routine data

常规数据
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:接近生命尽头的人在医疗保健费用中占了不成比例的比例,这些费用中的大部分是在医院累积的。提高对这一人群的护理价值的经济证据基础很薄。自然实验方法可能有助于弥合证据差距与可靠的因果估计从常规数据,但这些方法很少应用于这一领域。
    方法:在主要分析中,我们评估了急诊住院后及时接受姑息治疗是否会影响住院时间(LOS);在次要分析中,我们验证了姑息医学服务(PMS)的实施是否与住院死亡率的任何变化同时发生,我们估计了与LOS任何变化相关的成本差异。这是对爱尔兰公立医院急性入院常规收集数据的二次分析。我们使用差异差异分析来利用2010年至2015年间爱尔兰急性公立医院PMS团队的交错实施。我们使用ICD-10代码确定了PMS实施后的姑息治疗收据,我们使用倾向评分权重将涉及姑息治疗互动的入院与PMS实施前几年的入院进行了匹配.
    结果:我们的主要分析样本包括4,314个观测值,其中608人(14%)接受了及时的姑息治疗。我们估计干预措施使LOS减少了近两天,估计每次入场费为1820欧元。这些分析对回归规范的多重敏感性分析是稳健的,加权策略和选址。实施PMS后,以死亡告终的入院比例没有变化。
    结论:适当的患者与姑息治疗之间的迅速互动可以提高该人群的护理质量和效率。许多患者在住院后期接受姑息治疗,这不会产生成本节约。未来的研究可以用更好的数据来扩展和加强我们的方法,以及使用不同的方法来了解如何在入院早期触发姑息治疗并实现可获得的收益。
    People approaching end of life account disproportionately for health care costs, and the majority of these costs accrue in hospitals. The economic evidence base to improve value of care to this population is thin. Natural experiment methods may be helpful in bridging evidence gaps with credible causal estimates from routine data, but these methods have seldom been applied in this field. This study aimed to evaluate the association between timely palliative care consultation and length of stay for adults with serious illness admitted to acute hospital in Ireland.
    In primary analysis we evaluated if timely palliative care receipt following emergency hospital inpatient admission impacted length of stay (LOS); in secondary analysis we verified if palliative medicine service (PMS) implementation co-occurred with any changes in in-hospital mortality, and we estimated cost differences associated with any change in LOS. This was a secondary analysis on routinely collected data for acute admissions to public hospitals in Ireland. We used difference-in-differences analysis to exploit the staggered implementation of PMS teams at acute public hospitals in Ireland between 2010 and 2015. We identified palliative care receipt following PMS implementation using ICD-10 codes, and we matched admissions involving a palliative care interaction to admissions in years prior to PMS implementation using propensity score weights.
    Our primary analytic sample included 4,314 observations, of whom 608 (14%) received timely palliative care. We estimated that the intervention reduced LOS by nearly two days, with an estimated associated saving per admission of €1,820. These analyses were robust to multiple sensitivity analyses on regression specification, weighting strategy and site selection. Proportion of admissions ending in death did not change following PMS implementation.
