retrospective cohort

回顾性队列
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    整合多个观察性研究以对大量自然人群中的组潜在结果进行无混淆的因果或描述性比较是具有挑战性的。此外,回顾性队列,作为便利样品,通常不能代表自然的兴趣群体,并且具有不平衡协变量的群体。我们提出了一个基于伪群体的通用协变量平衡框架,该框架将已建立的加权方法扩展到具有多个组的多个回顾性队列的荟萃分析。此外,通过最大化队列的有效样本量,我们提议FLEXible,优化,和适用于综合分析的现实(FLEXOR)加权方法。我们开发新的加权估计器,用于对与定量,明确,或多变量结果。检查了这些估计器的渐近性质。通过对TCGA数据集的模拟研究和荟萃分析,我们证明了所提出的加权策略的多功能性和可靠性,特别是对于FLEXOR伪种群。
    Integrating multiple observational studies to make unconfounded causal or descriptive comparisons of group potential outcomes in a large natural population is challenging. Moreover, retrospective cohorts, being convenience samples, are usually unrepresentative of the natural population of interest and have groups with unbalanced covariates. We propose a general covariate-balancing framework based on pseudo-populations that extends established weighting methods to the meta-analysis of multiple retrospective cohorts with multiple groups. Additionally, by maximizing the effective sample sizes of the cohorts, we propose a FLEXible, Optimized, and Realistic (FLEXOR) weighting method appropriate for integrative analyses. We develop new weighted estimators for unconfounded inferences on wide-ranging population-level features and estimands relevant to group comparisons of quantitative, categorical, or multivariate outcomes. Asymptotic properties of these estimators are examined. Through simulation studies and meta-analyses of TCGA datasets, we demonstrate the versatility and reliability of the proposed weighting strategy, especially for the FLEXOR pseudo-population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:睡眠质量差是现代社会中普遍存在的问题,如今,甚至儿童也被诊断出患有睡眠障碍。从长远来看,儿童的睡眠中断可能会导致不良的心理健康。本研究旨在评估儿童和青少年睡眠障碍与随后的抑郁症之间的关系。
    方法:本回顾性队列研究使用IQVIATM疾病分析仪数据库中的电子病历。它包括最初诊断为睡眠障碍的6-16岁儿童和青少年,以及年龄和性别匹配的患者,这些患者在2010年1月至2022年12月期间由德国274名办公室儿科医生之一治疗,没有睡眠障碍。使用对数秩检验,通过Kaplan-Meier曲线研究了有和没有睡眠障碍的队列中抑郁症的五年累积发病率。多变量Cox回归分析用于评估睡眠障碍和抑郁之间的关联。
    结果:本研究包括10,466名儿童和青少年,以及52,330名没有睡眠障碍诊断的儿童和青少年(平均年龄10±3岁,48%女性)。在索引日期后的五年内,5%的睡眠障碍患者和2%的非睡眠障碍队列患者被诊断出患有抑郁症。在睡眠障碍和随后的抑郁症之间观察到强烈且显著的关联(HR:2.34;95%CI:2.09-2.63)。青少年的这种关联(HR:3.78;95%CI:3.13-4.56)比儿童更强。在索引日期后的第一年排除抑郁症诊断后,睡眠障碍和抑郁症之间的相关性仍然很强(HR:1.92;95%CI:1.68-2.19).
    结论:这项研究表明睡眠障碍与抑郁症之间存在强烈且显著的关联。
    BACKGROUND: Poor quality of sleep is a widespread issue in modern society, and even children are being diagnosed with sleep disorders nowadays. Sleep disruption in children can lead to poor mental health in the long term. The present study aimed to evaluate the association between sleep disorders and subsequent depression in children and adolescents.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used electronic medical records from the IQVIATM Disease Analyzer database. It included children and adolescents aged 6-16 with an initial diagnosis of a sleep disorder and age- and gender-matched patients without sleep disorders treated by one of 274 office-based pediatricians in Germany between January 2010 and December 2022. The five-year cumulative incidence of depression in the cohorts with and without sleep disorders was studied with Kaplan-Meier curves using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to assess the association between sleep disorders and depression.
