UNASSIGNED: Inetetamab is a novel antibody targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) developed in China. Due to its optimized antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity effect compared with trastuzumab, it has shown good efficacy and safety in the treatment of HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC).
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of inetetamab combination therapy in the treatment of HER2-positive ABC in real-world clinical practice.
UNASSIGNED: Retrospective study.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 133 patients with HER2-positive ABC who were treated with inetetamab-based regimens between March 2020 and January 2024 were retrospectively included in this study. The main endpoint was median progression-free survival (mPFS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.
UNASSIGNED: The study included 133 HER2-positive ABC patients, and the median age was 55 years. The mPFS was 8.0 (6.7-9.3) months. The ORR was 50.4%, while the DCR was 88.7%. The mPFS for patients receiving inetetamab-based therapy as first to second, third to fourth, and later lines of metastatic treatment were 14.0, 7.0, and 6.0 months, respectively. Patients treated with inetetamab plus pyrotinib plus chemotherapy, especially with capecitabine, had the best outcomes (mPFS = 14.0 months). Multivariate analysis revealed that prior HER2-TKI treatment was significantly associated with worse PFS (hazard ratios 2.829, 95% confidence interval 1.265-6.328, p = 0.011). Subgroup analysis indicated that patients without visceral metastases had significantly better PFS (14.0 months vs 8.0 months, p = 0.003). The overall incidence of any grade adverse events (AEs) was 100%, with most being grades 1-2. Severe complications included neutropenia (37.6%) and leukopenia (33.1%).
UNASSIGNED: Inetetamab-based combination therapy shows promising efficacy and good safety in patients with HER2-positive ABC. It is one of the late-line treatment options for Chinese patients with HER2-positive ABC.

BACKGROUND: The combination of encorafenib with cetuximab has become the standard of care in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after a prior systemic therapy. This study aims to describe the efficacy and safety of encorafenib/cetuximab +/- binimetinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC in a real-world setting.
METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC who received this combination from January 2020 to June 2022 in 30 centers.
RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were included, with 55% of women, a median age of 62 years, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) >1 in 20% of cases. The main tumor characteristics were 60% of right-sided primary tumor, 11% of microsatellite instability/mismatch repair deficient phenotype, and liver and peritoneum being the two main metastatic sites (57% and 51%). Encorafenib/cetuximab +/- binimetinib was prescribed in the first, second, third, and beyond third line in 4%, 56%, 29%, and 11%, respectively, of cases, with the encorafenib/cetuximab/binimetinib combination for 21 patients (10%). With encorafenib/cetuximab treatment, 21% of patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), with each type of grade ≥3 AE observed in <5% of patients. The objective response rate was 32.2% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 71.2%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9-5.4 months] and the median overall survival (OS) was 9.2 months (95% CI 7.8-10.8 months). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with a shorter PFS were synchronous metastases [hazard ratio (HR) 1.66, P = 0.04] and ECOG-PS >1 (HR 1.88, P = 0.007), and those associated with a shorter OS were the same factors (HR 1.71, P = 0.03 and HR 2.36, P < 0.001, respectively) in addition to treatment beyond the second line (HR 1.74, P = 0.003) and high carcinoembryonic antigen level (HR 1.72, P = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study showed that in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC treated with encorafenib/cetuximab +/- binimetinib, efficacy and safety data confirm those reported in the BEACON registration trial. The main poor prognostic factors for this treatment are synchronous metastases and ECOG-PS >1.

