OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of radical (RN) and partial nephrectomy (PN) in Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma (sRCC) utilizing a large national cohort. As RN is the reference standard for localized RCC with clinically aggressive features, PN in sRCC has been seldom studied.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2019 for patients who underwent PN and RN for sRCC (T1-T3N0-N1M0). We performed multivariable analyses (MVA) to determine factors associated with PN and all-cause mortality (ACM), and Kaplan-Meier Analysis (KMA) for overall survival (OS) in Charlson 0 patients who underwent PN vs. RN according to clinical stage.
RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 5,265 patients [RN 4,582 (87.0%)/PN 683 (13.0%)]. Increased odds of receiving PN was associated with papillary RCC (OR = 1.69, p = 0.015); inversely with increasing age (OR = 0.99, p = 0.004), cT2-cT3 (OR = 0.23, p < 0.001), and cN1 (OR = 0.2, p < 0.001). Worsened ACM was associated with positive margins (HR = 1.59, p < 0.001), male (HR = 1.1, p = 0.044), Charlson [Formula: see text]2 (HR = 1.47, p < 0.001), cT2-cT3 (HR 1.17-1.39, p < 0.001-0.035), and cN1 (HR = 1.59, p < 0.001). Improved ACM was noted with PN (HR = 0.64, p < 0.001), increasing household income (HR = 0.77-0.79, p < 0.001), and private insurance (HR = 0.80, p = 0.018). KMA showed PN had improved 5-year OS compared to RN in cT1 (86.5% vs. 63.2%, p < 0.001), and cT3 (61.0% vs. 44.0% p < 0.001), but not cT2 (p = 0.67).
CONCLUSIONS: In select patients, PN with negative margins may not compromise outcomes and may provide benefit when indicated. Patients with private insurance and highest income experienced improved survival suggesting disparity in care.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors with the reported outcomes of conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and investigate the transition of renal function after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label trial across 17 academic centers in Japan. Patients with endophytic renal tumors classified as cT1, cN0, cM0 were included and underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. We defined two primary outcomes to assess functional and oncological aspects of the procedure, which were represented by the warm ischemic time and positive surgical margin, respectively. Comparisons were made using control values previously reported in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy studies. In the historical control group, the warm ischemia time was 25.2, and the positive surgical margin was 13%.
RESULTS: Our per-protocol analysis included 98 participants. The mean warm ischemic time was 20.3 min (99% confidence interval 18.3-22.3; p < 0.0001 vs. 25.2). None of the 98 participants had a positive surgical margin (99% confidence interval 0-5.3%; p < 0.0001 vs. 13.0%). The renal function ratio of eGFR before and after protocol treatment multiplied by splits was 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.66-0.75). Factors such as preoperative eGFR, resected weight, and warm ischemic time influenced the functional loss of the partially nephrectomized kidney after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors offers a shorter warm ischemia time and comparable positive surgical margin rate compared with conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

We report the case of a 38-year-old man with two von Hippel-Lindau disease-associated T1a renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) (<2 cm in diameter) which developed into a 2.5-cm solitary diaphragmatic metastatic tumor. After diagnosis using percutaneous biopsy, the diaphragmatic metastasis and two RCCs were treated by laparoscopic resection and percutaneous cryoablation, respectively. One year after treatment, the patient survived without local recurrence or distant metastasis. This report describes a rare case of RCC metastasis in VHL disease and its treatment.

UNASSIGNED: The prevalence of malignancies is higher among kidney transplant recipients (KTR) than general population. Although the incidence of renal cell cancer (RCC) after KTR was reported as 0.6 % with a high mortality rate of 13.9 %, none of the guidelines except the European Best Practice Guideline (EBPG) recommends RCC screening based on cost-effectiveness and lack of solid evidence. The EBPG recommends RCC screening in native kidneys (not the allograft) by ultrasonography (USG) every 1-3 years.
UNASSIGNED: A 55-year-old male patient who had a kidney transplant from a living donor 14 years before, presented with sudden onset uncontrolled hypertension (180/110 mmHg) and rapid deterioration in graft functions (increase in serum creatinine to two-times baseline). Evaluations revealed RCC in the allograft. Abdominal pain, hematuria, fever, weight loss, flu-like syndrome, recurrent urinary tract infections, weakness, hypertension, and allograft dysfunction are reported as the main complaints and signs of RCC in KTR patients. Our patient\'s findings were hypertension and allograft dysfunction.
UNASSIGNED: It is essential to follow EBPG for KTR and not to forget the annual USG for screening of RCC both in native kidneys and allograft. HIPPOKRATIA 2023, 27 (2):69-71.