    RESULTS: The present study included 10,466 children and adolescents with and 52,330 without sleep disorder diagnosis (mean age 10 ± 3 years, 48% female). Within five years after the index date, 5% of sleep disorder patients and 2% of the matched non-sleep disorder cohort had been diagnosed with depression. A strong and significant association was observed between sleep disorders and subsequent depression (HR: 2.34; 95% CI: 2.09-2.63). This association was stronger in adolescents (HR: 3.78; 95% CI: 3.13-4.56) than in children. Upon the exclusion of depression diagnoses in the first year after the index date, the association between sleep disorders and depression remained strong and significant (HR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.68-2.19).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates a strong and significant association between sleep disorders and depression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:在不孕症治疗后的活产中,紫红色先天性心脏病(CCHD)的风险是否升高?
    结论:在这项基于人群的单胎研究中,不孕症治疗(ART或非ART)与活产中CCHD患病率较高相关.
    背景:在过去的几十年中,不孕症治疗的使用一直在增加。然而,评估不孕症治疗后严重心脏缺陷风险的研究有限.
    方法:对来自国家生命统计系统(NVSS)的分娩数据进行了回顾性队列研究,从2016年到2022年,年龄在15-49岁之间的首次母亲中有960万单胎出生。
    方法:从出生证明的健康和医疗信息部分获得有关不孕症治疗使用和CCHD的信息,这是医护人员在审查医疗记录后完成的。使用Logistic回归模型估计比值比(OR)和95%CI。还进行了熵平衡加权分析和概率偏差分析。
    结果:在研究期间,不孕症治疗后的分娩比例从1.9%(27.116)增加到3.1%(43.510)。总的来说,有5287例CCHD,导致每1000例活产中有0.6例的患病率.不孕症治疗使用者的患病率为每1000活产1.2例(ART:每1000活产1.1例;非ART:每1000活产1.3例),而自然受孕分娩的患病率为每1000活产0.5例。与自然分娩相比,使用任何不孕症治疗(OR:2.06,95%CI:1.82-2.33),ART(OR:2.02,95%CI:1.73-2.36)或其他不孕症治疗(OR:2.12,95%CI:1.74-2.33),在调整母亲和父亲年龄后,与更高的CCHD几率相关,种族和民族,和教育,以及母亲的出生,婚姻状况,付款来源,吸烟状况,和孕前BMI的测量,高血压和糖尿病。这种关联因不孕症治疗的类型(ART与其他不孕症治疗)而没有差异(OR:1.04,95%CI:0.82-1.33,P=0.712),并且对暴露和结果错误分类偏差和残余混杂的存在是稳健的。
    结论:研究结果仅局限于活体分娩。我们没有能力检查终止数据,但是,通过概念模式的差分终止并没有得到先前旨在考虑它的研究的支持。不孕症治疗的使用是自我报告的,导致不孕症治疗和CCHD的选择偏倚和错误分类的可能性。然而,当分析中考虑了系统性偏倚以及暴露和结局错误分类偏倚时,这种关联仍然存在.关于与任一母体有关的不孕症的潜在病因的信息,父系,或者这两个因素,关于特定类型的ART和其他不孕症治疗的数据,以及CCHD亚型的信息,都不可用。
    结论:鉴于在美国使用不孕症治疗的增加趋势,在其他地方,本研究的发现对生育年龄个体的临床和公共卫生具有重要意义.数据显示,使用不孕症治疗可能会使后代遭受严重的先天性心脏缺陷的可能性增加,例如此处研究的CCHD。这些发现不能因果关系解释。虽然我们的研究结果可以帮助通过ART或其他不孕症治疗怀孕的孕前咨询和产前护理,他们还支持目前的一些建议,即不孕症治疗导致的妊娠要接受胎儿超声心动图筛查.
    背景:没有为这项研究寻求资助。作者声明他们没有利益冲突。
    背景:不适用。
    OBJECTIVE: Is there an elevated risk of cyanotic congenital heart defects (CCHD) among livebirths following infertility treatments?
    CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study of single livebirths, infertility treatment (either ART or non-ART) was associated with a higher prevalence of CCHD among livebirths.
    BACKGROUND: The use of infertility treatment has been on the rise over the past few decades. However, there are limited studies assessing the risk of major cardiac defects following infertility treatments.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of livebirth data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) was conducted, comprising of 9.6 million singleton livebirths among first-time mothers aged 15-49 years from 2016 to 2022.
