risk-adjustment

风险调整
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:欧洲国家对老年人长期护理(LTC)的提供和资助各不相同。尽管存在差异,关于欧洲LTC系统比较性能的信息有限。在这项研究中,我们比较了奥地利家庭护理服务用户的非正式照顾者的生活质量(QoL),英格兰和芬兰。
    方法:在奥地利对非正式照顾者进行了调查,英格兰和芬兰。研究数据(n=835)包含与ASCOT-Carer措施相关的社会护理相关生活质量(SCRQoL)的信息,以及来自每个国家的照顾者和照顾者的特征。我们使用分数回归模型应用风险调整方法来产生风险调整后的SCRQoL评分以进行比较分析。在敏感性分析中,我们对缺失数据进行了多重填补,以验证我们的发现.
    结果:我们发现,英格兰非正式护理人员的风险调整SCRQoL的平均值比芬兰和奥地利高1.4-2.9%和0.3-0.5%,奥地利护理人员的风险调整SCRQoL的平均值比芬兰高0.8-2.7%.国家/地区特定风险调整后的SCRQoL评分的平均值差异很小,并且在统计学上无统计学意义。与奥地利或芬兰的照顾者相比,英国非正式照顾者的健康状况较差,并且与照顾者共同居住的频率更高。
    结论:奥地利、英国和芬兰的意见是一致的,即这两个国家为非正式护理人员提供不同类型的支持。我们的结果有助于这些国家的地方和国家决策者对其非正式护理支持系统进行基准测试。
    OBJECTIVE: The provision and funding of long-term care (LTC) for older people varies between European countries. Despite differences, there is limited information about the comparative performance of LTC systems in Europe. In this study, we compared quality of life (QoL) of informal carers of home care service users in Austria, England and Finland.
    METHODS: Informal carers were surveyed in Austria, England and Finland. The study data (n = 835) contained information on social care-related quality of life (SCRQoL) associated with the ASCOT-Carer measure, and characteristics of carers and care recipients from each country. We applied risk-adjustment methods using a fractional regression model to produce risk-adjusted SCRQoL scores for the comparative analysis. In a sensitivity analysis, we applied multiple imputation to missing data to validate our findings.
    RESULTS: We found that the mean values of the risk-adjusted SCRQoL of informal carers in England were 1.4-2.9% and 0.3-0.5% higher than in Finland and Austria, and the mean values of the risk-adjusted SCRQoL of carers in Austria were 0.8-2.7% higher than in Finland. Differences in the mean values of the country-specific risk-adjusted SCRQoL scores were small and statistically non-significant. English informal carers were less healthy and co-resided with care resipients more often than carers in Austria or Finland.
    CONCLUSIONS: Small differences between the risk-adjusted SCRQoL scores between Austria, England and Finland are consistent with the observation that the countries provide different types of support for informal carers. Our results help local and national decision-makers in these countries to benchmark their informal care support systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评估接受初次全关节置换术(TJA)的Medicare患者中外科医生和医院的风险与报销之间的关系。
    方法:使用了“2021-医疗保险-医师和其他提供者”和“2021-医疗保险-住院-医院”文件。收集患者共病概况,包括平均患者等级状况类别(HCC)风险评分,这是一种考虑合并症的标准化指标。外科医生数据包括2021年向Medicare收取的所有主要TJA程序(住院和门诊),而医院数据包括2021年向Medicare收取的所有主要TJA住院事件。收集了外科医生和医院的报销。所有的发作被分成一个“病情加重队列”,HCC风险评分为1.5或更高,“健康队列”,HCC风险评分小于1.5。在队列中比较变量。
    结果:2021年,向Medicare收取了386,355例初次全髋关节和膝关节置换术,并将其包括在内。在病情较重的队列中,外科医生的平均报销额为1,021.91美元,低于健康队列的1,060.13美元(P<0.001)。同时,对于医院分析,2021年,112,012名Medicare患者被接纳为原发性TJA的住院患者,并包括在内。与健康人群的8,430.46美元相比,病重人群的平均医院报销额要高得多,为13,950.66美元。对于外科医生和医院的分析,病情较重的患者队列评估的所有合并症发生率均显著较高(P<0.001).
    结论:这项研究表明,与健康患者相比,在病情较重的患者中,原发性TJA的平均外科医生报销较低。而病情较重的患者的医院报销更高。这代表了对复杂患者的护理激励方面的差异,随着医院因承担额外风险而获得更多报酬,而外科医生对病情较重的患者进行TJA的平均报酬较低。这些数据应该为未来的政策提供信息,以确保复杂患者继续获得关节成形术护理。
    BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between risk and reimbursement for both surgeons and hospitals among Medicare patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA).