    Prompt interaction between suitable patients and palliative care can improve the quality and efficiency of care to this population. Many patients receive palliative care later in the hospital stay, which does not yield cost-savings. Future studies can extend and strengthen our approach with better data, as well as using different methods to understand how to trigger palliative care early in a hospital admission and realise available gains.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的几十年中,已经为奶牛和小牛开发了福利评估方案。此类协议的一个实际用途可能是通过使用常规收集的数字数据进行福利评估(即,基于数据的评估)。这种方法可以允许连续监测大量农场中的动物福利。它认识到动物福利状况随时间的变化,并能够在农场之间进行比较。由于目前尚无全面的基于数据的小牛评估,本综述的目的是(i)概述小牛现有的单一基于数据的指标;(ii)制定瑞士小牛综合福利评估中使用的基于数据的指标的必要要求.在整个过程中,我们使用了小牛的福利质量协议(WQ)和世界动物卫生组织的陆地动物健康守则。随后,常规收集的数据被评估为瑞士小牛肉手术福利评估的数据来源。反映动物福利的四个WQ原则,即,\'良好的喂养\',\'良好的住房\',“良好的健康状况”和“适当的行为”几乎没有反映在常规可用数据中。动物健康,作为动物福利的一个要素,可以通过死亡率评估使用基于数据的指标进行部分评估,治疗,和car体特征。没有基于数据的指标反映喂养,住房和动物行为可用。因此,迄今为止,不可能使用常规收集的瑞士小牛小牛的数字数据来评估其多维性的福利。一个主要的潜在困难是使用常规数据区分小牛和其他小牛,因为瑞士官方数据库中缺少小牛的识别类别。为了从常规数据中推断动物福利,需要调整数据收集策略和动物识别。然后,可以使用基于数据的福利评估来有效地补充农场评估,例如,相应地将财务激励归因于特定的高福利标准。
    Welfare assessment protocols have been developed for dairy cows and veal calves during the past decades. One practical use of such protocols may be conducting welfare assessments by using routinely collected digital data (i.e., data-based assessment). This approach can allow for continuous monitoring of animal welfare in a large number of farms. It recognises changes in the animal welfare status over time and enables comparison between farms. Since no comprehensive data-based assessment for veal calves is currently available, the purposes of this review are (i) to provide an overview of single existing data-based indicators for veal calves and (ii) to work out the necessary requirements for data-based indicators to be used in a comprehensive welfare assessment for veal calves in Switzerland. We used the Welfare Quality Protocol® (WQ) for veal calves and the Terrestrial Animal Health Code from the World Organisation of Animal Health for guidance throughout this process. Subsequently, routinely collected data were evaluated as data sources for welfare assessment in Swiss veal operations. The four WQ principles reflecting animal welfare, i.e., \'good feeding\', \'good housing\', \'good health\' and \'appropriate behaviour\' were scarcely reflected in routinely available data. Animal health, as one element of animal welfare, could be partially assessed using data-based indicators through evaluation of mortality, treatments, and carcass traits. No data-based indicators reflecting feeding, housing and animal behaviour were available. Thus, it is not possible to assess welfare in its multidimensionality using routinely collected digital data in Swiss veal calves to date. A major underlying difficulty is to differentiate between veal calves and other youngstock using routine data, since an identifying category for veal calves is missing in official Swiss databases. In order to infer animal welfare from routine data, adaptations of data collection strategies and animal identification are required. Data-based welfare assessment could then be used to complement on-farm assessments efficiently and, e.g., to attribute financial incentives for specifically high welfare standards accordingly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于护理人员短缺和日益增长的护理需求,资源配置和优化任务分配已成为护理管理的首要问题。基于护理干预措施和常规患者文档中的护士资格的等级混合分析可以支持这一点。病例复杂性是护理干预的一个关键联系因素,工作量,和等级混合。这项研究基于瑞士医院一年的常规患者文档(n=3,373例)确定了病例复杂性预测因子,并通过加权累积逻辑回归模型预测了患者的临床复杂性水平。重要的预测因素是性别,年龄,入院前居留,入学类型,自我护理指数,肺炎风险,以及护理干预措施的数量。模型的准确性有限,但适用于基于需求和能力的员工计划等应用。通过院内数据校准后,它可以支持这些任务中的护理管理。下一步是在临床环境中测试模型。
    Due to nursing staff shortage and growing nursing care demand, resource allocation and optimal task distribution have become primary concerns of nursing management. Grade mix analysis based on nursing interventions and nurse qualifications from routine patient documentation can support this. Case complexity is a key linking factor of nursing interventions, workload, and grade mix. This study determined case complexity predictors based on one year of routine patient documentation (n = 3,373 cases) from a Swiss hospital and predicted the patient clinical complexity level via weighted cumulative logistic regression models. Significant predictors were sex, age, pre-admission residence, admission type, self- care index, pneumonia risk, and number of nursing interventions. The models\' accuracy is limited yet appropriate for applications such as needs- and competence- based staff-planning. After calibration via in-hospital data it could support nursing management in these tasks. The next step is now to test the model in a clinical setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:急性心肌梗死患者的虚弱表现越来越多。电子虚弱指数(eFI)是一种经过验证的方法,可从常规初级保健数据中识别社区中的脆弱老年患者。我们的目的是评估eFI与老年急性心肌梗死住院患者预后之间的关系。
    方法:使用DataLoch心脏病登记处进行的回顾性队列研究包括2013年10月至2021年3月期间因心肌梗死住院的65岁或以上的连续患者。
    方法:患者被分类为适合,温和,中度,或者根据他们的eFI分数严重虚弱。Cox回归分析用于确定虚弱类别与全因死亡率之间的关联。
    结果:在4670名患者中(中位年龄77岁[71-84],43%女性),1865年(40%)被归类为适合,1699(36%),798(17%)和308(7%)分类为轻度,中度和严重虚弱,分别。总的来说,1142例患者在12个月内死亡,其中248例(13%)和147例(48%)被归类为健康和严重虚弱。分别。调整后,任何程度的虚弱都与全因死亡风险增加相关,其中严重虚弱的风险最大(参考=fit,调整后的风险比2.87[95%置信区间2.24至3.66])。
    结论:eFI确定心肌梗死后死亡风险高的患者。管理数据中的自动计算是可行的,并且可以提供一种低成本的方法来识别医院就诊的脆弱老年患者。
    BACKGROUND: Frailty is increasingly present in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The electronic Frailty Index (eFI) is a validated method of identifying vulnerable older patients in the community from routine primary care data. Our aim was to assess the relationship between the eFI and outcomes in older patients hospitalised with acute myocardial infarction.