    METHODS: Information on infertility treatment use and CCHD was obtained from the health and medical information section of birth certificates, which was completed by healthcare staff after reviewing medical records. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI. Entropy balancing weighting analysis and probabilistic bias analysis were also performed.
    RESULTS: The proportion of births following infertility treatment increased from 1.9% (27 116) to 3.1% (43 510) during the study period. Overall, there were 5287 cases of CCHD resulting in a prevalence of 0.6 per 1000 livebirths. The prevalence was 1.2 per 1000 live births among infertility treatment users (ART: 1.1 per 1000 livebirths; non-ART: 1.3 per 1000 livebirths) while that for naturally conceived births was 0.5 per 1000 livebirths. Compared to naturally conceived births, the use of any infertility treatment (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.82-2.33), either ART (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.73-2.36) or other infertility treatments (OR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.74-2.33), was associated with higher odds of CCHD after adjusting for maternal and paternal age, race and ethnicity, and education, as well as maternal nativity, marital status, source of payment, smoking status, and pre-pregnancy measures of BMI, hypertension and diabetes. This association did not differ by the type of infertility treatment (ART versus other infertility treatments) (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.82-1.33, P = 0.712), and was robust to the presence of exposure and outcome misclassification bias and residual confounding.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings are only limited to livebirths. We did not have the capacity to examine termination data, but differential termination by mode of conception has not been supported by previous studies designed to consider it. Infertility treatment use was self-reported, leading to the potential for selection bias and misclassification for infertility treatment and CCHD. However, the association persisted when systematic bias as well as exposure and outcome misclassification bias were accounted for in the analyses. Information on the underlying etiology of infertility relating to either maternal, paternal, or both factors, data on specific types of ART and other infertility treatments, as well as information on subtypes of CCHD, were all not available.
    CONCLUSIONS: In light of the increasing trend in the use of infertility treatment in the USA, and elsewhere, the finding of the current study holds significant importance for the clinical and public health of reproductive-aged individuals. The data show that the use of infertility treatment may expose offspring to elevated odds of severe congenital heart defects such as CCHD studied here. These findings cannot be interpreted causally. While our findings can assist in preconception counseling and prenatal care for pregnancies conceived by either ART or other infertility treatments, they also support some current recommendations that pregnancies resulting from infertility treatments undergo fetal echocardiography screening.
    BACKGROUND: No funding was sought for the study. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
    BACKGROUND: N/A.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们的目的是通过比较全国多中心队列和单中心队列之间的各种治疗后的总生存期(OS)来评估对肝细胞癌(HCC)预后的回顾性单中心队列研究的普遍性。HCC患者。
    使用韩国原发性肝癌登记处(多中心队列,n=16,443),和Asan医学中心HCC注册(单中心队列,n=15,655)。主要结果,初始治疗后的OS,根据巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)策略治疗的Child-PughA肝功能(分别为n=2797和n=5151),使用对数秩检验和Cox比例风险模型。
    BCLC0期和A期患者(59.3%vs35.2%)和接受治愈性治疗的患者(42.1%vs32.1%)在单中心队列中更常见(P<0.001)。多变量分析显示,根据治疗类型,两个队列在OS上存在显著差异:多中心队列在接受治疗的患者中与较高的死亡风险相关(调整后的风险比[95%置信区间],1.48[1.39-1.59])和非治愈性(1.22[1.17-1.27])治疗,而接受全身治疗(0.83[0.74-0.92])和最佳支持治疗(0.85[0.79-0.91])的患者的风险较低.子队列分析还表明,两个队列之间的OS存在显着差异,在接受化疗栓塞(1.72[1.48-2.00])和消融(1.44[1.08-1.92])的多中心队列患者中,死亡率风险较高.
    单中心和多中心HCC患者队列的比较显示,在调整预后变量后,根据治疗方式,OS存在显着差异。因此,HCC治疗的回顾性单中心队列研究的结果可能无法推广到现实世界的实践中.
