Here, we report a case of laparoscopic trans-inguinal hernia repair (transabdominal preperitoneal repair or TAPP) for a recurrent inguinal hernia following direct Kugel surgery. A 71-year-old man underwent direct Kugel hernioplasty for a right inguinal hernia at another hospital 4 years prior to presentation. The patient subsequently underwent laparoscopic surgery using the TAPP technique, during which the abdominal cavity was visualized with a laparoscope, revealing a tubular mesh protruding towards the abdominal cavity with a direct and indirect hernia ring. Three months post-surgery, no recurrence was observed.

We present a case of a recurrent inguinal bladder hernia that was previously unsuccessfully operated on three times and was repaired using totally extraperitoneal repair (TEP). A 79-year-old man presented with a right inguinal swelling that had been treated three times on the same side with anterior approaches. Computed tomography confirmed a recurrent inguinal bladder hernia. TEP was performed after identifying the bladder hernia preoperatively, with previous surgeries that used a plug-and-patch technique through an anterior approach. The extraperitoneal approach allowed the bladder to be reduced without injury and the hernia to be safely repaired using a 3D Max® Light Mesh. The postoperative recovery was uneventful, with no recurrence after 1 year. TEP facilitates the diagnosis and repair of bladder hernias, emphasizing the importance of preoperative diagnosis and the efficacy of endoscopic procedures in bladder hernia repair, even in recurrent cases.

Inguinal hernias are among the most common cases presented to a surgeon. In spite of extensive research and clinical experience over centuries, inguinal hernias still pose anatomical challenges for operating surgeons, especially with a propensity for recurrence. One such complicated entity is the Amyand\'s hernia - defined as an inguinal hernia contained within the hernial sac - the vermiform appendix - as the herniated content. It is a rare clinical presentation and carries with it certain complexities with regard to operative decisions and clinical management. We present a case of a 71-year-old male presenting with a recurrent inguinal hernia, with an incarcerated, inflamed appendix as the content; managed surgically with appendicectomy and herniorraphy, without the use of a prosthetic mesh.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of laparoscopic techniques in the management of inguinal hernias among pediatric patients has seen a rising trend. We aimed to assess the efficacy of laparoscopic excision of the hernial sac as a suitable approach for managing inguinal hernias specifically in female patients and conducted a prospective study to investigate this hypothesis.
METHODS: Over a comprehensive four-year period, a total of 99 hernias in 69 female patients were surgically addressed using laparoscopic methods. The surgical procedure primarily involved the laparoscopic inversion and excision of the hernial sac without subsequent distal suturing.
RESULTS: During the initial phase of the study, two cases encountered recurrences within 48 hours post-operation, potentially attributed to incomplete excision. However, in the subsequent period, no further recurrences were recorded.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings support the contention that laparoscopic excision of the sac, without adjunctive closure of the peritoneum, suffices as an effective approach for managing inguinal hernias in female pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic redo inguinal hernia (LRIH) repairs are fraught with challenges as the pre-peritoneal space is violated due to previous surgery and the presence of mesh. The purpose of this study was to present the feasibility and safety of LRIH in a series of patients with recurrent inguinal hernia following previous endolaparoscopic repair and present technical experiences and clinical outcomes in this subset of patients.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study from a prospective database of 16 patients who underwent LRIH between March 2014 and December 2020. The decision to do a redo laparoscopic surgery was undertaken after a detailed discussion with the patient. The operative details, challenges faced and tips to overcome difficulties have been explained in detail.
RESULTS: Out of 16 patients (mean age 49.5 years, all men), 15 underwent laparoscopic redo trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) mesh repair and 1 underwent laparoscopic enhanced-view totally extra-peritoneal (eTEP) mesh repair. The mean operating time was 68.5 min for unilateral, 115 min for bilateral TAPP and 90 min for eTEP. The main contributing factors for recurrences were mesh migration, insufficient size of the mesh and inadequate fixation. There was no conversion to open repair. The duration of stay was 1-2 days. There was no documented re-recurrence during the follow-up period of 2-9 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our experience, redo laparoscopic inguinal hernia mesh repair after previous endolaparoscopic repair is feasible, effective and safe in experienced hands.

BACKGROUND: Amyand\'s hernia (AH)-where the appendix becomes incarcerated within the inguinal hernia (IH) sac-is rare, particularly if detected and operated concurrent with a contralateral recurrent IH.
METHODS: A 65-year-old man presented with symptomatic bilateral IH; the left IH was recurrent. Abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) revealed a right IH with appendiceal herniation and left recurrent IH with omental fat. Using the prolene hernia system (PHS) mesh, the left recurrent IH underwent operation, followed by the right AH. The patient was in a good state with no recurrence 16 months postsurgery.
CONCLUSIONS: If AH is accidentally encountered during surgery, the procedure should differ depending on the inflammatory state of the appendix. Simultaneously operating AH and contralateral recurrent IH is complicated; it is necessary to preoperatively decide which side to operate on first and whether to use an anterior or laparoscopic posterior surgical approach. If the planned operation is unattainable, alternative surgery should be considered. Fortunately, herein CT was performed prior to surgery, and the surgical plan was properly established.
CONCLUSIONS: Prior to simultaneous AH and contralateral recurrent IH surgery, the surgical plan should be established. If the planned surgical technique for recurrent hernia repair is not feasible, an alternative should be performed. In AH repair, different surgical methods are required depending on the presence and severity of inflammation of the appendix.

