reintubation

再插管
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们旨在评估自主呼吸试验(SBT)期间胸骨旁肋间增厚分数(PIC)预测脓毒症患者拔管后48小时内是否需要再插管的能力。
    方法:这项前瞻性观察性研究包括接受机械通气并接受SBT治疗的脓毒症成年患者。在SBT开始后15分钟记录PIC增厚分数和膈肌偏移(DE)的超声测量。拔管后,患者因需要再插管而被随访48小时。研究结果是PIC增厚分数(主要结果)和DE使用接收器特征曲线下面积(AUC)分析预测拔管后48小时内再插管的能力。还使用当前研究的截止值评估了包括右PIC增厚分数和右DE的发现的模型的准确性。采用多因素分析确定再插管的独立危险因素。
    结果:我们分析了49例成功接受SBT的患者的数据,和10/49(20%)需要重新插管。右侧和左侧PIC增厚分数预测再插管能力的AUC(95%置信区间[CI])分别为0.97(0.88-1.00)和0.96(0.86-1.00),分别在6.5-8.3%的临界值下,PIC增厚分数的阴性预测值为100%.PIC增厚分数和DE的AUC具有可比性;两种措施都是重新插管的独立危险因素。包括右PIC增厚分数>6.5%和右DE≤18mm的模型预测再插管的AUC(95%CI)为0.99(0.92-1.00),当两个超声检查结果均为阳性时,阳性预测值为100%,当两个超声检查结果均为阴性时,阴性预测值为100%。
    结论:在脓毒症手术患者中,在SBT期间评估的PIC增厚分数是再插管的独立危险因素。PIC增厚分数对再插管具有极好的预测价值。≤6.5-8.3%的PIC增厚分数可以排除再插管,阴性预测值为100%。此外,高PIC和低DE的组合也可能表明再插管的高风险。然而,需要包括不同人群的更大研究来复制我们的研究结果并验证截止值.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the ability of the parasternal intercostal (PIC) thickening fraction during spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) to predict the need for reintubation within 48 h after extubation in surgical patients with sepsis.
    METHODS: This prospective observational study included adult patients with sepsis who were mechanically ventilated and indicated for SBT. Ultrasound measurements of the PIC thickening fraction and diaphragmatic excursion (DE) were recorded 15 min after the start of the SBT. After extubation, the patients were followed up for 48 h for the need for reintubation. The study outcomes were the ability of the PIC thickening fraction (primary outcome) and DE to predict reintubation within 48 h of extubation using area under receiver characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. The accuracy of the model including the findings of right PIC thickening fraction and right DE was also assessed using the current study cut-off values. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for reintubation.
    RESULTS: We analyzed data from 49 patients who underwent successful SBT, and 10/49 (20%) required reintubation. The AUCs (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the ability of right and left side PIC thickening fraction to predict reintubation were 0.97 (0.88-1.00) and 0.96 (0.86-1.00), respectively; at a cutoff value of 6.5-8.3%, the PIC thickening fraction had a negative predictive value of 100%. The AUCs for the PIC thickening fraction and DE were comparable; and both measures were independent risk factors for reintubation. The AUC (95% CI) of the model including the right PIC thickening fraction > 6.5% and right DE ≤ 18 mm to predict reintubation was 0.99 (0.92-1.00), with a positive predictive value of 100% when both sonographic findings are positive and negative predictive value of 100% when both sonographic findings are negative.