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to evaluate the generalizability of retrospective single-center cohort studies on prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by comparing overall survival (OS) after various treatments between a nationwide multicenter cohort and a single-center cohort of HCC patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients newly diagnosed with HCC between January 2008 and December 2018 were analyzed using data from the Korean Primary Liver Cancer Registry (multicenter cohort, n=16,443), and the Asan Medical Center HCC registry (single-center cohort, n=15,655). The primary outcome, OS after initial treatment, was compared between the two cohorts for both the entire population and for subcohorts with Child-Pugh A liver function (n=2797 and n=5151, respectively) treated according to the Barcelona-Clinic-Liver-Cancer (BCLC) strategy, using Log rank test and Cox proportional hazard models.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients of BCLC stages 0 and A (59.3% vs 35.2%) and patients who received curative treatment (42.1% vs 32.1%) were more frequently observed in the single-center cohort (Ps<0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed significant differences between the two cohorts in OS according to type of treatment: the multicenter cohort was associated with higher risk of mortality among patients who received curative (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.48 [1.39-1.59]) and non-curative (1.22 [1.17-1.27]) treatments, whereas the risk was lower in patients treated with systemic therapy (0.83 [0.74-0.92]) and best supportive care (0.85 [0.79-0.91]). Subcohort analysis also demonstrated significantly different OS between the two cohorts, with a higher risk of mortality in multicenter cohort patients who received chemoembolization (1.72 [1.48-2.00]) and ablation (1.44 [1.08-1.92]).
    UNASSIGNED: Comparisons of single-center and multicenter cohorts of HCC patients revealed significant differences in OS according to treatment modality after adjustment for prognostic variables. Therefore, the results of retrospective single-center cohort studies of HCC treatments may not be generalizable to real-world practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:从2010年开始,表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)激酶抑制剂厄洛替尼和吉非替尼被引入新西兰奥特亚罗阿(NZ)的常规用途,用于治疗晚期肺癌,但他们在这种环境中的影响是未知的。
    目的:本方案中描述的研究旨在了解这些新的个性化肺癌治疗的有效性和安全性,以及伴随药物和其他因素对新西兰普通患者不良结局的影响。一项子研究旨在验证国家电子健康数据库作为数据源以及确定患者资格和确定结果和变量的方法。
    方法:本研究将包括所有NZ晚期EGFR突变阳性肺癌患者,这些患者在2020年10月1日之前首次分配埃罗替尼或吉非替尼,并随访至死亡或至少1年。定期收集的卫生行政和临床数据将从国家电子癌症注册中进行整理,医院出院,死亡率登记,和药品配药数据库,通过使用国家健康指数数字的确定性数据链接。主要的有效性和安全性结果将是治疗停止和严重不良事件的时间。分别。主要变量将是与厄洛替尼或吉非替尼一起使用的高风险伴随药物。对于验证子研究(n=100),将来自临床记录的数据与来自国家电子健康数据库的数据进行比较,并通过分类数据的协议分析和数字数据的配对双尾t检验进行分析.
    结果:在验证子研究中,在确定患者资格和识别严重不良事件方面达成一致的国家电子健康数据库和临床记录,高风险伴随药物的使用,和其他分类数据,总体一致性和κ统计量分别>90%和>0.8000;例如,为了确定患者的资格,比较适用于国家电子健康数据库和临床记录的代理和标准资格标准,分别,总体一致性和κ统计量分别为96%和0.8936。估计治疗中止时间的日期以及其他数值变量和结果显示出微小的差异,大多具有不显著的P值和95%的CIs重叠零差异;例如,对于第一次分配厄洛替尼或吉非替尼的日期,国家电子健康数据库和临床记录平均差异约4天,P值为.33%,CI为95%,差异为零.截至2024年5月,主要研究正在进行中。
    结论:提出了一项针对全国全患者人群回顾性队列研究的方案,旨在描述埃罗替尼和吉非替尼在新西兰常规使用治疗EGFR突变阳性肺癌的第一个十年期间的安全性和有效性。验证子研究证明了使用国家电子健康数据库以及确定患者资格和确定研究方案中提出的研究结果和变量的方法的可行性和有效性。
    背景:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心ACTRN12615000998549;https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=368928。
    DERR1-10.2196/51381。
    BACKGROUND: Starting in 2010, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib were introduced into routine use in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) for treating advanced lung cancer, but their impact in this setting is unknown.
