refractory ascites

顽固性腹水
  • 文章类型: Editorial
    肝硬化一直被认为是不归路,复苏的希望有限。然而,最近的进步,特别是BavenoVII标准和经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)的利用,阐明了肝脏再补偿的概念。在这篇社论中,我们评论了高等人在最近一期发表的文章。这篇社论全面概述了理解肝硬化的演变,补偿的标准,以及TIPS在实现补偿方面的功效。我们讨论了最近研究的关键发现,包括在TIPS插入后实现再补偿的患者中观察到的有希望的结局.虽然需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现并阐明补偿背后的机制,本文提出的见解为失代偿期肝硬化患者带来了新的希望,并突出了TIPS作为治疗选择的潜力.
    Liver cirrhosis has long been considered a point of no return, with limited hope for recovery. However, recent advancements, particularly the Baveno VII criteria and the utilization of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), have illuminated the concept of hepatic recompensation. In this editorial we comment on the article by Gao et al published in the recent issue. This editorial provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution of understanding cirrhosis, the criteria for recompensation, and the efficacy of TIPS in achieving recompensation. We discuss key findings from recent studies, including the promising outcomes observed in patients who achieved recompensation post-TIPS insertion. While further research is needed to validate these findings and elucidate the mech-anisms underlying recompensation, the insights presented here offer renewed hope for patients with decompensated cirrhosis and highlight the potential of TIPS as a therapeutic option in their management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    姑息治疗对于终末期肝病(ESLD)患者通常是次优的。腹水仍然是ESLD中最常见的并发症。尽管长期腹腔引流(LTAD)通常用于难治性恶性腹水,ESLD的标准治疗是医院引流(大体积穿刺(LVP)).正在进行的美国国立卫生与护理研究所(NIHR)资助的试验(REDUCe2研究)(ISRCTN269936824)将姑息性LTAD与ESLD中的LVP进行比较。这个35个地点的试验是在英国进行的,苏格兰和威尔士。
    了解医疗保健专业人员(HCP)对在ESLD中使用姑息性LTAD的看法和经验。
    在2019年8月至12月之间使用了一项电子调查,该调查包括七个带有固定定量选项的问题和三个探索性问题。该调查通过英国肝脏研究协会通讯以电子方式分发,并分发到英格兰东南部和伦敦东北部的相关医院部门。在初次邀请调查后的4周和8周发送了电子邮件提醒。
    有211名受访者(肝病专家(36.5%),专科护士(24.6%),胃肠病学家(16.6%),学员(17%)和其他人(5.2%))。所有受访者都可以使用LVP,86%的患者接受经颈静脉肝内门体分流术,67%到LTAD,10%到其他选项,如自动低流量腹水(ALFA)泵。调查的大多数受访者(68%)报告了他们使用LTAD的经验。几乎所有受访者(91%)都愿意在ESLD中考虑LTAD。然而,这方面的主要威慑因素是感知到的感染风险(90%),其次是社区的LTAD管理(57%)。有使用LTAD经验的患者中约有51%报告了患者的临床并发症(包括出血,感染和肾功能损害),41%的人报告了技术问题,35%的人报告了社区支持不足。
    由于ESLD,几乎所有的HCP都愿意在难治性腹水中考虑姑息性LTAD,但主要的威慑因素是感知到的感染风险和缺乏指导社区管理的公开数据。REDUCe2审判将澄清这些担忧是否真实,并提供关于角色的确凿证据,如果有的话,在这个脆弱的和正在研究的ELD队列中,姑息性LTAD。
    UNASSIGNED: Palliative care is often suboptimal for patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Ascites remains the most common complication in ESLD. Though long-term abdominal drains (LTAD) are commonly used in refractory malignant ascites, the standard care for ESLD is hospital drainage (large volume paracentesis (LVP)). There is an ongoing National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) funded trial (REDUCe 2 Study) (ISRCTN269936824) comparing palliative LTAD to LVP in ESLD. This 35-site trial is being conducted in England, Scotland and Wales.
    UNASSIGNED: To understand the views and experience of healthcare professionals (HCP) on the use of palliative LTAD in ESLD.
