This study compared rates of empirical-therapy use and negative patient outcomes between complicated and recurrent urinary tract infection (r/cUTI) cases diagnosed with a multiplex polymerase chain reaction or pooled antibiotic susceptibility testing (M-PCR/P-AST) vs. standard urine culture (SUC). Subjects were 577 symptomatic adults (n = 207 males and n = 370 females) presenting to urology/urogynecology clinics between 03/30/2022 and 05/24/2023. Treatment and outcomes were recorded by the clinician and patient surveys. The M-PCR/P-AST (n = 252) and SUC (n = 146) arms were compared after patient matching for confounding factors. The chi-square and Fisher\'s exact tests were used to analyze demographics and clinical outcomes between study arms. Reduced empirical-treatment use (28.7% vs. 66.7%), lower composite negative events (34.5% vs. 46.6%, p = 0.018), and fewer individual negative outcomes of UTI-related medical provider visits and UTI-related visits for hospitalization/an urgent care center/an emergency room (p < 0.05) were observed in the M-PCR/P-AST arm compared with the SUC arm. A reduction in UTI symptom recurrence in patients ≥ 60 years old was observed in the M-PCR/P-AST arm (p < 0.05). Study results indicate that use of the M-PCR/P-AST test reduces empirical antibiotic treatment and negative patient outcomes in r/cUTI cases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of vaccination with StroVac compared to placebo in patients with recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI).
METHODS: We performed a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study in patients with uncomplicated rUTI. Patients received three single intramuscular injections with StroVac every two weeks. Primary endpoint was the number of bacterial urinary tract infections (UTI) over 13.5 months after randomization and adjusted by the respective \"baseline\" value when comparing verum and placebo group. Secondary endpoints were the number of patients with non-recurrence, time to first recurrence, frequency of recurrences, and patients\' self-assessment of quality of life using a validated questionnaire.
RESULTS: 376 patients were randomized to both groups between January 2012 and March 2015. Mean age was 44.4 years. Patients were mainly female (98.4%). In the StroVac group (n = 188), the number of UTIs was reduced from 5.5 to 1.2, in the placebo group (n = 188) from 5.4 to 1.3 (p = 0.63). In patients with ≥ 7 UTIs prior to study inclusion, StroVac was statistically significantly superior to placebo (p = 0.048). However, in all other secondary endpoints, no statistical differences between the two groups could be seen (all p > 0.3).
CONCLUSIONS: StroVac reduced the number of clinically relevant UTIs like in former studies but did not show statistically significant better results than the chosen placebo. Most likely, that was due to a, since confirmed, prophylactic effect of the chosen placebo itself. Therefore, placebo-controlled and double-blinded studies using a different ineffective placebo preparation are needed to determine the importance of StroVac in prophylaxis of rUTI.