    CONCLUSIONS: Among surgical patients with sepsis, PIC thickening fraction evaluated during the SBT is an independent risk factor for reintubation. The PIC thickening fraction has an excellent predictive value for reintubation. A PIC thickening fraction of ≤ 6.5-8.3% can exclude reintubation, with a negative predictive value of 100%. Furthermore, a combination of high PIC and low DE can also indicate a high risk of reintubation. However, larger studies that include different populations are required to replicate our findings and validate the cutoff values.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究高流量鼻插管(HFNC)与常规氧疗(COT)(通过简单的鼻插管)作为拔管后的呼吸支持,对机械通气的危重患儿拔管后气道阻塞(PEAO)的发生率。
    方法:这项开放标签的随机对照试验在印度北部一家三级护理教学医院的儿科重症监护病房(PICU)进行了7个月(2021年8月11日至2022年3月10日)。纳入3个月至12岁需要有创机械通气>72小时且已通过自主呼吸试验(准备拔管)的儿童,并通过计算机生成的区组随机分组,在拔管后接受HFNC或COT。主要结果是PEAO率(通过改良的Westley臀部评分评估,mWCS)拔管48小时内;次要结局是肾上腺素雾化率和数量,治疗失败(需要加强呼吸支持),拔管失败,不良事件,两组的PICU住院时间。
    结果:在研究期间,116名儿童入组(HFNC和COT组各58名)。PEAO的比率没有差异(55%与51.7%,分别),需要肾上腺素雾化,拔管失败,不良事件,两组患者的PICU住院时间。然而,HFNC组的治疗失败率明显较低(27.6%vs.48.3%,p=0.02)。
    结论:HFNC组和COT组的PEAO发生率相似。然而,HFNC组需要加强呼吸支持的治疗失败率明显较低。
    OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) vs. conventional oxygen therapy (COT) (by simple nasal cannula) as respiratory support after extubation on the rates of post-extubation airway obstruction (PEAO) among mechanically ventilated critically ill children.
    METHODS: This open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a tertiary care teaching hospital in North India over a period of 7 mo (11 August 2021 to 10 March 2022). Children aged 3 mo to 12 y who required invasive mechanical ventilation for > 72 h and had passed spontaneous breathing trial (ready for extubation) were enrolled and randomized by computer generated block randomization to receive HFNC or COT after extubation. Primary outcome was rate of PEAO (assessed by modified Westley croup score, mWCS) within 48 h of extubation; and secondary outcomes were rate and number of adrenaline nebulization, treatment failure (requiring escalation of respiratory support), extubation failure, adverse events, and length of PICU stay in two groups.
    RESULTS: During the study period, 116 children were enrolled (58 each in HFNC and COT groups). There was no difference in rate of PEAO (55% vs. 51.7%, respectively), need of adrenaline nebulization, extubation failure, adverse events, and duration of PICU stay in two groups. However, the HFNC group had significantly lower rates of treatment failure (27.6% vs. 48.3%, p = 0.02).
    CONCLUSIONS: The rate of PEAO was similar in HFNC and COT groups. However, HFNC group had significantly lower rate of treatment failure requiring escalation of respiratory support.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在一些诊断中,机械通气为危重病人提供了必要的支持;然而,拔管失败会影响患者的预后。来自沙特阿拉伯,尚无研究评估成人拔管失败的相关因素.
    这项前瞻性观察研究是在利雅得一家三级医院的重症监护室进行的,沙特阿拉伯。包括通过气管内导管机械通气至少24小时,然后根据断奶方案拔管的成年患者。拔管失败定义为拔管48小时内再插管。
    共纳入505名患者,其中72例患者拔管失败(14.3%,95%CI:11.4%-17.7%)。与拔管失败组相比,成功拔管组的机械通气时间明显缩短(平均差异:-2.6天,95%CI:-4.3至-1;P=0.001),拔管时呼吸频率较慢(平均差:-2.3呼吸/分钟,95%CI:-3.8至-1;P=0.0005),较高的pH值(平均差:0.02,95%CI:0.001-0.04;P=0.03),和更多的患者强烈咳嗽(百分比差异:17.7%,95%CI:4.8%-30.5%;P=0.02)。拔管失败的独立危险因素为年龄(aOR=1.02;95%CI:1.002~1.03;P=0.03),呼吸频率(aOR=1.06,95%CI:1.01-1.1;P=0.008),机械通气时间(aOR=1.08,95%CI:1.03-1.1;P<0.001),和pH(aOR=0.02,95%CI:0.0006-0.5;P=0.02)。
    年龄较大,机械通气持续时间较长,更快的呼吸频率,研究发现,较低的pH是显著增加成人拔管失败几率的独立危险因素.
    UNASSIGNED: Mechanical ventilation provides essential support for critically ill patients in several diagnoses; however, extubation failure can affect patient outcomes. From Saudi Arabia, no study has assessed the factors associated with extubation failure in adults.