    UNASSIGNED: An electronic survey comprised of seven questions with fixed quantitative options and three exploratory questions was used between August-December 2019. The survey was distributed electronically via the British Association for Study of Liver newsletter and to relevant hospital departments in Southeast England and Northeast London. An email reminder was sent at 4 and 8 weeks after the initial invitation to the survey.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 211 respondents (hepatologists (36.5%), specialist nurses (24.6%), gastroenterologists (16.6%), trainees (17%) and others (5.2%)). All respondents had access to LVP, 86% to a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure for patients, 67% to LTADs and 10% to other options, such as the automated low-flow ascites (ALFA) pump. The majority of respondents to the survey (68%) reported their experience of using LTAD. Almost all respondents (91%) were willing to consider LTAD in ESLD. However, the main deterrents of this were the perceived risk of infection (90%), followed by LTAD management in community (57%). Some 51% of those with prior experience of using LTAD reported clinical complications for patients (including bleeding, infection and renal impairment), 41% reported technical issues and 35% inadequate community support.
    UNASSIGNED: Almost all HCPs are willing to consider palliative LTAD in refractory ascites due to ESLD, but the main deterrents are the perceived infection risk and lack of published data to guide community management. The REDUCe 2 trial will clarify if these concerns are real and provide conclusive evidence on role, if any, of palliative LTADs in this vulnerable and under researched cohort with ESLD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:难治性腹水影响肝硬化患者的预后和生活质量。腹膜静脉分流术(PVS)是顽固性腹水的姑息性介入放射学治疗方法。尽管据报道与严重的并发症有关(例如,心力衰竭,血栓性疾病),PVS的临床病程尚未得到全面评估.
    目的:探讨肝硬化顽固性腹水行PVS治疗的时程与并发症的关系。
    方法:这是一项回顾性研究,对2011年6月至2023年6月期间接受PVS安置的14例失代偿期肝硬化相关顽固性腹水患者进行了回顾性研究。临床特点,心胸比率(CTR)的变化,和实验室数据(即,脑钠肽(BNP),D-二聚体,血小板)进行评估。还评估了8例患者的后续CT图像的腹水和并发症。
    结果:在任何情况下都没有发生与手术相关的严重并发症。BNP和D-二聚体水平短暂升高,血小板计数减少,PVS后2天观察到CTR恶化;然而,除一例外,所有病例均在7天内得到改善。在CT随访中,所有患者的腹水量减少,但1例PVS后2天和7天D-二聚体持续升高的患者出现血栓性疾病(肾和脾梗死).平均PVS通畅率为345.4天,PVS放置后的中位生存期为474.4天.
    结论:PVS治疗顽固性腹水是一种技术上可行的姑息治疗。BNP时间变化的综合评价,D-二聚体,血小板计数和CTR,随访CT图像可能有助于早期预测PVS的疗效和并发症。
    BACKGROUND: Refractory ascites affects the prognosis and quality of life in patients with liver cirrhosis. Peritoneovenous shunt (PVS) is a treatment procedure of palliative interventional radiology for refractory ascites. Although it is reportedly associated with serious complications (e.g., heart failure, thrombotic disease), the clinical course of PVS has not been thoroughly evaluated.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between chronological course and complications after PVS for refractory ascites in liver cirrhosis patients.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 14 patients with refractory ascites associated with decompensated cirrhosis who underwent PVS placement between June 2011 and June 2023. The clinical characteristics, changes in cardiothoracic ratio (CTR), and laboratory data (i.e., brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), D-dimer, platelet) were evaluated. Follow-up CT images in eight patients were also evaluated for ascites and complications.
    RESULTS: No serious complication associated with the procedure occurred in any case. Transient increases in BNP and D-dimer levels, decreased platelet counts, and the worsening of CTR were observed in the 2 days after PVS; however, they were improved in 7 days in all cases except one. In the follow-up CT, the amount of ascites decreased in all patients, but one patient with a continuous increase in D-dimer 2 and 7 days after PVS had thrombotic disease (renal and splenic infarction). The mean PVS patency was 345.4 days, and the median survival after PVS placement was 474.4 days.
