repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation

重复外周磁刺激
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Intermittent theta-burst stimulation and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation can improve motor function in poststroke patients, but the therapeutic effect of this combination remains unclear.
    UNASSIGNED: To determine the effects of central intermittent theta-burst stimulation and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on upper limb function.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty-six subacute stroke patients were randomly assigned to three groups: the CMS (n = 18), peripheral magnetic stimulation (PMS) (n = 19) and CPS (n = 19) groups. The CMS group received intermittent theta-burst stimulation and peripheral false stimulation, while the PMS group received repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation and central false stimulation once a day for five days a week over four weeks. The CPS group received intermittent theta-burst stimulation and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation simultaneously once daily for four weeks. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Action Research Arm Test, Modified Barthel Index and Modified Ashworth Scale evaluated outcomes before and after four weeks of treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: The motor function scores of all groups were significantly increased after treatment compared with before treatment, while the Modified Ashworth Scale score showed no significant change. There was a significant difference in the motor function score of the CPS group compared with that of the CMS and PMS groups, but there was no significant improvement in the Modified Ashworth Scale score.
    UNASSIGNED: Combining the two treatment methods can improve patients\' motor function and daily living abilities but cannot improve muscle tone.
    UNASSIGNED: La estimulación intermitente de theta-burst y la estimulación magnética periférica repetitiva pueden mejorar la función motora en pacientes postictus, pero el efecto terapéutico de esta combinación sigue sin estar claro.
    UNASSIGNED: Determinar el efecto de la estimulacion central intermitente theta-burst y la estimulación magnética repetitiva periférica en la función del miembro superior.
    UNASSIGNED: Se asignaron aleatoriamente a tres grupos 56 pacientes con ictus subagudo: CMS (n = 18), estimulación magnética periferica (PMS) (n = 19) y CPS(Cm1) (n = 19). El grupo CMS recibió estimulación intermitente de theta-burst y falsa estimulación periférica, el grupo PMS recibió estimulación magnética periférica repetitiva y falsa estimulación central una vez al día durante cinco días a la semana a lo largo de cuatro semanas. El grupo SPC recibió estimulación intermitente theta-burst y estimulación magnética periférica repetitiva simultáneamente una vez al día durante cuatro semanas. Se utilizaron la Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Action Research Arm Test, Modified Barthel Index and Modified Ashworth Scale para evaluar losresultados antes y después de cuatro semanas de tratamiento.
    UNASSIGNED: Las puntuaciones de la función motora de todos los grupos aumentaron significativamente después del tratamiento en comparación con antes del tratamiento, mientras que la puntuación de la Escala de Ashworth Modificada no mostró cambios significativos. Hubo una diferencia significativa en la puntuación de la función motora del grupo CPS en comparación con la de los grupos CMS y PMS, pero no hubo una mejora significativa en la puntuación de la Escala de Ashworth Modificada.
