暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Despite rural regions being disproportionately impacted by the toxic drug supply, little is known about the contextual factors influencing access to opioid agonist treatment (OAT) specific to rural residents. The present study examines these factors in a rural and coastal setting in British Columbia, Canada.
METHODS: The qualitative methods were used to examine the barriers and facilitators to OAT access. Between July and October 2021, semi-structured interviews were conducted with people who use drugs who reside in a rural and coastal community. Thematic analysis was used to identify emergent themes and subthemes. Results were corroborated by the research team and a local community advisory board.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven (n = 27) participants described both limiting and facilitating factors that influenced OAT accessibility. Access was less challenging when participants\' OAT dispensing pharmacy was in close proximity, had extended hours of operation, or when pharmacies provided delivery services. Barriers to OAT access identified by participants included the high cost of transportation, residing or working in remote communities and few local OAT prescribers. A variety of treatment motivations and goals that impacted OAT satisfaction are also highlighted.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that patient satisfaction with OAT service access in a rural and coastal setting is multi-factorial and geographic proximity alone does not fully explain OAT accessibility issues in these settings. Accessibility to OAT may be improved through delivery services, expanded OAT prescribing authorisation beyond physician-only regulations, health authorities covering transportation costs and continual assurance that prescribing practices meet individuals\' goals.
BACKGROUND: Bien que les régions rurales soient touchées de manière disproportionnée par l\'approvisionnement en drogues toxiques, on sait peu de choses sur les facteurs contextuels qui influencent l\'accès au traitement par agoniste opioïde (TAO) spécifique aux résidents ruraux. La présente étude examine ces facteurs dans un contexte rural et côtier en Colombie-Britannique, au Canada.
UNASSIGNED: Des méthodes qualitatives ont été utilisées pour examiner les obstacles et les facilitateurs de l\'accès aux TAO. Entre juillet et octobre 2021, des entretiens semi-structurés ont été menés avec des personnes qui consomment des drogues résidant dans une communauté rurale et côtière. L\'analyse thématique a été utilisée pour identifier les thèmes et sous-thèmes émergents. Les résultats ont été corroborés par l\'équipe de recherche et un comité consultatif communautaire local.
UNASSIGNED: Vingt-sept (n = 27) participants ont décrit les facteurs limitants et facilitants qui ont influé sur l\'accessibilité au TAO. L\'accès était moins difficile lorsque la pharmacie du TAO des participants était proche, avait des heures d\'ouverture prolongées ou lorsque les pharmacies offraient des services de livraison. Parmi les obstacles à l\'accès au TAO mentionnés par les participants, il y avait le coût élevé du transport, le fait de résider ou de travailler dans des collectivités éloignées et la rareté des prescripteurs locaux du TAO. Les participants ont également fait état de divers objectifs et motivations liés au traitement qui ont eu une incidence sur la satisfaction à l\'égard du TAO.
CONCLUSIONS: Cette étude démontre que la satisfaction des patients à l\'égard de l\'accès aux services du TAO en milieu rural et côtier est multifactorielle et que la proximité géographique n\'explique pas à elle seule les problèmes d\'accessibilité au TAO dans ces milieux. Cette accessibilité peut être améliorée par des services de livraison, l\'élargissement de l\'autorisation de prescrire un TAO au-delà des règlements réservés aux médecins, la prise en charge des coûts de transport par les autorités sanitaires et l\'assurance continue que les pratiques de prescription répondent aux objectifs des individus.

