Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is increasingly being used as a reliable option for various shoulder disorders with deteriorated rotator cuff and glenohumeral joints. The stemless humerus component for shoulder arthroplasties is evolving with theoretical advantages, such as preservation of the humeral bone stock and decreased risk of periprosthetic fractures, as well as clinical research demonstrating less intraoperative blood loss, reduced surgical time, a lower rate of intraoperative fractures, and improved center of rotation restoration. In particular, for anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), the utilization of stemless humeral implants is gaining consensus in younger patients. The current systematic review of 14 clinical studies (637 shoulders) demonstrated the clinical outcomes of stemless rTSA. Regarding shoulder function, the mean Constant-Murley Score (CS) improved from 28.3 preoperatively to 62.8 postoperatively. The pooled overall complication and revision rates were 14.3% and 6.3%, respectively. In addition, recent studies have shown satisfactory outcomes with stemless rTSA relative to stemmed rTSA. Therefore, shoulder surgeons may consider adopting stemless rTSA, especially in patients with sufficient bone quality. However, further long-term studies comparing survivorship between stemless and stemmed rTSA are required to determine the gold standard for selecting stemless rTSA.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the acromion and spine can have a major impact on the outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with respect to pain, motion, and function. Reports on internal fixation for these fractures are isolated to small series or case reports with variable outcomes. The purpose of this study was to report on the outcome of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of acromion or spine fractures encountered before or after RSA and describe our evolution of fixation techniques.
METHODS: Between 2011 and 2023, 22 fractures or nonunions of the acromion or spine of the scapula underwent ORIF at a single institution and were followed for a minimum of 1 year. In 16 shoulders, fractures occurred after RSA, whereas 5 shoulders underwent ORIF prior to RSA. One shoulder had undergone prior failed ORIF elsewhere and revision ORIF was performed at our institution. There were 10 males and 12 females with a mean age of 67 (SD=15.1) years. Fixation strategies included single (n=11) and double plate fixation (n=11). Kruskal-Wallis one-way analyses of variance were used to analyze continuous variables and Chi-square tests employed for categorical variables.
RESULTS: Of the 5 fractures treated with ORIF pre-RSA, 1 shoulder suffered an additional fracture medial to the hardware and 1 required additional bone grafting for incomplete union at the time of RSA. These 5 shoulders all underwent RSA uneventfully, but one fracture experienced late displacement of the scapular spine nonunion, leading to plate removal. Of the 16 post-RSA ORIF shoulders, radiographic union was confirmed in 14 and substantial residual inferior angulation identified in 3. New fractures occurred after ORIF in 5 shoulders. For patients who underwent ORIF after RSA, pain scores improved from a mean of 8 to 1.9 points, with more modest elevation gains (58.2° to 91.3° pre- and postoperatively, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: ORIF of acromion and scapular spine fractures or nonunions in the setting of RSA have the potential to lead to union. When these fractures and nonunions are encountered prior to RSA, ORIF allows for uneventful RSA implantation, but secondary displacement may occur. ORIF seems to lead to improvements in pain, but more modest improvements in motion and function. Our fixation strategy has evolved to (1) dual plating, (2) spanning the whole length of the spine with one of the plates, (3) use of hook features under the acromion or os trigonum if possible, and (4) liberal use of bone graft.

Primary joint replacements are performed increasingly often worldwide, driven by an aging population, improvement in surgical techniques, and advancements in implant designs. While more attention has traditionally been focused on weight-bearing joints such as the hip and knee, shoulder replacement surgeries have gained increasing attention in recent years due to the population\'s demand for a better quality of life. Thus far, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of shoulder arthroplasty-related publications using the Scopus database has not yet been conducted. This bibliometric analysis aims to fill this gap by reviewing the Scopus database from its inception until 2023 to examine the literature on shoulder arthroplasty. A total of 5300 publications meeting the selection criteria were included in this analysis. The turn of the century marked a significant turning point for the field of shoulder arthroplasty, with an increasing number of publications produced annually. This trend can be attributed to the improvement of implant designs, which have become more consistent and reliable over time. While the majority of articles were authored by researchers and clinicians from the United States of America (USA), publications by French authors had a higher scholarly impact in the field. There is a noticeable gap in research on shoulder arthroplasty in developing countries, possibly due to the prohibitively high cost of implants and the prioritization of other healthcare sectors. This bibliometric analysis, utilizing Scopus data, serves as a guiding light for researchers, clinicians, and policymakers, potentially fostering collaborative projects and guiding the development of future studies to further advance the field of shoulder arthroplasty, particularly in developing countries.