    UNASSIGNED: La combinación de los dos métodos de tratamiento puede mejorar la función motora y las capacidades de la vida diaria de los pacientes, pero no puede mejorar el tono muscular.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    神经系统的非侵入性刺激在帕金森病(PD)中越来越受到关注,以减缓运动衰退并减少药物及其副作用。PD中使用的重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)调节初级运动皮层(M1)的兴奋性提供了有争议的结果,部分原因是与药物的相互作用。这保证在无药患者中管理rTMS。重复外周磁刺激(肌肉的rPMS)尚未在PD中进行测试。它对M1塑性的影响(通过TMS测试,经颅磁刺激)和其他健康状况的感觉运动障碍使其值得在PD中探索。因此,rTMS和rPMS在一名无药女性(52岁,10年前诊断的PD)在四种不同的rTMS+rPMS组合中(间隔一周):假假,真实真实,real-sham,假的.rTMS应用于M1对侧最受损的身体侧,和腿部肌肉的rPMS,树干,和手臂,双边。在不同时间点测量M1可塑性(TMS测量)和运动症状和功能(临床结果)。真实-真实会话引起了最大的电机改进,在会话之间可能的效果求和的情况下,和随访时的维护(80天后)。这与M1促进和抑制的变化平行。这为TMS测量M1可塑性与PD运动变化之间的联系提供了新的思路,并揭示了在没有抗帕金森病药物的情况下使用PD10年后神经可塑性和功能改善的剩余潜力。新发PD(无药)患者应积极参加未来的随机临床试验,以进一步测试在非侵入性神经刺激方案下运动衰退的减缓或延迟。无论疾病的阶段如何。
    Noninvasive stimulation of the nervous system is of growing interest in Parkinson\'s disease (PD) to slow-down motor decline and decrease medication and its side-effects. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) used in PD to modulate the excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1) provided controversial results, in part because of interactions with medication. This warrants to administer rTMS in drug-free patients. Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS of muscles) has not yet been tested in PD. Its influence on M1 plasticity (as tested by TMS, transcranial magnetic stimulation) and sensorimotor disorders in other health conditions makes it worth be explored in PD. Thus, rTMS and rPMS were tested in a drug-free woman (52 years old, PD-diagnosed 10 years ago) in four different rTMS + rPMS combinations (one week apart): sham-sham, real-real, real-sham, sham-real. rTMS was applied over M1 contralateral to the most impaired bodyside, and rPMS on muscles of the legs, trunk, and arms, bilaterally. M1 plasticity (TMS measures) and motor symptoms and function (clinical outcomes) were measured at different timepoints. The real-real session induced the largest motor improvements, with possible summation of effects between sessions, and maintenance at follow-up (80 days later). This was paralleled by changes of M1 facilitation and inhibition. This sheds a new light on the link between TMS measures of M1 plasticity and motor changes in PD and informs on the remaining potential for neuroplasticity and functional improvement after 10 years of PD with no antiparkinsonian drug. De novo patients with PD (drug-free) should be motivated to participate in future randomized clinical trials to further test the slow-down or delay of motor decline under noninvasive neurostimulation regimens, whatever the stage of the disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:膀胱过度活动症(OAB)的当前治疗方案继续对难治性病例构成挑战,并且可能涉及侵入性手术。使用间歇性theta爆发刺激(iTBS)作为OAB的治疗选择,评估非侵入性重复外周磁刺激(rPMS)对骶根的潜在益处。这项研究共涉及33只大鼠,分为三个不同的实验阶段。
    方法:为了诱导膀胱过度活动,用0.5%乙酸(AA)连续经膀胱输注预处理大鼠。在膀胱输注期间,使用膀胱造影(CMG)记录膀胱内压,以研究AA预处理的效果以及使用iTBS对急性骶骨rPMS的治疗性干预.
    结果:在100%强度下用iTBS预先应用rPMS可显着将正常健康大鼠的平均首次排尿时间(Tv)延长至132%。在100%强度下的急性rPMSiTBS导致收缩间期(ICI)显着增加至121%。在0.5%AA处理后,用连续盐水输注建立AA模型,导致Tv显著降低至42%,ICI显著降低至相应对照值的56%。随后,rPMSiTBS在骶神经上的强度为100%,可有效抑制AA引起的膀胱过度活动,并显着增加ICI至167%〜222%。没有发现最大膀胱压力(Pmax)的显着变化。
    结论:含iTBS的骶神经rPMS显示出抑制AA诱导的膀胱过度活动的能力。这种有希望的方式可以作为一种增强OAB综合征患者膀胱尿失禁的替代方法。
    BACKGROUND: The current treatment options for overactive bladder (OAB) continue to pose challenges for refractory cases and may involve invasive procedures. To assess the potential benefit of non-invasive repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) on sacral roots using intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) as treatment option for OAB. The study involved a total of 33 rats, which were divided into three different experimental phases.