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using the DataLoch Heart Disease Registry comprising consecutive patients aged 65 years or over hospitalised with a myocardial infarction between October 2013 and March 2021.
    METHODS: Patients were classified as fit, mild, moderate, or severely frail based on their eFI score. Cox-regression analysis was used to determine the association between frailty category and all-cause mortality.
    RESULTS: In 4670 patients (median age 77 years [71-84], 43% female), 1865 (40%) were classified as fit, with 1699 (36%), 798 (17%) and 308 (7%) classified as mild, moderate and severely frail, respectively. In total, 1142 patients died within 12 months of which 248 (13%) and 147 (48%) were classified as fit and severely frail, respectively. After adjustment, any degree of frailty was associated with an increased risk of all-cause death with the risk greatest in the severely frail (reference = fit, adjusted hazard ratio 2.87 [95% confidence intervals 2.24 to 3.66]).
    CONCLUSIONS: The eFI identified patients at high risk of death following myocardial infarction. Automatic calculation within administrative data is feasible and could provide a low-cost method of identifying vulnerable older patients on hospital presentation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景有效的大流行准备需要强有力的严重急性呼吸道感染(SARI)监测。然而,根据症状识别SARI患者是耗时的。使用逆转录(RT)-PCR测试或接触和液滴预防标签的数量作为SARI的替代,可以准确反映SARI患者的流行病学。我们的目的是比较RT-PCR测试的数量,接触和液滴预防标签和SARI相关的国际疾病分类(ICD)-10代码,并评估其作为监测指标的用途。方法2017年1月1日至2023年4月30日在莱顿大学医学中心住院的所有年龄组的患者均符合纳入条件。我们使用临床数据收集工具从电子病历中提取数据。对于每个监视指标,我们绘制了每周的绝对计数,3个监测指标之间的相关性。结果我们纳入了117,404例住院患者。在COVID-19大流行之前和期间,这三个监测指标通常遵循类似的模式。接触和液滴预防标签与ICD-10诊断代码之间的相关性最高(Pearson相关系数:0.84)。在COVID-19大流行开始后,RT-PCR检测的数量大幅增加。讨论三种监测指标各有优缺点。ICD-10诊断代码是合适的,但受到报告延迟的影响。接触和液滴预防标签是自动SARI监测的可行选择,因为这些反映了SARI发病率的趋势,并且可能是实时可用的。
    BackgroundEffective pandemic preparedness requires robust severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) surveillance. However, identifying SARI patients based on symptoms is time-consuming. Using the number of reverse transcription (RT)-PCR tests or contact and droplet precaution labels as a proxy for SARI could accurately reflect the epidemiology of patients presenting with SARI.AimWe aimed to compare the number of RT-PCR tests, contact and droplet precaution labels and SARI-related International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 codes and evaluate their use as surveillance indicators.MethodsPatients from all age groups hospitalised at Leiden University Medical Center between 1 January 2017 up to and including 30 April 2023 were eligible for inclusion. We used a clinical data collection tool to extract data from electronic medical records. For each surveillance indicator, we plotted the absolute count for each week, the incidence proportion per week and the correlation between the three surveillance indicators.ResultsWe included 117,404 hospital admissions. The three surveillance indicators generally followed a similar pattern before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The correlation was highest between contact and droplet precaution labels and ICD-10 diagnostic codes (Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.84). There was a strong increase in the number of RT-PCR tests after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.DiscussionAll three surveillance indicators have advantages and disadvantages. ICD-10 diagnostic codes are suitable but are subject to reporting delays. Contact and droplet precaution labels are a feasible option for automated SARI surveillance, since these reflect trends in SARI incidence and may be available real-time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Published Erratum
    [这修正了文章DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1002526。].
