recurrent laryngeal nerve

喉返神经
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    声带麻痹是由喉返神经(RLN)受累引起的,手术前或切除后。利用显微外科技术对切除的边缘进行接合是RLN切除最有前途的治疗策略。RLN可以通过直接硬膜外接合或使用粘附于推荐的显微外科技术的神经移植物来修复。本文旨在传达我们对RLN切除/损伤及其后续影响的经验。我们评估了我们研究所从2018年4月到2023年9月(5年零5个月)完成的RLN维修,包括至少1年的随访。功能性口腔摄入量表(FOSI)用于评估吞咽困难,误入性风险,喉镜检查的声门间隙,和GRBAS(等级,粗糙度,呼吸,Asthenia,应变)构成了语音专家评估语音质量的基础。手术技术包括使用9-0Ethilon进行初次修复或神经移植物修复。研究中包括10名患者;其中6名(60%)为男性,中位年龄为32岁。在12个月的随访中,只有10%(n=1)被发现有吞咽困难。只有10%(n=1)的声音温和刺耳。该患者是唯一显示最小残余声门间隙的患者。百分之十(n=1)的患者在12个月时表现出B/l脊髓活动,而30%(n=3)显示受影响的声带的闪烁运动。在所有的病人中,发现相反的声带正在补偿。因此,RLN的立即修复有助于声带的一般生理适应,以改善发声并减少误吸和吞咽困难的风险,从而有助于提高生活质量。术中仔细评估后,应从军械库中选择正确的程序。
    Vocal cord paralysis results from involvement of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN), either before the surgery or following excision. Coaptation of the resected edges utilising microsurgical techniques is the most promising therapeutic strategy available for RLN excision. The RLN can be repaired by direct epineural coaptation or using nerve grafts adhering to recommended microsurgical techniques. This article aims to convey our experience with RLN resections/injuries and their subsequent effects. We assessed the RLN repairs that our institute had completed from April 2018 to September 2023(5 years and 5 months) including follow-up of minimum 1 year. The Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOSI) was applied to assess dysphagia, aspiration risk, and glottic gap by laryngoscopy, and GRBAS (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain) comprised the basis for the assessment of voice quality by speech specialists. Surgical technique included using 9-0 Ethilon either for primary repair or for repair with a nerve graft. Ten patients were included in the study; six (60%) of them were male with the median age of 32 years. At 12-month follow-up, only 10% (n = 1) was found to have dysphagia. Only 10% (n = 1) had a mild harsh voice. This same patient was the only patient to show a minimal remnant glottic gap. Ten percent (n = 1) patient showed B/l cord mobility at 12 months, while 30% (n = 3) showed flickering movements of the affected vocal cord. In all the patients, the opposite vocal cord was found to be compensating. Thus, immediate repair of RLN is helpful along with the general physiological adaptation of vocal cords to improve phonation and reduce aspiration and dysphagia risks, thus helping to improve the quality of life. The right procedure should choose from the armoury after careful intraoperative assessment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在探讨甲状腺结节微波消融(MWA)后喉返神经(RLN)损伤的危险因素及影响术后声音嘶哑恢复时间的因素。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了2018年11月至2022年7月在五家医院接受MWA甲状腺结节患者的数据。患者分为恶性结节组和良性结节组。分析的变量包括结节大小和位置,从结节到甲状腺囊和气管食管沟(TEG-D)的最短距离,和消融参数。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定危险因素。使用Kaplan-Meier和Cox分析来评估MWA后声音嘶哑的恢复时间。
    结果:该研究包括1,216名患者(平均年龄44±12[SD]岁;901名女性),其中有602个恶性结节和614个良性结节。后囊距(PCD)和TEG-D是所有患者声音嘶哑的独立影响因素(P=0.014,OR=0.068;P<0.001,OR=0.005;AUC=0.869)。TEG-D是声音嘶哑的重要危险因素,恶性结节的安全阈值为4.9mm,良性结节的安全阈值为2.2mm。在出现声音嘶哑的患者中,与远距离组相比,近距离组(TEG-D≤2mm)的患者恢复时间更长.TEG-D是影响恢复时间的独立因素(P=0.008,HR=11.204)。
    结论:临床医生应该考虑几个因素,特别是TEG-D和PCD,在MWA之前评估RLN损伤的风险时。TEG-D是影响恢复时间的重要独立因素。
    结论:临床医生应注意MWA前RLN损伤的几个影响因素,TEG-D是MWA后声音嘶哑恢复时间的独立影响因素。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury after microwave ablation (MWA) of thyroid nodules and to identify factors influencing the recovery time of post-procedure hoarseness.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent MWA for thyroid nodules at five hospitals between November 2018 and July 2022. Patients were divided into malignant and benign nodule groups. Variables analyzed included nodule size and location, the shortest distance from nodules to the thyroid capsule and tracheoesophageal groove (TEG-D), and ablation parameters. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors. Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses were used to evaluate the recovery time of hoarseness after MWA.
