BACKGROUND: Transbronchial microwave ablation in treating lung nodules is gaining popularity. However, microwave ablation in subpleural lung nodules raised concerns about pleural-based complications due to the proximity between the pleura and the ablation zone.
METHODS: Patients who underwent transbronchial microwave ablation between March 2019 and November 2022 were included in this analysis. The lung nodules were categorized into the subpleural group-less than 5 mm distance to the nearest pleural surface; the deep nodule group-larger or equal to 5 mm distance to the nearest pleural surface. A review of the safety profile of subpleural lung nodule ablation was conducted.
RESULTS: Eighty-two lung nodules (n = 82) from 77 patients were treated. The mean nodule size was 14.2 ± 5.50 mm. The technical success rate was 100%. The mean procedural time was 133 min. No statistically significant differences were detected in the complication rate and the length of stay between the subpleural and deep nodule groups. Complications occured in 21 nodules (25.6%). No minor pneumothorax was reported. Total five cases of pneumothorax required drainage were observed (6.06% in subpleural nodules [n = 2] vs. 6.12% in deep nodules [n = 3], p = 0.991). Total seven cases of pleuritic chest pain were observed (12.1% in subpleural nodules [n = 4] vs. 6.12% in deep nodules [n = 3], p = 0.340).
CONCLUSIONS: This single-center retrospective analysis found no significant difference in the safety outcomes between subpleural and nonsubpleural lung nodule ablation. The overall rate of complications was low in the cohort. This demonstrated that transbronchial microwave was feasible and safe for most lung nodules.

Leiomyoma is the most common benign tumor of the esophagus. Open thoracotomy, the traditional approach adopted for the enucleation of the esophageal leiomyoma, over the years, has been gradually replaced by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. However, this minimally invasive approach has limitations, such as two-dimensional vision and reduced range of motion, which have recently been overcome by technical advantages of robot-assisted surgery. In the surgical management of circumferential esophageal leiomyoma, a combined use of robotic surgery and intraoperative endoscopy may be helpful to facilitate tumor enucleation and to prevent esophageal mucosal injury during the surgical procedure.

UNASSIGNED: Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has become widely used for mediastinal procedures since 2018 when it was included in insurance coverage in Japan. Few studies have compared the surgical outcomes of RATS with the more established video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach to mediastinal surgery. We aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of VATS and RATS to examine the advantages of the RATS approach in a single institutional cohort.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 144 patients who underwent VATS and 46 who underwent RATS mediastinal surgery between 2014 and 2022 were enrolled. We compared clinicopathological features such as age, sex, smoking history, respiratory function, surgical field, laterality, surgical procedure, board certification of the surgeon, and histology between the two groups. Perioperative outcomes including operation time, volume of blood lost, number of conversion cases to open surgery, duration of chest drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications were also reviewed.
UNASSIGNED: The comparison of patient characteristics between the groups showed significant differences in median age (VATS, 52.5 years; RATS, 67.0 years; P=0.001), combined resection of surrounding tissues of the tumor (VATS, 2.1%; RATS, 10.9%; P=0.02), board certification of the surgeon (VATS, 53.5%; RATS, 100.0%; P<0.001), and histology (RATS group had a higher percentage of thymic epithelial tumors, P=0.01). Regarding perioperative outcomes, the median operation time was 120 min in the VATS group and 88 min in the RATS group, showing a significant difference (P=0.03). There were no significant differences in the volume of blood lost, incidence of conversion to open chest surgery, duration of chest drainage, postoperative length of stay in hospital, and incidence of perioperative complications. In the perioperative outcomes of cases operated on by board-certified surgeons, the median operation time (VATS, 117 min; RATS, 88 min; P=0.02) and median postoperative length of stay in hospital (VATS, 7 days; RATS, 6 days; P=0.001) showed significant differences, while other postoperative outcomes were not significantly different.
UNASSIGNED: RATS for mediastinal surgery is as safe as the VATS approach and may result in a shorter operative time and postoperative hospital stay. Further analysis of RATS for mediastinal surgery in a larger cohort is warranted.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is a rapidly expanding technique. In our study, we aimed to analyze the results of the process to adopt robotic surgery in our Department of Thoracic Surgery.
METHODS: This is an intention-to-treat analysis of a series of consecutive patients operated on using the RATS approach in our hospital from January 2021 to March 2022. Data were registered for patient characteristics, type of surgery, operative times, conversion rate, chest tube duration, length of hospital stay and complications. The IBM SPSS® statistical software was used for the statistical analysis. A cumulative sum analysis of the operating time was performed to define the learning curve.
RESULTS: During the study period, 51 patients underwent robotic surgery, including pulmonary and non-pulmonary interventions. In addition, 15 patients (29.4%) underwent non-pulmonary interventions: one pleural (2%), 2 diaphragmatic (3.9%), and 12 mediastinal (23.5%). Among the mediastinal surgeries, one conversion was necessary (8.3%) for a complex vascular malformation, and 11 were completed by RATS, including 7 (58.3%) thymomas, 3 (25%) pleuro-pericardial cysts, and one (8.3%) neurogenic tumor. Mean operative time was 141 min (104-178), mean chest tube duration was 0.9 days (0-2), and mean length of stay was 1.45 days (1-2). Thirty-six patients underwent lung surgery (70.6%). The complete RATS resections (34; 94.4%) included: 3 wedge resections (11.1%), 2 segmentectomies (3.7%), 28 lobectomies (81.5%), and one sleeve lobectomy (3.7%). Mean surgery time was 194.56 min (141-247), chest tube duration was 3.92 days (1-8), and length of stay was 4.6 days (1-8). Complications occurred in 4 patients (11.1%). No 90-day mortalities were registered.
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of RATS was achieved with good clinical results and operative times for all indications. A rapid learning curve was accomplished in short time. Previous VATS experience, patient selection, team training and program continuity are fundamental to successfully develop a RATS program.