    UNASSIGNED: This prospective observational study was conducted in the intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Adult patients who had been mechanically ventilated via the endotracheal tube for a minimum of 24 hours and then extubated according to the weaning protocol were included. Failed extubation was defined as reintubation within 48 hours of extubation.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 505 patients were included, of which 72 patients had failed extubation (14.3%, 95% CI: 11.4%-17.7%). Compared with the failed extubation group, the successfully extubated group had significantly shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference: -2.6 days, 95% CI: -4.3 to -1; P = 0.001), a slower respiratory rate at the time of extubation (mean difference: -2.3 breath/min, 95% CI: -3.8 to -1; P = 0.0005), higher pH (mean difference: 0.02, 95% CI: 0.001-0.04; P = 0.03), and more patients with strong cough (percent difference: 17.7%, 95% CI: 4.8%-30.5%; P = 0.02). Independent risk factors of failed extubation were age (aOR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.002-1.03; P = 0.03), respiratory rate (aOR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.1; P = 0.008), duration of mechanical ventilation (aOR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03 - 1.1; P < 0.001), and pH (aOR = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.0006-0.5; P = 0.02).
    UNASSIGNED: Older age, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, faster respiratory rate, and lower pH were found to be independent risk factors that significantly increased the odds of extubation failure among adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们旨在评估外周灌注指数(PPI)预测危重手术患者再插管的能力。
    方法:这项前瞻性观察研究包括在成功自主呼吸试验(SBT)后拔管的机械通气成人。在接下来的48小时内对患者进行了随访,以需要重新插管。心率,收缩压,呼吸频率,外周动脉血氧饱和度(SpO2),和PPI是在之前测量的-,在SBT结束时,拔管后1和2小时。主要结果是拔管后1小时PPI使用接受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)分析预测再插管的能力。进行单变量和多变量分析以确定再插管的预测因子。
    结果:分析了62例患者的数据。12/62(19%)的患者发生了重新插管。与成功断奶的患者相比,重新插管的患者心率和呼吸频率更高;SpO2和PPI更低。拔管后1小时PPI预测再插管能力的AUC(95%置信区间)为0.82(0.71-0.91),阴性预测值为97%,在≤2.5的截止值。低PPI和高呼吸频率是再插管的独立预测因素。
    结论:拔管后早期PPI是预测再插管的有用工具。低PPI是再插管的独立危险因素。一PPI>2.5,拔管后一小时可确认拔管成功。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the ability of the peripheral perfusion index (PPI) to predict reintubation of critically ill surgical patients.
    METHODS: This prospective observational study included mechanically ventilated adults who were extubated after a successful spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). The patients were followed up for the next 48 h for the need for reintubation. The heart rate, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, peripheral arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), and PPI were measured before-, at the end of SBT, 1 and 2 h postextubation. The primary outcome was the ability of PPI 1 h postextubation to predict reintubation using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors for reintubation.
    RESULTS: Data from 62 patients were analysed. Reintubation occurred in 12/62 (19%) of the patients. Reintubated patients had higher heart rate and respiratory rate; and lower SpO2 and PPI than successfully weaned patients. The AUC (95%confidence interval) for the ability of PPI at 1 h postextubation to predict reintubation was 0.82 (0.71-0.91) with a negative predictive value of 97%, at a cutoff value of ≤ 2.5. Low PPI and high respiratory rate were the independent predictors for reintubation.
    CONCLUSIONS: PPI early after extubation is a useful tool for prediction of reintubation. Low PPI is an independent risk factor for reintubation. A PPI > 2.5, one hour after extubation can confirm successful extubation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:重新插管与较高的死亡风险相关。没有明确的证据表明最好的自主呼吸试验(SBT)方法可以降低再插管的风险。
    目的:与T管相比,在危重患者中进行SBT的不同方法是否具有不同的再插管风险?