    RESULTS: The study included 1,216 patients (mean age 44 ± 12 [SD] years; 901 women) with 602 malignant nodules and 614 benign nodules. The posterior capsule distance (PCD) and TEG-D were identified as independent influencing factors for hoarseness in all patients (P = 0.014, OR = 0.068; P < 0.001, OR = 0.005; AUC = 0.869). TEG-D was a significant risk factor for hoarseness, with safe thresholds identified at 4.9 mm for malignant nodules and 2.2 mm for benign nodules. Among patients who developed hoarseness, those in the close-distance group (TEG-D≤2 mm) had a longer recovery time compared to the distant-distance group. TEG-D was an independent factor influencing recovery time (P = 0.008, HR = 11.204).
    CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should consider several factors, particularly TEG-D and PCD, when assessing the risk of RLN injury before MWA. TEG-D was a vital independent factor influencing recovery time.
    CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should pay attention to several influencing factors for RLN injury before MWA and TEG-D was an independent influencing factor for recovery time of hoarseness after MWA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:术后喉返神经麻痹是甲状腺手术并发症之一,瘫痪的预防和管理是外科医生的重要问题。在这项研究中,为了进一步了解甲状腺手术后喉返神经麻痹,我们分析并检查了神经刺激器对喉返神经麻痹的作用以及可能导致喉返神经麻痹的因素。此外,在发生短暂性喉返神经麻痹的情况下,我们分析并检查了每次术中发现和术中手术导致瘫痪的声带运动改善的时机。
    方法:在耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,札幌医科大学医院,2012年1月至2021年12月,受试者为543例甲状腺手术患者(692条神经),术前均未发生麻痹或癌神经侵犯。使用单变量和多变量分析评估喉返神经术后短暂性和永久性麻痹之间的关系。评估的因素是性别,年龄,BMI,甲状腺全切除术,仁慈,恶性肿瘤,严重的疾病,使用IIONM(间歇性术中神经监测),使用CIONM(连续术中神经监测),恶性肿瘤T3b或更高,侧颈解剖,和多年的外科医生经验。此外,通过瞄准87条短暂瘫痪的神经,手术分为三组:轻伤、重大伤害,和附着力,并评价其与术后声带运动改善时机的关系。
    结果:喉返神经永久性麻痹发生在12条神经(1.7%),100条神经发生一过性麻痹(14.5%)。单因素分析显示与各因素无关联,但多变量分析显示,在男性和使用IIONM的患者中,短暂性麻痹显著降低.轻伤组声带麻痹改善时间为2.8个月,严重损伤组4.5个月,粘连组3.2个月,表明轻微损伤组和严重损伤组之间的统计学差异。
    结论:这项研究表明,使用IIONM和对女性进行温和操作可以预防甲状腺手术期间的喉返神经麻痹。此外,了解术后短暂性喉返神经麻痹每次手术的神经恢复时间可能有助于患者解释和确定言语改善手术的治疗干预时机。
    OBJECTIVE: Postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis is one of the complications of thyroid surgery, and the prevention and management of paralysis is an important issue for surgeons. In this study, in order to gain further understanding of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis after thyroid surgery, we analyzed and examined the usefulness of nerve stimulators for recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis and the factors that may cause recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis. Furthermore, in cases where transient recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis occurred, we analyzed and examined the timing of improvement in vocal cord movement for each intraoperative finding and intraoperative operation that caused the paralysis.