    METHODS: To induce bladder overactivity rats were pretreated with a continuous transvesical infusion of 0.5% acetic acid (AA). During bladder infusion, the intravesical pressure was recorded using cystometrography (CMG) to investigate the effects of AA pretreatment and the therapeutic intervention of acute sacral rPMS using iTBS.
    RESULTS: Pre-application of rPMS with iTBS at a 100% intensity significantly extended the mean first voiding time (Tv) in normal healthy rats to 132%. Acute rPMS iTBS at a 100% intensity resulted in a significant increase of the inter-contraction interval (ICI) to 121%. An AA model was established with continuous saline infusion after 0.5% AA treatment and resulted in significant reductions of Tv to 42% and ICI to 56% of the corresponding control values. Subsequently, rPMS iTBS at a 100% intensity on the sacral nerve effectively inhibited AA-induced bladder overactivity and significantly increased the ICI to 167%∼222%. No significant changes in maximum bladder pressure (Pmax) were found.
    CONCLUSIONS: Sacral nerve rPMS with iTBS demonstrated the ability to suppress AA-induced bladder overactivity. This promising modality could be developed as an alternative approach to enhance bladder continence in OAB syndrome patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    KamiueM,TsubaharaA,ItoT.重复外周磁刺激对冠状病毒病致严重下肢肌无力患者的影响-2019。JpnJComprRehabilSci2024;15:27-33。
    一名患者因2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)在重症监护病房(ICU)接受机械通气后出现严重的下肢肌肉无力和步态障碍。我们描述了重复外周磁刺激(rPMS)增强下肢肌肉的效果。
    一名70岁的男子因与COVID-19相关的呼吸困难而机械通气。54天后他停止了机械通气,气管造口术在225天后关闭。然而,他的下肢仍然明显虚弱,他坐在轮椅上进行日常活动。尽管在日间服务中心进行了大约6个月的功能培训,他的身体机能和运动能力没有改善。因此,将30HzrPMS应用于两个股四头肌20分钟/天,一周三次,4周(12次)。最大自愿收缩(MVC)期间的膝关节伸肌扭矩(KET)更大(右:42.1Nm,左:40.7牛米)比干预前(右:33.7牛米,左:36.2牛米)。在干预之前,由rPMS引起的KET(rPMS引起的扭矩)两侧为0Nm,30秒的椅子支架测试(CS-30)具有挑战性,功能独立性测量(FIM)的步行项目评分为2分(耐力30m)。干预后,rPMS引起的扭矩右侧为6.5Nm,左侧为4.7Nm,CS-30可以执行一次,FIM步行评分提高到6分(耐力60米)。
    使用rPMS改善了一名在COVID-19后出现ICU获得性肌无力的患者的下肢肌肉力量。
    Kamiue M, Tsubahara A, Ito T. Effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on a patient with severe lower limb muscle weakness due to coronavirus disease-2019. Jpn J Compr Rehabil Sci 2024; 15: 27-33.
    UNASSIGNED: A patient developed severe lower limb muscle weakness and gait disturbance after receiving mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We describe the effect of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) to strengthen his lower limb muscles.
    UNASSIGNED: A 70-year-old man was mechanically ventilated due to COVID-19-related breathing difficulties. He was weaned off mechanical ventilation after 54 days, and the tracheostomy was closed after 225 days. However, his lower limbs remained significantly weak, and he was wheelchair-bound for daily activities. Despite approximately 6 months of functional training at a day-service center, his physical function and movement abilities did not improve. Therefore, 30-Hz rPMS was applied to both quadriceps for 20 minutes/day, three times a week, for 4 weeks (12 times). Knee extensor torque (KET) during maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) was greater after (right: 42.1 Nm, left: 40.7 Nm) than before the intervention (right: 33.7 Nm, left: 36.2 Nm). Before the intervention, KET induced by rPMS (rPMS-induced torque) was 0 Nm on both sides, the 30-second chair stand test (CS-30) was challenging to perform, and the walking item score of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was 2 points (endurance 30 m). Post-intervention, rPMS-induced torque was 6.5 Nm on the right and 4.7 Nm on the left side, CS-30 could be performed once, and the FIM walking score was improved to 6 points (endurance 60 m).