    OBJECTIVE: The study described in this protocol aims to understand the effectiveness and safety of these new personalized lung cancer treatments and the contributions made by concomitant medicines and other factors to adverse outcomes in the general NZ patient population. A substudy aimed to validate national electronic health databases as the data source and the methods for determining patient eligibility and identifying outcomes and variables.
    METHODS: This study will include all NZ patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer who were first dispensed erlotinib or gefitinib before October 1, 2020, and followed until death or for at least 1 year. Routinely collected health administrative and clinical data will be collated from national electronic cancer registration, hospital discharge, mortality registration, and pharmaceutical dispensing databases by deterministic data linkage using National Health Index numbers. The primary effectiveness and safety outcomes will be time to treatment discontinuation and serious adverse events, respectively. The primary variable will be high-risk concomitant medicines use with erlotinib or gefitinib. For the validation substudy (n=100), data from clinical records were compared to those from national electronic health databases and analyzed by agreement analysis for categorical data and by paired 2-tailed t tests for numerical data.
    RESULTS: In the validation substudy, national electronic health databases and clinical records agreed in determining patient eligibility and for identifying serious adverse events, high-risk concomitant medicines use, and other categorical data with overall agreement and κ statistic of >90% and >0.8000, respectively; for example, for the determination of patient eligibility, the comparison of proxy and standard eligibility criteria applied to national electronic health databases and clinical records, respectively, showed overall agreement and κ statistic of 96% and 0.8936, respectively. Dates for estimating time to treatment discontinuation and other numerical variables and outcomes showed small differences, mostly with nonsignificant P values and 95% CIs overlapping with zero difference; for example, for the dates of the first dispensing of erlotinib or gefitinib, national electronic health databases and clinical records differed on average by approximately 4 days with a nonsignificant P value of .33 and 95% CIs overlapping with zero difference. As of May 2024, the main study is ongoing.
    CONCLUSIONS: A protocol is presented for a national whole-of-patient-population retrospective cohort study designed to describe the safety and effectiveness of erlotinib and gefitinib during their first decade of routine use in NZ for treating EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer. The validation substudy demonstrated the feasibility and validity of using national electronic health databases and the methods for determining patient eligibility and identifying the study outcomes and variables proposed in the study protocol.
    BACKGROUND: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615000998549; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=368928.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/51381.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在炎症性肠病(IBD)的生物治疗前筛查潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)时,指南通常建议将免疫学测定和胸部X射线成像(CXR)结合使用。
    调查在IBD患者开始生物治疗前筛查LTBI/TB时,CXR是否能识别未通过QuantiFERON试验(QFT)鉴定的疑似LTBI/TB患者。
    单中心,炎症性肠病患者在开始生物治疗前进行了QFT和CXR的回顾性队列研究(10月1日,2017年9月30日,2022年)。
    520名患者(56%为女性,平均年龄40.1岁)。大多数人没有或很少有结核病的危险因素(如人口统计学特征所反映的),但有一些风险因素具有假阴性QFT结果(同时进行糖皮质激素治疗和炎症活动)。8例患者(1.5%)QFT结果为阳性,18例(3.5%)无定论,494例(95.0%)阴性。只有1例患者(0.19%)有可疑LTBI的CXR发现。该患者的QFT也呈阳性,随后被诊断为活动性TB。所有QFT阴性或不确定的患者均患有CXR,无任何提示LTBI/TB的发现。尽管在筛选时QFT阴性和CXR正常,但一名患者在开始生物治疗后发展为活动性TB。
    在结核病风险较低的人群中,用CXR补充QFT的好处是有限的,并且不太可能超过患者测试负担的成本,放射性暴露,和经济资源。
    UNASSIGNED: Guidelines generally recommend a combination of immunological assays and chest X-ray imaging (CXR) when screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) prior to biologic treatment in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate whether CXR identify patients with suspected LTBI/TB who were not identified with QuantiFERON tests (QFT) when screening for LTBI/TB before starting biologic treatment in IBD patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with inflammatory bowel disease who had a QFT and a CXR prior to initiation of biologic treatment in a 5-year period (October 1st, 2017 to September 30th, 2022).
