Abstracting causal knowledge from process measurements has become an appealing topic for decades, especially for fault root cause analysis (RCA) based on signals recorded by multiple sensors in a complex system. Although many causality detection methods have been developed and applied in different fields, some research communities may have an idiosyncratic implementation of their preferred methods, with limited accessibility to the wider community. Targeting interested experimental researchers and engineers, this paper provides a comprehensive comparison of data-based causality detection methods in root cause diagnosis across two distinct domains. We provide a possible taxonomy of those methods followed by descriptions of the main motivations of those concepts. Of the two cases we investigated, one is a root cause diagnosis of plant-wide oscillations in an industrial process, while the other is the localization of the epileptogenic focus in a human brain network where the connectivity pattern is transient and even more complex. Considering the differences in various causality detection methods, we designed several sets of experiments so that for each case, a total of 11 methods could be appropriately compared under a unified and reasonable evaluation framework. In each case, these methods were implemented separately and in a standard way to infer causal interactions among multiple variables to thus establish the causal network for RCA. From the cross-domain investigation, several findings are presented along with insights into them, including an interpretative pitfall that warrants caution.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a quality improvement (QI) method to decrease pediatric accidental decannulation (AD) in the early postoperative period for children under age 3.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on children under age 3 who underwent tracheostomy at Duke University Health System from August 1, 2013 to May 1, 2023 (n = 104). A root cause analysis was used to assess factors associated with AD following pediatric tracheostomy. Based on the factors identified by the research team, retrospective data was collected before (8/1/13 - 1/31/22) and after (2/1/22 - 5/1/23) a single practice change was implemented: using twill neck ties, rather than foam neck ties, to secure newly-placed tracheostomy tubes. Twill ties were applied intraoperatively as a visual cue to signal a recent tracheostomy for the interdisciplinary care team. The primary outcome in the pre-intervention and post-intervention period was measured as 30-day incidence of AD per 10 tracheostomy cases.
RESULTS: Prior to the intervention, a total of 11 ADs occurred in 9 patients across 93 pediatric tracheostomies (1.18 AD per 10 cases). Afterward, 0 ADs occurred across 11 pediatric tracheostomies (0 AD per 10 cases).
CONCLUSIONS: This data suggests that the twill tie intervention may prevent AD and the associated morbidity. With the twill tie initiative, we describe 11 ADs and associated risk factors and present a QI intervention that may help prevent AD and improve patient safety in the early postoperative period.

OBJECTIVE: to identify and analyze the factors that contribute to safety incident occurrence in the processes of prescribing, preparing and dispensing antineoplastic medications in pediatric oncology patients.
METHODS: a quality improvement study focused on oncopediatric pharmaceutical care processes that identified and analyzed incidents between 2019-2020. A multidisciplinary group performed root cause analysis (RCA), identifying main contributing factors.
RESULTS: in 2019, seven incidents were recorded, 57% of which were prescription-related. In 2020, through active search, 34 incidents were identified, 65% relating to prescription, 29% to preparation and 6% to dispensing. The main contributing factors were interruptions, lack of electronic alert, work overload, training and staff shortages.
CONCLUSIONS: the results showed that adequate recording and application of RCA to identified incidents can provide improvements in the quality of pediatric oncology care, mapping contributing factors and enabling managers to develop an effective action plan to mitigate risks associated with the process.

BACKGROUND: An intravesical gas explosion is a rare complication of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). It was first reported in English literature in 1926, and up to 2022 were only forty-one cases. Injury from an intravesical gas explosion, in the most severe cases appearing as extraperitoneal or intraperitoneal bladder rupture needed emergent repair surgery.
METHODS: We present a case of a 75-year-old man who suffered an intravesical gas explosion during TURP. The patient underwent an emergent exploratory laparotomy for bladder repair and was transferred to the intensive care unit for further observation and treatment. Under the medical team\'s care for up to sixty days, the patient recovered smoothly without clinical sequelae.
CONCLUSIONS: This case report presents an example of a rare complication of intravesical gas explosion during TURP, utilizing root cause analysis (RCA) to comprehend causal relationships and team strategies and tools to improve performance and patient safety (TeamSTEPPS) method delivers four teamwork skills that can be utilized during surgery and five recommendations to avoid gas explosions during TURP to prevent the recurrence of medical errors. In modern healthcare systems, promoting patient safety is crucial. Once complications appear, RCA and TeamSTEPPS are helpful means to support the healthcare team reflect and improve as a team.

OBJECTIVE: The debate about the safest birth mode for breech presentation at term remains unresolved. The comparison of a vaginal breech birth (VBB) with an elective caesarean section (CS) regarding fetal outcomes favors the CS. However, the question of whether attempting a VBB is associated with poorer fetal outcomes is examined in this study. Additionally, the study evaluates factors contributing to a successful VBB and illustrates possible errors in VBB management.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of term breech births over 15 years in a Perinatal Center Level I regarding fetal, maternal, and obstetric outcomes by comparing successful with unsuccessful VBB attempt and all attempted VBB vs. CS including a multivariate analysis of predictors for a successful VBB. A root cause analysis of severe adverse events (SAE) was conducted to evaluate factors leading to poorer fetal outcomes in VBB.
RESULTS: Of 863 breech cases, in 78 % a CS was performed and in 22 % a VBB was attempted, with 57 % succeeding. Comparing successful with unsuccessful VBB attempts, successful VBB showed significantly lower maternal blood loss (p < 0.001) but poorer umbilical arterial pH (UApH) (p < 0.001), while other fetal outcome parameters showed no significant differences. Predictive factors for a successful VBB attempt were a body mass index (BMI) below 30.0 kg/m2 (p = 0.010) and multiparity (p = 0.003). Comparing all attempted VBB to CS, maternal blood loss was significantly higher in CS (p < 0.001), while fetal outcomes were significantly worse in VBB attempts, included poorer Apgar scores (p < 0.001), poorer UApH values (p < 0.001), higher transfer rate to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) (p < 0.001) and higher rate of respiratory support in the first 24 h (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: The failed attempt of VBB indicates significantly worse UApH without lower Apgar scores or higher transfer rate to the NICU. The likelihood of a successful VBB is 9% lower with obesity and 2.5 times higher in multiparous women. Attempting a VBB should include detailed pre-labor counseling, regarding predictive success factors, an experienced team, and consistent management during birth.

