retroperitoneal liposarcoma

腹膜后脂肪肉瘤
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:腹膜后脂肪肉瘤(RPLPS)是一种相对罕见的疾病。脂肪肉瘤大小不同,但是直径大于30厘米的相当大的RPLPS非常罕见,他们的诊断和治疗提出了重大挑战。
    方法:我们报告了一名58岁的男性患者,因腹围增大入院,后来被诊断为巨大的RPLPS。发现脂肪肉瘤粘附在右肾和整个输尿管上,侵入升结肠.患者接受了完整的联合手术切除。肿瘤完整切除,55.0厘米×30.0厘米×18.0厘米,重19.8kg。组织病理学分析显示高分化脂肪肉瘤(WDLPS)。患者顺利出院,随访6个月,无复发迹象。
    结论:RPLPS是一种罕见的肿瘤,临床表现不典型。手术仍然是治疗腹膜后肉瘤的最有效方法。如果有当地入侵,则完全删除。术前检查,包括三维(3D)重建,是手术成功的关键.辅助放疗或化疗的作用仍存在争议。然而,临床医生不应排除他们是可行的选择.
    BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLPS) is a relatively rare disease. Liposarcomas vary in size, but sizeable RPLPS larger than 30 cm in diameter are very rare, and their diagnosis and treatment present significant challenges.
    METHODS: We report a 58-year-old male patient who was admitted to the hospital with an increased abdominal circumference and was later diagnosed with a giant RPLPS. The liposarcoma was found to adhere to the right kidney and the entire ureter, invading the ascending colon. The patient underwent complete combined surgical resection. The tumor was removed intact, measured 55.0 cm × 30.0 cm × 18.0 cm, and weighed 19.8 kg. Histopathologic analysis revealed well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS). The patient was successfully discharged from the hospital and followed up for 6 months with no signs of recurrence.
    CONCLUSIONS: RPLPS is a rare tumor with atypical clinical presentation. Surgery remains the most effective method of treatment for retroperitoneal sarcomas, with complete removal if there is local invasion. Preoperative examination, including three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction, is essential for surgical success. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy remains controversial. However, clinicians should not rule them out as viable options.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多内脏切除术是腹膜后脂肪肉瘤(RLPS)的标准治疗方法。营养不良往往会导致手术并发症增加和生存率降低。这项研究的目的是确定营养状况在RLPS患者中的预后作用。
    回顾性分析了2011年4月至2022年8月在北京大学肿瘤医院肉瘤中心接受手术治疗的189例RLPS患者的数据。计算了以下营养参数:营养风险指数,2002年预后营养指数(PNI)和营养风险筛查。进行了时间依赖性受试者工作特征(时间-ROC)曲线分析,以比较营养指标的预后效用。营养指标与主要并发症之间的关系,研究了无局部复发生存期(LRFS)和总生存期(OS).
    基于时间-ROC曲线分析,PNI在预测OS方面优于其他营养指数.PNI的最佳截止值为41.2。PNI与肿瘤大小呈显著负相关,肿瘤分级,和组织学亚型。低PNI组(<41.2)患者的LRFS和OS明显短于高PNI组(≥41.2),主要发病率和死亡率较高。发现PNI是在多变量分析中独立预测LRFS和OS的独特营养预测因子。
    PNI是RLPS患者营养评估的有效工具。RLPS患者的低PNI值预示着较差的生存结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Extended surgery with multi-visceral resection is the standard treatment for retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS). Malnutrition tends to result in increased surgical complications and reduced survival. The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic role of nutritional status in patients with RLPS.
    UNASSIGNED: Data from 189 consecutive patients with RLPS who underwent surgical treatment at the Peking University Cancer Hospital Sarcoma Center between April 2011 and August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The following nutritional parameters were calculated: nutritional risk index, prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and Nutrition Risk Screening 2002. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (time-ROC) curve analysis was conducted to compare the prognostic utility of nutritional indicators. The associations between nutritional indicators and major complications, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated.