    方法:我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析,研究了不同SBT方法对再插管的影响。我们调查了PubMed,MEDLINE,CINAHL和CENTRAL数据库从开始到2024年1月26日。累积排序曲线下的表面(SUCRA)用于确定干预被评为最佳的可能性。还通过频率荟萃分析研究了成对比较。根据等级方法评估证据的确定性。
    结果:共纳入22项随机对照试验,共6196名患者。该网络包括9个节点,有13个直接成对比较。大约71%的患者被分配到T型管和PSV-ZEEP,2135和2101名患者,分别。与T管相比,唯一的再插管风险显着降低的干预措施是高流量氧气(HFO)(RR0.23,CrI0.09至0.51,中等质量证据)。HFO与降低再插管风险的最佳干预措施的可能性最高(81.86%,SUCRA96.42),其次是持续气道正压通气(11.8%,SUCRA76.75).
    结论:与其他SBT方法相比,HFOSBT与更低的再插管风险相关。我们的分析结果应谨慎考虑,因为调查HFOSBT的研究数量较少,以及与共同干预相关的潜在临床异质性。应进行进一步的试验以确认更大的患者队列的结果并评估特定的亚组。
    BACKGROUND: Reintubation is associated with higher risk of mortality. There is no clear evidence on the best spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) method to reduce the risk of reintubation.
    OBJECTIVE: Are different methods of conducting SBTs in critically ill patients associated with different risk of reintubation compared with T-tube?
    METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of different SBT methods on reintubation. We surveyed PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from inception to January 26, 2024. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to determine the likelihood that an intervention was ranked as the best. Pairwise comparisons were also investigated by frequentist meta-analysis. Certainty of the evidence was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach.
    RESULTS: A total of 22 randomized controlled trials were included, for a total of 6,196 patients. The network included nine nodes, with 13 direct pairwise comparisons. About 71% of the patients were allocated to T-tube and pressure support ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure, with 2,135 and 2,101 patients, respectively. The only intervention with a significantly lower risk of reintubation compared with T-tube was high flow oxygen (HFO) (risk ratio, 0.23; 95% credibility interval, 0.09-0.51; moderate quality evidence). HFO was associated with the highest probability of being the best intervention for reducing the risk of reintubation (81.86%; SUCRA, 96.42), followed by CPAP (11.8%; SUCRA, 76.75).
    CONCLUSIONS: HFO SBT was associated with a lower risk of reintubation in comparison with other SBT methods. The results of our analysis should be considered with caution due to the low number of studies that investigated HFO SBTs and potential clinical heterogeneity related to cointerventions. Further trials should be performed to confirm the results on larger cohorts of patients and assess specific subgroups.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO; No.: CRD42023449264; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:延长机械通气(PMV)和再插管是与宫颈恶性肿瘤相关的最严重的术后不良事件。在这项研究中,我们的目的是澄清发病率,特点,以及目标患者PMV和再插管的危险因素。
    方法:这项回顾性巢式病例对照研究于2014年1月至2020年1月在中国一家大型脊柱肿瘤中心进行。单因素分析用于确定与PMV和再插管相关的可能危险因素。进行Logistic回归分析以估计比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CIs),其中单变量分析中概率<0.05的协变量。
    结果:从560例原发性恶性(n=352)和转移性(n=208)宫颈肿瘤患者的队列中,27例患者需要PMV,20例患者接受了再插管。PMV和再插管的发生率分别为4.82%和3.57%,分别。三个变量(所有p<0.05)与PMV的风险增加独立相关:Karnofsky性能状态<50与≥80相比,手术持续时间≥8小时与<6小时相比,和C4神经根被肿瘤包裹。延长手术时间和术前高碳酸血症(均P<0.05)是术后再插管的独立危险因素,两者都导致住院时间延长(32.6±30.8vs.10.7±5.95天,p<0.001),住院死亡率为17.0%。
    结论:我们的结果证明了宫颈恶性肿瘤术后PMV或再插管的危险因素。充分的评估,早期发现,对于这个高危人群来说,预防是必要的。
    OBJECTIVE: Prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) and reintubation are among the most serious postoperative adverse events associated with malignant cervical tumors. In this study, we aimed to clarify the incidence, characteristics, and risk factors for PMV and reintubation in target patients.
    METHODS: This retrospective nested case-control study was performed between January 2014 and January 2020 at a large spinal tumor center in China. Univariate analysis was used to identify the possible risk factors associated with PMV and reintubation. Logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with covariates of a probability < 0.05 in univariate analysis.
