UNASSIGNED: Knowledge of the anatomy and morphology of root canal orifices and variations are vital elements affecting treatment outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study was to evaluate variations in the number of root canal orifices and their patterns in primary teeth, as identified by both the naked eye and under magnifying loupes.
UNASSIGNED: Total of 173 primary teeth was scheduled for pulpectomy over a period of 18 months. Two examiners assessed the number and pattern of the root canal orifices. After access cavity preparation, the operator recorded the number of root canal orifices with naked eye, and examiner recorded the same using magnifying loupes (3.5×). After cleaning and shaping, the same protocol was used. Collected data were statistically analyzed using SPSS version 23.0 and compared using a paired t-test.
UNASSIGNED: The overall variation in the in the identification of root canal orifices between the naked eye and magnifying loupes (3.005 ± 0.971) was statistically significant after access cavity preparation (P ≤ 0.05).
UNASSIGNED: Magnifying loupes significantly enhances the determination of the number and pattern of root canal orifices in primary teeth. Therefore, the application of magnifying loupes is essential for accurately assessing variations in root canal orifices in primary dentition.

Mandibular lateral incisors sometimes feature an additional lingual canal, which, if not identified and missed during endodontic treatment, can lead to postoperative pain. Thus, a proper diagnosis of the internal anatomy of a tooth is necessary before treatment begins. Radiovisiography (RVG), a cost-effective and widely employed dental imaging technique, is used in clinics to visualize the internal root structure of teeth. The zoom function of RVG allows for a detailed examination of complex internal anatomical variations, facilitating a more accurate diagnosis and treatment planning process. This case study identified a rare Vertucci Type VII root canal system in a mandibular left lateral incisor using the zoom-in feature of radiovisiography (Vatech, EZ sensor). Additionally, horizontal sectioning was performed, and these sections were imaged to verify the accuracy of digital radiographs in diagnosing such cases as part of a preclinical demonstration for aspiring endodontists.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and the morphology of c-shaped root canal(s) in mandibular premolars using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.
UNASSIGNED: CBCT images of 1095 mandibular premolars were examined at coronal, middle, and apical levels of the root canals. The type, the level, and the position (buccal or lingual) of the c-shaped anatomy were recorded. Absolute counts and percentages of different groups and subgroups of C-shape morphologies were calculated. The Chi-square test was used to compare the prevalence of C-shaped morphology between mandibular first and second premolars. The Z-test for proportions in independent groups was used to analyze the differences in mandibular C-shaped premolar proportions between location (left and right side) and tooth (first or second premolars) (p=0.05).
UNASSIGNED: C-shaped root canal morphology was present in 44 teeth. The percentage of c-shaped morphologies was 6.9% and 1.6% in mandibular first and second premolars, respectively. Comparison of the first and the second premolars showed that C1 type (p=0.008) and C4b type (p=0.013) configurations are more common in the first premolars at the coronal level. In contrast, the C2 type configuration showed significantly higher prevalence in the second premolars (p=0.009). Additionally, the C4c type configuration was significantly frequent on the right premolars at the coronal level (p=0.038).
UNASSIGNED: C-shape canal morphology is a rare but complex anatomic feature in mandibular premolars. Therefore, clinicians should be aware of this complex root canal anatomy for the success of endodontic treatment in mandibular premolar teeth.

Background Understanding root canal anatomy variations, particularly C-shaped canals, is crucial for successful endodontic treatment. This study used clinical and radiographic methods to assess the prevalence and characteristics of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars in Western Maharashtra. Materials and methods This prospective study was conducted in the western region of Maharashtra, India. The samples included patients requiring endodontic treatment for mandibular second molars. Clinical evaluation was conducted using a surgical endodontic microscope and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. Inclusion and exclusion criteria ensured the selection of a focused and homogeneous sample. Data analysis included assessment of unilateral/bilateral occurrence, canal distribution, and cross-sectional characteristics. Results Out of 200 mandibular second molars, 7.5% exhibited C-shaped root canals, with no significant gender differences. Canal distribution varied across coronal, middle, and apical levels, with prevalent configurations being C1, C2, C3, and C4. No significant differences were observed in canal distribution based on root levels. No significant gender differences were found in the presence of grooves on the root surfaces. Conclusion This study provides valuable insights into the prevalence and characteristics of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars in Western Maharashtra. Further research into histological and genetic aspects can enhance our understanding, leading to improved treatment strategies for complex root canal anatomy variations.

Variations in the root canal anatomy of a maxillary first molar are often challenging to diagnose and treat; thus, clinicians must have a thorough knowledge of the same. This case report highlights the successful nonsurgical endodontic management of a maxillary first molar with an unusual morphology of three roots and six root canals. A total of six root canals (mesiobuccal [MB] 1, MB2, MB3, distobuccal [DB] 1, DB2, and palatal) were detected after initiating root canal therapy and access cavity preparation. Conventional root canal treatment was completed, and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography scanning was done to verify the total number of canals and ensure the adequacy of root canal fillings. Managing such cases with rare variations in the root canal systems could be arduous and thus, clinicians should be well-versed in the methods to identify and manage such complexities to facilitate the successful outcomes of endodontic treatment.