    METHODS: At the Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, between January 2012 and December 2021, the subjects were 543 thyroid surgery cases (692 nerves) without preoperative paralysis or cancer nerve invasion performed. The relationship between postoperative transient and permanent paralysis of the recurrent laryngeal nerve was evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis. The factors evaluated were gender, age, BMI, total thyroidectomy, benignity, malignancy, Graves\' disease, using IIONM (intermittent intraoperative nerve monitoring), using CIONM (continuous intraoperative nerve monitoring), malignant tumor T3b or higher, with lateral neck dissection, and years of experience of the surgeon. Furthermore, by targeting 87 nerves with transient paralysis, surgical operations were divided into three groups: minor injury, major injury, and adhesion, and their relationship with the timing of postoperative vocal fold movement improvement was evaluated.
    RESULTS: Permanent paralysis of the recurrent laryngeal nerve occurred in 12 nerves (1.7 %), and transient paralysis occurred in 100 nerves (14.5 %). Univariate analysis showed no association with each factor, but multivariate analysis showed that transient paralysis was significantly lower in men and in patients using IIONM. The improvement time for vocal cord paralysis was 2.8 months in the minor injury group, 4.5 months in the major injury group, and 3.2 months in the adhesion group, indicating a statistically significant difference between the minor injury group and the major injury group.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the use of IIONM and gentle manipulation of women may prevent recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis during thyroid surgery. In addition, understanding the period of nerve recovery for each operation for postoperative transient recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis may contribute to patient explanations and determining the timing of therapeutic intervention for speech improvement surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    喉返神经麻痹是动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后一种罕见但重要的并发症。此过程之后对语音质量的影响也很重要。该研究的目的是评估CEA后的语音质量和声带功能。
    200名患者被纳入研究。纳入标准是CEA的适应症和患者同意该程序。手术前进行喉内窥镜检查,手术后立即,手术后的第二天,然后在手术后3个月和6个月。通过最大发声时间(MPT)评估语音,GRBAS量表,语音障碍指数(VHI)和语音相关生活质量(V-RQOL)问卷。
    在研究组中,与对照组相比,GRBAS量表的结果明显更差,平均MPT较短。在V-RQOL评估中,患者评价他们的声音是正常或良好,更经常注意到他们难以大声说话和被听到,他们说话时感到空气不足。在VHI-30中,研究组的总分明显高于对照组。68例患者报告了手术后的语音障碍,而32例患者术后立即观察到喉返神经紊乱。大多数声带疾病是短暂的。最终,3%的患者被诊断为声带麻痹。
    颅神经麻痹,包括喉返神经,是CEA后常见的并发症。大多数瘫痪是短暂的,但需要适当的诊断和治疗程序。声带评估是一种非侵入性且广泛可用的检查,应在所有颈部手术后的术前和术后进行。CEA术后语音障碍的发生率显著影响患者的生活质量,需要语音康复和患者心理支持的护理。
    UNASSIGNED: Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy is a rare but important complication after endarterectomy (CEA). The impact on voice quality after this procedure is also important. The aim of the study was to assess voice quality and vocal cord function after CEA.
    UNASSIGNED: 200 patients were enrolled in the study. Inclusion criteria were indications for CEA and patient consent to the procedure. Endoscopic examination of the larynx was performed before the procedure, immediately after the procedure, on the 2nd day after the procedure, then 3 month and 6 months after the procedure. Voice was assessed by maximum phonation time (MPT), GRBAS scale, Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and the Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) questionnaire.
