目的:压力性损伤是老龄化社会中逐渐增多的疾病。压力性溃疡的重建需要患者和手术技术。患者在其他检测穿孔器的方法下暴露于辐射风险,例如计算机断层扫描血管造影和磁共振血管造影。这里,我们比较了臀上动脉穿支(SGAP)的两种无辐射方法,皮瓣收获和锚定。一种是仅检测手持式声学多普勒超声(ADS)的传统方法(组1)。另一个涉及术中吲哚菁绿荧光近红外血管造影(ICGFA)和手持式ADS(第2组)的辅助。
方法:这是一个单中心,回顾性,包括III级和IV级骶骨压力损伤患者的观察性研究,他在2019年1月至2021年1月期间接受了SGAP皮瓣重建手术。术中使用两种检测方法。主要结果指标包括手术时间,估计失血量,主要射孔器检测编号,伤口情况,和并发症的发生率。
结果:16例患者接受了SGAP皮瓣重建。经过一系列检查,所有患者均被诊断为III至IV级骶骨压力损伤。第1组包括8例患者,平均手术时间为91分钟,平均估计失血量为50mL。射孔器的平均数量为4。术后并发症包括1例伤口感染和1例伤口边缘裂开。无死亡率与此过程相关。平均总住院时间为16天。第2组包括8例患者,平均手术时间为107.5分钟,平均估计失血量为50mL。射孔器的平均数量为5。术后并发症包括1例伤口感染。无死亡率与此过程相关。平均总住院时间为13天。
结论:通过ICGFA检测SGAP和手持式ADS用于重建骶骨压力损伤提供了更准确的方法,并提供了无辐射的优势。
OBJECTIVE: Pressure injury is a gradually increasing disease in the aging society. The reconstruction of a pressure ulcer requires a patient and surgical technique. The patients were exposed to the radiation risk under other ways of detection of perforators such as computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography. Here, we compared two radiation-free methods of a superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP), flap harvesting and anchoring. One is the traditional method of detecting only handheld acoustic Doppler sonography (ADS) (Group 1). The other involves the assistance of intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescent near-infrared angiography (ICGFA) and handheld ADS (Group 2).
METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective, observational study that included patients with sacral pressure injury grades III and IV, who had undergone reconstructive surgery with an SGAP flap between January 2019 and January 2021. Two detection methods were used intraoperatively. The main outcome measures included the operative time, estimated blood loss, major perforator detection numbers, wound condition, and incidence of complications.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent an SGAP flap reconstruction. All patients were diagnosed with grade III to IV sacral pressure injury after a series of examinations. Group 1 included 8 patients with a mean operative time of 91 min, and the mean estimated blood loss was 50 mL. The mean number of perforators was 4. Postoperative complications included one wound infection in one case and wound edge dehiscence in one case. No mortality was associated with this procedure. The mean total hospital stay was 16 days. Group 2 included 8 patients with a mean operative time of 107.5 min, and the mean estimated blood loss was 50 mL. The mean number of perforators was 5. Postoperative complications included one wound infection. No mortality was associated with this procedure. The mean total hospital stay was 13 days.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of detection of the SGAP by ICGFA and handheld ADS for the reconstruction of a sacral pressure injury provides a more accurate method and provides the advantage of being radiation-free.