    CONCLUSIONS: PVS placement for refractory ascites is a technically feasible palliative therapy. The combined evaluation of chronological changes in BNP, D-dimer, platelet count and CTR, and follow-up CT images may be useful for the early prediction of the efficacy and complications of PVS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    结节性再生增生(NRH)和闭塞性门静脉病(OPV)是非肝硬化门脉高压(NCPH)的两个原因,这是一种血管性肝病,其中门脉高压(PHT)的临床体征,比如食管静脉曲张,腹水,在没有肝硬化和门静脉血栓形成的情况下发生脾肿大。病因往往不明,但在本文中,我们介绍了一名56岁的NCPH和难治性腹水男性,他接受了肝活检,证实了NRH和OPV。病因检查显示β-2糖蛋白-1和抗心磷脂抗体,关于抗磷脂综合征(APS),尽管没有血栓形成的病史。该患者因难治性腹水而接受了经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)手术,并因担心APS而开始预防性抗凝治疗,其腹水和呼吸急促得到临床改善。在难治性腹水的设置中更早地追求TIPS,以及为可能患有APS的患者提供抗凝治疗,以防止潜在血栓形成的发展,可能是预防疾病过程中并发症的适当建议。本病例报告强调需要进一步调查病因,诊断途径,以及NCPH的治疗选择。
    Nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) and obliterative portal venopathy (OPV) are two causes of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH), which is a vascular liver disease wherein clinical signs of portal hypertension (PHT), such as esophageal varices, ascites, and splenomegaly develop in the absence of cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis. The etiology often remains unidentified, but herein we present the case of a 56-year-old male with NCPH and refractory ascites who underwent liver biopsy confirming NRH and OPV. Etiological workup revealed beta-2 glycoprotein-1 and anticardiolipin antibodies, concerning antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) despite no prior history of thrombosis. The patient underwent a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure for his refractory ascites and was started on prophylactic anticoagulation owing to a concern for APS with clinical improvement in his ascites and shortness of breath. Pursuing TIPS earlier in the setting of refractory ascites, as well as offering anticoagulation therapy for patients with possible APS to prevent the development of potential thromboses, could be appropriate recommendations to prevent complications in the disease course. This case report highlights the need for further investigations on the etiologies, diagnosis pathways, and treatment options for NCPH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肝硬化背景下顽固性腹水患者通常面临不良预后。经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)是一种有效的干预措施,但缺乏可靠的术后预后评估工具。以前使用的临床生化标志物,如血清白蛋白浓度(Alb),钠(Na+)浓度,和血清肌酐(Scr),预测价值有限。因此,对小说的追求,评估肝硬化和难治性腹水患者TIPS后预后的特异性生物标志物具有重要的实际意义.
    目的:为了调查Child-Pugh评分之间的关联,终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分,肝硬化顽固性腹水患者血清胱抑素C(CysC)水平与TIPS后预后的关系。
    方法:对2019年8月至2021年8月在我院接受TIPS治疗的75例肝硬化和难治性腹水患者进行回顾性分析。这些患者定期随访两年,死亡人数被精心记录。根据患者的预后状况,将患者分为存活组(n=45例)或死亡组(n=30例)。收集两组患者的临床资料,计算Child-Pugh评分和MELD评分进行分析。采用Spearman相关分析评价Child-Pugh分级与预后的相关性,MELD得分,CysC级。此外,利用Cox比例风险模型进行多因素分析,以确定影响肝硬化和难治性腹水患者TIPS后预后的独立危险因素.受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)确定了CysC浓度的预测值,Child-Pugh年级,和MELD评分对TIPS后肝硬化伴顽固性腹水患者预后的影响。
    结果:在2年的随访期间,在接受TIPS治疗的75例肝硬化和顽固性腹水患者中,30例(40.00%)患者死亡。死者群体表现出天冬氨酸转氨酶升高,丙氨酸氨基转移酶,总胆红素,Scr,凝血酶原时间,CysC,国际标准化比率,Child-Pugh,和MELD评分与生存队列相比,死亡组Alb和Na+水平降低(P<0.05)。Spearman分析显示,预后与Child-Pugh评分之间存在中度至高度正相关,MELD得分,CysC水平(r=0.709、0.749、0.671,P<0.05)。使用Cox比例风险模型的多因素分析表明,肝硬化和难治性腹水患者TIPS后预后的独立危险因素是CysC(HR=3.802;95CI:1.313-11.015),Child-Pugh(HR=3.030;95CI:1.858-4.943),和MELD(HR=1.222;95CI:1.073-1.393)评分。ROC分析证实,与Child-Pugh和MELD评分的经典预后模型相比,CysC对肝硬化和顽固性腹水患者TIPS后预后的预测准确性略低.该分析产生的灵敏度和特异性值分别为83.33%和82.22%,分别。该时刻的曲线下面积值为0.883,最佳截止值为1.95mg/L。
    结论:监测血清CysC浓度对于评估肝硬化和顽固性腹水患者TIPS后的预后具有重要价值。基于血清CysC水平的预测模型,与Scr水平相反,更有利于评估肝硬化腹水患者的病情和预后。