UNASSIGNED: Drug-induced thrombocytopenia is a rare adverse reaction of drug therapy and usually underdiagnosed. Cefoperazone/sulbactam is a compound preparation composed of the third generation of cephalosporin and β-lactamase inhibitor, of which thrombocytopenia is an uncommon but serious adverse reaction. However, the existing literature on cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced thrombocytopenia remains limited, and the specific risk factors associated with this adverse effect have not been thoroughly elucidated. Consequently, this study aims to investigate the clinical characteristics and identify the risk factors for thrombocytopenia in adult patients undergoing cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy.
UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective study, we reviewed patients treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam at Beijing Hospital between January 2017 and June 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the presence or absence of thrombocytopenia: the thrombocytopenia group and the non-thrombocytopenia group. We collected data on demographic features, clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, treatments, and outcomes. Subsequently, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify potential risk factors for cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced thrombocytopenia.
UNASSIGNED: In total, 6489 patients were included in this study, and 2.4% (155/6489) developed thrombocytopenia. The results of multivariate analysis showed that cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy duration (d) >14, PLT (109/L) <200, daily dose of cefoperazone/sulbactam (g) ≥6, TBil (μmoL/L) >21, AST (U/L) >35, and use of non-invasive ventilator were risk factors for cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced thrombocytopenia.
UNASSIGNED: Despite the low incidence (2.4%), cefoperazone/sulbactam could cause serious thrombocytopenia sometimes accompanied with hemorrhage. In clinical therapy, clinicians should be vigilant in monitoring platelet count, especially for patients with risk factors of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced thrombocytopenia.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the real-world impact of glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs) as an adjunct to insulin in Chinese patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM).
METHODS: This dual-center, observational, retrospective study included 121 T1DM patients receiving GLDs as adjuncts and 56 participants with insulin-only drugs as comparators. Glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), daily insulin dosage, fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial blood glucose (PBG), nocturnal blood glucose (NBG) and the difference in trough and peak blood glucose levels on the same day (Δ TP) were assessed at baseline and at the end of the study.
RESULTS: In total, HbA1c decreased by 1.14% in the GLD+insulin group (p < 0.0001) and 0.36% in the insulin-only group (p = 0.0423, mean adjusted difference, -0.09% [95% CI, -0.55 to 0.37]). The total daily insulin concentration was reduced by 7.34 U per day in the GLD+insulin group vs. 5.55 U per day in the insulin-only group (mean adjusted difference, -2.32 U [95% CI, -4.97 to 0.33]). In particular, among patients with fasting C-peptide levels < 17 pmol/L, the total daily insulin concentration was significantly reduced by 9.22 U vs. 5.09 U per day (mean adjusted difference, -3.84 [95% CI, -6.85-0.84]; p = 0.0129). There were no notable differences in the other glycemic indices between the two groups. A gradual downward trend in changes in glycemic outcomes was observed among patients treated with various combinations of metformin, acarbose, and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i). Similar reductions in the daily insulin dose were also detected in most of the GLD+insulin group in addition to the DPP-4i-only group. No severe hypoglycemia was induced by additional GLDs.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of additional GLDs tends to improve glycemic outcomes and reduce insulin requirements in patients with T1DM. These results indicate that the use of GLDs as an adjunctive therapy may have been an effective treatment strategy among adults with T1DM in China.

BACKGROUND: Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) that significantly improve the prognosis of patients with prostate cancer include abiraterone acetate (androgen synthesis inhibitor) and enzalutamide (androgen receptor inhibitor). A recent analysis of ARPI and cardiovascular events using the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) has been reported; however, the evidence on cardiovascular events for abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide in real-world clinical practice is insufficient. Using a large Japanese database of medical institutions, the Japanese Medical Data Center (JMDC) medical institution database (JMDC Inc., Tokyo, Japan), this study tested the hypothesis that the risk of cardiovascular events with enzalutamide is lower than that with abiraterone acetate.
METHODS: Using the JMDC medical institution database, patients with new use of abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide who had not experienced a major cardiovascular event between October 2014 and February 2022 were included. After adjusting for age, comorbidities, and concomitant medications using propensity score matching, cumulative incidence rates were compared for cardiovascular death and all cardiovascular events as the primary endpoints, and major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke as secondary endpoints.
RESULTS: A total of 3,033 patients in the enzalutamide group and 2,021 in the abiraterone group met the eligibility criteria. After propensity score matching, the cohort included 1,940 patients in the enzalutamide group and 1,940 patients in the abiraterone group. Enzalutamide was associated with significantly lower cumulative rates of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-0.93), all cardiovascular events (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64-0.98), major cardiovascular events (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64-0.97), and myocardial infarction (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.46-0.84) compared to abiraterone.
CONCLUSIONS: In a national sample of males with prostate cancer, those newly treated with enzalutamide had a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular events than those treated with abiraterone acetate.

BACKGROUND: Pralsetinib, a selective RET targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has been approved for treating locally advanced or metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC in adults who have previously received platinum-based chemotherapy in China.
METHODS: In this retrospective analysis conducted at Hunan Cancer Hospital in China, we examined 36 patients with advanced NSCLC with RET fusion, who were treated with pralsetinib between January 2021 and December 2023. The study focused on assessing the efficacy (Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)) and safety profile of pralsetinib in these patients. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 20.0, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.
RESULTS: The results revealed that pralsetinib exhibited significant activity in this patient cohort. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated a median PFS of 10.7 months and a median OS of 21.2 months. The overall response rate(ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was 55.6 % and 72.2 %, respectively. Pralsetinib was generally well tolerated, with most adverse events being mild to moderate (grades 1-2). The most common serious adverse events (≥grade 3) observed were lymphopenia (13.9 %), hypertension (11.1 %), leukopenia (8.3 %), neutropenia (8.3 %), and creatine kinase elevation (8.3 %).
CONCLUSIONS: Pralsetinib demonstrated promising activity in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring RET fusion with a favorable safety profile.

