retroperitoneal access

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这篇文章中,试图阐明经皮内镜下坏死切除术(PEN)在胰腺坏死介入治疗中的作用.对当前文献进行了全面审查,以确定有关PEN在急性坏死性胰腺炎后果患者中的作用的出版物。该研究的目的是回顾有关微创坏死切除术的文献,重点是使用食管自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)的PEN。所描述的结果来自对当前文献进行回顾后的15项研究。研究组包括52名患者(36名男性和16名女性;平均年龄,50.87(13-75)年),伴有胰腺坏死,使用自膨式食管支架进行PEN的患者。所有52例患者(100%)均顺利完成PEN。18/52例(34.62%)患者出现PEN并发症。42/52(80.77%)患者获得临床成功,随访平均136天(14-557天)。总之,PEN技术可能是有效的,具有可接受的并发症发生率,并且可以在胰腺坏死患者中实施并取得良好的临床效果。
    In this article, an attempt was made to clarify the role of percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy (PEN) in the interventional treatment of pancreatic necrosis. A comprehensive review of the current literature was performed to identify publications on the role of PEN in patients with consequences of acute necrotizng pancreatitis. The aim of the study was to review the literature on minimal invasive necrosectomy, with emphasis on PEN using esophageal self-expanding metal stents (SEMS). The described results come from 15 studies after a review of the current literature. The study group comprised 52 patients (36 men and 16 women; mean age, 50.87 (13-75) years) with walled-off pancreatic necrosis, in whom PEN using a self-expandable esophageal stent had been performed. PEN was successfully completed in all 52 patients (100%). PEN complications were observed in 18/52 (34.62%) patients. Clinical success was achieved in 42/52 (80.77%) patients, with follow-up continuing for an average of 136 (14-557) days. In conclusion, the PEN technique is potentially effective, with an acceptable rate of complications and may be implemented with good clinical results in patients with pancreatic necrosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腰椎融合术是脊柱外科中最常见的手术之一。对于其实施,前外侧(腰大前)入路(斜腰椎椎间融合术,OLIF)由于其高疗效和安全性,现在越来越多地使用。然而,关于使用该技术的临床和放射学结果的信息仍然很少。该研究的目的是分析文献中提出的OLIF治疗腰椎疾病的安全性和有效性。
    使用OvidMedline进行了系统的电子搜索,PubMed,还有ELIBRARY.RU电子数据库。使用了以下搜索关键字:斜腰椎椎间融合,OLIF,腰大前腰椎椎间融合术,和ATP。
    最后分析,选择了17个来源;共有2900名患者。总并发症发生率为13.9%(403例)。严重持续性并发症的发生率小于1%。根据获得的数据,我们比较了OLIF与其他腰椎融合方法的临床和放射学结果。
    OLIF是一种有效的,多才多艺,和微创腰椎融合术的选择,并发症相对较少,这使得它优于其他腹膜后方法。然而,OLIF技术并非完全没有与腹侧入路相关的并发症,它不能在所有情况下提供足够的椎管减压。此外,在脊柱畸形的情况下,前路手术的应用仍然有限;主要结合后路手术可以实现适当的畸形矫正。
    Lumbar spinal fusion is one of the most common operations in spinal surgery. For its implementation, anterolateral (pre-psoas) approach (oblique lumbar interbody fusion, OLIF) is now increasingly used due to its high efficacy and safety. However, there is still little information on the clinical and radiological results of using this technique. The aim of the study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of OLIF in the treatment of lumbar spine disorders as presented in the literature.
    The systematic electronic search was performed using the Ovid Medline, PubMed, and eLIBRARY.RU electronic databases. The following search key words were used: Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion, OLIF, Anterior to Psoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and ATP.
    For the final analysis, 17 sources were selected; with a total of 2900 patients. Total complication rate was 13.9% (403 cases). The incidence of severe persistent complications was less than 1%. Based on the data obtained, we compared the clinical and radiological results of OLIF with other lumbar fusion methods.