UNASSIGNED: Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is a systematic process which can be applied to analyze fall incidences in reactive manner to identify contributing factors and propose actions for preventing future falls. To better understand cause of falls and effective interventions for their reduction we conducted a narrative review of RCA and Strategies for Reducing Falls among Inpatients in Healthcare Facilities.
UNASSIGNED: In this narrative review, databases including Scopus, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane, and PubMed were searched to obtain the related literature published. Databases were searched from January 2005 until the end of March 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool was used for quality assessment of articles. To analyze the data, a five-stage framework analysis method was utilized.
UNASSIGNED: Seven articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were identified for this study. All of the selected studies were interventional in nature and employed the RCA method to ascertain the underlying causes of inpatient falls. The root causes discovered for falls involved patient-related factors (37.5%), environmental factors (25%), organizational and process factors (19.6%), staff and communication factors (17.9%). Strategies to reduce falls involved environmental measures and physical protection (29.4%), identifying, and displaying the causes of risk (23.5%), education and culturalization (21.6%), standard fall risk assessment tool (13.7%), and supervision and monitoring (11.8%).
UNASSIGNED: the findings identify the root causes of falls in inpatient units and provide guidance for successful action plan execution. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of considering the unique characteristics of healthcare organizations and adapting interventions accordingly for effectiveness in different settings.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of framework to incorporate equity into event analysis. This quality improvement initiative involved the development of equity tools that were introduced in a two-hour interactive, case-based training across 11 acute care facilities at the largest municipal health care system in the United States. A pre and post survey (which included analysis of a clinical vignette) was also conducted to assess for knowledge and comfort embedding equity in patient safety event analysis, and to measure discomfort or distress during the training. A separate assessment was used to evaluate the tools.
UNASSIGNED: A visual aid, the Patient Equity Wheel, was created to facilitate more comprehensive and robust health equity discussions by compiling a comprehensive list of equity categories, including internal, external, and organizational dimensions of equity. The Wheel was designed for use during each phase of event analysis. An Embedding Equity in Root Cause Analysis Worksheet was developed to aid in assessing considerations of equitable care in the investigation process and includes questions to ask staff to further assess bias or equitable care factors.
UNASSIGNED: Participant knowledge and level of comfort increased after training. The most commonly unrecognized categories of bias were Training/Competencies, Structural Workflow, and Culture/Norms. Most participants responded that they had no discomfort or distress during the training. Post-training feedback noted that the tools were being used across the system in various stages of event analysis and have been reported to improve health equity conversations.

BACKGROUND: Assessing patients\' satisfaction is an easy and cost-effective method of evaluating the outpatient services provided by health-care institutions.
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to determine patient satisfaction among patients attending various outpatient departments (OPDs) at a tertiary care hospital and the factors affecting their satisfaction.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among patients attending various OPDs at a tertiary care hospital in Faridabad. Exit face-to-face interviews were conducted for 334 patients above 18 years of age who availed OPD services followed by pharmacy services. Information regarding sociodemography, rating of satisfaction with various attributes of OPD services on a 5-point Likert scale, and reasons for dissatisfaction was collected. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22. Root cause analysis for the lowest-scoring attribute was done using fishbone diagram.
RESULTS: About 64% of the patients were satisfied with the OPD services. \"Attitude and communication of doctors\" was the prime contributor to patient satisfaction. \"Promptness at medicine distribution counter\" was the attribute that scored lowest followed by \"waiting time at the registration counter.\" The mean waiting time for registration was 38.2 min, for consultation with doctor 41.3 min, for collection of samples 49.6 min, and for drug dispensing 61 min.
CONCLUSIONS: The issues related to pharmacy services need to be promptly acknowledged and addressed.

Visible particle is an important issue in the biopharmaceutical industry, and it may occur across all the stages in the life cycle of biologics. Upon the occurrence of visible particles, it is often necessary to conduct chemical identification and root cause analysis to safeguard the safety and efficacy of the biotherapeutic products. In this article, we present a number of typical particles and relevant root cause analysis in the categories of extrinsic, intrinsic and inherent particles that are commonly encountered in the biopharma industry. In particular, the optical images of particles obtained both in situ and after isolation are provided, along with the spectral and elemental information. The particle identification was carried out with multiple microscopic and microspectroscopic techniques, including stereo optical microscopy, Fourier transform infrared microscopy, confocal Raman microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Both commercial and in-house spectral databases were used for comparison and identification. In addition to particle identification, our significant efforts are placed on the root cause analysis of the addressed particles with the intention to provide a relatively whole picture of the particle related issues and practical references to particle mitigation for our peers in the biopharmaceutical industry.