Spinal muscular atrophy is no longer a leading cause of inherited infant death in the United States. Since 2016, three genetic therapies have been approved for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy. Each therapy has been well studied with robust data for both safety and efficacy. However, there are no head-to-head comparator studies to inform clinical decision making. Thus, treatment selection, timing, and combination therapy is largely up to clinician preference and insurance policies. As the natural history of spinal muscular atrophy continues to change, more data is needed to assist in evidence-based and cost-effective clinical decision making.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a severe genetic disorder characterized by the loss of motor neurons, leading to progressive muscle weakness, loss of mobility, and respiratory complications. In its most severe forms, SMA can result in death within the first two years of life if untreated. The condition arises from mutations in the SMN1 (survival of motor neuron 1) gene, causing a deficiency in the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein. Humans possess a near-identical gene, SMN2, which modifies disease severity and is a primary target for therapies. Recent therapeutic advancements include antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), small molecules targeting SMN2, and virus-mediated gene replacement therapy delivering a functional copy of SMN1. Additionally, recognizing SMA\'s broader phenotype involving multiple organs has led to the development of SMN-independent therapies. Evidence now indicates that SMA affects multiple organ systems, suggesting the need for SMN-independent treatments along with SMN-targeting therapies. No single therapy can cure SMA; thus, combination therapies may be essential for comprehensive treatment. This review addresses the SMA etiology, the role of SMN, and provides an overview of the rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape, highlighting current achievements and future directions.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a genetic disorder primarily caused by mutations in the SMN1 gene, leading to motor neuron degeneration and muscle atrophy, affecting multiple organ systems. Nusinersen treatment targets gene expression and is expected to enhance the motor function of voluntary muscles in the limbs and trunk. Motor skills can be assessed through specific scales like the Revised Upper Limb Module Scale (RULM) and Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE). This study aims to evaluate the influence of nusinersen on the motor skills of patients with SMA Type 2 and 3 using real-world data collected over 54 months. A prospective longitudinal study was conducted on 37 SMA patients treated with nusinersen, analyzing data with R statistical software. The outcomes revealed significant improvements in motor functions, particularly in SMA Type 3 patients with higher RULM and HFSME scores. Additionally, GEE analysis identified time, type, age, and exon deletions as essential predictors of motor score improvements. The extended observation period is both a major strength and a limitation of this research, as the dropout rates could present challenges in interpretation. Variability in responses, influenced by genetic background, SMA type, and onset age, highlights the need for personalized treatment approaches.

OBJECTIVE: Following the approval of risdiplam, there are more possibilities for disease-modifying therapy (DMT) in children with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Non-treatment-naïve subjects with SMA involved in the JEWELFISH study, designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of risdiplam, were required to undergo a washout period before receiving risdiplam. This study aims to investigate the safety of administering risdiplam in patients within 90 days of receiving treatment with nusinersen.
METHODS: Data were collected on SMA patients who had undergone treatment with nusinersen, and who then received risdiplam within 90 days of their last dose of nusinersen, including demographic characteristics, information on treatment with nusinersen and risdiplam, adverse events, and laboratory assessments in a follow-up period of 90 days, presented as median (range).
RESULTS: A total of 15 children with SMA were reported, including 8 males and 7 females. The median number of doses of previous nusinersen treatment received was 8 (6-17) doses, and the median age at first risdiplam treatment was 4.3 (1.9-11.2) years. Specifically, 8 children received risdiplam 30 days or less after their most recent nusinersen treatment, 2 at 31-60 days after nusinersen, and 5 at 61-89 days post-nusinersen. Adverse events of pyrexia, pneumonia, vomiting and rash were reported in 4 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed good safety data on patients who received risdiplam following nusinersen within the washout period of 90 days. This supplements the JEWELFISH study in the era of DMT, providing additional guidance for clinicians, but additional data from other centers is needed.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are neuromuscular disorders that affect muscular function. The most common causes of morbidity and mortality are respiratory complications, including restrictive lung disease, ineffective cough, and sleep-disordered breathing. The paradigm of care is changing as new disease-modifying therapies are altering disease trajectory, outcomes, expectations, as well as patient and caregiver experiences. This article provides an overview on therapeutic advances for SMA and DMD in the last 10 years, with a focus on the effects of disease-modifying therapies on respiratory function.