    UNASSIGNED: In the study group, the results on the GRBAS scale were significantly worse and the average MPT was shorter compared to the control group. In the V-RQOL assessment, patients rated their voice as fair or good, significantly more often noticed that they had difficulty speaking loudly and being heard, and that they felt short of air when speaking. In VHI-30, the total score was significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group. Voice disorders after the procedure were reported by 68 patients, while a disorder of the recurrent laryngeal nerve was observed immediately after the procedure in 32 patients. Most vocal cord disorders were transient. Ultimately, 3% of patients were diagnosed with vocal cord paralysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Cranial nerves paralysis, including the recurrent laryngeal nerve, are a common complication after CEA. Majority the paralysis is transient, but requires appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Vocal cord evaluation is a non-invasive and widely available examination and should be performed pre- and postoperatively after all neck surgeries. The incidence of voice disorders after CEA significantly affects the quality of life of patients and requires voice rehabilitation and patient care with psychological support.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    迷走神经刺激器(VNS)植入是治疗其他治疗难治性癫痫的重要疗法;然而,它与非常高的语音变化率有关。这些患者中很少有人进行声带运动障碍评估。在这个系列中,我们评估了5例具有VNS刺激强迫外展新表型的患者。
    回顾性病例系列。
    包括5名VNS植入患者,他们接受了直接手术或办公室刚性喉镜检查,并且有与VNS激活相关的声带运动障碍。所有5例患者的声带活动均关闭,VNS关闭,并固定激活。所有患者均表现出VNS激活的声带外展。病人2已经接受了喉部神经支配,这有助于她的间歇性发声障碍,但留下了一个小的声门间隙。1型甲状腺成形术纠正了这个差距,并进一步改善了她的声音。患者3经历了喉部神经支配,其早期结果显示感知和患者报告结果的改善。患者4和5均经历了喉部神经支配,声音有所改善。
    先前报道的与VNS使用相关的受刺激不动的病例仅描述了声带的内收。该系列扩展了先前的工作,表明VNS激活也可以导致在被绑架的位置受刺激的不动,神经支配和其他中介化程序提供了有希望的治疗。
    UNASSIGNED: Vagal nerve stimulator (VNS) implantation is a vital therapy for epilepsy refractory to other treatments; however, it is associated with a very high rate of voice changes. Relatively few of these patients are evaluated for vocal fold motion impairments. In this series, we evaluate 5 such patients with a novel phenotype of forced abduction with VNS stimulation.
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective case series.
    UNASSIGNED: Five patients with a VNS implant who underwent operative direct or in-office rigid laryngoscopy and had vocal fold motion impairment associated with VNS activation are included. All 5 patients had vocal fold mobility with VNS off and a fixed with activation. All patients exhibited vocal fold abduction with VNS activation. Patient 2 has since undergone laryngeal reinnervation, which helped her intermittent dysphonia but left a small glottic gap. A type 1 thyroplasty corrected this gap and improved her voice further. Patient 3 has undergone laryngeal reinnervation for which early results show improvement in perceptual and patient reported outcomes. Patients 4 and 5 have both undergone laryngeal reinnervation with improvement in voice.