    UNASSIGNED: 520 patients (56% female, mean age 40.1 years) were included. The majority had none or few risk factors for TB (as reflected by the demographic characteristics) but some risk factors for having false negative QFT results (concurrent glucocorticoid treatment and inflammatory activity). QFT results were positive in 8 patients (1.5%), inconclusive in 18 (3.5%) and negative in 494 (95.0%). Only 1 patient (0.19%) had CXR findings suspicious of LTBI. This patient also had a positive QFT and was subsequently diagnosed with active TB. All patients with negative or inconclusive QFT had CXR without any findings suggesting LTBI/TB. One patient developed active TB after having initiated biologic treatment in spite of having negative QFT and a normal CXR at screening.
    UNASSIGNED: In a population with low risk of TB, the benefits of supplementing the QFT with a CXR are limited and are unlikely to outweigh the cost in both patient test-burden, radioactive exposure, and economic resources.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2is)与二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP4i)在美国老年成年人和不同亚组中的房颤风险。
    我们使用来自15%的医疗保险按服务收费受益人随机样本的索赔数据进行了回顾性队列分析。患者为成人2型糖尿病(T2D),没有预先存在的AF,并且是在SGLT2i或DPP4i上新启动的。结果是第一次事件AF。逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)用于平衡治疗组之间的基线协变量,包括社会人口统计学,合并症,和共同用药。Cox回归模型用于评估SGLT2i与DPP4i相比对偶发AF的影响。
    在97,436名符合条件的个人中(平均年龄71.2±9.8岁,54.6%女性),1.01%(n=983)在361天的中位随访期间发生房颤。SGLT2i和DPP4i组的调整后发病率为8.39(95%CI:6.67-9.99)和11.70(95%CI:10.9-12.55)每1000人年,分别。与DPP4相比,SGLT2is与房颤事件的风险(HR0.73;95%CI,0.57至0.91;p=0.01)显着降低相关。非西班牙裔白人个体和存在动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病和慢性肾脏疾病的亚组发生房颤的风险降低显著。
    与使用DPP4i相比,SGLT2i与T2D患者房颤风险较低相关.我们的研究结果为SGLT2i预防房颤的有效性提供了现实证据,并支持量身定制的治疗方法,以根据个体特征优化治疗选择。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) compared to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i) use in older US adults and across diverse subgroups.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using claims data from 15% random samples of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. Patients were adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), no preexisting AF, and were newly initiated on SGLT2i or DPP4i. The outcome was the first incident AF. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance the baseline covariates between the treatment groups including sociodemographics, comorbidities, and co-medications. Cox regression models were used to assess the effect of SGLT2i compared to DPP4i on incident AF.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 97,436 eligible individuals (mean age 71.2 ± 9.8 years, 54.6% women), 1.01% (n = 983) had incident AF over a median follow-up of 361 days. The adjusted incidence rate was 8.39 (95% CI: 6.67-9.99) and 11.70 (95% CI: 10.9-12.55) per 1,000 person-years in the SGLT2i and DPP4i groups, respectively. SGLT2is were associated with a significantly lower risk of incident AF (HR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.91; p = 0.01) than DPP4is. The risk reduction of incident AF was significant in non-Hispanic White individuals and subgroups with existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases and chronic kidney disease.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared to the use of DPP4i, that of SGLT2i was associated with a lower risk of AF in patients with T2D. Our findings contribute to the real-world evidence regarding the effectiveness of SGLT2i in preventing AF and support a tailored therapeutic approach to optimize treatment selection based on individual characteristics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:卢森堡在2022年期间由于Omicron变异而经历了主要的连续SARS-CoV-2感染波,同时在2021年实现了高疫苗接种覆盖率。我们调查了与严重结局相关的风险因素(即,住院治疗,死亡)和估计的疫苗有效性(VE)以及先前感染对成人严重结局的免疫作用。