    BACKGROUND: Individuals with refractory ascites in the context of liver cirrhosis typically face an adverse prognosis. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an efficacious intervention, but there is a lack of reliable tools for postoperative prognosis assessment. Previously utilized clinical biochemical markers, such as the serum albumin concentration (Alb), sodium (Na+) concentration, and serum creatinine (Scr), have limited predictive value. Therefore, the quest for novel, specific biomarkers to evaluate the post-TIPS prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and refractory ascites holds significant practical importance.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations between the Child-Pugh score, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and serum cystatin C (Cys C) level and post-TIPS prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and refractory ascites.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 75 patients with liver cirrhosis and refractory ascites who underwent TIPS at our institution from August 2019 to August 2021. These patients were followed up regularly for two years, and the death toll was meticulously documented. The patients were allocated into a survival group (n = 45 patients) or a deceased group (n = 30 patients) based on their prognosis status. The clinical data of the two groups were collected, and Child-Pugh scores and MELD scores were calculated for analysis. Spearman correlation analysis was carried out to evaluate the correlation of prognosis with Child-Pugh grade, MELD score, and Cys C level. Additionally, a multiple-factor analysis utilizing the Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify independent risk factors affecting the post-TIPS prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis and refractory ascites. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) ascertained the predictive value of the Cys C concentration, Child-Pugh grade, and MELD score for the prognosis of liver cirrhosis with refractory ascites in post-TIPS patients.
    RESULTS: During a 2-year follow-up period, among 75 patients with liver cirrhosis and refractory ascites who underwent TIPS treatment, 30 patients (40.00%) passed away. The deceased cohort exhibited heightened aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, Scr, prothrombin time, Cys C, international normalized ratio, Child-Pugh, and MELD scores compared to those of the survival cohort, while Alb and Na+ levels were attenuated in the deceased group (P < 0.05). Spearman analysis revealed moderate to high positive correlations between prognosis and Child-Pugh score, MELD score, and Cys C level (r = 0.709, 0.749, 0.671, P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model demonstrated that the independent risk factors for post-TIPS prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and refractory ascites were Cys C (HR = 3.802; 95%CI: 1.313-11.015), Child-Pugh (HR = 3.030; 95%CI: 1.858-4.943), and MELD (HR = 1.222; 95%CI: 1.073-1.393) scores. ROC analysis confirmed that, compared to those of the classic prognostic models for Child-Pugh and MELD scores, the predictive accuracy of Cys C for post-TIPS prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and refractory ascites was slightly lower. This analysis yielded sensitivity and specificity values of 83.33% and 82.22%, respectively. The area under the curve value at this juncture was 0.883, with an optimal cutoff value set at 1.95 mg/L.
    CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring the serum Cys C concentration is valuable for assessing the post-TIPS prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and refractory ascites. Predictive models based on serum Cys C levels, as opposed to Scr levels, are more beneficial for evaluating the condition and prognosis of patients with ascites due to cirrhosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在患有慢性肝病(如肝硬化)的患者中,肝切除术后大量腹水是住院时间延长和预后恶化的原因。最近,托伐普坦在难治性腹水中的功效已有报道;然而,目前尚无关于托伐普坦治疗肝切除术后顽固性腹水的疗效或安全性的报道.本研究旨在评估肝切除术后难治性腹水患者早期使用托伐普坦的疗效。
    这是一个开放标签,单臂I/II期研究。该研究对象将包括计划进行肝肿瘤的肝切除术的患者。肝切除术后顽固性腹水患者(术后第1天的引流量≥5ml/体重1kg/天)将接受托伐普坦治疗。主要终点将包括肝切除后体重相对于术前基线的最大变化。次要终点将包括排水量,腹围,尿量,术后并发症发生率(心力衰竭和呼吸衰竭),由于腹水减少到术前体重,术后体重增加所需的天数,术后胸腔积液改善的变化,白蛋白或新鲜冷冻血浆输注总量,使用的利尿剂的类型和数量,术后住院天数。
    本试验将评估托伐普坦预防肝切除术后顽固性腹水的疗效和安全性。由于没有报告证明托伐普坦预防肝切除术后顽固性腹水的疗效,作者预计,这些发现将导致未来的III期试验,并为术后顽固性腹水的治疗选择提供有价值的指征.