    UNASSIGNED: Previous reported cases of stimulated immobility associated with VNS use describe only adduction of the vocal fold. This series expands the previous work showing the VNS activation can also cause stimulated immobility in an abducted position, for which reinnervation and other medialization procedures offer promising treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非喉返神经(NRLN)是在约0.52-0.7%的患者中看到的解剖变异,一般在右边。它离开迷走神经,直接通向喉,不像通常的喉返神经,除了环甲外,还提供内在的喉部肌肉。它在极少数情况下位于左侧,也就是说,0.04%的病例。一些NRLN病例与食管后方的异常右锁骨下动脉共存,也被称为“动脉lusoria”。这里我们介绍一个60岁的病人,2023年6月,在巴基斯坦卡拉奇三级医疗机构的头颈外科,诊断为甲状腺肿。术中,遇到了非复发性神经,发现了与Lusoria的联系,在术前CT扫描中观察到。保留了神经,患者未见术后并发症。在这种情况下,动脉lusoria的关联强调了其在通过术前成像技术预测NRLN中的重要性,该技术可以防止术中损伤。
    Non-recurrent laryngeal nerve (NRLN) is an anatomic variation seen in about 0.52-0.7% patients, generally on right side. It exits the vagus nerve having a direct route to the larynx, unlike usual recurrent laryngeal nerve, supplying intrinsic laryngeal muscles except cricothyroid. It is sited over left side on extremely rare occasions, that is, 0.04% of the cases. Some cases of NRLN co-exists with aberrant right subclavian artery which courses behind the esophagus, also known as \'arteria lusoria\'. Here we present a case of 60-years old patient, diagnosed as goiter presented to us in june 2023 at the department of head and neck surgery at a tertiary care setup of Karachi Pakistan. Intra-operatively, non-recurrent nerve was encountered, whose association was found with arteria lusoria, observed in pre-operative CT-scan. The nerve was saved and no post-operative complications were seen in patient. The association of arteria lusoria in this case emphasize its importance in predicting NRLN via pre-operative imaging techniques which can prevent its injury intra-operatively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在阐明隆突下转移模式,胸段食管鳞状细胞癌的左、右喉返神经淋巴结清扫及探讨相应的淋巴结清扫策略。
    方法:对2020年12月至2024年4月行食管切除术的胸段食管鳞癌患者进行回顾性分析。隆突下的危险因素,采用卡方检验和多因素logistic回归分析确定左、右喉返神经淋巴结转移。我们根据不同的临床病理特征可视化了这些特定淋巴结的转移率。隆突下之间的相关性,同时分析左右喉返淋巴结转移及术后并发症。
    结果:共纳入503例胸段食管鳞癌患者行食管切除术。隆突下的转移率,左右喉返神经淋巴结占10.3%,10.3%,10.9%,分别。淋巴管浸润状态和肿瘤位置是隆下和右喉返神经淋巴结转移的重要预测因素,分别为(P<0.001和P=0.013)。对于左喉返神经淋巴结转移,年龄较小(P=0.020)和淋巴管浸润(P=0.009)是显著的危险因素.此外,肺部感染是隆突下夹层术后最常见的并发症,左右喉返淋巴结。吻合口漏发生率差异无统计学意义(P=0.872)。肺部感染(P=0.139),乳糜胸(P=0.702),隆突下淋巴结清扫队列和保留队列之间的声音嘶哑(P=0.179)。与保留队列相比,右侧(P=0.042)和左侧(P=0.010)喉返神经淋巴结清扫队列的声音嘶哑发生率显着增加,发病率分别为5.9%和6.7%,分别。
    结论:隆突下转移率,胸段食管鳞癌中左右喉返神经淋巴结均超过10%。隆突下淋巴结清扫术不会增加术后并发症风险,喉返神经淋巴结清扫术显著增加了声音嘶哑的发生率。因此,隆突下淋巴结的淋巴结清扫应常规进行,而喉返神经淋巴结清扫术可以在特定患者中选择性进行。
    OBJECTIVE: This research aimed to clarify the metastatic patterns of subcarinal, right and left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and to investigate appropriate strategies for lymph node dissection.
    METHODS: Patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving esophagectomy from December 2020 to April 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Risk factors for subcarinal, right and left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes metastasis were determined by chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression analysis. We visualized the metastasis rates of these specific lymph nodes based on the different clinicopathological characteristics. Correlation between subcarinal, right and left recurrent laryngeal lymph nodes metastasis and postoperative complications were also analyzed.