UNASSIGNED: Recently, robot-assisted thoracic surgery has been increasingly performed for mediastinal disease. However, appropriate postoperative analgesic methods have not been evaluated.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively studied patients who underwent robot-assisted thoracic surgery for mediastinal disease at a single university hospital between January 2019 and December 2021. Patients were performed either general anesthesia alone, general anesthesia combined with thoracic epidural anesthesia, or general anesthesia combined with ultrasound-guided thoracic block. Patients were divided into three groups [non-block (NB), thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), and thoracic paraspinal block (TB)] according to postoperative analgesic methods, and they compared with terms of postoperative pain scores by using numerical rating scale (NRS) at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 h. Additionally, rescue supplemental analgesic within 24 h, side effects of anesthesia such as respiratory depression, hypotension, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus and urinary retention, time to ambulation after surgery, and hospital stay after surgery were also compared among the three groups.
UNASSIGNED: Data from 169 patients (Group NB: 25, Group TEA: 102, and Group TB: 42) were progressed to the analysis. Postoperative pain scale at 6 and 12 h was significantly lower in Group TEA than NB (1.2±1.6 vs. 2.4±1.8, P<0.01; and 1.2±1.5 vs. 2.2±1.7, P=0.018, respectively). There were no differences in pain scores between Groups TB and TEA at any point. The incidence of patients using rescue analgesics within 24 h was significantly different between groups [Group NB: 15/25 (60%), Group TEA: 30/102 (29.4%), Group TB: 25/42 (59.5%), P=0.01]. For postoperative side effects, only the number of patients complaining of postoperative nausea and vomiting for 24 h after surgery differed significantly between groups [Group NB: 7/25 (28%), Group TEA: 19/102 (18.6%), Group TB: 1/42 (2.4%), P=0.01].
UNASSIGNED: TEA provided better analgesia after robot-assisted thoracic surgery for mediastinal disease than NB as indicated by lower pain scores and fewer rescue analgesic requirements. However, the frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting was lowest in Group TB of all the groups. Thus, TBs might also provide adequate postoperative analgesia following robot-assisted thoracic surgery for mediastinal disease.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: To perform safe robot-assisted anatomical lung resections, the details of intraoperative complications need to be shared among thoracic surgeons. However, only limited data are available.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective, single-institutional study evaluated 134 patients who underwent robot-assisted anatomical lung resection. We examined the causes, management, and outcomes of all intraoperative complications.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 134 eligible patients, 118 (88%) underwent lobectomy and 16 (12%) underwent segmentectomy. Intraoperative complications occurred in 17 (12.7%) patients. These complications included pulmonary artery (PA) injuries in seven patients, pulmonary vein (PV) injuries in three, azygos vein (AV) injury in one, superior vena cava (SVC) injury in one, bronchial injuries in three, and lung injuries in four. Most PA injuries were at a distal side and controlled by pressure, fibrin sealant, or stapling of the proximal side. In the three PV injuries, right upper PV was sandwiched by robotic instruments, V6 was punctured by the tip of the Maryland bipolar forceps, and the distal side of V2t was injured during tunneling of a minor interlobar fissure. These were controlled the same way as the PA injuries. The AV injury occurred during hilar lymph node (LN) dissection and was controlled by suturing. The SVC injury was caused by interference of the robotic forceps and the suction tube outside the field of view during upper mediastinal LN dissection. The injury was controlled by continuous pressure while layering polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue. In the three bronchial injuries, B10 was injured during subcarinal LN dissection, right main bronchus was injured during upper bronchus dissection and the stapling failure of the bronchus occurred by strong traction. They were all repaired by suturing. All lung parenchymal injuries were caused by manipulation of robotic instruments outside the field of view. The lung injuries were repaired by suturing with pledgets. No cases were converted to thoracotomy. The 30-day mortality rate was 0.7%. The cause of mortality was pneumonia.
UNASSIGNED: In robot-assisted anatomical pulmonary resection for lung cancer, most major intraoperative complications can be safely managed robotically without conversion to thoracotomy.