    UNASSIGNED: Based on the time-ROC curve analysis, the PNI was superior to other nutritional indices at predicting OS. The optimal cut-off value of PNI was 41.2. The PNI was significantly inversely associated with tumor size, tumor grade, and histological subtype. Patients in the low PNI group (< 41.2) had significantly shorter LRFS and OS than those in the high PNI (≥ 41.2) group, with higher major morbidity and mortality rates. The PNI was found to be a unique nutritional predictor that independently predicted LRFS and OS in the multivariate analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: The PNI is an effective tool for nutritional assessment in patients with RLPS. A low PNI value in patients with RLPS predicts worse survival outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:腹膜后脂肪肉瘤(RLPS)的根治性切除可能需要血管切除和重建。进行该研究以评估具有主要血管受累的RLPS的手术结果。
    方法:2011年4月至2022年12月在北京大学肿瘤医院肉瘤中心接受手术切除的RLPS患者从前瞻性维护的数据库中进行鉴定。患者分为两组:血管切除组和非血管切除组。进行倾向评分匹配分析以消除组间的基线差异。分析手术细节和术后结果。此外,评估了无局部复发生存期(LRFS)和总生存期(OS)的预后因素.
    结果:总体而言,199例患者被确定,中位随访期为48个月(四分位距[IQR]45-69)。42例(21%)患者行血管切除,其中25人血管浸润。共有39例患者进行了血管置换,3例患者进行了部分切除术(侧壁切除术)。血管切除的主要发病率较高(38%vs.14%,p<0.001)和30天死亡率(7.1%vs.1.3%,p=0.005)。经过倾向匹配分析,接受血管切除术的患者的5年LRFS和OS率与无血管受累的患者相当.大血管切除不是LRFS或OS的独立危险因素。
    结论:尽管伴随着重大发病率和死亡率的风险增加,大血管切除使晚期RLPS患者能够进行根治性切除,与没有提供的5年期LRFS和OS费率相比,提供可比的5年期LRFS和OS费率。
    OBJECTIVE: Radical resection of retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS) may necessitate vascular resection and reconstruction. The study was conducted to assess surgical outcomes of surgery for RLPS with major vascular involvement.
    METHODS: Patients with RLPS who underwent surgical resection at the Sarcoma Center of Peking University Cancer Hospital between April 2011 and December 2022 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were classified into two groups: vascular resection and non-vascular resection groups. A propensity score matching analysis was performed to eliminate baseline differences between the groups. Surgical details and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Furthermore, prognostic factors for local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed.
    RESULTS: Overall, 199 patients were identified and the median follow-up period was 48 (interquartile range [IQR] 45-69) months. Vascular resection was performed in 42 (21%) patients, 25 of whom had vascular infiltration. A total of 39 patients had vascular replacement and 3 patients underwent partial resection (side-wall resection). Vascular resection was burdened by higher rates of major morbidity (38% vs. 14%, p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (7.1% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.005). After propensity-matched analysis, patients who underwent vascular resection had 5-year LRFS and OS rates comparable to those without vascular involvement. Major vascular resection was not an independent risk factor for LRFS or OS.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although accompanied by increased risks of major morbidity and mortality, the major vascular resection enabled radical resection in patients with advanced RLPS, affording comparable 5-year LRFS and OS rates compared to those who did not.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们开发了可解释的机器学习模型来预测腹膜后脂肪肉瘤(RLPS)患者的总生存期(OS)。这种方法旨在增强我们建模结果的可解释性和透明度。
    方法:我们从监测中收集RLPS患者的临床病理信息,流行病学,和最终结果(SEER)数据库,并以7:3的比例将它们分配到训练集和验证集。同时,我们从海军医科大学第一附属医院(上海,中国)。我们进行了LASSO回归和多变量Cox比例风险分析,以识别相关的危险因素,然后将其组合以开发六个机器学习(ML)模型:Cox比例风险模型(Coxph),随机生存森林(RSF),游侠,使用分量线性模型(GBM)的梯度增强,决策树,提升树木。使用一致性指数(C指数)评估了这些ML模型的预测性能,积分累积/动态曲线下面积(AUC),和综合Brier得分,以及Cox-Snell残差图。我们还使用了时间依赖的变量重要性,部分依赖生存图的分析,和聚集生存Shapley加法扩张(SurvSHAP)图的生成,以提供最优模型的全局解释。此外,SurvSHAP(t)和生存局部可解释模型不可知解释(SurvLIME)图用于提供最佳模型的局部解释。
    结果:最终的ML模型由六个因素组成:患者的年龄,性别,婚姻状况,手术史,以及肿瘤的组织病理学分类,组织学分级,SEER阶段。我们的预后模型表现出显著的判别能力,特别是在游侠模型表现最佳的情况下。在训练集中,验证集,和外部验证集,1、3和5年OS的AUC均高于0.83,Brier积分始终低于0.15.游侠模型的可解释性分析还表明,组织学分级,组织病理学分类,年龄是预测操作系统的最重要因素。
    结论:rangerML预后模型表现出最佳性能,可用于预测RLPS患者的OS,为临床医生提前做出明智的决定提供有价值和关键的参考。
    OBJECTIVE: We have developed explainable machine learning models to predict the overall survival (OS) of retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS) patients. This approach aims to enhance the explainability and transparency of our modeling results.