UNASSIGNED: The literature regarding size descriptions for spermatic cord lipomas is limited. The term \"giant\" is utilized loosely and seen on case reports for masses as small as 6 cm. Here we present a case of a giant left sided spermatic cord lipoma, found incidentally during a recurrent inguinal hernia repair, that measured 18 × 14 × 10 cm on final pathologic examination.
METHODS: A 59 year old male, with a history of morbid obesity and surgical history of prior bilateral inguinal hernia repair, presented with recurrent left sided groin and scrotal bulging with associated discomfort several months after the initial hernia repair. Following imaging performed on preoperative work up, the patient was brought to the operating room for a robotic inguinal hernia repair.
UNASSIGNED: Preoperative physical examination was limited due to the patient\'s body habitus which precluded a definitive diagnosis of inguinal hernia based on physical examination. Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis was performed with findings consistent with bilateral recurrent inguinal hernias. A bilateral robotic inguinal hernia repair was attempted. The procedure was converted to open via a groin incision when an incidental 18 cm left sided spermatic cord lipoma was discovered. An orchiectomy was ultimately performed as the mass was intimately intertwined with the spermatic cord.
CONCLUSIONS: In our case, the patient had a recurrent inguinal hernia and an incidental finding of an 18 cm spermatic cord lipoma which warranted a left orchiectomy followed by open inguinal hernia repair. We propose standardizing the term \"giant\" to include spermatic cord lipomas >15 cm.

Introduction Surgery for complex inguinal hernia (IH) (recurrent IH or IH after radical prostatectomy (RP)) may be difficult because of the presumed scar or adhesion in the retropubic space. A hybrid method combining the laparoscopic and anterior approaches (HLAA) in a bidirectional surgical technique may be an option in complex IH cases. Methods Patients at our institution who underwent IH repair for complex IH using HLAA from April 2018 to November 2019 were included. We retrospectively evaluated the patient characteristics, IH diagnosis, intraoperative variables, complications, and hernia recurrence during the follow-up period. Results Twenty patients were involved in this study. Seven patients underwent hLAA for recurrent IH, whereas the remaining 13 underwent hLAA for IH after RP. Five patients had bilateral IH, all of whom had IH after RP. The type of IH was lateral in 21 patients, medial in six patients, and lateral and medial in two patients. Hernia repair was performed using a patch alone in two patients and a plug and patch in 18 patients. Seroma or hematoma was observed in five patients, and one patient experienced chronic pain. No hernia recurrence was observed during the median follow-up period of 24 months. Conclusion hLAA could facilitate precise diagnosis and intraoperative confirmation of repair for recurrent IH and IH after RP. The intraoperative findings and the cause of recurrence can be easily shared among surgeons in hLAA. Further investigations are necessary to determine the long-term efficacy of hLAA in a larger cohort.

The Kugel procedure resulted in extensive adhesion in the preperitoneal space. Performing a transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) for recurrent hernia after Kugel procedure is extremely difficult. In this case report, we present the case of a 81-year-old male who presented with recurrent inguinal hernia after Kugel procedure 8 years ago. Transabdominal laparoscopy was performed first. Indirect hernia formed inferior to the lateral edge of the previous mesh was diagnosed under laparoscopy. The patient\'s medial umbilical ligament (MUL) was big enough and could be completely released by separating the Retzius space. Finally, TAPP was successfully performed by using the MUL to create and close the preperitoneal space. No perioperative complications or hernia recurrence was observed 1 year after the surgery. Using the MUL to deal with preperitoneal problems was practical and feasible.

Introduction: Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in general surgery. Despite surgical advances, recurrence and chronic pain are still major issues after this intervention. Aim of our study was to retrospectively assess and compare outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. Methods: All patients who underwent recurrent inguinal hernia repair between 2014 and 2021 in five different institutions were included in our study. Baseline data on age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, smoking habit, and anticoagulant therapy were retrospectively collected from prospectively maintained databases. Operative time, length of stay, and early and late complications were compared between the robotic and the laparoscopic approach. Results: Forty-eight patients underwent recurrent inguinal hernia repair between January 2014 and December 2021. Twenty-three patients underwent a robotic procedure, whereas 25 were submitted to the laparoscopic intervention. Overall mean follow-up was 26.2 months. There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics of the two groups. Acceptable and comparable rates of peri- and postoperative outcomes were recorded. However, postoperative visual analog scale score and incidence of chronic pain were lower after the robotic rather than after the laparoscopic approach. (2.9 versus 3.8 P = .002; 20% versus 0%; P = .02, respectively). Conclusions: Minimally invasive repair of recurrent inguinal hernia is safe and feasible; robotic surgery is associated with low rate of postoperative and chronic pain without a significant increase in operative time.