BACKGROUND: Navigated augmented reality (AR) through a head-mounted display (HMD) has led to accurate glenoid component placement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in an in-vitro setting. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the deviation between planned, intra-, and postoperative inclination, retroversion, entry point and depth of the glenoid component placement during RSA, assisted by navigated AR through a HMD, in a surgical setting.
METHODS: A prospective, multicenter study was conducted. All consecutive patients undergoing RSA in two institutions, between August 2021 and January 2023, were considered potentially eligible for inclusion in the study. Inclusion criteria were: age >18 years, surgery assisted by AR through a HMD, and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans at six weeks. All participants agreed to participate in the study and an informed consent was provided in all cases. Preoperative CT scans were undertaken for all cases and used for three-dimensional (3D) planning. Intra-operatively, glenoid preparation and component placement were assisted by a navigated AR system through a HMD in all patients. Intraoperative parameters were recorded by the system. A postoperative CT scan was undertaken at 6 weeks, and 3D reconstruction was used for obtaining postoperative parameters. The deviation between planned, intra-, and postoperative inclination, retroversion, entry point, and depth of the glenoid component placement was calculated. Outliers were defined as >5° for inclination and retroversion and >5 mm for entry point.
RESULTS: 17 patients (9 females, 12 right shoulders) with a mean age of 72.8±9.1 years old (range, 47.0 to 82.0) met inclusion criteria. The mean deviation between intra- and postoperative measurements was 1.5°±1.0° (range, 0.0° to 3.0°) for inclination, 2.8°±1.5° (range, 1.0° to 4.5°) for retroversion, 1.8±1.0 mm (range, 0.7mm to 3.0mm) for entry point, and 1.9±1.9 mm (range, 0.0mm to 4.5mm) for depth. The mean deviation between planned and postoperative values was 2.5°±3.2° (range, 0.0° to 11.0°) for inclination, 3.4°±4.6° (range, 0.0° to 18.0°) for retroversion, 2.0±2.5 mm (range, 0.0° to 9.7°) for entry point, and 1.3±1.6 mm (range, 1.3mm to 4.5mm) for depth. There were no outliers between intra- and postoperative values and there were three outliers between planned and postoperative values. The mean time (minutes:seconds) for the tracker unit placement and the scapula registration was 03:02 (range, 01:48 to 04:26) and 08:16 (range, 02:09 to 17:58), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a navigated AR system through a HMD in RSA led to low deviations between planned, intra-operative and postoperative parameters for glenoid component placement.

Background: The treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients is not yet fully elucidated. Of all treatment options, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and non-operative treatment (NOT) appear to provide the best results. Evidence to guide the choice between the two is sparse. Therefore, this review provides an overview of the available evidence on RSA versus NOT. Methods: Studies comparing complex proximal humerus fractures in patients aged >65 years treated either with RSA or NOT were included for systematic review and direct comparison via pooled analysis of patient-rated outcome and range of motion. Indirect comparison of case series and non-comparative studies on either treatment was performed separately. Results: Three comparative studies including 77 patients treated with RSA and 81 treated non-operatively were analysed. The RSA group scored better for both the Constant-Murley score (mean difference 6 points) and DASH score (mean difference 8 points). No differences were detected in ASES, PENN score, pain scores, or range of motion between treatment groups. The most common complications for RSA were infection (3%), nerve injury (2%), and dislocation (2%). Reoperation was required in 5%. In the NOT group, common complications included malunion (42%), osteonecrosis (25%), and non-union (3%); no reoperation was required. Patient satisfaction was equal in both groups. Conclusions: The functional outcomes and range of motion after RSA seemed satisfactory and potentially superior to NOT in elderly patients. Patient satisfaction was comparable despite a high malunion and osteonecrosis rate in the non-operative treatment group, which did not require re-interventions.

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) offers promising functional outcomes for young patients, yet challenges persist in restoring internal rotation (IR). This study aimed to assess the restoration of IR after RSA in patients younger than 60 years of age and analyze the factors affecting IR recovery.
METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted, examining the functional outcome of patients who underwent RSA, with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Two subgroups of patients who underwent primary RSA were analyzed separately with respect to active internal rotation with the elbow at the side (AIR1): \"difficult AIR1\" and \"easy AIR1.\"
RESULTS: The study included 136 patients (overall series) with a mean age of 51.6 years. The overall series showed statistically significant improvement in active range of motion (RoM), pain, and Constant scores, especially with active IR (p ​< ​0.01). According to etiology, statistically significant improvement (p ​< ​0.05) in active IR was observed for fracture sequelae, primary osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis, whereas no statistically significant improvement in IR was observed for tumor, revision, and cuff-tear arthropathy (p ​> ​0.05). In subgroup analysis, patients with easy AIR1 displayed a statistically significant lower body mass index and better Constant score mobility, as well as improved motion in forward elevation and active IR (p ​< ​0.05). No statistically significant associations were found between improved IR and prosthetic design or subscapularis repair. Scapular notch, lysis of the graft, and teres minor atrophy were significantly associated with better active IR (p ​< ​0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: RSA improves active RoM, pain, and functional outcomes in patients aged under 60. However, the degree of improvement in IR may vary depending on several factors and the underlying etiologies. These insights are crucial for patient selection and counseling, guiding RSA optimization efforts.
METHODS: IV.