    METHODS: The \"2021 Medicare Physician and Other Provider\" and \"2021 Medicare Inpatient Hospitals\" files were used. Patient comorbidity profiles were collected, including the mean patient hierarchal condition category (HCC) risk score. Surgeon data included all primary TJA procedures (inpatient and outpatient) billed to Medicare in 2021, while hospital data included all such inpatient episodes. Surgeon and hospital reimbursements were collected. All episodes were split into a \"sicker cohort\" with an HCC risk score of 1.5 or more and a \"healthier cohort\" with HCC risk scores less than 1.5. Variables were compared across cohorts.
    RESULTS: In 2021, 386,355 primary total hip and knee arthroplasty procedures were billed to Medicare and were included. The mean surgeon reimbursement among the sicker cohort was $1,021.91, which was less than for the healthier cohort of $1,060.13 (P < .001). Meanwhile, for the hospital analysis, 112,012 Medicare TJA patients were admitted as inpatients and included. The mean reimbursement to hospitals was significantly greater for the sicker cohort at $13,950.66, compared to the healthier cohort of $8,430.46. For both analyses, the sicker patient cohorts had a significantly higher rate of all comorbidities assessed (P < .001).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that mean surgeon reimbursement was lower for primary TJA among sicker patients in comparison to their healthier counterparts, while hospital reimbursement was higher for sicker patients. This represents a discrepancy in the incentivization of care for complex patients, as hospitals receive increased remuneration for taking on extra risk, while surgeons get paid less on average for performing TJA on sicker patients. Such data should inform future policy to assure continued access to arthroplasty care among complex patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:卒中结局研究需要针对卒中严重程度进行风险调整,但这一措施往往是不可用的。被动监测卒中严重程度(PaSSV)评分是在安大略省开发的基于管理数据的卒中严重程度指标。加拿大。我们评估了不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)PaSSV的地理和时间外部有效性,新斯科舍省(NS)和安大略省,加拿大。
    方法:我们使用每个省的关联管理数据来识别2014-2019年间的缺血性卒中或脑出血成年患者,并计算其PaSSV评分。我们使用Cox比例风险模型来评估PaSSV评分与30天以上死亡风险之间的关联以及365天以上长期护理的原因特异性风险。我们使用Uno的c统计量评估了模型的判别值,比较有和没有PaSSV的模型。
    结果:我们纳入了86,142例患者(公元前18,387例,n=65,082在安大略省,n=2,673在NS中)。各省的平均和中位数PaSSV相似。更高的PaSSV分数,代表较低的中风严重程度,与较低的死亡风险相关(在BC中,风险比和95%置信区间为0.70[0.68,0.71],0.69[0.68,0.69]在安大略省,NS为0.72[0.68,0.75])和长期护理(BC为0.77[0.76,0.79],0.84[0.83,0.85]在安大略省,0.86[0.79,0.93]单位为NS)。与没有此变量的模型相比,在多变量模型中包括PaSSV增加了c统计量。
    结论:PaSSV具有地理和时间有效性,使其对中风结局研究的风险调整有用,包括多司法管辖区分析。
    BACKGROUND: Stroke outcomes research requires risk-adjustment for stroke severity, but this measure is often unavailable. The Passive Surveillance Stroke SeVerity (PaSSV) score is an administrative data-based stroke severity measure that was developed in Ontario, Canada. We assessed the geographical and temporal external validity of PaSSV in British Columbia (BC), Nova Scotia (NS) and Ontario, Canada.
    METHODS: We used linked administrative data in each province to identify adult patients with ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage between 2014-2019 and calculated their PaSSV score. We used Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the association between the PaSSV score and the hazard of death over 30 days and the cause-specific hazard of admission to long-term care over 365 days. We assessed the models\' discriminative values using Uno\'s c-statistic, comparing models with versus without PaSSV.
    RESULTS: We included 86,142 patients (n = 18,387 in BC, n = 65,082 in Ontario, n = 2,673 in NS). The mean and median PaSSV were similar across provinces. A higher PaSSV score, representing lower stroke severity, was associated with a lower hazard of death (hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals 0.70 [0.68, 0.71] in BC, 0.69 [0.68, 0.69] in Ontario, 0.72 [0.68, 0.75] in NS) and admission to long-term care (0.77 [0.76, 0.79] in BC, 0.84 [0.83, 0.85] in Ontario, 0.86 [0.79, 0.93] in NS). Including PaSSV in the multivariable models increased the c-statistics compared to models without this variable.