OBJECTIVE: Advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) seriously affects the life and health of patients, but effective treatment for this disease is still lacking in clinic. This study investigated the efficacy of nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced ccRCC.
METHODS: The clinical data of 216 elderly patients with advanced ccRCC in our hospital from January 2020 to January 2022 were retrospectively analysed. On the basis of different treatment regimens, patients were divided into the cabozantinib group (n = 111, receiving nivolumab and cabozantinib) and the sunitinib group (n = 105, receiving nivolumab and sunitinib). The overall survival time, disease control rates, health status, incidence of adverse events and identification of prognostic risk were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The cabozantinib group had higher overall survival time, disease control rate and scores in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index and EuroQol-Five Dimensions-Three Levels Questionnaire than the sunitinib group. The incidence of adverse events in the cabozantinib group was lower than that in the sunitinib group (p < 0.001). However, no difference existed in the identification of prognostic risk between the two groups (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The effect of nivolumab plus cabozantinib on the treatment of elderly patients with advanced ccRCC is better than that of nivolumab plus sunitinib, with fewer adverse reactions and higher safety. However, the research results require further clinical studies to confirm and promote.

Purpose To investigate the prevalence of FLCN, BAP1, SDH, and MET mutations in an oncologic cohort and determine the prevalence, clinical features, and imaging features of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) associated with these mutations. Secondarily, to determine the prevalence of encountered benign renal lesions. Materials and Methods From 25 220 patients with cancer who prospectively underwent germline analysis with a panel of more than 70 cancer-predisposing genes from 2015 to 2021, patients with FLCN, BAP1, SDH, or MET mutations were retrospectively identified. Clinical records were reviewed for patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, and renal cancer diagnosis. If RCC was present, baseline CT and MRI examinations were independently assessed by two radiologists. Summary statistics were used to summarize continuous and categorical variables by mutation. Results A total of 79 of 25 220 (0.31%) patients had a germline mutation: FLCN, 17 of 25 220 (0.07%); BAP1, 22 of 25 220 (0.09%); SDH, 39 of 25 220 (0.15%); and MET, one of 25 220 (0.004%). Of these 79 patients, 18 (23%) were diagnosed with RCC (FLCN, four of 17 [24%]; BAP1, four of 22 [18%]; SDH, nine of 39 [23%]; MET, one of one [100%]). Most hereditary RCCs demonstrated ill-defined margins, central nonenhancing area (cystic or necrotic), heterogeneous enhancement, and various other CT and MR radiologic features, overlapping with the radiologic appearance of nonhereditary RCCs. The prevalence of other benign solid renal lesions (other than complex cysts) in patients was up to 11%. Conclusion FLCN, BAP1, SDH, and MET mutations were present in less than 1% of this oncologic cohort. Within the study sample size limits, imaging findings for hereditary RCC overlapped with those of nonhereditary RCC, and the prevalence of other associated benign solid renal lesions (other than complex cysts) was up to 11%. Keywords: Familial Renal Cell Carcinoma, Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Paragangliomas, Urinary, Kidney © RSNA, 2024.

UNASSIGNED: Combination therapies of immune checkpoint and tyrosine kinase inhibitors for end-stage kidney disease and patients on hemodialysis need careful consideration as few case reports provide suitable management decisions.
UNASSIGNED: A 70-year-old man who had undergone hemodialysis for 6 years due to nephrosclerosis. Avelumab plus axitinib combination therapy was performed for repeated lung metastasis, and a complete response was achieved without major side effects.
UNASSIGNED: A complete response was achieved after Ave plus Axi combination therapy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma in a patient undergoing dialysis. This suggests that Ave plus Axi combination therapy may be safe and effective for dialysis patients.