BACKGROUND: This descriptive study reviews clinical outcomes of individuals admitted to a northern Canadian, rural intensive care unit (ICU) with severe COVID-19. It reports our site-specific data that is part of an ongoing global effort to gather data and guide therapy; the aims of this study were to describe participants admitted to our ICU with COVID-19 and illuminate challenges faced by rural and remote centres.
METHODS: This retrospective study examined data from participants admitted to the ICU with COVID-19 pneumonia between 24th November 2020 and 28th February 2022. Using data from electronic and hardcopy health records, data were obtained according to standardised forms developed for the Short Period Incidence Study of Severe Acute Respiratory Infection.
RESULTS: Eighty-five adult participants were admitted to our ICU with COVID-19. The median age of participants was 57 years old (range: 23-83 years); 49.4% were males and 50.6% were females. Of our cohort, 58.9% required mechanical ventilation at some point during their stay and the median duration of stay in our ICU was 5 days (range: 1-36 days). Amongst individuals included, 25.9% were discharged alive from our hospital on their index admission, 57.6% were transferred to another facility and 16.5% died in our facility.
CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 significantly strained our local ICU resources, necessitating high numbers of patient transfers. However, despite limited resources, patients at our site received contemporary guideline-based care for COVID-19 pneumonia. Future pandemic and surge capacity planning must ensure that rural and remote communities receive adequate additional resources to meet the anticipated needs of their local populations.
BACKGROUND: Cette étude descriptive examine les résultats cliniques des personnes admises dans une unité de soins intensifs rurale du nord du Canada avec une COVID-19 sévère. Elle rapporte des données spécifiques à notre site qui font partie d\'un effort global en cours pour rassembler des données et guider la thérapie. Les objectifs de cette étude étaient de décrire les participants admis dans notre unité de soins intensifs avec la COVID-19 et d\'éclairer les défis auxquels sont confrontés les centres ruraux et éloignés.
UNASSIGNED: Cette étude rétrospective a examiné les données des participants admis à l\'unité de soins intensifs pour une pneumonie due à la COIVD-19 entre le 24 novembre 2020 et le 28 février 2022. Les données ont été obtenues à partir de dossiers médicaux électroniques et papier, selon des formulaires standardisés développés pour l\'étude d\'incidence à court terme des infections respiratoires aiguës sévères (SPRINT-SARI).
UNASSIGNED: 85 participants adultes ont été admis dans notre unité de soins intensifs avec la COVID-19. L\'âge médian des participants était de 57 ans (intervalle: 23-83 ans); 49,4% étaient des hommes et 50,6% des femmes. Dans notre cohorte, 58,9% ont eu besoin d\'une ventilation mécanique à un moment ou à un autre de leur séjour et la durée médiane du séjour dans notre unité de soins intensifs était de 5 jours (intervalle: 1-36 jours). Parmi les personnes incluses, 25,9% sont sorties vivantes de notre hôpital lors de leur admission initiale, 57,6% ont été transférées dans un autre établissement et 16,5% sont décédées dans notre établissement.
CONCLUSIONS: La COVID-19 a mis à rude épreuve les ressources de notre unité locale de soins intensifs, nécessitant un grand nombre de transferts de patients. Cependant, malgré des ressources limitées, les patients de notre site ont reçu des soins fondés sur des lignes directrices contemporaines pour la pneumonie due à la COVID-19. À l\'avenir, la planification de la pandémie et de la capacité de pointe doit garantir que les communautés rurales et éloignées reçoivent des ressources supplémentaires adéquates pour répondre aux besoins anticipés de leurs populations locales.

BACKGROUND: Prompt bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can double the chance of cardiac arrest survival. Rural and remote communities experience longer emergency service wait times and have lower rates of bystander-CPR compared to their urban counterparts. Our study addresses this disparity.
METHODS: We designed a 1.5-h free hands-only CPR course tailored to secondary school students in rural and remote communities taught by medical students. We evaluated our course using pre-test and post-test surveys.
RESULTS: We taught over 300 secondary students in 5 days. Less than one-third of students had previously taken a CPR course. We found that brief CPR instruction taught by medical students was effective in both improving students\' knowledge of CPR (t[528] = -26, P < 0.01) and perceived comfort in performing CPR (t[548] = -12, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: CPR courses taught by medical students are effective, low cost, and may help address regional health care disparities. Teaching CPR to rural/remote communities may have secondary benefits such as promoting health care careers to rural youth. We encourage other health professional programmes to consider engaging students in CPR outreach projects.
BACKGROUND: Une réanimation cardio-pulmonaire rapide peut doubler les chances de survie en cas d\'arrêt cardiaque. Les communautés rurales et éloignées connaissent des temps d\'attente plus longs dans les services d\'urgence et ont des taux plus faibles de RCP par rapport à leurs homologues urbains. Notre étude porte sur cette disparité.
UNASSIGNED: Nous avons conçu un cours de RCP pratique et gratuit d\'une heure et demie, adapté aux élèves du secondaire des communautés rurales et isolées et dispensé par des étudiants en médecine. Nous avons évalué notre cours à l\'aide d\'enquêtes pré-test et post-test.
UNASSIGNED: En 5 jours, nous avons enseigné à plus de 300 élèves du secondaire. Moins d\'un tiers des élèves avaient déjà suivi un cours de RCP. Nous avons constaté qu\'une brève formation à la RCP dispensée par des étudiants en médecine était efficace pour améliorer les connaissances des élèves en matière de RCP (t[528] = -26, P < 0,01) et la perception de leur aisance à pratiquer la RCP (t[548] = -12, P < 0,01).
CONCLUSIONS: Les cours de RCP dispensés par les étudiants en médecine sont efficaces, peu coûteux et peuvent contribuer à lutter contre les disparités régionales en matière de soins de santé. L\'enseignement de la RCP aux communautés rurales/éloignées peut avoir des avantages secondaires tels que la promotion des carrières dans le domaine de la santé auprès des jeunes ruraux. Nous encourageons d\'autres programmes professionnels de santé à envisager d\'engager leurs étudiants dans des projets de sensibilisation à la RCP.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