    CONCLUSIONS: PaSSV has geographical and temporal validity, making it useful for risk-adjustment in stroke outcomes research, including in multi-jurisdiction analyses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    衰弱是死亡率的重要预测指标,医疗保健成本和利用率,和健康结果。在临床接触期间,未收集到验证的虚弱措施,进行不同人群的比较具有挑战性。然而,已经开发了几种基于索赔的算法来预测脆弱和相关概念。本研究比较了医疗保险受益人中三种此类算法的性能。在2014-2016年期间,选择了来自12个月连续注册期的索赔数据。脆弱的分数,使用Faurot先前开发的算法计算,Kim,还有兰德,被添加到基线回归模型中,以预测下一年测量的基于索赔的结果。计算每个模型和结果组合的均方根误差和受试者工作特征曲线下的面积,并在感兴趣的亚群中进行测试。总的来说,Kim模型在大多数结果中表现最好,指标、和亚群。卫生系统和研究人员可以使用Kim脆弱分数进行风险调整或有针对性的干预措施。
    Frailty is an important predictor of mortality, health care costs and utilization, and health outcomes. Validated measures of frailty are not consistently collected during clinical encounters, making comparisons across populations challenging. However, several claims-based algorithms have been developed to predict frailty and related concepts. This study compares performance of three such algorithms among Medicare beneficiaries. Claims data from 12-month continuous enrollment periods were selected during 2014-2016. Frailty scores, calculated using previously developed algorithms from Faurot, Kim, and RAND, were added to baseline regression models to predict claims-based outcomes measured in the following year. Root mean square error and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for each model and outcome combination and tested in subpopulations of interest. Overall, Kim models performed best across most outcomes, metrics, and subpopulations. Kim frailty scores may be used by health systems and researchers for risk adjustment or targeting interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:先天性心脏手术(CHS)包括异质人群的患者和手术。针对患者和程序特征进行调整的风险标准化模型可以允许对这些不同的患者和程序进行集体研究。
    目的:我们试图使用新开发的ICD-10管理数据的先天性心脏手术风险分层(RACHS-2)方法开发CHS的风险调整模型。
    方法:在2019年儿童住院患者数据库中,我们确定了所有可以分配RACHS-2评分的CHSs。采用分层逻辑回归(集中于医院)来确定与住院死亡率相关的患者和手术特征。使用2017年24个州住院数据库的数据进行模型验证。
    结果:在2019年儿童住院数据库中的5,902,538例加权出院中,确定了22,310例小儿心脏手术,并分配了RACHS-2评分。543例(2.4%)发生住院死亡率。仅使用RACHS-2,死亡率模式的C统计量为0.81,随着年龄的增加而提高到0.83。最终的多变量模型,包括RACHS-2、年龄、付款人,先天性心脏病以外的复杂慢性疾病的存在进一步将模型判别提高到0.87(P<0.001)。验证队列中的辨别也非常好,C统计量为0.83。
    结论:我们创建并验证了CHS的风险调整模型,该模型考虑了行政数据中与住院死亡率相关的患者和程序特征,包括新开发的RACHS-2。我们的风险模型对于用于卫生服务研究和质量改进计划至关重要。
    Congenital heart surgery (CHS) encompasses a heterogeneous population of patients and surgeries. Risk standardization models that adjust for patient and procedural characteristics can allow for collective study of these disparate patients and procedures.
    We sought to develop a risk-adjustment model for CHS using the newly developed Risk Stratification for Congenital Heart Surgery for ICD-10 Administrative Data (RACHS-2) methodology.
    Within the Kids\' Inpatient Database 2019, we identified all CHSs that could be assigned a RACHS-2 score. Hierarchical logistic regression (clustered on hospital) was used to identify patient and procedural characteristics associated with in-hospital mortality. Model validation was performed using data from 24 State Inpatient Databases during 2017.
    Of 5,902,538 total weighted hospital discharges in the Kids\' Inpatient Database 2019, 22,310 pediatric cardiac surgeries were identified and assigned a RACHS-2 score. In-hospital mortality occurred in 543 (2.4%) of cases. Using only RACHS-2, the mortality mode had a C-statistic of 0.81 that improved to 0.83 with the addition of age. A final multivariable model inclusive of RACHS-2, age, payer, and presence of a complex chronic condition outside of congenital heart disease further improved model discrimination to 0.87 (P < 0.001). Discrimination in the validation cohort was also very good with a C-statistic of 0.83.