    UNASSIGNED: The use of rPMS improved lower limb muscle strength in a patient who developed ICU-acquired muscle weakness after COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:重复外周磁刺激[rPMS]是一种非侵入性工具,在许多肌肉骨骼疾病中具有潜在的治疗作用。我们旨在证明高频[rPMS]在急性特发性面神经麻痹[IFP]中的疗效。并研究神经肌肉超声在急性特发性面神经麻痹中的作用。
    方法:40名患者,18岁以上,被诊断为单侧急性[发病7天内]特发性面神经麻痹,随机分为干预组[20例]和对照组。两组均接受临床检查,通过House-Brackmann分级[HBG]评分和面部残疾指数[FDI]评分评估面神经残疾,正常和患侧面神经在基线和6周后的超声检查,医疗和常规康复治疗。干预组在患侧接受了10次高频rPMS[5次/周,连续2周]。
    结果:随访6周后,与对照组相比,干预组[HBG]和[FDI]均显示出更显着的改善。基线时,患侧面神经的超声检查明显大于未患侧。然而,随访6周后,这些指标显着下降。令人惊讶的是,与对照组相比,干预组[无鞘]近端面神经指数下降更明显。
    结论:高频rPMS对急性特发性面神经麻痹有辅助治疗作用。此外,超声检查对[IFP]的评估和预后具有有益的作用。
    OBJECTIVE: Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation [rPMS] is a non-invasive tool that has a potential therapeutic role in many musculoskeletal disorders. We aimed to demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy of high frequency [rPMS] in acute Idiopathic Facial Nerve Palsy [IFP]. And to study the role of neuromuscular ultrasonography in acute idiopathic facial palsy.
    METHODS: Forty patients, aged above 18 years, diagnosed with unilateral acute [within 7 days of onset] idiopathic facial palsy were enrolled and randomly divided into intervention group [20 patients] and control group. Both groups underwent clinical examination, assessment of facial nerve disability by House-Brackmann grading [HBG] score and Facial Disability Index [FDI] score, ultrasonography of facial nerve of both normal and affected sides at baseline and after 6 weeks, medical treatment and routine rehabilitation therapy. The intervention group were subjected to 10 sessions of high frequency r PMS [5/week for 2 successive weeks] on the affected side.
    RESULTS: Both [HBG] and [FDI] showed more significant improvement in the intervention group in comparison to the control group after 6 weeks follow up. Ultrasonographic measures of facial nerve in the affected side were significantly larger than non-affected side at baseline. However, those measures significantly decreased after 6 weeks follow up. Surprisingly, the intervention group showed more significant decrease in facial nerve dimeter at proximal portion [without sheath] in comparison to control group.