Background To address rural physician workforce shortages, the Health Resources and Services Administration funded multiple Rural Residency Planning and Development (RRPD) awards, beginning in 2019, to develop rural residency programs in needed specialties. Objective To describe early resident recruitment outcomes of the RRPD grants program. Methods A cross-sectional survey of program directors or administrators of these 25 new rural residency training programs across the United States was administered at RRPD award conclusion in 2022. We performed descriptive analyses of applicant and Match data, including applications and interviews per resident position, positions filled in the main Match vs the Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program (SOAP), and recruitment of residents from the program\'s state. Results The 25 Cohort 1 RRPD programs ranged from 2 to 8 residents per year. Most programs (16 of 25, 64.0%) were rural expansion tracks of an urban program. Most programs were sufficiently developed to participate in the 2022 (N=17) or 2023 (N=20) Match; we report on 13 of 17 (76.5%) programs for 2022 and 14 of 20 (70.0%) programs for 2023. Programs completed a median of 14.8 interviews per position. Most positions were filled in the Match (43 of 58, 74.1% in 2022; 45 of 58, 77.6% in 2023); most others were filled in the SOAP. On average, 34.4% of enrolled residents were from the same state as the program (range 0-78.6%). Conclusions The early resident recruitment outcomes of the RRPD model for developing new physician training in rural communities had sufficient recruitment success to support program continuation.

Growing nursing workforce maldistributions impede rural healthcare access globally. In-depth exploration of underlying philosophical ideas about rural health in nursing curricular could support recruitment and retention of nurses who are well positioned to support and advocated for health care and services relevant to their communities. Through a lens of positionality, the purpose of this paper is to explore rural health and nursing within the United States and Australia from the perspective of undergraduate students. Recognizing that both countries have \'first world\' health services, issues of access to services associated with systemic and structural biases were significant features identified by participants. Their perceptions were supported by discussion with attendees of the 26th International Nursing Philosophy Conference from several countries, during a presentation titled \'What is different about rural health nursing: A philosophical exploration.\' This international consistency suggests that systemic and structural biases are global phenomena. While exposure to rural health and rural nursing may be beneficial for recruitment, preparing nurses for rural practice requires more than educating students to complete clinical tasks. Uncovering collaboration, advocacy and policy development opportunities for nurses in rural communities could move the dial from recruiting rural nurses to fulfill immediate needs to retention of well-educated and highly skilled nurses. Building a stronger philosophical base for rural healthcare inclusive of all people, honouring their distinguishing characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, is long overdue. Positionality can inform how nurses across the globe relate to other countries\' governments, cultures, norms, values, expectations, etc., which can influence the advancement of the profession and address social inequities among rural populations.

BACKGROUND: United States rural community-based practices are increasingly participating in undergraduate and graduate medical education to train the workforce of the future, and are required or encouraged to provide academic appointments to physicians who have typically not held an academic appointment. Mechanisms to identify faculty and award academic appointments across an entire health system have not been reported.
METHODS: Our rural community regional practice identified academic appointments as important for participating in medical education. Over a three-year period, our regional leadership organized a formal education committee that led a variety of administrative changes to promote the adoption of academic rank. Data on attainment of academic appointments was obtained from our Academic Appointment and Promotion Committee, and cross referenced with data from our regional human resources department using self-reported demographic data.
RESULTS: We describe a successful adoption strategy for awarding academic rank in a rural regional practice in which the percentage of physician staff with academic rank increased from 41.1 to 92.8% over a 3-year period.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that process changes can rapidly increase and then sustain academic appointments for physicians over time. More rural health systems may want to consider the use of academic rank to support educational programs while enhancing physician satisfaction, recruitment and retention.

BACKGROUND: It is vital that health service delivery and health interventions address patients\' needs or preferences, are relevant for practice and can be implemented. Involving those who will use or deliver healthcare in priority-setting can lead to health service delivery and research that is more meaningful and impactful. This is particularly crucial in rural communities, where limited resources and disparities in healthcare and health outcomes are often more pronounced. The aim of this study was to determine the health and healthcare priorities in rural communities using a region-wide community engagement approach.
METHODS: This multi-methods study was conducted in five rural communities in the Grampians region, Western Victoria, Australia. It involved six concept mapping steps: (1) preparation, (2) generation (brainstorming statements and identifying rating criteria), (3) structuring statements (sorting and rating statements), (4) representation of statements, (5) interpretation of the concept map and (6) utilization. Community forums, surveys and stakeholder consultations with community members and health professionals were used in Step 2. An innovative online group concept mapping platform, involving consumers, health professionals and researchers was used in Step 3.
RESULTS: Overall, 117 community members and 70 health professionals identified 400 health and healthcare issues. Six stakeholder consultation sessions (with 16 community members and 16 health professionals) identified three key values for prioritizing health issues: equal access for equal need, effectiveness and impact (number of people affected). Actionable priorities for healthcare delivery were largely related to access issues, such as the challenges navigating the healthcare system, particularly for people with mental health issues; the lack of sufficient general practitioners and other health providers; the high travel costs; and poor internet coverage often impacting technology-based interventions for people in rural areas.
CONCLUSIONS: This study identified actionable health and healthcare priorities from the perspective of healthcare service users and providers in rural communities in Western Victoria. Issues related to access, such as the inequities in healthcare costs, the perceived lack of quality and availability of services, particularly in mental health and disability, were identified as priorities. These insights can guide future research, policy-making and resource allocation efforts to improve healthcare access, quality and equity in rural communities.