    方法:我们将20岁以上居民中报告的SARS-CoV-2病例与疫苗接种数据以及SARS-CoV-2相关的住院和死亡联系起来。病例随访至与COVID-19相关的入院第14天,并在阳性测试后直至第28天死亡。我们使用比例Cox回归分析了疫苗接种状态和严重形式之间的关联,调整以前的感染,年龄,性和疗养院居民。VE被测量为接种疫苗与未接种疫苗的个体的1-调整的风险比。使用调整后的风险比和疫苗接种类别内的病例比例计算了人口可预防比例。
    结果:在2021年12月至2023年3月之间,我们记录了187143例SARS-CoV-2病例,1728例(0.93%)住院,611例(0.33%)死亡。严重结局的风险随着年龄的增长而增加,男性和疗养院居民的比例更高。与未接种疫苗的成年人相比,对于完整的主要疫苗接种周期,住院的VE为38.8%(95CI:28.1%-47.8%),一个助推器的62.1%(95CI:57.0%-66.7%),两次加强剂量为71.6%(95CI:66.7%-76.2%)。对死亡的价值分别为49.5%(95CI:30.8%-63.3%),69.0%(95CI:61.2%-75.3%)和76.2%(95CI:68.4%-82.2%)。以前的感染与较低的住院或死亡风险无关。接种疫苗使死亡率降低了55.8%(95CI:46.3%-62.8%),住院率降低了49.1%(95CI:43.4%-54.4%)。
    结论:完全接种疫苗和加强而非既往感染对住院和死亡具有保护作用。卢森堡的疫苗接种计划导致在人口水平上与SARS-CoV-2相关的死亡率和住院率大大降低。
    BACKGROUND: Luxembourg experienced major consecutive SARS-CoV-2 infection waves due to Omicron variants during 2022 while having achieved a high vaccination coverage in 2021. We investigated the risk factors associated to severe outcomes (i.e., hospitalisation, deaths) and estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) as well as the role of immunity conferred by prior infections against severe outcomes in adults.
    METHODS: We linked reported SARS-CoV-2 cases among residents aged ≥ 20 years with vaccination data and SARS-CoV-2 related hospitalisations and deaths. Cases were followed-up until day 14 for COVID-19 related hospital admission and up to day 28 for mortality after a positive test. We analysed the association between the vaccination status and severe forms using proportional Cox regression, adjusting for previous infection, age, sex and nursing homes residency. VE was measured as 1-adjusted hazard ratio of vaccinated vs unvaccinated individuals. The population preventable fraction was computed using the adjusted hazard ratio and the proportion of cases within the vaccination category.
    RESULTS: Between December 2021, and March 2023, we recorded 187143 SARS-CoV-2 cases, 1728 (0.93%) hospitalizations and 611 (0.33%) deaths. The risk of severe outcomes increased with age, was higher among men and nursing home residents. Compared to unvaccinated adults, VE against hospitalization was 38.8% (95%CI: 28.1%-47.8%) for a complete primary cycle of vaccination, 62.1% (95%CI: 57.0%-66.7%) for one booster, and 71.6% (95%CI: 66.7%-76.2%) for two booster doses. VE against death was respectively 49.5% (95%CI: 30.8%-63.3%), 69.0% (95%CI: 61.2%-75.3%) and 76.2% (95%CI: 68.4%-82.2%). Previous infection was not associated with lower risk of hospitalisation or mortality. The vaccination lowered mortality by 55.8 % (95%CI: 46.3%-62.8%) and reduced hospital admissions by 49.1% (95%CI: 43.4%-54.4%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Complete vaccination and booster but not previous infection were protective against hospitalization and death. The vaccination program in Luxembourg led to substantial reductions in SARS-CoV-2-related mortality and hospitalizations at the population level.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:新生儿禁欲综合征(NAS),很大程度上是产前阿片类药物暴露的结果,导致大量发病率。超出医疗补助人群和出院数据(HDD)的基于人群的NAS研究是有限的。使用全州田纳西州(TN)硬盘和出生证明(BC)数据,我们研究了与NAS相关的趋势并评估了母婴因素.
    方法:我们在2013-2017年在TN进行了一项基于人群的描述性研究。在HDD中使用国际疾病分类(ICD)-9-临床修改(CM)和ICD-10-CM代码识别NAS婴儿,并使用迭代确定性匹配算法链接到BC数据。通过NAS(结果)对婴儿和母亲因素(暴露)进行描述性分析。多变量逻辑回归模型用于估计校正OR和95%CI。
    结果:在2013-2017年期间,每千名活产的NAS发病率从13.4增加到15.4(增加15%;趋势<0.001),但在2017年保持稳定。在调整后的模型中,与NAS发生几率降低相关的母体因素包括母乳喂养(OR:0.55,95CI:0.52-0.59)和产前护理(OR:0.36,95CI:0.32-0.41).吸烟,早产和低出生体重与NAS发生几率增加相关.
