■旨在改善餐厅食品环境健康的政策的公众接受度是其成功实施的关键。然而,这些政策的可接受性仍然模棱两可,尤其是在不同的人群中。这项研究旨在研究加拿大17个城市辖区中三种具有不同侵入性程度的餐厅食品环境政策的社会人口统计学特征与可接受性水平之间的关联。
■数据是从THEPA调查中提取的,关于干预可接受性的最大和最具管辖权的综合调查之一(N=27,162)。考虑到可接受性的潜在管辖权差异,对于每个政策,建立了多水平Logistic回归模型。
■结果表明,平均而言,完全同意实施目标政策的参与者占参与者的20.3%-26.9%,取决于政策。可接受性因政策干预而异,管辖权,和参与者的社会人口统计学特征。女人,家庭收入<40,000美元/年的个人,来自加拿大以外的高收入国家的移民,土著人民更有可能表示完全同意所有政策,与男人相比,家庭收入为40,000-79,999美元/年的参与者,加拿大出生的人,和非土著个人。对于那些拥有$80,000-$119,999/年家庭收入的人,表示完全同意所有政策的可能性较低,与那些拥有40,000-79,999美元/年家庭收入的人相比。对于选定的策略和模型,其他社会人口统计学特征(即,年龄,教育,出生在低收入或中等收入国家)预测可接受性。所检查的社会人口统计学特征不能解释可接受性的管辖权差异。
■了解可接受性的管辖权差异值得进一步研究。政策含义涉及让不同的社会人口群体参与对话,讨论他们的餐厅食物环境可以变得更加健康的可接受方式。
UNASSIGNED: Public acceptability of policies aiming to improve the healthfulness of the
restaurant food environment is key to their successful implementation. Yet, the acceptability of these policies remains ambiguous, especially across diverse population groups. This study aims to examine associations between sociodemographic characteristics and acceptability levels of three
restaurant food environment policies of varying degrees of intrusiveness across 17 urban Canadian jurisdictions.
UNASSIGNED: Data was extracted from the THEPA survey, one of the largest and most jurisdictionally comprehensive surveys on intervention acceptability (N = 27,162). To account for potential jurisdictional differences in acceptability, for each policy, multilevel logistic regression models were developed.
UNASSIGNED: Results indicated that, on average, those in complete agreement with the implementation of the targeted policies represented 20.3%-26.9% of participants, depending on the policy. Acceptability varied according to policy intrusiveness, jurisdiction, and participants\' sociodemographic characteristics. Women, individuals with household incomes of <$40,000/year, immigrants from a high-income country other than Canada, and Indigenous peoples were more likely to express complete agreement with all policies, versus men, participants with household incomes of $40,000-$79,999/year, Canadian-born individuals, and non-Indigenous individuals. A lower likelihood of expressing complete agreement with all policies was observed for those with a $80,000-$119,999/year household income, versus those with a $40,000-$79,999/year household income. For selected policies and models, other sociodemographic characteristics (i.e., age, education, and being born in a low-or middle-income country) predicted acceptability. The examined sociodemographic characteristics did not explain jurisdictional differences in acceptability.
UNASSIGNED: Understanding jurisdictional differences in acceptability merits further research. Policy implications involve engaging diverse sociodemographic groups in conversations about acceptable ways in which their
restaurant food environment could be rendered more healthful.