    RESULTS: From a cohort of 560 patients with primary malignant (n = 352) and metastatic (n = 208) cervical tumors, 27 patients required PMV and 20 patients underwent reintubation. The incidence rates of PMV and reintubation were 4.82% and 3.57%, respectively. Three variables (all p < 0.05) were independently associated with an increased risk of PMV: Karnofsky Performance Status < 50 compared to ≥ 80, operation duration ≥ 8 h compared to < 6 h, and C4 nerve root encased by the tumor. Longer operative duration and preoperative hypercapnia (all p < 0.05) were independent risk factors for postoperative reintubation, both of which led to longer length of stay (32.6 ± 30.8 vs. 10.7 ± 5.95 days, p < 0.001), with an in-hospital mortality of 17.0%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the risk factors for PMV or reintubation after surgery for malignant cervical tumors. Adequate assessment, early detection, and prevention are necessary for this high-risk population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自主呼吸试验(SBT)技术在成功拔管与再插管风险之间的最佳平衡尚不清楚。我们试图确定替代SBT技术的比较疗效和安全性。
    方法:我们搜索了Medline,EMBASE,和Cochrane中央对照试验注册从开始到2023年2月,用于比较SBT技术在危重成人和儿童中的随机或准随机试验,并报告最初的SBT成功,成功拔管,再插管(主要结果)和死亡率(ICU,医院,最持久的;次要结果)比率。两名审稿人筛选,审查全文,和抽象的数据。我们进行了频繁随机效应网络荟萃分析。
    结果:我们纳入了40个RCTs(6716例患者)。压力支持(PS)与T型SBT是最常见的比较。初始成功SBT率随着PS[风险比(RR)1.08,95%置信区间(CI)(1.05-1.11)]而增加,PS/自动管补偿(ATC)[1.12(1.01-1.25),高流量鼻插管(HFNC)[1.07(1.00-1.13)(均为中等确定性),和ATC[RR1.11,(1.03-1.20);低确定性]SBT与T型SBT相比。同样,最初的成功SBT率随着PS的增加而增加,ATC,与持续气道正压通气(CPAP)SBT相比,PS/ATCSBT。成功拔管率随着PS[RR1.06,(1.03-1.09);高确定性]而增加,ATC[RR1.13,(1.05-1.21);中等确定性],和HFNC[RR1.06,(1.02-1.11);高确定性]SBT,与T型SBT相比。PS的再插管率几乎没有差异(与T形件)SBT[RR1.05,(0.91-1.21);低确定性],但与HFNCSBT相比,PS[RR2.84,(1.61-5.03);中等确定性]和ATC[RR2.95(1.57-5.56);中等确定性]SBT的再插管率增加。
    结论:通过压力增加进行的SBT(PS,ATC,PS/ATC)与不带(T形,CPAP)增加初始成功SBT和成功拔管率。尽管使用PS或ATC与HFNC进行的SBT增加了再插管率,PS与T型SBT的情况并非如此。
    The spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) technique that best balance successful extubation with the risk for reintubation is unknown. We sought to determine the comparative efficacy and safety of alternative SBT techniques.
    We searched Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to February 2023 for randomized or quasi-randomized trials comparing SBT techniques in critically ill adults and children and reported initial SBT success, successful extubation, reintubation (primary outcomes) and mortality (ICU, hospital, most protracted; secondary outcome) rates. Two reviewers screened, reviewed full-texts, and abstracted data. We performed frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis.
    We included 40 RCTs (6716 patients). Pressure Support (PS) versus T-piece SBTs was the most common comparison. Initial successful SBT rates were increased with PS [risk ratio (RR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.05-1.11)], PS/automatic tube compensation (ATC) [1.12 (1.01 -1.25), high flow nasal cannulae (HFNC) [1.07 (1.00-1.13) (all moderate certainty), and ATC [RR 1.11, (1.03-1.20); low certainty] SBTs compared to T-piece SBTs. Similarly, initial successful SBT rates were increased with PS, ATC, and PS/ATC SBTs compared to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) SBTs. Successful extubation rates were increased with PS [RR 1.06, (1.03-1.09); high certainty], ATC [RR 1.13, (1.05-1.21); moderate certainty], and HFNC [RR 1.06, (1.02-1.11); high certainty] SBTs, compared to T-piece SBTs. There was little to no difference in reintubation rates with PS (vs. T-piece) SBTs [RR 1.05, (0.91-1.21); low certainty], but increased reintubation rates with PS [RR 2.84, (1.61-5.03); moderate certainty] and ATC [RR 2.95 (1.57-5.56); moderate certainty] SBTs compared to HFNC SBTs.