    We created and validated a risk-adjustment model for CHS that accounts for patient and procedural characteristics associated with in-hospital mortality available in administrative data, including the newly developed RACHS-2. Our risk model will be critical for use in health services research and quality improvement initiatives.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自动特征选择方法,例如最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO),最近在质量相关结果的预测以及医疗保健质量指标的风险调整中获得了重要意义。到目前为止使用的方法,然而,不要考虑患者数据通常嵌套在医院内的事实。
    方法:因此,我们旨在演示如何使用LASSO解释医院数据的多级结构,并将该程序的结果与忽略数据多级结构的LASSO变体进行比较.我们使用了三个不同的数据集(来自急性心肌梗塞,COPD,和中风患者)具有两个因变量(一个数字和一个二进制),在其上应用了不同的LASSO变体,并且不考虑嵌套数据结构。使用20倍的子采样程序,我们测试了不同LASSO变体的预测性能,并检查了变量重要性的差异.
    结果:对于度量因变量DurationStay,我们发现插入医院会带来更好的预测,而对于二元变量死亡率,所有方法都表现得同样好。然而,在某些情况下,两种方法之间的变量重要性差异很大。
    结论:我们表明,在自动预测因子选择中可以考虑数据的多层次结构,至少部分地,更好的预测性能。从可变重要性的角度来看,考虑到医院之间的结构差异,包括多层次结构对于以无偏见的方式选择预测因子至关重要。
    Automated feature selection methods such as the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) have recently gained importance in the prediction of quality-related outcomes as well as the risk-adjustment of quality indicators in healthcare. The methods that have been used so far, however, do not account for the fact that patient data are typically nested within hospitals.
    Therefore, we aimed to demonstrate how to account for the multilevel structure of hospital data with LASSO and compare the results of this procedure with a LASSO variant that ignores the multilevel structure of the data. We used three different data sets (from acute myocardial infarcation, COPD, and stroke patients) with two dependent variables (one numeric and one binary), on which different LASSO variants with and without consideration of the nested data structure were applied. Using a 20-fold sub-sampling procedure, we tested the predictive performance of the different LASSO variants and examined differences in variable importance.
    For the metric dependent variable Duration Stay, we found that inserting hospitals led to better predictions, whereas for the binary variable Mortality, all methods performed equally well. However, in some instances, the variable importances differed greatly between the methods.
    We showed that it is possible to take the multilevel structure of data into account in automated predictor selection and that this leads, at least partly, to better predictive performance. From the perspective of variable importance, including the multilevel structure is crucial to select predictors in an unbiased way under consideration of the structural differences between hospitals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在评估组织绩效时,手术死亡率指标应进行风险调整。这项研究评估了使用英国医院管理数据评估神经外科术后30天死亡率的风险调整模型的性能。
    方法:本回顾性队列研究使用2013年4月1日至2018年3月31日的医院事件统计(HES)数据。计算了选定亚专科的组织水平30天死亡率(神经肿瘤学,神经血管和创伤神经外科)和整体队列。使用多变量逻辑回归开发了风险调整模型,并结合了各种患者变量:年龄,性别,录取方法,社会剥夺,合并症和虚弱指数。根据辨别和校准来评估性能。
    结果:该队列包括49,044例患者。总的来说,30天死亡率为4.9%,未经调整的组织率从3.2%到9.3%不等。最佳性能模型中的变量因亚专业而异;对于创伤神经外科,一个包含剥夺和虚弱的模型有最好的校准,而对于神经肿瘤学,具有这些变量加合并症的模型表现最好。对于神经血管手术,一个简单的年龄模型,性别和入院方法表现最好。亚专业的歧视水平各不相同(范围:创伤为0.583,神经血管为0.740)。这些模型通常被很好地校准。将模型应用于组织数字,对于整个队列模型,死亡率的平均(中位数)绝对变化为0.33%(四分位数间距(IQR)0.15-0.72)。亚专科模型的中位数变化为0.29%(神经肿瘤学,IQR0.15-0.42),0.40%(神经血管,IQR0.24-0.78)和0.49%(创伤神经外科,IQR0.23-1.68)。
    结论:使用HES的变量,可以建立神经外科手术后30天死亡率的合理风险调整模型,尽管创伤神经外科的模型表现不佳。包括弱点的度量通常会改善模型性能。
    Surgical mortality indicators should be risk-adjusted when evaluating the performance of organisations. This study evaluated the performance of risk-adjustment models that used English hospital administrative data for 30-day mortality after neurosurgery.