    CONCLUSIONS: high frequency r PMS have an adjuvant role in treatment of acute idiopathic facial palsy. Also, ultrasonography has beneficial role in evaluation and prognosis of [IFP].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有慢性非特异性下腰痛(CNLBP)的患者通常会经历姿势控制受损,导致疼痛复发。尽管重复周围磁刺激(rPMS)结合核心肌肉训练(CMT)可以改善姿势控制,其神经机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨rPMS对CNLBP患者影响的姿势控制相关皮层机制。
    方法:这个单中心,prospective,随机化,双盲,对照试验于2023年5月至12月在一家公立医院进行.共有40名患者(27名女性,13名男性,平均年龄29.38±7.72)的CNLBP患者被随机分配到rPMS组(realrPMS+CMT)或假rPMS组(假rPMS+CMT),共4周12个疗程.将rPMS应用于疼痛一侧的腰椎旁多裂肌。在干预前后,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)对疼痛和残疾进行量化。此外,使用力平台测量压力中心(COP)的摇摆面积和速度。通过功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)在干预前后记录了4项任务(在稳定/不稳定的平面上睁眼/闭眼站立)中6个感兴趣区域的皮层活动。应用重复测量ANOVA进行统计分析。使用Spearman相关性来确定变量之间的关系。
    结果:干预后,与假rPMS组相比,rPMS组显示疼痛强度降低(p=0.001)和摇摆面积(闭眼任务不稳定)(p=0.046).此外,rPMS组显示在左初级运动皮质(M1)激活增加(p=0.042)和在左补充运动区(SMA)减少(p=0.045),而假rPMS组无明显变化。在静态平衡任务下,左侧M1的激活增加与疼痛强度(r=-0.537,p=0.018)和摇摆面积(r=-0.500,p=0.029)的减少呈负相关。此外,rPMS干预后摇摆速度与VAS呈正相关(r=0.451,p=0.046)。
    结论:重复外周磁刺激联合核心肌肉训练显示出更好的镇痛效果和姿势控制改善,与假刺激相比。这可能归因于左初级运动皮层的激活增加。
    背景:该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(ChiCTR2300070943)上注册。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) often experience impaired postural control, contributing to pain recurrence. Although repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) combined with core muscle training (CMT) could improve postural control, its neural mechanism remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the postural control-related cortical mechanism of the effect of rPMS on patients with CNLBP.
    METHODS: This unicentric, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was conducted in a public hospital from May to December 2023. A total of 40 patients (27 females and 13 males, mean age 29.38 ± 7.72) with CNLBP were randomly assigned to either the rPMS group (real rPMS with CMT) or the sham-rPMS group (sham-rPMS with CMT) for 12 sessions over 4 weeks. The rPMS was applied to the lumbar paravertebral multifidus muscle on the painful side. Pain and disability were quantified using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) pre- and post-intervention. Furthermore, the sway area and velocity of the center of pressure (COP) were measured using a force platform. The cortical activities in 6 regions of interest during 4 tasks (standing with eyes open/closed on a stable/unstable plane) were recorded by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) pre- and post-intervention. The repeated measure ANOVA was applied for statistical analysis. Spearman\'s correlation was used to determine the relationships between variables.
    RESULTS: After the intervention, the rPMS group showed decreased pain intensity (p = 0.001) and sway area (unstable eyes-closed task) (p = 0.046) compared to the sham-rPMS group. Additionally, the rPMS group exhibited increased activation in left primary motor cortex (M1) (p = 0.042) and reduced in left supplementary motor area (SMA) (p = 0.045), whereas the sham-rPMS group showed no significant changes. The increased activation of left M1 was negatively correlated to the reduction of pain intensity (r = - 0.537, p = 0.018) and sway area (r = - 0.500, p = 0.029) under the static balancing task. Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between sway velocity and VAS (r = 0.451, p = 0.046) post-rPMS intervention.
    CONCLUSIONS: Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation combined with core muscle training demonstrated better analgesic effects and postural control improvements, compared to sham-stimulation. This may be attributed to the increased activation of the left primary motor cortex.