    RESULTS: A total of 503 thoracic esophageal squamous carcinoma patients who underwent esophagectomy were enrolled. The metastasis rates of subcarinal, right and left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes were 10.3%, 10.3%, and 10.9%, respectively. The lymphovascular invasion status and tumor location were the significant predictors for subcarinal and right recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes metastasis, respectively (P < 0.001 and P = 0.013). For left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node metastasis, younger age (P = 0.020) and presence of lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.009) were significant risk factors. Additionally, pulmonary infection is the most frequent postoperative complication in patients with dissection of subcarinal, right and left recurrent laryngeal lymph nodes. There was no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic leakage (P = 0.872), pulmonary infection (P = 0.139), chylothorax (P = 0.702), and hoarseness (P = 0.179) between the subcarinal lymph node dissection cohort and the reservation cohort. The incidence of hoarseness significantly increased in both right (P = 0.042) and left (P = 0.010) recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes dissection cohorts compared by the reservation cohorts, with incidence rates of 5.9% and 6.7%, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: The metastasis rates of subcarinal, right and left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were all over 10%. The dissection of subcarinal lymph nodes does not increase postoperative complications risk, while recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes dissection significantly increases the incidence of hoarseness. Thus, lymph node dissection of subcarinal lymph nodes should be conducted routinely, while recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes dissection may be selectively performed in specific patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究的目的是描述当计划的双侧甲状腺手术的第一侧发生信号丢失(LOS)时,甲状腺外科医生在不同手术量下采用的管理和相关随访策略,并进一步定义术中神经监测(IONM)应用的共识。
    方法:国际神经监测研究组(INMSG)基于网络的调查已发送给全球950名甲状腺外科医生。调查包括参与者的信息,IONM团队/设备/程序,术中/术后LOS的管理,良性和恶性甲状腺切除术第一侧LOS的处理。
    结果:在950,318(33.5%)的受访者完成了调查。根据甲状腺手术量进行亚组分析:<50例/年(n=108,34%);50至100例/年(n=69,22%);和>100例/年(n=141,44.3%)。大批量外科医生(P<0.05)更有可能执行标准程序(L1-V1-R1-S1-S2-R2-V2-L2),为了区分真/假LOS,并验证LOS损伤/损伤类型。当LOS发生时,大多数外科医生会安排耳鼻喉科医生或言语咨询。当出现第一侧LOS时,并非所有受访者都决定进行对侧手术,特别是对于患有严重疾病的恶性患者(例如,甲状腺外浸润和低分化甲状腺癌)。
    结论:受访者认为IONM在基于团队的协作方法下进行时得到了优化,并完成了IONM标准程序和LOS管理算法,尤其是那些体积大的。在第一站点LOS的情况下,外科医生可以确定疾病相关的最佳管理,患者相关,和手术因素。外科医生需要对LOS管理标准和准则进行额外的教育,以掌握其涉及IONM应用的决策过程。
    BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to describe the management and associated follow-up strategies adopted by thyroid surgeons with different surgical volumes when loss of signal (LOS) occurred on the first side of planned bilateral thyroid surgery, and to further define the consensus on intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) applications.
    METHODS: The International Neural Monitoring Study Group (INMSG) web-based survey was sent to 950 thyroid surgeons worldwide. The survey included information on the participants, IONM team/equipment/procedure, intraoperative/postoperative management of LOS, and management of LOS on the first side of thyroidectomy for benign and malignant disease.
    RESULTS: Out of 950, 318 (33.5%) respondents completed the survey. Subgroup analyses were performed based on thyroid surgery volume: <50 cases/year (n = 108, 34%); 50 to 100 cases/year (n = 69, 22%); and >100 cases/year (n = 141, 44.3%). High-volume surgeons were significantly (P < .05) more likely to perform the standard procedures (L1-V1-R1-S1-S2-R2-V2-L2), to differentiate true/false LOS, and to verify the LOS lesion/injury type. When LOS occurs, most surgeons arrange otolaryngologists or speech consultation. When first-side LOS occurs, not all respondents decided to perform stage contralateral surgery, especially for malignant patients with severe disease (eg, extrathyroid invasion and poorly differentiated thyroid cancer).
    CONCLUSIONS: Respondents felt that IONM was optimized when conducted under a collaborative team-based approach, and completed IONM standard procedures and management algorithm for LOS, especially those with high volume. In cases of first-site LOS, surgeons can determine the optimal management of disease-related, patient-related, and surgical factors. Surgeons need additional education on LOS management standards and guidelines to master their decision-making process involving the application of IONM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号