    [This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1002526.].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管许多酒精依赖(AD)的人在德国的医疗保健系统中得到认可,只有少数人利用针对成瘾的治疗服务。那些进入治疗的人没有很好地描述他们通过高度分散的德国医疗保健系统的预期途径。本文旨在(1)确定AD患者的典型护理途径及其对治疗指南的依从性,以及(2)使用来自不同医疗保健部门的常规数据探索这些患者的特征。
    方法:我们在不来梅联邦州常规收集的与酒精相关诊断的个人登记数据,德国,在2016/2017年及其针对成瘾的医疗保健:两个法定健康保险基金(门诊药物治疗,用于预防复发和因AD引起的住院发作,有或没有合格的戒断治疗(QWT)),德国养老保险(康复治疗)和一组社区医院(门诊成瘾护理)。使用状态序列分析和聚类分析分析了由于AD导致的住院患者入院后使用成瘾特异性治疗的五种不同每日状态的个体护理途径。随访时间为307天(10个月)。就目前的治疗建议(1:QWT,然后是急性后治疗;2:QWT和康复之间的时间)比较了聚集途径的个体。聚类分析中未考虑的患者特征(性别,年龄,国籍,合并症,和门诊成瘾护理)然后使用多项逻辑回归进行比较。
    结果:对518个单独序列的分析导致鉴定出四种途径簇,它们在急性和急性后治疗中的利用率不同。大多数人在其指数住院发作后(n=276)没有使用后续的成瘾特异性治疗,或者在没有急性后治疗的情况下发生了几次住院发作或QWT(n=205)。两个小集群包含在索引发作后开始康复(n=26)或药物治疗(n=11)的途径。总的来说,只有9.3%的患者按照建议使用了急性后治疗.
    结论:除了成瘾特异性治疗的利用率普遍较低之外,人们还担心QWT后对个体实施急性后治疗。
    BACKGROUND: Although many individuals with alcohol dependence (AD) are recognized in the German healthcare system, only a few utilize addiction-specific treatment services. Those who enter treatment are not well characterized regarding their prospective pathways through the highly fragmented German healthcare system. This paper aims to (1) identify typical care pathways of patients with AD and their adherence to treatment guidelines and (2) explore the characteristics of these patients using routine data from different healthcare sectors.
    METHODS: We linked routinely collected register data of individuals with a documented alcohol-related diagnosis in the federal state of Bremen, Germany, in 2016/2017 and their addiction-specific health care: two statutory health insurance funds (outpatient pharmacotherapy for relapse prevention and inpatient episodes due to AD with and without qualified withdrawal treatment (QWT)), the German Pension Insurance (rehabilitation treatment) and a group of communal hospitals (outpatient addiction care). Individual care pathways of five different daily states of utilized addiction-specific treatment following an index inpatient admission due to AD were analyzed using state sequence analysis and cluster analysis. The follow-up time was 307 days (10 months). Individuals of the clustered pathways were compared concerning current treatment recommendations (1: QWT followed by postacute treatment; 2: time between QWT and rehabilitation). Patients\' characteristics not considered during the cluster analysis (sex, age, nationality, comorbidity, and outpatient addiction care) were then compared using a multinomial logistic regression.
    RESULTS: The analysis of 518 individual sequences resulted in the identification of four pathway clusters differing in their utilization of acute and postacute treatment. Most did not utilize subsequent addiction-specific treatment after their index inpatient episode (n = 276) or had several inpatient episodes or QWT without postacute treatment (n = 205). Two small clusters contained pathways either starting rehabilitation (n = 26) or pharmacotherapy after the index episode (n = 11). Overall, only 9.3% utilized postacute treatment as recommended.