    METHODS: We collected clinicopathological information of RLPS patients from The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and allocated them into training and validation sets with a 7:3 ratio. Simultaneously, we obtained an external validation cohort from The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Shanghai, China). We performed LASSO regression and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis to identify relevant risk factors, which were then combined to develop six machine learning (ML) models: Cox proportional hazards model (Coxph), random survival forest (RSF), ranger, gradient boosting with component-wise linear models (GBM), decision trees, and boosting trees. The predictive performance of these ML models was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), the integrated cumulative/dynamic area under the curve (AUC), and the integrated Brier score, as well as the Cox-Snell residual plot. We also used time-dependent variable importance, analysis of partial dependence survival plots, and the generation of aggregated survival SHapley Additive exPlanations (SurvSHAP) plots to provide a global explanation of the optimal model. Additionally, SurvSHAP (t) and survival local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (SurvLIME) plots were used to provide a local explanation of the optimal model.
    RESULTS: The final ML models are consisted of six factors: patient\'s age, gender, marital status, surgical history, as well as tumor\'s histopathological classification, histological grade, and SEER stage. Our prognostic model exhibits significant discriminative ability, particularly with the ranger model performing optimally. In the training set, validation set, and external validation set, the AUC for 1, 3, and 5 year OS are all above 0.83, and the integrated Brier scores are consistently below 0.15. The explainability analysis of the ranger model also indicates that histological grade, histopathological classification, and age are the most influential factors in predicting OS.
    CONCLUSIONS: The ranger ML prognostic model exhibits optimal performance and can be utilized to predict the OS of RLPS patients, offering valuable and crucial references for clinical physicians to make informed decisions in advance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    空肠肠套叠作为腹膜后脂肪肉瘤(RLPS)的表现很少发生。大部分RLPS表现为腹部肿块,然而,有空肠阻塞是一个有趣的案例。目的是描述并发RLPS的非典型脂肪瘤性肿瘤继发的空肠肠套叠的处理。一名61岁的女士突然出现肠梗阻,伴有1个月的宪法症状和右腰椎肿块扩大。计算机断层扫描显示小肠肠套叠伴弥漫性腹膜和腹膜后脂肪瘤病。急诊剖腹探查术,节段性肠切除术,行腹膜内肠系膜脂肪瘤部分切除术。随后进行了RLPS的整块切除术和右肾切除术。然而,她拒绝了随后的手术。完全切除是管理RLPS的金标准。在这份报告中,由于患者首先出现肠梗阻,需要通过零碎切除术进行紧急复位,因此治疗不符合标准。需要分期手术来确定有希望的预后,但是病人拒绝了这种手术。成人小肠套叠很少见,但主要由肿瘤或肿瘤引起。应尽早认识到病例的复杂性,并将其转介给三级团队进行进一步的明确手术。随后手术的患者精疲力竭可能会妨碍该病例的唯一可用管理。
    A jejunal intussusception as a presentation of retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS) is a rare occurrence. The majority of RLPS are presented as an abdominal mass, however, having a jejunal obstruction is an interesting case. The aim is to describe the management of jejunal intussusception secondary to atypical lipomatous tumours with concurrent RLPS. A 61-year-old lady presented with a sudden onset of intestinal obstruction with 1 month of constitutional symptoms and an enlarging right lumbar mass. Computed tomography showed a small bowel intussusception with diffuse peritoneal and retroperitoneal lipomatosis. Emergency exploratory laparotomy, segmental bowel resection, and partial excision of intraperitoneal mesenteric lipoma were performed. A stage En-bloc resection of the RLPS and right nephrectomy was done later. However, she refused for subsequent surgery. A complete resection is the gold standard in managing RLPS. In this report, the management is rendered not to the standard as the patient first presented with intestinal obstruction requiring emergency reduction with a piecemeal resection. A stage surgery was required to determine a promising prognosis, but the patient refused such surgery. A small bowel intussusception in adults is rare but is mostly caused by a tumor or neoplasm. Early recognition of the complexity of the case should be preempted and referred to the tertiary team for further definitive surgery. Patient exhaustion from the subsequent surgery might hamper the only management available for the case.