TKA患者之间的结果。
    结果:在THA和TKA人群中,0天LOS患者较年轻,平均体重指数较低,更有可能是白人,男人,与1天LOS患者相比,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分<3。在控制了组间的差异后,一年随访次数无显著差异,物理治疗访问,ED回报,或在THA或TKA患者0至1天之间再入院。在TKA患者中,1天LOS与PROMIS-PF评分改善较低相关。
    结论:风险调整后,在术后1年期间,THA和TKA患者当天出院未导致资源利用率增加.在护士导航员支持下的协调关节成形术计划中,在适当选择同时接受THA和TKA的患者中,可以安全地进行当天出院,而不需要增加术后护理.
    BACKGROUND: While the safety of rapid recovery total joint arthroplasty is well established, less is known about its impact on postoperative care utilization patterns. We wished to examine whether same-day discharge-and its associated presumed reduction in hospital-based postoperative care and education-translates to the need for more postoperative support during the 1-year recovery period.
    METHODS: A retrospective review of 1,237 total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 1,710 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who had 0- or 1-day length of stay (LOS) from January 2020 to October 2023 was conducted. The primary outcome was the number of follow-up visits with total joint arthroplasty providers at our institution during the 1-year postoperative period. Secondary outcomes included 30-day emergency department returns, readmissions, 1-year physical therapy utilization, and improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function scores at 6 to 12 months postoperatively. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed to compare outcomes between 0-day and 1-day LOS THA and TKA patients.
    RESULTS: In both the THA and TKA populations, 0-day LOS patients were younger, had a lower average body mass index, were more likely to be White, men, and had an American Society of Anesthesiologists score < 3 than 1-day LOS patients. After controlling for differences between groups, no significant differences in the number of one-year follow-up visits, physical therapy visits, emergency department returns, or readmissions were seen between 0 and 1-day THA or TKA patients. In TKA patients, 1-day LOS was associated with lower improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function scores.
    CONCLUSIONS: After risk adjustment, same-day discharge of THA and TKA patients did not result in increased resource utilization during the one-year postoperative period. In the setting of a coordinated joint arthroplasty program with nurse navigator support, same-day discharge can be safely performed without increasing the need for postoperative care in appropriately selected patients undergoing both THA and TKA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)后当天出院(SDD)是一种安全有效的医疗保健途径。然而,对SDD患者观点的理解有限。这项研究的目的是探讨RYGB后患者对SDD的满意度和体验。
    方法:在荷兰教学医院进行了一项并行设计的混合方法研究,使用问卷和访谈。接受RYGB并在手术当天出院的患者完成了4份BODY-Q问卷(对外科医生的满意度,对医疗队满意,对办公室工作人员的满意,和对信息提供的满意度)术后±4个月。将问卷的结果与手术后过夜的一组患者的现有数据进行比较(即,对照组)。单独采访了一部分患者,以深入了解患者对SDD的看法。
    结果:在问卷中,对照组(n=158)与本组患者(n=51)的中位数得分如下:92/100vs.92/100(p=0.331)的外科医生,100/100vs.92/100(p=0.775)的医疗团队,100/100vs.办公室工作人员的100/100(p=0.616),和90/100vs.73/100(p=0.015)用于提供信息。对14名患者的访谈揭示了七个主题,描述高满意度,还有几个兴趣点。
    结论:RYGB后患者对SDD的满意度较高,尽管有关手术当天的信息提供可以改善。然而,并非每个符合医疗条件的患者都适合这种医疗保健途径,责任转移。
    BACKGROUND: Same-day discharge (SDD) after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a safe and effective healthcare pathway. However, there is limited understanding of the patient perspective on SDD. The aim of this study was to explore patient satisfaction and experience with SDD after RYGB.
    METHODS: A mixed-methods study with a concurrent design was conducted in a Dutch teaching hospital, using questionnaires and interviews. Patients who underwent RYGB and were discharged on the day of the surgery completed four questionnaires of the BODY-Q (satisfaction with the surgeon, satisfaction with the medical team, satisfaction with the office staff, and satisfaction with information provision) ± 4 months postoperative. The results of the questionnaires were compared with pre-existing data from a cohort of patients who stayed overnight after surgery (i.e., control group). A subset of patients was individually interviewed for an in-depth understanding of the patient perspective on SDD.
    RESULTS: In the questionnaires, median scores for the control group (n = 158) versus the present group of patients (n = 51) were as follows: 92/100 vs. 92/100 (p = 0.331) for the surgeon, 100/100 vs. 92/100 (p = 0.775) for the medical team, 100/100 vs. 100/100 (p = 0.616) for the office staff, and 90/100 vs. 73/100 (p = 0.015) for information provision. Interviews with 14 patients revealed seven themes, describing high satisfaction, along with several points of interest.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patient satisfaction with SDD after RYGB is high, although information provision regarding the day of surgery could be improved. However, not every medically eligible patient might be suitable for this healthcare pathway, as responsibilities are shifted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号