    CONCLUSIONS: A concern besides the generally low utilization of addiction-specific treatment is the implementation of postacute treatments for individuals after QWT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在常规数据中收集性取向,从与卫生服务部门的联系或为政策和研究而设计和收集的基础设施数据资源中生成,在过去十年中,英国的情况有了很大改善。现在也开始收集关于性别和变性者地位的包容性措施。这个观点考虑了当前的数据收集,以及它们的优势和局限性,包括访问数据,样本量,衡量性取向和性别,健康结果的衡量标准,纵向随访。现有数据在社会政治和生物医学健康模型中都被认为是女同性恋,同性恋,双性恋,变性人,酷儿,或其他身份,包括非二进制(LGBTQ+)。尽管大多数单独的数据集都有一些方法论上的限制,当放在一起,现在有一个真正深度的LGBTQ+健康研究的常规数据。本文旨在为如何使用这些数据来改善健康和医疗保健结果提供一个框架。介绍了四种实用的分析方法-描述性流行病学,风险预测,干预发展,和影响评估-并被讨论为将数据转化为具有改善健康潜力的研究的框架。
    The collection of sexual orientation in routine data, generated either from contacts with health services or in infrastructure data resources designed and collected for policy and research, has improved substantially in the United Kingdom in the last decade. Inclusive measures of gender and transgender status are now also beginning to be collected. This viewpoint considers current data collections, and their strengths and limitations, including accessing data, sample size, measures of sexual orientation and gender, measures of health outcomes, and longitudinal follow-up. The available data are considered within both sociopolitical and biomedical models of health for individuals who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or of other identities including nonbinary (LGBTQ+). Although most individual data sets have some methodological limitations, when put together, there is now a real depth of routine data for LGBTQ+ health research. This paper aims to provide a framework for how these data can be used to improve health and health care outcomes. Four practical analysis approaches are introduced-descriptive epidemiology, risk prediction, intervention development, and impact evaluation-and are discussed as frameworks for translating data into research with the potential to improve health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    数据和指标估计被认为对于记录孕产妇和新生儿健康方面的持续挑战以及跟踪实现全球目标的进展至关重要。然而,标准化的优先次序,可比的定量数据可能会妨碍收集当地相关信息,并在资源匮乏的环境中造成压倒性的负担,对提供护理质量产生负面影响。越来越多的定性研究旨在提供对孕产妇和新生儿健康数据生成和使用背后的复杂过程和人类经验的基于地点的理解。我们进行了定性系统评价,探讨了在低收入和中低收入国家,在国家以下和国家层面如何看待和体验收集和报告孕产妇和新生儿健康指标数据的国家或国际要求。我们系统地搜索了六个电子数据库,以获取2000年1月至2023年3月之间发表的定性和混合方法研究。在四名审稿人筛选了4084条记录后,47份出版物被列入审查。从复杂适应系统(CAS)理论的角度对数据进行主题分析和综合。我们的调查结果表明,孕产妇和新生儿健康数据和指标并不固定,中立实体,而是复杂过程的结果。它们的收集和吸收受到众多系统硬件元素(人力资源、工具的相关性和充分性,基础设施,和互操作性)和软件元素(激励系统,监督和反馈,权力和社会关系,和问责制)。当这些组件对齐并足够支撑时,数据和指标可以通过性能评估获得积极的系统适应性,优先次序,学习,和宣传。然而,系统组件之间的缺点和破碎的循环可能会导致不可预见的紧急行为,如责备,恐惧,和数据操纵。这篇综述强调了优先考虑当地相关性和可行性的测量方法的重要性,需要采用参与性方法来定义特定环境的衡量目标和策略。
    Data and indicator estimates are considered vital to document persisting challenges in maternal and newborn health and track progress towards global goals. However, prioritization of standardised, comparable quantitative data can preclude the collection of locally relevant information and pose overwhelming burdens in low-resource settings, with negative effects on the provision of quality of care. A growing body of qualitative studies aims to provide a place-based understanding of the complex processes and human experiences behind the generation and use of maternal and neonatal health data. We conducted a qualitative systematic review exploring how national or international requirements to collect and report data on maternal and neonatal health indicators are perceived and experienced at the sub-national and country level in low-income and lower-middle income countries. We systematically searched six electronic databases for qualitative and mixed-methods studies published between January 2000 and March 2023. Following screening of 4084 records by four reviewers, 47 publications were included in the review. Data were analysed thematically and synthesised from a Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) theoretical perspective. Our findings show maternal and neonatal health data and indicators are not fixed, neutral entities, but rather outcomes