This is a unique case of a single-rooted maxillary premolar with two separate canals in bayonet or S-shaped radicular anatomy undergoing post-endodontic reinforcement prior to crown placement. Bayonet-shaped canals present challenges in canal negotiation, cleaning, shaping, and obturation. The complexity of these canals heightens the risk of accidental file breakage and other iatrogenic errors, posing significant challenges. Post-endodontic restoration in S-shaped canals with double curvature poses challenges in precise placement and material adaptation. A novel technique was implicated to preserve the functionality and structural aesthetics of a decayed maxillary first premolar tooth.

Knowledge of the root canals configuration is essential for the success of endodontic treatment. The main aim of the systematic review is to determine the number of roots and the number of root canals in maxillary third molars, in addition, where possible, to determine the Vertucci classification. This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement guidelines. The study protocol was registered and approved on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews PROSPERO (Reg. No: CRD42022366444) before the start of the study. Twelve studies were included in the analysis, differing in sample origin and methodology. The combined studies were analyzed based on the number of roots, number of canals, and root canal configurations, and the findings were compared with those of other international studies. Analyzing the available research results regarding the root anatomy and canal configuration of the third maxillary molar, the most commonly maxillary third molars had 3 roots (59.00%). Single-rooted teeth (24.20%) or double-rooted teeth (13.80%) were less common. In addition, it was observed that maxillary third molars typically possessed three root canals (47.28%) and the MB (mesiobuccal), DB (distobuccal), and P (palatal) canals most often showed Vertucci Type I (59.53%, 95.83% and 98.61%, respectively) in three-rooted form. Due to the small number of available studies, it is necessary to conduct further analyses taking into account demographic and ethnic differences that may affect the anatomical and morphological structure of the teeth.

The description of non-surgical retreatment is to eliminate all previous filling materials and correct any mishaps. An adequate understanding of root and canal morphology is a fundamental requirement for obtaining a favorable outcome in endodontic treatment. The endodontic diagnosis was previously treated through therapy with symptomatic apical periodontitis. Treatment was performed under a dental operative microscope. Gates Glidden (GG) drills size 2 and 3 were used to remove the coronal part of gutta-percha for all canals. A braiding technique with a Hedstrom file size 15 without a solvent was used to remove gutta-percha and separate the file together for the palatal canal whereas the mesiobuccal canal was retreated by ProTaper Retreatment Kit. Proper understanding of root canal morphology and using an endodontic armamentarium could reduce endodontic mishaps. This case report described the successful management of overextended gutta-percha, a separated file, and a missed canal.

BACKGROUND: A simple tooth extraction method usually involves using elevators and forceps to remove the tooth easily. In contrast, a surgical extraction method requires utilizing a straight handpiece to facilitate the tooth extraction, either removing bone or sectioning the tooth into pieces.
OBJECTIVE: In this research, we aim to diagnose a tooth radiographically before extraction and determine certain factors to observe which extraction method might be more feasible, either simple or surgical.
METHODS: This study followed a retrospective cross-sectional study design. The x-ray radiographs (periapical (PA) or panoramic) were collected from the R4 system in the university dental hospital for data collection. Different radiographic influencing factors were measured, such as bone density, bone level, endodontic involvement (RCT/post and core), crowned or remaining root, and root morphology. Statistical associations were performed using SPSS (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) with a one-way ANOVA test.
RESULTS: There were 62 cases with 47 simple and 15 surgical extractions. There was a non-significant (p>0.05) association between the measured factors and the extraction method, either simple or surgical tooth extraction. Although bone density measurements showed a slight tendency toward PA lesions and simple tooth extraction.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant association between the factors and extraction methods. Future research is required to determine whether or not preoperative radiographic evaluation can influence the decision for the tooth extraction method.

BACKGROUND: Large-scale clinical studies on the incidence of middle mesial canals (MMCs) in nonsurgical root canal treatment (RCT) and retreatment of mandibular molars are lacking. The primary aim of this observational study was to determine the incidence of MMCs in mandibular first and second molars that received RCT or nonsurgical retreatment (NSRetx). The secondary aim was to determine factors associated with incidence of MMCs.
METHODS: Included were 3018 mandibular molars that received RCT (n = 1624) or NSRetx (n = 1394) by 3 endodontists in a private practice. Demographic and procedural data were collected. Bivariate and multivariable (Poisson regression model) analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Incidence of MMCs was 8.8% (n = 267). Although the bivariate analysis showed that NSRetx was significantly associated with incidence of MMCs, this association did not reach the threshold for statistical significance after controlling for all covariates (P = .07). Multivariable analysis on the entire cohort showed that incidence of MMCs was significantly associated with younger age (risk ratio [RR] = 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-2.06), male gender (RR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18-1.85), preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) (RR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.17-1.89), and first molar (RR = 2.30; 95% CI:1.74-3.05). Subgroup multivariable analyses revealed that incidence of MMCs was associated with male gender only in the RCT group (RR = 2.26; 95% CI, 1.55-3.30) but not in the NSRetx group (RR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82, 1.50); and with preoperative CBCT only in the NSRetx group (RR = 1.78; 95% CI, 1.28, 2.50) but not in the RCT group (RR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.71, 1.69). Associations with younger age and first molar remained unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall incidence of MMCs was 8.8%. Incidence of MMCs was significantly higher in younger patients and in mandibular first molars but was not associated with the type of treatment.