Introduction The management of malignant bone tumors of lower extremities involves various modalities, which depend not only on local and systemic affection but are also affected by psychosocial factors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate functional and psychosocial outcomes in patients with non-salvageable lower limbs having malignant or aggressive benign bone tumors of distal thighs, who were treated with a technique called straightplasty. Material and methods We enrolled 20 patients of non-salvageable primary malignant or aggressive benign bone tumors around the knee. Out of these, 15 patients were followed and evaluated in view of functional and clinical outcomes having a minimum of 22 months of final follow-up. Results A total of 15 patients (8 males, 7 females) having a non-salvageable lower limb with a mean age of 20.53 years (range, 12 to 45 years), who were managed with straightplasty and followed for a mean duration of 31.73 months (range 22 to 72 months) were evaluated clinico-radiologically, and the functional outcomes were measured by Enneking\' s method. The surgical procedure is simple and better in terms of functional outcomes than other procedures described in the literature, while it is observed as psychosocially more acceptable in developing nations, especially in the Indian context. Most of the parameters are comparable to rotationplasty and above-knee amputation, whereas it is less technically demanding and satisfying due to the straight limb rather than the rotated leg in rotationplasty. Conclusion We recommend straightplasty as an alternative to rotationplasty or above-knee amputation in patients having malignant or aggressive benign tumors around the knee joint and where limb salvage procedures are not feasible.

OBJECTIVE: The biological reconstruction of the knee with osteoarticular allografts and resection arthrodesis have been reported but there has not yet been a direct comparison between both these procedures. This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors that influence failure of biological reconstruction and compared the results between both procedures.
METHODS: Between 1994 and 2017, we performed 92 limb-sparing procedures using resection arthrodesis (n = 53) and osteoarticular allograft reconstruction (n = 39) for the management of primary bone tumors around the knee. The minimum follow-up time was 2 years in both groups.
RESULTS: The failure rate of reconstruction in the osteoarticular allograft and resection arthrodesis group was 48.7% and 39.6%, respectively (p = 0.75). The mean MSTS score in the osteoarticular allograft and resection arthrodesis group was 23.7 and 21.8, respectively (p = 0.01). The significant risk factor for failure after biological reconstruction was the administration of chemotherapy (p = 0.001; HR = 3.39; 95% CI, 1.60-7.17).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent osteoarticular allograft had a better functional outcome than those who underwent resection arthrodesis reconstruction, but clinical outcomes between the groups were comparable. Chemotherapy is a significant adverse prognostic factor for failure of biological reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of bone are aggressive benign tumors. Wide resection is reserved for a small subset of patients with biologically more aggressive, recurrent and extensive tumors. As the patients affected with GCT are young or middle-aged adults with a normal life expectancy, arthrodesis is an attractive option for reconstruction in these patients.
METHODS: Thirty-six patients of mean age 33.1 years with Campanacci Grade III giant cell tumors around the knee (20 distal femoral and 16 proximal tibial) were treated with wide resection and arthrodesis from January 1996 through January 2006. Arthrodesis was performed using plating with free fibular graft (n = 18), IM nail with free fibular graft (n = 8) and IM nail combined with ring fixator using bone transport (n = 10).
RESULTS: Fusion after the first surgery was achieved in 77.7%, 75% and 90% of the patients in the three groups respectively. Local recurrence was seen in two patients and repeat surgery for nonunion/ graft fracture had to be done in four patients and two patients in the plating and nailing groups respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Wide resection and arthrodesis in aggressive GCTs around the knee is a good treatment option. IM nail combined with a ring fixator seems to be a good method of arthrodesis with high fusion rates, least shortening and early rehabilitation.