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    腹膜后脂肪肉瘤(RPLPS)是一种罕见的恶性肿瘤,通常通过手术切除治疗。然而,RPLPS常具有较高的局部复发率,这使得探索新的治疗方案变得至关重要。在这份报告中,我们介绍了一例中年妇女,她经历了7次复发,并在初次切除后接受了7次手术。目前,患者的病情在第8次手术后保持稳定。尽管国内和国际上都有许多关于RPLPS病例的报道,像这样反复复发的例子非常罕见。因此,我们收集了患者的病例数据并进行了回顾性分析,结合相关文献,以提高临床医生对这种疾病的认识。
    Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLPS) is a rare malignant tumor that is typically treated with surgical resection. However, RPLPS often has a high rate of local recurrence, making it crucial to explore new treatment options. In this report, we present the case of a middle-aged woman who experienced seven recurrences and underwent seven surgeries following the initial resection. Currently, the patient\'s condition remains stable after the eighth surgery. Although there have been numerous reports of RPLPS cases both domestically and internationally, instances of repeated recurrence like this are exceptionally rare. Therefore, we have gathered the patient\'s case data and conducted a retrospective analysis, incorporating relevant literature, to enhance the understanding of this disease among clinical practitioners.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹膜后脂肪肉瘤(RPLS)以其局部复发和生存时间短的倾向而闻名。我们旨在确定RPLS的可靠和特异性预后生物标志物。
    方法:纳入癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)肉瘤数据集的病例作为训练组。使用加权基因共表达网络分析(WGCNA)构建共表达模块以探索模块与存活之间的关联。使用Kaplan-Meier方法进行hub基因的存活分析。此外,我们对来自腹膜后肉瘤注册(RESAR)研究(NCT03838718)的135例中国RPLS患者进行了独立外部验证.
    结果:基于TCGA组群中26,497个RNA的表达水平构建了总共19个共表达模块。在这些模块中,绿色模块与总生存期呈正相关(OS,p=0.10)和无病生存率(DFS,p=0.06)。基因集富集分析表明,绿色模块与内吞和软组织肉瘤有关。生存分析表明,NINJ1,绿色模块内的枢纽基因,在TCGA队列中与OS呈正相关(p=0.019)。此外,在验证队列中,NINJ1表达水平较高的患者的OS(p=0.023)和DFS(p=0.012)的生存概率较高.多变量Cox分析进一步证实了NINJ1的独立预后意义。
    结论:我们在这里为建立RPLS的共识预后生物标志物提供了基础,这不仅应便于医疗治疗,还应指导新型靶向药物的开发。
    BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS) is known for its propensity for local recurrence and short survival time. We aimed to identify a credible and specific prognostic biomarker for RPLS.
    METHODS: Cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) sarcoma dataset were included as the training group. Co-expression modules were constructed using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to explore associations between modules and survival. Survival analysis of hub genes was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. In addition, independent external validation was performed on a cohort of 135 Chinese RPLS patients from the REtroperitoneal SArcoma Registry (RESAR) study (NCT03838718).
    RESULTS: A total of 19 co-expression modules were constructed based on the expression levels of 26,497 RNAs in the TCGA cohort. Among these modules, the green module exhibited a positive correlation with overall survival (OS, p = 0.10) and disease-free survival (DFS, p = 0.06). Gene set enrichment analysis showed that the green module was associated with endocytosis and soft-tissue sarcomas. Survival analysis demonstrated that NINJ1, a hub gene within the green module, was positively associated with OS (p = 0.019) in the TCGA cohort. Moreover, in the validation cohort, patients with higher NINJ1 expression levels displayed a higher probability of survival for both OS (p = 0.023) and DFS (p = 0.012). Multivariable Cox analysis further confirmed the independent prognostic significance of NINJ1.