    BACKGROUND: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ChiCTR2300070943).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    [目的]通过比目鱼肌Hoffmann反射测量,探讨重复外周磁刺激腓总神经对神经回路功能改变的影响。[实验对象与方法]将24例健康成年男性随机等分为磁刺激(实验组)和对照组。实验组在重复外周磁刺激前后10min,对照组在休息前后10min,分析比目鱼肌的霍夫曼反射。记录并比较了二十次重复的霍夫曼反射的最大振幅和潜伏期的平均值。[结果]实验组Hoffmann反射波幅随刺激而下降,实验组和对照组之间观察到显着差异。[结论]磁刺激腓总神经I-a感觉纤维可能引起霍夫曼反射幅度的变化。表明磁刺激通过脊髓中的突触诱导运动神经元的相互抑制。
    [Purpose] This study aimed to investigate the effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation of the common fibular nerve on the modification of neural circuit function as measured through the soleus muscle Hoffmann reflex. [Participants and Methods] Twenty-four healthy adult males were randomly and equally divided into the magnetic stimulation (experimental) and control groups. The Hoffmann reflex of the soleus muscle was analyzed before and after 10 min of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for the experimental group and before and after 10 min of rest for the control group. The averages of the values for the maximum amplitude and latency of the Hoffman reflex across twenty repetitions were recorded and compared. [Results] The Hoffmann reflex amplitude decreased following stimulation in the experimental group, and significant variations were observed between the experimental and control groups. [Conclusion] The change in the Hoffmann reflex amplitude may have been caused by the magnetic stimulation to I-a sensory fibers on the common fibular nerve, suggesting that magnetic stimulation induces reciprocal inhibition of motor neurons through synapses in the spinal cord.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    增强来自瘫痪肢体的传入信息可以改善中风后的运动恢复。然而,关于不同的感觉神经调节方案及其具体影响存在不确定性。这项研究概述了中风患者重复周围感觉刺激(RPSS)和重复磁刺激(rPMS)的使用。
    本范围审查是根据JBI证据综合指南进行的。我们使用三步分析和分类研究来搜索直到2023年6月在几个数据库上发表的研究:预分析,材料的探索,和数据处理。
    我们确定了916项研究,其中52人(N=1,125名参与者)。大约53.84%的参与者处于慢性期,显示中度至重度功能损害。32项研究使用RPSS经常将其与任务导向培训相结合,而20人使用rPMS作为独立干预。RPSS主要针对正中和尺神经,在引起感觉异常的强度下平均刺激92.78分钟。RPMS靶向上肢和下肢肌肉,在大多数研究中采用20Hz的频率。平均刺激时间为12.74min,强度为最大刺激器输出的70%。在52项研究中分析的114个变量中,88人(77.20%)在“s”中,b\“域,26人(22.8%)属于ICF的“d”域。
    感觉周围神经调节方案具有增强中风后运动恢复的潜力,然而,当与强化或任务导向的运动训练相结合时,可获得最佳结果.
    UNASSIGNED: Enhancing afferent information from the paretic limb can improve post-stroke motor recovery. However, uncertainties exist regarding varied sensory peripheral neuromodulation protocols and their specific impacts. This study outlines the use of repetitive peripheral sensory stimulation (RPSS) and repetitive magnetic stimulation (rPMS) in individuals with stroke.
    UNASSIGNED: This scoping review was conducted according to the JBI Evidence Synthesis guidelines. We searched studies published until June 2023 on several databases using a three-step analysis and categorization of the studies: pre-analysis, exploration of the material, and data processing.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified 916 studies, 52 of which were included (N = 1,125 participants). Approximately 53.84% of the participants were in the chronic phase, displaying moderate-to-severe functional impairment. Thirty-two studies used RPSS often combining it with task-oriented training, while 20 used rPMS as a standalone intervention. The RPSS primarily targeted the median and ulnar nerves, stimulating for an average of 92.78 min at an intensity that induced paresthesia. RPMS targeted the upper and lower limb paretic muscles, employing a 20 Hz frequency in most studies. The mean stimulation time was 12.74 min, with an intensity of 70% of the maximal stimulator output. Among the 114 variables analyzed in the 52 studies, 88 (77.20%) were in the \"s,b\" domain, with 26 (22.8%) falling under the \"d\" domain of the ICF.
    UNASSIGNED: Sensory peripheral neuromodulation protocols hold the potential for enhancing post-stroke motor recovery, yet optimal outcomes were obtained when integrated with intensive or task-oriented motor training.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:慢性腰背痛是一个重要的社会问题,导致医疗费用和生活质量的增加。本研究旨在评估非侵入性脊柱电磁模拟(SEMS)治疗非特异性慢性下腰痛(CLBP)的可行性和有效性。方法:进行单中心前瞻性研究以评估SEMS在减轻疼痛和改善残疾方面的作用。共有17名患者每周接受两次至三次SEMS。使用数字评定量表和改良的Oswestry残疾问卷来评估疼痛和残疾。结果:接受SEMS的参与者在疼痛和残疾方面表现出统计学上的显着降低。结论:目前的结果表明,非侵入性SEMS可以有效地减轻与CLBP相关的疼痛和改善残疾。
    Aim: Chronic low back pain represents a significant societal problem leading to increased healthcare costs and quality of life. This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of non-invasive spinal electromagnetic simulation (SEMS) to treat nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP). Methods: A single-site prospective study was conducted to evaluate SEMS in reducing pain and improving disability. A total of 17 patients received SEMS two to three sessions a week. The Numeric Rating Scale and the Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire were used to assess pain and disability. Results: Participants receiving SEMS exhibited statistically significant reductions in pain and disability. Conclusion: Current results suggest that non-invasive SEMS can be an effective treatment in reducing pain and improving disability associated with CLBP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对于患有双侧痉挛型脑瘫(BSCP)的儿童和青少年,非侵入性神经刺激与重复神经肌肉磁刺激(rNMS)结合体育锻炼,概念化为功能性rNMS(frNMS),代表了一种新颖的治疗方法。方法:在这项开放标签研究中,6名接受BSCP治疗的儿童和2名青少年(10.4±2.5岁)接受了针对臀肌的frNMS干预(3周内12次).结果:在77.1%的会议中,没有副作用的报道。在16.7%中,6.3%和5.2%的会议,一种刺痛的感觉,压力/温暖/寒冷或非常短暂的持久疼痛的感觉出现,分别。frNMS被家庭高度接受(100%依从性),且高度可行(每个培训方案治疗的97.9%).总共100%的参与者会重复frNMS,87.5%的人会推荐它。加拿大职业绩效评估表明,在至少一个随访时间点(干预后6天和6周)内,护理人员评估的与行动相关的任务中有28%的表现和42%的满意度在临床上具有重要意义。两名患者分别实现了一个与移动性相关的目标。一名患者经历了两个预定目标的改善,另一位参与者经历了一个目标的改进和另一个目标的推广,如目标达成量表所评估的。结论:frNMS是一种安全且广为接受的神经调节方法,可以改善生活质量,特别是在活动和参与方面,儿童和青少年的BSCP。需要更大规模的研究来进一步探索frNMS在这种情况下的影响。
    Background: For children and adolescents affected by bilateral spastic cerebral palsy (BSCP), non-invasive neurostimulation with repetitive neuromuscular magnetic stimulation (rNMS) combined with physical exercises, conceptualized as functional rNMS (frNMS), represents a novel treatment approach. Methods: In this open-label study, six children and two adolescents (10.4 ± 2.5 years) with BSCP received a frNMS intervention targeting the gluteal muscles (12 sessions within 3 weeks). Results: In 77.1% of the sessions, no side effects were reported. In 16.7%, 6.3% and 5.2% of the sessions, a tingling sensation, feelings of pressure/warmth/cold or very shortly lasting pain appeared, respectively. frNMS was highly accepted by families (100% adherence) and highly feasible (97.9% of treatment per training protocol). A total of 100% of participants would repeat frNMS, and 87.5% would recommend it. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure demonstrated clinically important benefits for performance in 28% and satisfaction in 42% of mobility-related tasks evaluated by caregivers for at least one follow-up time point (6 days and 6 weeks post intervention). Two patients accomplished goal attainment for one mobility-related goal each. One patient experienced improvement for both predefined goals, and another participant experienced improvement in one and outreach of the other goal as assessed with the goal attainment scale. Conclusions: frNMS is a safe and well-accepted neuromodulatory approach that could improve the quality of life, especially in regard to activity and participation, of children and adolescents with BSCP. Larger-scaled studies are needed to further explore the effects of frNMS in this setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号