    SBTs conducted with pressure augmentation (PS, ATC, PS/ATC) versus without (T-piece, CPAP) increased initial successful SBT and successful extubation rates. Although SBTs conducted with PS or ATC versus HFNC increased reintubation rates, this was not the case for PS versus T-piece SBTs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估使用预先确定的呼吸频率氧合(ROX)指数开始早期高流量鼻氧(HFNO)治疗对降低拔管后患者的再插管率和重症监护病房(ICU)停留时间的影响。
    方法:我们共纳入了145例拔管患者(平均年龄:67.1±12.9岁;性别:男性96例,女性49例;急性生理和慢性健康评估II评分:18.4±6.8分),分为两组:建立拔管标准前入住ICU的患者71例,标准实施后入住ICU的患者74例。在6个月的时间里。我们比较了实施早期HFNO标准前后拔管后2h的HFNO再插管率和ROX指数。
    结果:早期HFNO标准建立前后HFNO的利用率没有显着差异(19.7%与17.6%)。然而,再插管率显着降低(11.3%vs.4.1%,P<0.05)与早期使用HFNO。此外,在总插管期间观察到显着差异(5.2±7.0vs.2.5±2.7天,P<0.05)和ICU持续时间(8.6±9.7vs.5.8±5.6天,P<0.05)。
    结论:ICU患者拔管后早期启动ROX指数阈值指导下的HFNO与再插管率降低和ICU住院时间缩短相关。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of early high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy initiation using a pre-determined respiratory rate‑oxygenation (ROX) index on reducing reintubation rates and duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay in post-extubated patients.
    METHODS: We enrolled a total of 145 extubated patients (mean age: 67.1 ± 12.9 years; sex: 96 male and 49 female; acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score: 18.4 ± 6.8 points) classified into two groups: 71 patients admitted to the ICU before establishing extubation criteria and 74 patients after criteria implementation, over a 6-month period. We compared the HFNO reintubation rates and ROX index at 2 h post-extubation before and after implementing early HFNO criteria.
    RESULTS: The utilization rate of HFNO pre- and post-establishment of early HFNO criteria did not differ significantly (19.7% vs. 17.6%). However, the reintubation rate significantly decreased (11.3% vs. 4.1%, P < 0.05) with early HFNO use. Additionally, significant differences were observed in the total intubation period (5.2 ± 7.0 vs. 2.5 ± 2.7 days, P < 0.05) and ICU duration (8.6 ± 9.7 vs. 5.8 ± 5.6 days, P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Early initiation of HFNO guided by the ROX index threshold post-extubation in patients admitted to ICU is associated with reduced reintubation rates and shorter ICU stays.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的脑动脉瘤合并蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)具有较高的发病率和病死率。本研究旨在比较超早期手术(24小时内)和晚期手术(>24小时)围手术期并发症的发生率。方法回顾性分析2014年1月至2020年12月行开颅动脉瘤夹闭术的302例患者的资料。从医疗记录中获得围手术期数据,并由研究人员进行审查。比较超早期和晚期手术的并发症。我们感兴趣的主要并发症,如迟发性缺血性神经功能缺损(DIND),术中动脉瘤破裂(IAR),和麻醉相关的并发症。比较有或没有DIND和IAR的患者的短期(住院)和长期(1年)结果。对收集的数据进行统计分析。结果分析了三百零二例患者,264例患者完成随访。超早期病例(150例患者)具有较高的美国麻醉医师协会身体状况,较低的格拉斯哥昏迷量表,和更高的亨特和赫斯尺度。作为超早期手术,外科医生对更多的大脑前动脉病例进行了手术。DIND的发病率,IAR,严重的血流动力学不稳定,心脏骤停分别为5.6、8.3、6.3和0.3%,分别,这两组之间没有什么不同。然而,超早期手术病例的再插管率较高(0vs.3.3%,p=0.023)。DIND和IAR患者的短期(住院)预后较差。结论超早期开颅手术与晚期开颅动脉瘤夹闭术在主要并发症方面无差异。然而,超早期组的再插管率显著较高.有主要并发症的患者早期,不利的结果。
    Objectives  The intracerebral aneurysm with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) has a high morbidity and mortality rate. This study aimed to compare the incidences of perioperative complications in ultra-early surgery (within 24 hours) with those in late surgery (> 24 hours). Methods  Retrospective data were reviewed for 302 patients who underwent craniotomies with aneurysm clipping between January 2014 and December 2020. Perioperative data were obtained from the medical records and reviewed by the investigators. The complications were compared between ultra-early and