An international collaborative study was jointly organised by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) to establish the WHO 3rd International Standard (IS) for Prekallikrein activator (PKA) and European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) PKA in albumin Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) batch 7. Twenty-six laboratories took part in the study to calibrate these replacement batches, as well as an additional reserve batch for the WHO IS, against the current WHO 2nd IS for PKA (02/168). Ph. Eur. PKA in albumin BRP batch 6 was also included to evaluate the continuity of the consecutive batches of BRP. The centrally calculated overall Huber\'s means based on the results from laboratories with at least two valid assays were 29.6 and 29.6 IU/ampoule for the candidate WHO 3rd IS (Sample A) and reserve batch (Sample B), and were 38.4 and 37.0 IU/vial for the current BRP batch 6 (Sample C) and the candidate BRP batch 7 (Sample D). The intra-laboratory variation expressed as coefficient of variation (CV) ranged between 1.4 and 16.6 %. The inter-laboratory variation expressed as CV based on Huber\'s means ranged between 4.4 and 5.4 %. The Huber\'s mean activity of Sample D against Sample C was 36.6 IU/vial with a CV of 1.7 %. These results confirm the good continuity of the consecutive batches of BRP. Based on the results of this study, it is recommended to establish Sample A as the WHO 3rd IS for PKA with an assigned potency of 30 IU/ampoule and Sample D as the Ph. Eur. PKA in albumin BRP batch 7 with an assigned potency of 37 IU/vial. Sample B is intended to be kept as a future reserve replacement WHO IS.

UNASSIGNED: The accurate measurement of α-fetoprotein (AFP) is critical for clinical diagnosis. However, different AFP immunoassays may yield different results. Appropriate AFP reference materials (RMs) were selected and assigned accurate values for applications with external quality assessment (EQA) programs to standardize AFP measurements.
UNASSIGNED: Forty individual clinical samples and six different concentrations of candidate RMs (Can-RMs, L1-L6) were prepared by the Beijing Center for Clinical Laboratories. The Can-RMs were assigned target values by performing five immunoassays, using WHO International Standard 72/225 as a calibrator, and sent to 45 clinical laboratories in Beijing for AFP measurements. The commutability of all RMs was assessed based on CLSI and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) approaches. Analytical performance was assessed for compliance based on accuracy (total error, TE), trueness (bias), and precision (CV).
UNASSIGNED: The Can-RMs were commutable for all immunoassays using the CLSI approach and for 6 of 10 assay combinations using the IFCC approach. RMs diluted in WHO RM 72/225 were commutable among all assays with the CLSI approach, except for serum matrix (Autolumo vs. Roche analyzer) and diluted water matrix (Abbott vs. Roche/Mindray analyzer), whereas some inconclusive and non-commutable results were found using the IFCC approach. The average pass rates based on the TE, bias, and CV were 91%, 81%, and 95%, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: The commutability of the RMs differed between both evaluation approaches. The Can-RMs exhibited good commutability with the CLSI approach, suggesting their suitability for use with that approach as commutable EQA materials with assigned values and for monitoring the performance of AFP measurements.

The growing use of botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) for medical and aesthetic purposes has led to the development and marketing of an increasing number of BoNT products. Given that BoNTs are biological medications, their characteristics are heavily influenced by their manufacturing methods, leading to unique products with distinct clinical characteristics. The manufacturing and formulation processes for each BoNT are proprietary, including the potency determination of reference standards and other features of the assays used to measure unit potency. As a result of these differences, units of BoNT products are not interchangeable or convertible using dose ratios. The intrinsic, product-level differences among BoNTs are compounded by differences in the injected tissues, which are innervated by different nerve fiber types (e.g., motor, sensory, and/or autonomic nerves) and require unique dosing and injection sites that are particularly evident when treating complex therapeutic and aesthetic conditions. It is also difficult to compare across studies due to inherent differences in patient populations and trial methods, necessitating attention to study details underlying each outcome reported. Ultimately, each BoNT possesses a unique clinical profile for which unit doses and injection paradigms must be determined individually for each indication. This practice will help minimize unexpected adverse events and maximize efficacy, duration, and patient satisfaction. With this approach, BoNT is poised to continue as a unique tool for achieving individual goals for an increasing number of medical and aesthetic indications.