    This retrospective cohort study used Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data from 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2018. Organisational-level 30-day mortality was calculated for selected subspecialties (neuro-oncology, neurovascular and trauma neurosurgery) and the overall cohort. Risk adjustment models were developed using multivariable logistic regression and incorporated various patient variables: age, sex, admission method, social deprivation, comorbidity and frailty indices. Performance was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration.
    The cohort included 49,044 patients. Overall, 30-day mortality rate was 4.9%, with unadjusted organisational rates ranging from 3.2 to 9.3%. The variables in the best performing models varied for the subspecialties; for trauma neurosurgery, a model that included deprivation and frailty had the best calibration, while for neuro-oncology a model with these variables plus comorbidity performed best. For neurovascular surgery, a simple model of age, sex and admission method performed best. Levels of discrimination varied for the subspecialties (range: 0.583 for trauma and 0.740 for neurovascular). The models were generally well calibrated. Application of the models to the organisation figures produced an average (median) absolute change in mortality of 0.33% (interquartile range (IQR) 0.15-0.72) for the overall cohort model. Median changes for the subspecialty models were 0.29% (neuro-oncology, IQR 0.15-0.42), 0.40% (neurovascular, IQR 0.24-0.78) and 0.49% (trauma neurosurgery, IQR 0.23-1.68).
    Reasonable risk-adjustment models for 30-day mortality after neurosurgery procedures were possible using variables from HES, although the models for trauma neurosurgery performed less well. Including a measure of frailty often improved model performance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评估医疗保险人群中风险状况不同的全关节置换术(TJA)患者的外科医生报销情况。
    方法:使用了“2019年Medicare医师和其他提供者”文件。在2019年,441,584例主要的全髋关节和膝关节置换术程序被计入MedicareB部分。收集所有患者的患者人口统计学和合并症概况。此外,平均患者等级状况类别(HCC)风险评分,和医生报销被收集。所有手术发作分为两组;HCC风险评分为1.5或更高的患者,和那些与患者肝癌风险评分低于1.5。对每个队列的变量进行平均并进行比较。
    结果:所有程序的平均报销额为1,068.03美元。对于平均HCC风险评分为1.5或更高的病情较重的患者队列,与HCC风险评分低于1.5的队列相比,所有合并症的发生率明显更高.整个病情加重的队列的平均支付为$1,059.21,而HCC风险评分低于1.5的队列中的平均支付为1,073.32(p=.032)。
    结论:这项研究表明,对于2019年接受原发性TJA的Medicare患者,与健康患者相比,初次全关节置换术的平均外科医生报销较低。尽管很难确定这种差异的影响。随着替代支付模式的不断评估和发展,这些数据对于关节成形术护理中更公平的报销模式的潜在发展将是重要的,特别是关于外科医生报销和此类模型中可能的风险调整。
    The purpose of this study was to assess surgeon reimbursement among total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients who had differing risk profiles within the Medicare population.
    The \"2019 Medicare Physician and Other Provider\" file was utilized. In 2019, 441,584 primary total hip and knee arthroplasty procedures were billed to Medicare Part B. All episodes were included. Patient demographics and comorbidity profiles were collected for all patients. Additionally, mean patient hierarchal condition category (HCC) risk scores and physician reimbursements were collected. All procedure episodes were split into 2 cohorts; those with an HCC risk score of 1.5 or greater, and those with patient HCC risk scores less than 1.5. Variables were averaged for each cohort and compared.
    The mean reimbursement across all procedures was $1,068.03. For the sicker patient cohort with a mean HCC risk score of 1.5 or greater, there was a significantly higher rate of all comorbidities compared to the cohort with HCC risk score under 1.5. The mean payment across the sicker cohort was $1,059.21, while the mean payment among the cohort with HCC risk score under 1.5 was 1,073.32 (P = .032).