Risdiplam, the first oral therapy approved for spinal muscular atrophy and made globally available in 2021, necessitates a highly sensitive and straightforward assay for therapeutic drug monitoring. This is crucial to manage potential toxicities linked to drug concentrations and supervise dosing regimens. A cutting-edge ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry bioassay for risdiplam in human serum has been developed. In this method, analytes were separated on a Phenomenex Kinetex XB C18 column using a 6.5-min gradient elution after a single-step protein precipitation. MS detection was conducted via electrospray ionization in positive mode with selected reaction monitoring. The validated range for risdiplam was determined to be 1.95-125.00 ng/mL. The precision and accuracy of intra- and inter-batch analyses were within ±15%. The novel method met all other established criteria. This assay holds promise for monitoring drug concentrations and guiding clinical decisions in patients with spinal muscular atrophy.

暂无摘要。

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an orphan disease characterized by the progressive degeneration of spinal alpha motor neurons. In recent years, nusinersen and several other drugs have been approved for the treatment of this disease. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) modulates spinal neuronal networks, resulting in changes in locomotion and posture in patients with severe spinal cord injury and stroke. We hypothesize that tSCS can activate motor neurons that are intact and restored by medication, slow the decline in motor activity, and contribute to the development of motor skills in SMA patients. Thirty-seven children and adults with SMA types 2 and 3 participated in this study. The median duration of drug treatment was over 20 months. The application of tSCS was performed during physical therapy for 20-40 min per day for ~12 days. Outcome measures were specific SMA motor scales, goniometry of contractured joints, and forced vital capacity. Significant increases in motor function, improved respiratory function, and decreased contracture were observed in both type 2 and 3 SMA participants. The magnitude of functional changes was not associated with participant age. Further studies are needed to elucidate the reasons for the beneficial effects of spinal cord electrical stimulation on SMA.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review provides an update on outcomes for patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type 1 to 4 treated with approved therapeutics, including the most recent, risdiplam, for an observation period of up to 48 months.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in July 2023 in four databases. Selected publications were assessed for internal validity and risk of bias by two authors and relevant data were extracted into standardised tables. Results were summarised narratively as substantial heterogeneity of studies prevents meaningful quantitative analysis.
RESULTS: Twenty observational studies and one RCT were included in the analysis, fifteen studies on nusinersen, one on onasemnogene abeparvovec and two on risdiplam. Evidence supports the effectiveness of the therapies in motor function improvement for up to 48 months of follow-up in the SMA types specified in their respective indications. Better results were observed with earlier treatment initiation and higher baseline function. Whilst motor improvement was consistently observed, regardless of SMA type or treatment used, we noted no significant improvements in respiratory and nutritional outcomes. Quality of life endpoints were rarely investigated. Adverse events were common but seldom classified as treatment-related except for post-lumbar puncture syndrome, which was frequently reported across nusinersen studies.
CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of SMA with the new therapies changes the disease phenotype with changes in motor function far exceeding any improvement in respiratory and nutritional function. Questions persist on long-term efficacy, potential regressions, impact on quality of life and social functioning, therapy duration, and discontinuation indicators.

Spinal muscular atrophy is a rare and progressive neuromuscular disease that, without treatment, leads to progressive weakness and often death. A plethora of studies have led to the approval of three high-cost and effective treatments since 2016. These treatments, nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec, and risdiplam, have not been directly compared and have varying challenges in administration. In this review, we discuss the evidence supporting the use of these medications, the process of treatment selection, monitoring after treatment, the limited data comparing treatments, as well as future directions for investigation and therapy.