    OLIF is an effective, versatile, and minimally traumatic option for lumbar fusion with relatively few complications, which makes it superior to other retroperitoneal approaches. However, the OLIF technique is not completely free of complications associated with the ventral approach, and it cannot provide adequate decompression of the spinal canal in all cases. In addition, anterior approach surgery is still of limited use in cases of spinal deformities; adequate correction of deformity is achievable mainly in combination with posterior surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    微创手术仍然是兽医学实验和临床研究的活跃领域。我们在这一领域取得的进展对应于我们的患者的多重益处。新的MIS方法(腹膜后,注意,机器人技术)继续进行研究,以提供更好的可视化和操作特定程序的重要解剖结构。增加可用于我们的患者人群的MIS技术的数量是临床医生和业主最关心的问题,并鼓励令人兴奋的新临床研究。新技术(近红外荧光,带刺缝合线,3D打印)处于这些发展的最前沿。
    Minimally invasive surgery continues to be an active area of experimental and clinical research in veterinary medicine. The advances we make in this field correspond to multiple benefits for our patients. New MIS approaches (retroperitoneal, NOTES, robotics) continue to be investigated to provide better visualization and manipulation of important anatomic structures for specific procedures. Increasing the number of MIS techniques available to our patient population is of utmost concern for clinicians and owners and is encouraging exciting new clinical research. New technologies (near-infrared fluorescence, barbed suture, 3D printing) are at the forefront of these developments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:通过CT和临床经验评估直接穿刺隧道法建立腹膜后腔的可行性和安全性。材料与方法:对10例接受后腹腔镜手术的患者进行侧卧位CT扫描。测量穿刺线上腰筋膜与腰大肌之间的距离(L-P距离)。还测量了穿刺线和结肠后缘之间的角度(P-C角)。总的来说,292例接受后腹腔镜手术的患者使用直接穿刺隧道法建立腹膜后腔,并对这些患者的并发症进行了评估。结果:侧卧位的平均L-P距离为25.0mm(左侧)和25.5mm(右侧)。平均P-C角为26.8°(左侧)和29.7°(右侧)。所有292例患者的腹膜后腔均已建立,无内脏及血管损伤。结论:侧卧位CT扫描显示穿刺路径上无内脏大血管。扫描还提供了将第一套管针盲目地插入腹膜后的窗口。临床上观察到直接穿刺隧道法成功率高,并发症发生率低。我们认为直接穿刺隧道法是一种简单的,有效,建立腹膜后腔的安全方法。
    Purpose: The feasibility and safety of the direct puncture tunnel method to establish the retroperitoneal cavity was assessed by CT and clinical experience. Materials and Methods: Ten patients who underwent retroperitoneoscopic procedure were scanned by CT in the lateral decubitus position. The distance between the lumbar fascia and psoas major muscle (L-P distance) on the puncture line was measured. The angle between the puncture line and the posterior colon margin (P-C angle) was also measured. In total, 292 patients who underwent retroperitoneoscopic procedure were used to establish the retroperitoneal cavity using the direct puncture tunnel method, and complications in these patients were evaluated. Results: The average L-P distance was 25.0 mm (left side) and 25.5 mm (right side) in the lateral decubitus position. The average P-C angle was 26.8° (left side) and 29.7° (right side). The retroperitoneal cavity was well established in all 292 patients, and no visceral or blood vessel injury occurred. Conclusions: CT scans in the lateral recumbent position indicate that there are no visceral and large blood vessels on the puncture path. The scans also provide a window for inserting the first trocar blindly into the retroperitoneum. A high success rate and low complication rate were observed clinically for the direct puncture tunnel method. We consider the direct puncture tunnel method to be a simple, effective, and safe way to establish the retroperitoneal cavity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    The purpose of this study was to describe our robotic retroperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy technique and its associated outcomes as well as the advantages and disadvantages. We prospectively collected data on all retroperitoneal aortocaval lymphadenectomy procedures performed at Donostia University Hospital from December 2011 to April 2013 using the da Vinci S robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale,CA). A total of 13 of these procedures were performed. The mean patient age was 60.3 years (SD, 10.18). Most patients were obese with a mean body mass index of 31.95 kg/m(2) (SD, 5), and 9 had endometrial cancer. Five individuals were restaged: 4 because of lymphovascular space invasion and 1 because of lymphovascular space invasion with G3 histology. There were 2 cases of Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d\'Obstétrique stage IB endometrial cancer: 1 of papillary serous histology and 1 of G3. Two patients had advanced cervical cancer, and 2 had early-stage ovarian cancer. The median para-aortic lymph node yield was 12 (range, 4-21). In 3 patients, it was necessary to convert the procedure to transperitoneal access because of technical difficulties; 1 of these required laparotomy. The mean surgical time was 323 minutes (SD, 58) although this included additional complex procedures. Robotic para-aortic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy is feasible and offers the advantages of retroperitoneal access.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号