    UNASSIGNED: In patients with chronic liver diseases such as cirrhosis, massive ascites after hepatic resection is the cause of prolonged hospitalization and worsening prognosis. Recently, the efficacy of tolvaptan in refractory ascites has been reported; however, there are no reports on the efficacy or safety of tolvaptan for refractory ascites after hepatic resection. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of early administration of tolvaptan in patients with refractory ascites after hepatic resection.
    UNASSIGNED: This is an open-label, single-arm phase I/II study. This study subject will comprise patients scheduled for hepatic resection of a liver tumor. Patients with refractory ascites after hepatic resection (drainage volume on postoperative day 1 ≥5 ml/body weight 1 kg/day) will be treated with tolvaptan. The primary endpoint will include the maximum change in body weight after hepatic resection relative to the preoperative baseline. The secondary endpoints will include drainage volume, abdominal circumference, urine output, postoperative complication rate (heart failure and respiratory failure), number of days required for postoperative weight gain because of ascites to decrease to preoperative weight, change in improvement of postoperative pleural effusion, total amount of albumin or fresh frozen plasma transfusion, type and amount of diuretics used, and postoperative hospitalization days.
    UNASSIGNED: This trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan prophylaxis for refractory ascites after hepatic resection. As there are no reports demonstrating the efficacy of tolvaptan prophylaxis for refractory ascites after hepatic resection, the authors expect that these findings will lead to future phase III trials and provide valuable indications for the selection of treatments for refractory postoperative ascites.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)是肝硬化患者治疗门静脉高压相关疾病的常用方法,包括静脉曲张出血和顽固性腹水。然而,虽然在确定患者是否是TIPS的良好候选者时,TIPS后肝性脑病(HE)的风险增加是重要的,目前没有广泛使用的方法来预测后TIPSHE的发展,尽管终末期肝病(MELD)评分模型用于预测TIPS后死亡率。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估肌肉减少症作为TIPS患者HE和死亡率的危险因素。
    方法:使用综合检索策略来确定肌肉减少症患者TIPS后HE和死亡率的报告。2023年3月接受TIPS治疗的肝硬化非肌肉减少症患者.使用开放式元分析师来计算结果。
    结果:12项研究有2056名患者符合纳入标准,并被纳入最终的荟萃分析。肌肉减少症与TIPS后HE率显著高于非肌肉减少症相关(风险比[RR]:1.68,95%CI:1.48-1.92,p<0.00001,I2=65%),以及明显更高的TIPS后死亡率(RR:1.73,95%CI:1.14-2.64,p<0.00001,I2=87%)。
    结论:患有肌少症的患者发生TIPSHE后和死亡的风险显著增加。在权衡肝硬化患者进行TIPS的风险和益处时,应考虑肌肉减少症的存在。需要进一步的研究来确定重要危险因素的临床效用,如肌肉减少对TIPS后结局的影响。
    OBJECTIVE: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a commonly performed procedure in patients with liver cirrhosis to treat portal hypertension-related conditions, including variceal bleeding and refractory ascites. However, while the increased risk of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) after TIPS is important to consider when determining whether a patient is a good candidate for TIPS, currently there is no widely used method to predict the development of post-TIPS HE, although the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score is used to predict post-TIPS mortality. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate sarcopenia as a risk factor for HE and mortality in patients undergoing TIPS.
    METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy was used to identify reports of post-TIPS HE and mortality in sarcopenia vs. non-sarcopenia patients with liver cirrhosis who received TIPS in March 2023. Open Meta Analyst was used to compute the results.
    RESULTS: Twelve studies with 2056 patients met inclusion criteria and were included in the final meta-analysis. Sarcopenia was associated with a significantly higher post-TIPS HE rate than non-sarcopenia (risk ratio [RR]: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.48-1.92, p < 0.00001, I2 = 65%), as well as a significantly higher post-TIPS mortality rate (RR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.14-2.64, p < 0.00001, I2 = 87%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with sarcopenia have a significantly increased risk of post-TIPS HE and mortality. Presence of sarcopenia should be considered when weighing the risks and benefits of performing TIPS in patients with cirrhosis. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical utility of important risk factors such as sarcopenia on post-TIPS outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:淋巴系统对于维持体液稳态至关重要。淋巴系统功能失调可能导致肝硬化患者腹水和水肿的顽固性。因此,对肝硬化伴顽固性腹水(RA)患者的淋巴功能障碍的评估可能是至关重要的,因为这需要使用不同的液体动员策略.
