■自1949年以来,胸膜内纤溶疗法已被用作治疗复杂的胸腔积液和脓胸的有效药物。几种药物,如链激酶(STK),尿激酶(英国),发现和重组组织纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)有效,效果可变。然而,头对头对照试验,以比较最常用的药物的疗效,即UK和rt-PA(阿替普酶)在治疗复杂的胸腔积液中的报道很少。
■将50名患者随机分为两个干预组,即英国和rt-PA。rt-PA的剂量为10mg,英国的是1.0个紫胶单位。英国每天接受三次,为期两天,然后夹紧,使药物在胸膜腔中保留2小时。rt-PA每天两次滴入胸膜腔,持续两天,并夹住肋间引流1小时。
■共有50名患者参加了这项研究,其中84%(n=42)为男性,16%(n=8)为女性。其中,30(60%)患者接受英国,20例(40%)患者接受了阿替普酶作为IPFT药物。UK组胸膜混浊的平均变化为-33.0%(SD/-9.9)和阿替普酶组的-41.0%(SD/-14.9)(P值-0.014)。疼痛是最常见的不良副作用,UK组中60%(n=18)的患者和阿替普酶组中40%(n=8)的患者发生(P值0.24),而发热是第二常见的副作用.早期报告(在症状发作的6周内)的患者表现出比晚期报告干预的患者更大的反应。
■IPFT是治疗复杂的胸腔积液或脓胸的安全有效选择,与传统药物如UK相比,阿替普酶等新型药物具有更高的疗效和相似的不良反应。
BACKGROUND: Intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (IPFT) has been used as an effective agent since 1949 for managing complicated pleural effusion and empyema. Several agents, such as streptokinase, urokinase (UK), and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), have been found to be effective with variable effectiveness. However, a head-tohead controlled trial comparing the efficacy of the most frequently used agents, i.e., UK and rt-PA (alteplase) for managing complicated pleural effusion has rarely been reported.
METHODS: A total of 50 patients were randomized in two intervention groups, i.e., UK and rt-PA. The dose of rt-PA was 10 mg, and that of UK was 1.0 lac units. UK was given thrice daily for 2 days, followed by clamping to allow the retainment of drugs in the pleural space for 2 hours. rt-PA was instilled into the pleural space twice daily for 2 days, and intercostal drainage was clamped for 1 hour.
RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were enrolled into the study, of which 84% (n=42) were males and 16% (n=8) were females. Among them, 30 (60%) patients received UK, and 20 (40%) patients received alteplase as IPFT agents. The percentage of mean± standard deviation changes in pleural opacity was -33.0%±9.9% in the UK group and -41.0%±14.9% in the alteplase group, respectively (p=0.014). Pain was the most common adverse side effect, occurring in 60% (n=18) of the patients in the UK group and in 40% (n=8) of the patients in the alteplase group (p=0.24), while fever was the second most common side effect. Patients who reported early (within 6 weeks of onset of symptoms) showed a greater response than those who reported late for the intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: IPFT is a safe and effective option for managing complicated pleural effusion or empyema, and newer agents, such as alteplase, have greater efficacy and a similar adverse effect profile when compared with conventional agents, such as UK.