The adoption of robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has helped to overcome some of the challenges associated with surgeons performing conventional video-assisted thoracic surgery. The Versius Surgical System (CMR Surgical, Cambridge, UK) has been developed iteratively in line with surgical team feedback to improve the surgeon\'s experience and patient outcomes. The goal of this study was to assess the use of the device in RATS in a preclinical setting and to fulfil Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-Term Follow Up-Devices stage 1 (Idea).
Four cadaveric sessions were conducted between November 2018 and December 2020, during which device performance in a range of thoracic operations was assessed. Procedures were categorized as either completed or not completed, and surgeons evaluated the device\'s ability to successfully complete necessary surgical steps. Port and bedside unit positions were recorded.
In total, 22/24 (91.7%) thoracic procedures were successfully completed, including 17/18 lobectomies, 2/3 thymectomies and 3/3 diaphragm plications, in 9 cadaver specimens. One thymectomy could not be completed due to cadaver anatomy and 1 lobectomy was not completed due a console system fault. Port and bedside unit configurations were successfully validated for all procedures, and lead surgeons deemed the device to be well-suited for thoracic surgery.
This preclinical study demonstrated the successful use of the device in RATS in cadaveric models and supports progression to small-scale clinical studies, as part of Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-Term Follow Up-Devices stage 2a (Development).

UNASSIGNED: At present, research comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in lobectomy/segmentectomy for lung cancer is insufficient. This paper aimed to compare the safety, short-term efficacy, quality of life (QoL), and delayed complications at 6 weeks postoperatively via a retrospectively controlled study by a single surgeon.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 110 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases from December 2020 to May 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study, and were divided into RATS and VATS groups (both three-port procedures) according to the patients\' preference. The propensity-score matching method was applied to control the potential differences. The patients were treated with lobectomy/segmentectomy for lung cancer by RATS or VATS, and the safety outcomes were evaluated. The follow-up was initiated after surgery, and the outcome assessments including hospitalization costs, short-term efficacy, pain and QoL, were collected and analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: Both matched groups achieved a R0 resection rate of 100%. The average operation time of the RATS group was 21 minutes shorter than VATS (P<0.01), and the average hospitalization costs of the RATS group was 17,746 China Yuan higher than VATS (P<0.01). Furthermore, the visual analogue pain scores of the RATS group were lower than those of the VATS group at 1 day and 6 weeks postoperatively (2.53±0.86 vs. 3.88±0.88 and 0.35±0.65 vs. 0.74±0.88, respectively, P<0.05). Moreover, the core QoL scale score for cancer patients in the RATS group were higher than those of the VATS group at 6 weeks postoperatively (98.64±5.73 vs. 93.02±15.21, respectively, P<0.05). No significant differences were observed in the other indicators.
UNASSIGNED: Despite its high cost, RATS showed considerable potential for reducing the operation time and improving the QoL of patients. Meanwhile, RATS and VATS exhibited similar perioperative safety and short-term efficacy in lobectomy and segmentectomy.

暂无摘要。