Accurate assessments of symptoms and diagnoses are essential for health research and clinical practice but face many challenges. The absence of a single error-free measure is currently addressed by assessment methods involving experts reviewing several sources of information to achieve a more accurate or best-estimate assessment. Three bodies of work spanning medicine, psychiatry, and psychology propose similar assessment methods: The Expert Panel, the Best-Estimate Diagnosis, and the Longitudinal Expert All Data (LEAD). However, the quality of such best-estimate assessments is typically very difficult to evaluate due to poor reporting of the assessment methods and when it is reported, the reporting quality varies substantially. Here we tackle this gap by developing reporting guidelines for such studies, using a four-stage approach: 1) drafting reporting standards accompanied by rationales and empirical evidence, which were further developed with a patient organization for depression, 2) incorporating expert feedback through a two-round Delphi procedure, 3) refining the guideline based on an expert consensus meeting, and 4) testing the guideline by i) having two researchers test it and ii) using it to examine the extent previously published articles report the standards. The last step also demonstrates the need for the guideline: 18 to 58% (Mean = 33%) of the standards were not reported across fifteen randomly selected studies. The LEADING guideline comprises 20 reporting standards related to four groups: The Longitudinal design; the Appropriate data; the Evaluation - experts, materials, and procedures; and the Validity group. We hope that the LEADING guideline will be useful in assisting researchers in planning, reporting, and evaluating research aiming to achieve best-estimate assessments.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare birth weight (BW) distribution and proportion of BWs below or above specified percentiles in low-risk singleton pregnancies in healthy South African (SA) women of mixed ancestry with expected values according to four BW references and to determine the physiological factors affecting BW.
METHODS: This was an ancillary study of a prospective multinational cohort study, involving 7060 women recruited between August 2007 and January 2015 in two townships of Cape Town, characterized by low socioeconomic status, and high levels of drinking and smoking. Detailed information about maternal and pregnancy characteristics, including harmful exposures, was gathered prospectively, allowing us to select healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies without any known harmful exposures. In this cohort we compared the median BW and the proportion of BWs P90, 95 and 97 according to four reference standards (INTERGROWTH-21st, customized according to the method described by Mickolajczyk, Fetal Medicine Foundation and revised Fenton reference) with expected values. Appropriate parametric and nonparametric tests were used, and sensitivity analysis was performed for infant sex, first trimester bookings and women of normal body mass index (BMI). Multiple regression was used to explore effects of confounders. Written consent and ethics approval was obtained.
RESULTS: The cohort included 739 infants. The INTERGROWTH-21st standard was closest for the actual BW-distribution and categories. Below-expected BW was associated with boys, younger, shorter, leaner women, lower parity and gravidity. Actual BW was significantly influenced by maternal weight, BMI, parity and gestational age.
CONCLUSIONS: Of the four references assessed in this study, the INTERGROWTH-21st standard was closest for the actual BW distribution. Maternal variables significantly influence BW.

This publication describes the outcome of a project to develop a replacement European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for Human tetanus immunoglobulin (TIg) as well as for the World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS) for Tetanus Immunoglobulin, Human. Bulk TIg was kindly provided by a European manufacturer and was used to prepare the candidate standard. The candidate standard was freeze-dried and calibrated in an international collaborative study jointly co-ordinated by the Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM, Council of Europe). The results of this study show that there was good agreement between laboratories for the potency estimates obtained for the candidate standard relative to the current WHO IS/Ph. Eur. BRP. The study also demonstrated that the candidate standard is suitable for use in Ph. Eur. assays for potency testing of TIg products and there was good agreement in the potency estimates obtained using the different assay methods included in the study. Accelerated degradation studies performed at the MHRA over a period of 4 years suggest that the freeze-dried candidate standard will be very stable. The candidate standard was established as Ph. Eur. BRP for Human tetanus immunoglobulin, batch 2 with an assigned potency of 45 IU/ampoule. The same preparation was also adopted by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) to serve as the WHO 2nd IS for Tetanus Immunoglobulin, Human (13/240).

The area of forensic chemistry has been growing and developing as a line of research due to the high demands of public safety that require increasingly reliable results due to their importance in criminalistics. In this way, the development of new technologies that help this area, whether in the identification and quantification of drugs or the fight against fraud, becomes promising. In this context, the present work explored the production of reference standards from the purification of cocaine/crack samples seized by the Civil Police of the State of Espírito Santo. Cocaine was purified using chromatographic techniques, and benzoylecgonine was synthesized from purified cocaine. All substances were characterized by ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance. Homogeneity and stability studies were also performed with benzoylecgonine, and the results were evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Cocaine and benzoylecgonine showed purities of 98.37% and 96.34%, respectively. The homogeneity of the batch, short-term stability, and other parameters were also evaluated, which together indicate this proposal as promising in the development of reference standards for drugs of abuse from samples seized by the Brazilian forensic police.

A collaborative study was conducted to establish the first Indian Pharmacopoeia Reference Standard (IPRS) for teriparatide to be used in quality control testing of marketed products in compliance with the Indian Pharmacopoeia (IP) monograph. The study objective was to evaluate the candidate standard in terms of the WHO International Standard (IS) to assign its content in mg per vial terms. This study involved four laboratories from India and the candidate standard was calibrated against the WHO IS by each participant laboratory using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay method per IP monograph. Direct calibration of the candidate standard resulted in an assigned content of 1.02 mg per vial. Based on the study results the candidate standard was judged suitable to serve as the first IPRS for teriparatide for identification and assay by HPLC.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness of our new diagnostic chart using point of care ultrasound combined with CTS-6 for diagnosing idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the data of patients who visited our department and received point of care ultrasound combined with CTS-6 from 2020 to 2023. Data regarding age, sex, initial and final diagnosis, cross-sectional area of the median nerve, CTS-6 score, and electrodiagnostic severity were obtained and statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: Of the 177 wrists included in our study, 138 (78 %) were diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome, while 39 (22 %) were not (non-carpal tunnel syndrome). With our diagnostic method, 127 wrists (72 %) were diagnosed initially with carpal tunnel syndrome, 23 wrists (13 %) with non-carpal tunnel syndrome, and the rest 27 wrists (15 %) as borderline. Our initial diagnoses of carpal tunnel syndrome and non-carpal tunnel syndrome were maintained in all cases except for two. Cross-sectional area, CTS-6 score, and electrodiagnostic severity showed a positive correlation. A post hoc analysis showed that the new scoring system (CTS-6 score + 2 × cross-sectional area) with a cutoff value of 31.25 points showed a sensitivity as high as 95 % and a specificity of 100 %.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that most suspected idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome cases can be diagnosed correctly using the diagnostic chart. Although additional tools, including electrodiagnostic studies, may be needed for borderline cases, the use of point of care ultrasound combined with CTS-6 may be a recommendable first-line confirmatory test because point of care ultrasound and CTS-6 could be complementary tools, and this chart may be especially beneficial for atypical or outlier cases.
METHODS: Diagnostic III.