    目的:为了评估震级,光谱,肝硬化RA患者淋巴功能障碍的临床相关性。
    方法:这项观察性研究包括155例RA肝硬化患者。淋巴水肿的临床症状,如橙色外观和积极的斯坦默标志,十二指肠活检中的肠淋巴管扩张症(IL)被视为固有层中的扩张血管,具有强烈的D2-40免疫组织化学,乳糜腹水用于诊断明显的淋巴功能障碍。
    结果:155例患者中有69例(44.5%)有淋巴功能障碍的证据。外周淋巴水肿,在52名(33.5%)患者中发现,是最常见的表现,其次是42例(27.0%)患者的IL,2例(1.9%)乳糜性腹水。与没有淋巴水肿的患者相比,那些有淋巴水肿的人平均年龄更高,终末期肝病评分的中位模型,平均体重指数,平均腹水甘油三酯水平,低蛋白血症(血清总蛋白<5g/dL)和淋巴细胞减少症(白细胞总数<15%)的患者比例。IL患者的淋巴细胞减少症和低蛋白血症的患病率也较高(28.6%vs.9.1%,P=0.004)。与没有淋巴水肿的患者相比,有7例(13%)患有下肢蜂窝织炎。在多元回归分析中,与淋巴功能障碍独立相关的因素包括肥胖[比值比(OR):4.2,95%置信区间(95CI):1.1-15.2,P=0.027],淋巴细胞减少症[OR:6.2,95CI:2.9-13.2,P<0.001],低蛋白血症[OR:3.7,95CI:1.5-8.82,P=0.003]。
    结论:在RA的肝硬化患者中,淋巴功能障碍是常见的。其存在的重要指标包括低蛋白血症和淋巴细胞减少症,这可能是由于循环中淋巴液的流失。未来在这些患者中动员液体的努力应集中在改善淋巴引流的方法上。
    BACKGROUND: The lymphatic system is crucial in maintaining the body fluid homeostasis. A dysfunctional lymphatic system may contribute to the refractoriness of ascites and edema in cirrhosis patients. Therefore, assessment of lymphatic dysfunction in cirrhosis patients with refractory ascites (RA) can be crucial as it would call for using different strategies for fluid mobilization.
    OBJECTIVE: To assessing the magnitude, spectrum, and clinical associations of lymphatic dysfunction in liver cirrhosis patients with RA.
    METHODS: This observational study included 155 consecutive cirrhosis patients with RA. The presence of clinical signs of lymphedema, such as peau d\'orange appearance and positive Stemmer sign, intestinal lymphangiectasia (IL) on duodenal biopsy seen as dilated vessels in the lamina propria with strong D2-40 immunohistochemistry, and chylous ascites were used to diagnose the overt lymphatic dysfunctions.
    RESULTS: A total of 69 (44.5%) patients out of 155 had evidence of lymphatic dysfunction. Peripheral lymphedema, found in 52 (33.5%) patients, was the most common manifestation, followed by IL in 42 (27.0%) patients, and chylous ascites in 2 (1.9%) patients. Compared to patients without lymphedema, those with lymphedema had higher mean age, median model for end-stage liver disease scores, mean body mass index, mean ascitic fluid triglyceride levels, and proportion of patients with hypoproteinemia (serum total protein < 5 g/dL) and lymphocytopenia (< 15% of total leukocyte count). Patients with IL also had a higher prevalence of lymphocytopenia and hypoproteinemia (28.6% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.004). Seven (13%) patients with lymphedema had lower limb cellulitis compared to none in those without it. On multivariate regression analysis, factors independently associated with lymphatic dysfunction included obesity [odds ratio (OR): 4.2, 95% confidence intervals (95%CI): 1.1-15.2, P = 0.027], lymphocytopenia [OR: 6.2, 95%CI: 2.9-13.2, P < 0.001], and hypoproteinemia [OR: 3.7, 95%CI: 1.5-8.82, P = 0.003].
    CONCLUSIONS: Lymphatic dysfunction is common in cirrhosis patients with RA. Significant indicators of its presence include hypoproteinemia and lymphocytopenia, which are likely due to the loss of lymphatic fluid from the circulation. Future efforts to mobilize fluid in these patients should focus on methods to improve lymphatic drainage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号