    CONCLUSIONS: We here provide a foundation for the establishment of a consensus prognostic biomarker for RPLS, which should not only facilitate medical treatment but also guide the development of novel targeted drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹膜后脂肪肉瘤(RLPS)患者通常进行同侧肾的多内脏整块切除术。我们评估了肾切除术对RLPS患者短期和长期预后的影响。
    方法:分析来自北京大学肿瘤医院肉瘤中心2011年4月至2022年8月前瞻性维护数据库的数据。我们将接受手术的RLPS患者分为肾切除术组(NP)和非肾切除术组(非NP)。使用1:1倾向评分对患者进行匹配,以消除组间的基线差异。术后肾功能结果,主要发病率,分析和死亡率,以比较肾切除术后的短期结局.通过Kaplan-Meier分析比较了无局部复发生存率(LRFS)和总生存率(OS)在肿瘤获益方面的差异。
    结果:在匹配的队列中,NP组患者术后eGFR和CKD分期明显较高,但都不需要透析.NP和非NP之间的患者具有相当的主要发病率(p=0.820)和60天死亡率(p=0.475)。NP组患者的5年LRFS率高于非NP组(34.5vs.17.8%,p=0.015),和类似的5年操作系统率(52.4与47.1%,p=0.401)。肾切除术是LRFS的独立危险因素,但不适用于重大发病率或OS。
    结论:肾切除术的RLPS切除与肾损害的轻度进展有关;然而,透析是罕见的。完全切除RLPS的整块肾切除术是安全的,并改善了局部控制。
    BACKGROUND: Multivisceral en bloc resection with the ipsilateral kidney is commonly performed in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS). We evaluated the effect of nephrectomy on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with RLPS.
    METHODS: Data from a prospectively maintained database of the Peking University Cancer Hospital Sarcoma Center between April 2011 and August 2022 were analyzed. We classified the RLPS patients who underwent surgery into nephrectomy group (NP) and non-nephrectomy group (non-NP). Patients were matched using a 1:1 propensity score to eliminate baseline differences between groups. Postoperative renal function outcomes, major morbidity, and mortality were analyzed to compare short-term outcomes after nephrectomy. Differences in local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis with respect to oncological benefits.
    RESULTS: In the matched cohort, patients in the NP group had significantly higher postoperative eGFR and CKD stages, but none required dialysis. Patients between NP and non-NP had a comparable major morbidity (p = 0.820) and 60-day mortality (p = 0.475). Patients in the NP group had a higher 5-year LRFS rates than those in the non-NP group (34.5 vs. 17.8%, p = 0.015), and similar 5-year OS rates (52.4 vs. 47.1%, p = 0.401). Nephrectomy was an independent risk factor for LRFS, but not for major morbidity or OS.
    CONCLUSIONS: RLPS resection with nephrectomy is related to a mild progression of renal impairment; however, dialysis is rare. En bloc nephrectomy for complete resection of RLPS is safe and improves local control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肌脂瘤是罕见的肿瘤,通常难以与脂肪肉瘤区分。在这里,我们报告一例切除的巨大肌脂瘤术前诊断为脂肪肉瘤。一名63岁的妇女在202X年10月被怀疑患有大型腹膜后脂肪肉瘤。患者被转诊至我们部门进行肿瘤切除和组织学诊断。在与泌尿科协商后,妇产科,和血管外科,计划切除肿瘤,包括其他器官的潜在切除。术中发现了一个大的,弹性,具有光滑表面和占据整个腹腔的囊膜的软肿瘤。肿瘤附着在胃上,左结肠,和子宫附件,没有观察到入侵。肿瘤完全切除,器官切除是不必要的。肿瘤直径为40cm,重量为4.0kg。病理检查和免疫染色证实了肌脂肪瘤的诊断。病人的术后过程是顺利的,术后第10天出院,无并发症。手术后12个月,病人做得很好。据我们所知,我们报道了迄今为止报道的最大的腹膜后肌脂肪瘤的完整切除术.医生应该考虑手术,甚至对于可能难以完全切除的疑似大型肉瘤。
    Myolipomas are rare tumors that are often difficult to differentiate from liposarcoma. Herein, we report a case of resected giant myolipoma preoperatively diagnosed as liposarcoma. A 63-year-old woman was suspected of having a large retroperitoneal liposarcoma on October 202X. The patient was referred to our department for tumor resection and a histological diagnosis. After consultation with the urology, obstetric and gynecology, and vascular surgery departments, tumor resection was planned, including the potential resection of other organs. Intraoperative findings revealed a large, elastic, soft tumor with a smooth surface and a capsule occupying the entire abdominal cavity. The tumor was adherent to the stomach, left colon, and uterine adnexa, and no invasion was observed. The tumor was completely resected, and organ resection was not necessary. The tumor was 40 cm in diameter and 4.0 kg in weight. Pathological examination and immunostaining confirmed a diagnosis of myolipoma. The patient\'s postoperative course was uneventful, and she was discharged on postoperative day 10 with no complications. Twelve months after surgery, the patient was doing well. To the best of our knowledge, we report a complete resection of the largest retroperitoneal myolipoma reported to date. Physicians should consider surgery, even for suspected large sarcomas that may be difficult to resect completely.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:短期(≤1年)复发(STR)是影响腹膜后脂肪肉瘤(RPLS)手术切除患者生活质量和生存时间的主要决定因素,发病机制复杂而模糊的状况。目的分析RPLS和原发性腹膜后脂肪肉瘤(PRPLS)病例与STR相关的危险因素。
    方法:对于这项回顾性观察研究,共选择296例RPLS作为研究对象,在随访期间出现肿瘤复发。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计局部无复发生存率(LRFS),随后使用对数秩检验进行组间比较。随后的分析涉及单变量和多变量逻辑回归,以确定RPLS病例中STR的预测因子。此外,建立PRPLS的逻辑回归模型.
    结果:1-,3-,296例RPLS的5年LRFS率为51.7%,16.9%,和7.1%,分别。在单变量分析中,发现几个因素与STR有关,包括术前中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率(NLR),吸烟史,手术频率,联合器官切除,手术时间,术中出血,转移到重症监护病房(ICU),多原发肿瘤,肿瘤形状和包膜特征,组织学亚型,和肿瘤坏死的存在。术前NLR升高,手术频率≥3次,转移到ICU,多原发肿瘤的存在,肿瘤坏死被确定为手术切除的RPLS中STR的独立危险因素。相反,糖尿病,完整的肿瘤包膜,分化良好的组织学亚型似乎是独立的保护因素。PRPLS分析表明,肿瘤包膜和肿瘤坏死是STR的独立预测因素。
    结论:术前NLR升高,手术频率≥3次,转移到ICU,多原发肿瘤的存在,肿瘤坏死,和肿瘤包膜有望作为STR手术切除的RPLS和PRPLS的预测因素。
    BACKGROUND: The short-term (≤ 1 year) recurrence (STR) is the primary determinant impacting both the life quality and survival duration in patients who have undergone surgical resection for retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS), a condition with intricate and ambiguous pathogenesis. The purpose of this study was to analyze the risk factors associated with STR in cases of RPLS and primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma (PRPLS).
    METHODS: For this retrospective observational study, a total of 296 RPLS cases were selected as research subjects, who experienced tumor recurrence during the follow-up period. The Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and subsequently compared between groups utilizing the log-rank test. The subsequent analyses involved univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of STR in RPLS cases. Additionally, a logistic regression model was constructed for PRPLS.
    RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year LRFS rates of the 296 RPLS cases were 51.7%, 16.9%, and 7.1%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, several factors were found to be associated with STR, including preoperative neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), smoking history, surgical frequency, combined organ excision, operative time, intraoperative bleeding, transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU), multiple primary tumors, tumor shape and capsule characteristics, histological subtype, and presence of tumor necrosis. The elevated preoperative NLR, surgical frequency of ≥ 3 times, transfer to the ICU, presence of multiple primary tumors, and tumor necrosis were identified as independent risk factors for STR in surgically resected RPLS. Conversely, diabetes, intact tumor capsule, and well-differentiated histological subtype appeared to be independent protective factors. Analysis for PRPLS revealed that tumor capsule and tumor necrosis were independent predictors of STR.
    CONCLUSIONS: The elevated preoperative NLR, surgical frequency of ≥ 3 times, transfer to the ICU, presence of multiple primary tumors, tumor necrosis, and tumor capsule were expected to serve as predictive factors of STR for surgical resected RPLS and PRPLS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号