Background: Ocular comorbidities of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has been widely evaluated; however real-world evidence was scarce. Moreover, risk of glaucoma in HS patients remained unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the 5-year glaucoma risk in HS patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the TriNetX database covering 2005-2017. In total, 53,281 HS patients were propensity score matched 1:1 to controls based on demographics, including comorbidities, medications, healthcare utilization, etc. Patients were followed for 5 years post-index date. Glaucoma risks were calculated based on hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Stratified analyses by sex and age were performed. Results: After matching, baseline characteristics were similar between groups. HS was associated with a 1.25 times higher 5-year glaucoma risk (95% CI, 1.10-1.42). The risk was significant within 1 year (HR=1.37; 95% CI, 1.03-1.82), 3 years (HR=1.31; 95% CI, 1.12-1.54), and 5 years post-index. In subgroup analysis, women had a 1.28 times higher risk (95% CI, 1.10-1.49). Patients aged 18-64 years (HR=1.33; 95% CI, 1.14-1.55) and ≥65 years (HR=1.33; 95% CI, 1.05-1.67) also presented elevated glaucoma risks. Conclusion: This real-world data analysis demonstrated a significantly increased 5-year glaucoma risk in HS patients versus matched controls. Ocular complications should be concerned while managing HS patients.

UNASSIGNED: Olanzapine is used for treating bipolar disorder (BPD); however, the optimal initial dosing regimen is unclear. The present study aimed to investigate the optimal olanzapine initial dosage in patients with BPD via model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) based on a real-world study.
UNASSIGNED: Thirty-nine patients with BPD from the real-world study were collected to construct the MIPD model.
UNASSIGNED: Weight, combined used quetiapine influenced olanzapine clearances in patients with BPD, where the clearance rates were 0.152:1 in patients with or without quetiapine under the same weight. We simulated olanzapine doses once a day or twice a day, of which twice a day was optimal. Without quetiapine, for twice-a-day olanzapine doses, 0.80, 0.70, and 0.60 mg/kg/day were suitable for 40- to 56-kg BPD patients, 56- to 74-kg BPD patients, and 74- to 100-kg BPD patients, respectively. With quetiapine, for twice-a-day olanzapine doses, 0.05 mg/kg/day was suitable for 40- to 100-kg BPD patients.
UNASSIGNED: This study was the first to investigate the optimal olanzapine initial dosage in patients with BPD via MIPD based on a real-world study, providing clinical reference for the precision medication of olanzapine in BPD patients.

UNASSIGNED: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, a rapidly emerging treatment for cancer that has gained momentum since its approval by the FDA in 2017, involves the genetic engineering of patients\' T cells to target tumors. Although significant therapeutic benefits have been observed, life-threatening adverse pulmonary events have been reported.
UNASSIGNED: Using SAS 9.4 with MedDRA 26.1, we retrospectively analyzed data from the Food and Drug Administration\'s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, covering the period from 2017 to 2023. The analysis included the Reporting Odds Ratio Proportional Reporting Ratio Information Component and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean to assess the association between CAR-T cell therapy and adverse pulmonary events (PAEs).
UNASSIGNED: The FAERS database recorded 9,400 adverse events (AEs) pertaining to CAR-T therapies, of which 940 (10%) were PAEs. Among these CAR-T cell-related AEs, hypoxia was the most frequently reported (344 cases), followed by respiratory failure (127 cases). Notably, different CAR-T cell treatments demonstrated varying degrees of association with PAEs. Specifically, Tisa-cel was associated with severe events including respiratory failure and hypoxia, whereas Axi-cel was strongly correlated with both hypoxia and tachypnea. Additionally, other CAR-T therapies, namely, Brexu-cel, Liso-cel, Ide-cel, and Cilta-cel, have also been linked to distinct PAEs. Notably, the majority of these PAEs occurred within the first 30 days post-treatment. The fatality rates varied among the different CAR-T therapies, with Tisa-cel exhibiting the highest fatality rate (43.6%), followed by Ide-cel (18.8%).
UNASSIGNED: This study comprehensively analyzed the PAEs reported in the FAERS database among recipients of CAR-T cell therapy, revealing conditions such as hypoxia, respiratory failure, pleural effusion, and atelectasis. These CAR-T cell therapy-associated events are clinically significant and merit the attention of clinicians and researchers.

BACKGROUND: There is limited real-world data regarding subsequent treatment utilization and clinical outcomes following initial androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) exposure for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. This study aimed to address this evidence gap.
METHODS: Electronic health records during 01/01/2013-07/31/2022 from Flatiron Health were used to identify adults with mCRPC, who had prior exposure to ARPIs (irrespective of the setting) and ≥1 post-ARPI line of therapy (LOT) in the mCRPC setting (index therapy: the first eligible LOT in the mCRPC setting). Treatment patterns and survival outcomes following the initiation of index therapy were reported.
RESULTS: Among 804 ARPI-experienced mCRPC patients, 459 patients (57.1%) received another ARPI as their index therapy and 192 (23.9%) received chemotherapy as their index therapy. In the overall population, median time on the index therapy and median time from index therapy to next therapy were 4.1 and 6.2 months, respectively. Median overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival from the initiation of index therapy were 15.1 and 7.0 months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world analysis, more than half of patients attempted at least 1 additional ARPI in the mCRPC setting, despite prior treatment with ARPIs. The short treatment duration and survival time highlight the unmet need for additional, effective therapies that may improve clinical outcomes in this population.