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a frequently used therapy for complex proximal humeral fractures and posttraumatic disorders. The present study\'s purpose was to assess the clinical and radiological outcome of primary and secondary RSA, and to analyze the impact of refixation of the greater tuberosity (GT).
METHODS: 28 patients with primary fracture RSA and 18 patients with RSA due to posttraumatic disorders were examined with a mean clinical follow-up of 2.5 ± 1.73 years. Operative details and radiographs were retrospectively reviewed. Additional analyses were performed for healed and non-healed GT in primary RSA.
RESULTS: Patients with fracture RSA had higher Constant-Murley score (CMS) than secondary RSA without reaching significance (p = 0.104). No significant difference was present for the quality of life measured by the Short Form 36 (SF 36) and the range of motion. In primary RSA, 78.6% GT healed anatomically. Compared to non-healed GT, patients with healed GT had a significantly higher CMS (p = 0.011), external rotation (p = 0.026) and forward flexion (p = 0.083), whereas DASH score was lower without a significant difference (p = 0.268). SF 36 showed no significant difference. Patients with healed GT had a more neutral glenoid version (p = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: Superior range of motion and clinical outcome scores were present for anatomically healed GT. Therefore, refixation of the tuberosities is recommended. Secondary RSA can result in inferior results compared to primary RSA, so patients need to be adequately informed.

BACKGROUND: The use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has increased at a greater rate than other shoulder procedures. In general, clinical and functional outcomes after RTSA have been favorable regardless of indication. However, little evidence exists regarding patient specific factors associated with clinical improvement after RTSA. Predicting postoperative outcomes after RTSA may support patients and physicians to establish more accurate patient expectations and contribute in treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to determine predictive factors for postoperative outcomes after RTSA for patients with degenerative shoulder disorders.
METHODS: EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library and PEDro were searched to identify cohort studies reporting on predictive factors for postoperative outcomes after RTSA. Authors independently screened publications on eligibility. Risk of bias for each publication was assessed using the QUIPS tool. A qualitative description of the results was given. The GRADE framework was used to establish the quality of evidence.
RESULTS: A total of 1986 references were found of which 11 relevant articles were included in the analysis. Risk of bias was assessed as low (N = 7, 63.6%) or moderate (N = 4, 36.4%). According to the evidence synthesis there was moderate-quality evidence indicating that greater height predicts better postoperative shoulder function, and greater preoperative range of motion (ROM) predicts increased postoperative ROM following.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative predictive factors that may predict postoperative outcomes are: patient height and preoperative range of motion. These factors should be considered in the preoperative decision making for a RTSA, and can potentially be used to aid in preoperative decision making.
METHODS: Level I; Systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Pre-operative planning for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) poses challenges, particularly when dealing with glenoid bone loss. This modified Delphi study aimed to assess expert consensus on RSA planning processes and rationale, specifically targeting low-resourced institutions. Our objective was to offer pre-operative decision-making algorithms tailored for surgeons practising in resource-constrained hospitals with limited access to computed tomography (CT) scans.
METHODS: A working group generated statements on pre-operative imaging and glenoid of glenoid morphology and intra-operative decision-making. The study was conducted in three stages, with virtual consensus meetings in between. Stages 2 and 3 consisted only of closed questions/statements. The statements with over 70% were considered consensus achieved and those with less than 10% were considered disagreement consensus achieved.
RESULTS: Twelve shoulder surgeons participated, with 67% having over five years of experience in shoulder arthroplasty. In the absence of glenoid bone loss, the sole use of plain radiographs for pre-operative planning reached consensus and is recommended by these groups, while 100% advise using CT scans when bone loss is present. Most surgeons (70%) recommend using patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in cases of structural bone loss. Most of the statements on intra-operative decision-making related to component placement and enhancing stability failed to reach consensus.
CONCLUSIONS: While consensus was achieved on most aspects of pre-operative imaging and planning, technical aspects of surgery lacked consensus. Planning for patients with structural glenoid bone loss necessitates CT scans and planning tools.

UNASSIGNED: This study investigated the rate of acromial insufficiency fractures (AIF) in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with concomitant distal clavicle excision (DCE).
UNASSIGNED: Patients who underwent primary RSA with DCE by a single surgeon from 2010 to 2021 were identified. Exclusion criteria included revision RSA, RSA for fracture, or cases utilizing an augmented baseplate or bone graft. AIF was defined as a radiographically proven acromion or scapular spine fracture. Pain without an identifiable fracture on imaging was defined as an acromial insufficiency reaction. Patient demographics, implant information, and radiograph measurements were compared between patients with and without acromial pathology.
UNASSIGNED: One hundred and seventy-five patients were included. Mean age was 72.8 years, and 67% of patients were female. There were 3/174 acromial insufficiency fractures (1.7%). AIF occurred at a mean of 9.3 months after surgery. Twelve patients had insufficiency reactions (6.9%). Patients with acromial pathology were more likely to be female (p = .003) and have a diagnosis of osteoporosis (p = .047) and inflammatory arthritis (p = .049). There was no significant difference between groups in terms of other factors.
UNASSIGNED: The AIF rate in patients who underwent RSA with DCE was 1.7%. These findings suggest that DCE in the setting of RSA may have a protective role against AIF.