of complex processes. Their collection and uptake is influenced by a multitude of system hardware elements (human resources, relevancy and adequacy of tools, infrastructure, and interoperability) and software elements (incentive systems, supervision and feedback, power and social relations, and accountability). When these components are aligned and sufficiently supportive, data and indicators can be used for positive system adaptivity through performance evaluation, prioritization, learning, and advocacy. Yet shortcomings and broken loops between system components can lead to unforeseen emergent behaviors such as blame, fear, and data manipulation. This review highlights the importance of measurement approaches that prioritize local relevance and feasibility, necessitating participatory approaches to define context-specific measurement objectives and strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Preprint
    背景在西开普省,南非,公共部门个人层面的常规数据通过省卫生数据中心(PHDC)从多个来源合并。这可以描述全人群产前HIV血清阳性率的时间变化。与西开普省的汇总计划数据和全人群前哨产前HIV血清阳性率调查相比,我们评估了这些数据的有效性。方法我们对2011年1月至2020年12月在PHDC中确定的所有妊娠进行了回顾性队列分析。使用唯一的患者标识符将来自电子平台的产前和HIV护理的证据联系起来。对艾滋病毒流行率估计数进行了三角测量,并与现有的调查估计数和地区卫生信息系统记录的登记册中的汇总方案数据进行了比较。省,使用相关系数在数据系统之间比较了地区级和年龄组的HIV患病率估计值,绝对差异和趋势分析。在确定的977800例怀孕中,2011-2013年的PHDC艾滋病毒流行率估计与汇总和调查数据大相径庭(由于电子数据不完整)。而从2014年起,估计在调查估计的95%置信区间内,与总体数据估计密切相关(r=0.8;p=0.01),平均患病率差异为0.4%。PHDC数据显示,省级艾滋病毒感染率从2015年的16.7%缓慢但稳定地上升到2020年的18.6%。艾滋病毒感染率最高的是开普都会区(20.3%),从2015年起,按年龄组划分的患病率估计在哨点调查和PHDC之间具有可比性。在年龄较小的人群(15-24岁)中,随着时间的推移,患病率估计值稳定,但在年龄较大的人群(>34岁)中增加.结论本研究将哨兵血清阳性率调查与基于注册的汇总数据和合并的个性化管理数据进行了比较。我们表明,在这种情况下,关联的个性化数据可以可靠地用于HIV监测,并且比血清阳性率调查和基于注册的汇总数据提供更精细的估计,效率更高。
    UNASSIGNED: In the Western Cape, South Africa, public-sector individual-level routine data are consolidated from multiple sources through the Provincial Health Data Centre (PHDC). This enables the description of temporal changes in population-wide antenatal HIV seroprevalence. We evaluated the validity of these data compared to aggregated program data and population-wide sentinel antenatal HIV seroprevalence surveys for the Western Cape province.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of all pregnancies identified in the PHDC from January 2011 to December 2020. Evidence of antenatal and HIV care from electronic platforms were linked using a unique patient identifier. HIV prevalence estimates were triangulated and compared with available survey estimates and aggregated programmatic data from registers as recorded in the District Health Information System. Provincial, district-level and age-group HIV prevalence estimates were compared between data systems using correlation coefficients, absolute differences and trend analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 977800 pregnancies ascertained, PHDC HIV prevalence estimates from 2011-2013 were widely disparate from aggregate and survey data (due to incomplete electronic data), whereas from 2014 onwards, estimates were within the 95% confidence interval of survey estimates, and closely correlated to aggregate data estimates (r = 0.8; p = 0.01), with an average prevalence difference of 0.4%. PHDC data show a slow but steady increase in provincial HIV prevalence from 16.7% in 2015 to 18.6% in 2020. The highest HIV prevalence was in the Cape Metro district (20.3%) Prevalence estimates by age group were comparable between sentinel surveys and PHDC from 2015 onwards, with prevalence estimates stable over time among younger age-groups (15-24 years) but increased among older age-groups (> 34 years).
    UNASSIGNED: This study compares sentinel seroprevalence surveys with both register-based aggregate data and consolidated individuated administrative data. We show that in this setting linked individuated data may be reliably used for HIV surveillance and provide more granular estimates with greater efficiency than seroprevalence surveys and register-based aggregate data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号