    This study demonstrates that for Medicare patients undergoing primary TJA in 2019, the mean surgeon reimbursement was lower for primary TJA among sick patients in comparison to their healthier counterparts, although it is difficult to ascertain the impact of this discrepancy. As alternative payment models continue to undergo evaluation and development, these data will be important for the potential advancement of more equitable reimbursement models in arthroplasty care, specifically regarding surgeon reimbursement and possible risk adjustment within such models.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:目前尚缺乏评估脓毒症急性治疗长期结局质量的方法。我们研究了一种基于德国健康声明数据的长期结果质量测量方法。
    UASSIGNED:分析基于德国最大的健康保险公司的数据,覆盖了32%的人口。包括2014年住院的根据脓毒症-1定义的严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克的ICD-10编码的病例(15岁及以上)。通过90天死亡率评估短期结局;通过复合终点评估长期结局,复合终点定义为1年死亡率或对慢性护理的依赖性增加。通过逆向选择的逻辑回归确定风险因素。分层广义线性模型用于校正医院中的病例聚类。通过使用自举抽样的内部验证来评估模型的预测有效性。在有和没有可靠性调整的情况下计算风险标准化死亡率(RSMR),并描述了它们的单变量和双变量分布。
    未经证实:在35,552名患者中,53.2%在入院后90天内死亡;39.8%的90天幸存者在第一年内死亡或对慢性护理的依赖性增加。两种风险模型都显示出足够的关于歧视的预测有效性[AUC=0.748(95%CI:0.742;0.752)对于90天死亡率;AUC=0.675(95%CI:0.665;0.685)对于1年综合结局,分别],校准(Brier评分为0.203和0.220;校准斜率为1.094和0.978),并解释了方差(R2=0.242和R2=0.111)。因为每家医院的病例量很小,对RSMR应用可靠性调整导致各医院的变异性大大降低[从中位数(第一四分位数,第三四分位数)54.2%(44.3%,65.5%)至53.2%(50.7%,90天死亡率为55.9%;从39.2%(27.8%,51.1%)至39.9%(39.5%,40.4%)为1年综合终点]。医院水平的两个终点之间没有实质性相关性(观察率:ρ=0,p=0.99;RSMR:ρ=0.017,p=0.56;可靠性调整RSMR:ρ=0.067;p=0.026)。
    UNASSIGNED:脓毒症护理的质量保证和流行病学监测应包括长期死亡率和发病率的指标。基于索赔的急性脓毒症护理质量指标的风险调整模型显示出令人满意的预测有效性。为了提高测量的可靠性,数据源应覆盖全部人群,医院需要改进脓毒症的ICD-10编码.
    UNASSIGNED: Methods for assessing long-term outcome quality of acute care for sepsis are lacking. We investigated a method for measuring long-term outcome quality based on health claims data in Germany.
    UNASSIGNED: Analyses were based on data of the largest German health insurer, covering 32% of the population. Cases (aged 15 years and older) with ICD-10-codes for severe sepsis or septic shock according to sepsis-1-definitions hospitalized in 2014 were included. Short-term outcome was assessed by 90-day mortality; long-term outcome was assessed by a composite endpoint defined by 1-year mortality or increased dependency on chronic care. Risk factors were identified by logistic regressions with backward selection. Hierarchical generalized linear models were used to correct for clustering of cases in hospitals. Predictive validity of the models was assessed by internal validation using bootstrap-sampling. Risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMR) were calculated with and without reliability adjustment and their univariate and bivariate distributions were described.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 35,552 included patients, 53.2% died within 90 days after admission; 39.8% of 90-day survivors died within the first year or had an increased dependency on chronic care. Both risk-models showed a sufficient predictive validity regarding discrimination [AUC = 0.748 (95% CI: 0.742; 0.752) for 90-day mortality; AUC = 0.675 (95% CI: 0.665; 0.685) for the 1-year composite outcome, respectively], calibration (Brier Score of 0.203 and 0.220; calibration slope of 1.094 and 0.978), and explained variance (R 2 = 0.242 and R 2 = 0.111). Because of a small case-volume per hospital, applying reliability adjustment to the RSMR led to a great decrease in variability across hospitals [from median (1st quartile, 3rd quartile) 54.2% (44.3%, 65.5%) to 53.2% (50.7%, 55.9%) for 90-day mortality; from 39.2% (27.8%, 51.1%) to 39.9% (39.5%, 40.4%) for the 1-year composite endpoint]. There was no substantial correlation between the two endpoints at hospital level (observed rates: ρ = 0, p = 0.99; RSMR: ρ = 0.017, p = 0.56; reliability-adjusted RSMR: ρ = 0.067; p = 0.026).
    UNASSIGNED: Quality assurance and epidemiological surveillance of sepsis care should include indicators of long-term mortality and morbidity. Claims-based risk-adjustment models for quality indicators of acute sepsis care showed satisfactory predictive validity. To increase reliability of measurement, data sources should cover the full population and hospitals need to improve ICD-10-coding of sepsis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号