late operations. We were interested in major complications such as delayed ischemic neurologic deficit (DIND), intraoperative aneurysm rupture (IAR), and anesthesia-related complications. The short-term (in hospital) and long-term (1 year) outcomes in patients with or without DIND and IAR were compared. The collected data was statistically analyzed. Results  Three hundred and two patients were analyzed, and 264 patients had completed follow-up. The ultra-early cases (150 patients) had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, a lower Glasgow Coma Scale, and higher Hunt and Hess scales. The surgeons operated on more cases of the anterior cerebral artery as ultra-early operations. The incidence rates of DIND, IAR, severe hemodynamic instability, and cardiac arrest were 5.6, 8.3, 6.3, and 0.3%, respectively, which were not different between groups. However, the reintubation rate was higher in the ultra-early surgery cases (0 vs. 3.3%, p  = 0.023). The DIND and IAR patients had poorer short-term (in hospital) outcomes. Conclusions  There were no differences in major complications between ultra-early and late craniotomy with aneurysm clipping. However, the reintubation rate was strikingly higher in the ultra-early group. Patients with major complications had early, unfavorable outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:没有客观指标来评估气管插管患者拔管期间的咳嗽强度。这项研究旨在确定咳嗽峰值呼气流量(CPEF)是否可以预测由于咳嗽强度降低而重新插管的风险。
    方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2020年9月1日至2021年8月31日期间入住急诊重症监护病房并接受人工通气管理≥24h的患者。患者分为两组:成功拔管组和重新插管组,探讨拔管前CPEF与再插管前CPEF的关系。
    结果:分析76例患者。在单变量分析中,成功拔管组(90.7±25.9L/min)和再插管组(57.2±6.4L/min)之间的CPEF差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。在以年龄和人工通气持续时间为协变量的多变量分析中,再插管组CPEF明显降低(p<0.01)。根据受试者工作特性曲线,再插管的CPEF截止值为60L/min(曲线下面积,0.897;灵敏度,78.5%;特异性,90.9%;p<0.01)。
    结论:气管插管患者的CPEF可能是预测与咳嗽强度降低相关的再插管风险的有用指标。由于咳嗽强度降低而重新插管的截止CPEF值为60L/min。
    BACKGROUND: No objective indicator exists for evaluating cough strength during extubation of tracheally intubated patients. This study aimed to determine whether cough peak expiratory flow (CPEF) can predict the risk of reintubation due to decreased cough strength.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who were admitted to our Emergency Intensive Care Unit between September 1, 2020 and August 31, 2021 and were under artificial ventilation management for ≥ 24 h. The patients were divided into two groups: successful extubation and reintubation groups, and the relationship between CPEF immediately before extubation and reintubation was investigated.
    RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were analyzed. In the univariate analysis, CPEF was significantly different between the successful extubation (90.7 ± 25.9 L/min) and reintubation (57.2 ± 6.4 L/min) groups (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis with age and duration of artificial ventilation as covariates, CPEF was significantly lower in the reintubation group (p < 0.01). The cutoff value of CPEF for reintubation according to the receiver operating characteristic curve was 60 L/min (area under the curve, 0.897; sensitivity, 78.5%; specificity, 90.9%; p < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: CPEF in tracheally intubated patients may be a useful indicator for predicting the risk of reintubation associated with decreased cough strength. The cutoff CPEF value for reintubation due to decreased cough strength was 60 L/min.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号