UNASSIGNED: Patients with hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC) syndrome have high risks of uterine and cutaneous leiomyomas and renal cell carcinoma (RCC), which are caused by germline mutation of the fumarate hydratase (FH) gene. RCC lesions are mostly high-grade tumors with a poor prognosis.
UNASSIGNED: A 37-year-old man who had previously undergone treatment for a left RCC was referred to our hospital with a diagnosis of right RCC. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy was performed, and the pathological diagnosis revealed fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient RCC. The left RCC, which was originally diagnosed as mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma, was reviewed and diagnosed as FH-deficient RCC. The patient\'s father and uncle both died of RCC, and the father\'s tumor was also immunohistochemically proven to be FH-deficient RCC.
UNASSIGNED: HLRCC-related RCC should be considered in a differential diagnosis of young patients with a family history of RCC.

Lack of strict indications in current guidelines have led to significant variation in management patterns of small renal masses. The impact of the urologist on the management approach for patients with small renal masses has not been explored previously.
Using the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, patients aged ≥66 years diagnosed with small renal masses from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2013 were identified and assigned to primary urologists. Mixed-effects logistic models were used to evaluate factors associated with different management approaches, estimate urologist-level probabilities of each approach, assess management variation, and determine urologist impact on choice of approach.
A total of 12,402 patients with 2,794 corresponding primary urologists were included in the study. At the individual urologist level, the estimated case-adjusted probability of different approaches varied markedly: nonsurgical management (mean, 12.8%; range, 4.9%-36.1%); thermal ablation (mean, 10.8%; range, 2.4%-66.3%); partial nephrectomy (mean, 30.1%; range, 10.1%-66.6%); and radical nephrectomy (mean, 40.4%; range, 17.7%-71.6%). Compared to patient and tumor characteristics, the primary urologist was a more influential measured factor, accounting for 13.6% (vs. 12.9%), 33.8% (vs. 2.1%), 15.1% (vs. 8.4%), and 13.5% (vs. 4.0%) of the variation in management choice for nonsurgical management, thermal ablation, partial nephrectomy, and radical nephrectomy, respectively.
Significant variation exists in the management of small renal masses and appears to be driven primarily by urologist preference and practice patterns. Our findings emphasize the need for unified guidance regarding management of these masses to reduce unwarranted variation in care.

BACKGROUND: Tivozanib is an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Long-term exploratory analyses from the TIVO-3 trial in relapsed/refractory (R/R) RCC including patients (26%) with prior immuno-oncology (IO) therapy are reported.
METHODS: Patients with R/R advanced RCC that progressed with 2 or 3 prior systemic therapies (≥1 VEGFR TKI) were randomized to tivozanib 1.5 mg QD or sorafenib 400 mg BID, stratified by IMDC risk and previous therapy. Safety, investigator-assessed long-term progression-free survival (LT-PFS), and serial overall survival (OS) were assessed.
RESULTS: Mean time on treatment was 11.0 months with tivozanib (n = 175) and 6.3 months with sorafenib (n = 175). Fewer grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred with tivozanib (46%) than sorafenib (55%). Dose modification rates were lower with tivozanib than sorafenib across age/prior IO subgroups; prior IO therapy did not impact dose reductions or discontinuations in either arm. Landmark LT-PFS rates were higher with tivozanib (3 years: 12.3% vs 2.4%; 4 years: 7.6% vs 0%). After 22.8 months mean follow-up, the OS HR was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.70-1.14); when conditioned on 12-month landmark PFS, tivozanib showed significant OS improvement over sorafenib (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.91; 2-sided P = .0221).
CONCLUSIONS: Tivozanib demonstrated a consistent safety profile and long-term survival benefit in patients with R/R advanced RCC who were alive and progression free at 12 months. These post hoc exploratory analyses of LT-PFS and conditional OS support a clinically meaningful improvement with tivozanib versus sorafenib in this advanced RCC population.