    结论:本研究强调了利用监测数据监测NAS的趋势和相关性,为预防工作和公共卫生资源的针对性提供信息的价值。
    BACKGROUND: Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), largely a consequence of prenatal opioid exposure, results in substantial morbidity. Population-based studies of NAS going beyond Medicaid populations and hospital discharge data (HDD) alone are limited. Using statewide Tennessee (TN) HDD and birth certificate (BC) data, we examined trends and evaluated maternal and infant factors associated with NAS.
    METHODS: We conducted a population-based descriptive study during 2013-2017 in TN. NAS infants were identified with International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9-Clinical Modification (CM) and ICD-10-CM codes in HDD and linked to BC data using iterative deterministic matching algorithms. Descriptive analyses were conducted for infant and maternal factors (exposures) by NAS (outcome). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted ORs and 95% CIs.
    RESULTS: NAS incidence increased from 13.4 to 15.4 per 1,000 live births between 2013-2017 (15% increase; ptrend<0.001), but remained stable in 2017. In adjusted models, maternal factors associated with reduced odds of NAS included breastfeeding (OR:0.55, 95%CI:0.52-0.59) and prenatal care (OR:0.36, 95%CI:0.32-0.41). Smoking, preterm birth and lower birthweight were associated with increased odds of NAS.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the value of utilizing surveillance data to monitor trends and correlates of NAS to inform prevention efforts and targeting of public health resources.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项回顾性队列研究旨在确定妇科癌症患者在任何治疗前的贫血患病率,并确定与该组贫血相关的因素。我们回顾性分析18岁及以上女性患者的数据,2016年2月至2021年3月在西南医科大学附属医院诊断为各种形式的妇科癌症。在任何癌症治疗之前,根据最新的CBC结果评估贫血。资格基于明确的组织病理学诊断。关键变量包括人口统计细节,临床特征,和血细胞计数,关注血红蛋白水平。采用Logistic回归模型进行统计分析,贫血定义为女性的血红蛋白水平低于12g/dL,根据WHO标准。在320名参与者中,发现贫血的患病率很高。贫血与年龄等因素之间的相关性,教育水平,和生物标记(铁,叶酸,和维生素B12水平)进行鉴定。在我们的研究中,我们发现,在任何治疗之前,妇科癌症患者的贫血患病率为59.06%,表明该人群中存在重大健康问题。该研究强调了妇科癌症患者贫血的患病率,强调需要定期血红蛋白筛查和个性化管理。这些发现表明,在该患者组中,在贫血管理中考虑各种特征和临床变量的重要性。需要进一步的研究来探索这些因素对患者预后的长期影响,并制定有针对性的干预措施。
    This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine the prevalence of anemia among patients with gynecological cancer prior to any treatment and to identify contributing factors associated with anemia in this group. We retrospectively analyzed data from female patients aged 18 and above, diagnosed with various forms of gynecological cancer at The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University between February 2016 and March 2021. Anemia was assessed based on the most recent CBC results before any cancer treatment. Eligibility was based on a definitive histopathological diagnosis. Key variables included demographic details, clinical characteristics, and blood counts, focusing on hemoglobin levels. Statistical analysis was conducted using logistic regression models, and anemia was defined as hemoglobin levels below 12 g/dL for women, according to WHO criteria. Of the 320 participants, a significant prevalence of anemia was found. Correlations between anemia and factors like age, educational level, and biological markers (iron, folic acid, and vitamin B12 levels) were identified. In our study, we found that the prevalence of anemia among patients with gynecological cancer prior to any treatment was 59.06%, indicating a significant health concern within this population. The study highlights a significant prevalence of anemia in patients with gynecological cancer, emphasizing the need for regular hemoglobin screening and individualized management. These findings suggest the importance of considering various characteristics and clinical variables in anemia management among this patient group. Further studies are needed to explore the long-term effects of these factors on patient outcomes and to develop targeted interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号