BACKGROUND: Organized cervical cancer (CxCa) screening is the most effective secondary prevention method to decrease the disease incidence and mortality. Screening for infection with 14 high-risk HPV genotypes (hrHPV) is recommended as primary screening test. Since only ca. 6 % of HPV-positive (HPV+) women will develop a high-grade lesion in 5 years, triage is critical for risk stratification and management of colposcopy resources. Dual staining (DS) p16/Ki67 cytology is an alternative to Papanicolau cytology (PAP) for triage of HPV+women, with potential improvements in sensitivity and specificity, and optimization of colposcopy referrals.
OBJECTIVE: To compare PAP vs DS cytology in terms of (i) optimization of referrals for colposcopy and (ii) risk stratification to better define the follow-up interval.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the CxCa screening database of Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), one of the centralized diagnostic laboratories for the CxCa screening program of the central region of Portugal, between July 2019 and May 2023. At CHUC, since July 2019, all samples from hrHPV+women have been triaged with liquid PAP and tested with DS cytology.
RESULTS: At baseline (1032 HPV+women), 1028 women were tested with DS: 739 women were DS negative (DS-) [70.7 % with normal PAP cytology (NILM) and 29.3 % with abnormal PAP cytology (ASC-US+)], and 289 were DS positive (DS+) (1.1 % NILM and 98.6 % ASC-US+). DS positivity as referral criterion for colposcopy instead of ASC-US+would have reduced the number of colposcopies by 39.4 % overall and by 48.3 % for other 12 hrHPV, while improving the number of colposcopies per HSIL (3.9 vs. 2.4 overall and 4.9 vs. 2.9 for other 12 hrHPV). In this cohort, if the follow-up interval for women positive for other 12 hrHPV+and DS- would have been extended from 1 to 3 years, 799 follow-up consultations, 799 HPV re-tests, and 277 colposcopies (-64.7 %) would have been avoided, with an overall risk of missed HSIL lesions of 2.2 %.
CONCLUSIONS: Triage with DS allows the optimization of colposcopy referrals and a safe extension of the follow-up interval to 3 years for other 12 hrHPV+/DS- women, eliminating the need for annual re-testing for many women.

UNASSIGNED: ESKALE is a French, multicentre, observational study of adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) treated with esketamine. This interim analysis describes baseline demographic and clinical characteristic evolution in patients included and treated from early access program to post-marketing launch.
UNASSIGNED: Data were collected from medical records and included patient characteristics, disease history at esketamine initiation, use of neurostimulation, the patient\'s care pathway, and the number of antidepressant treatment lines prescribed prior to esketamine initiation. Descriptive statistics were used for each cohort: the early access program \'Temporary Authorisation for Use\' (ATU), post-ATU, and post-launch cohorts.
UNASSIGNED: The overall ESKALE cohort (N = 160 included; n = 157 treated with esketamine; average age 49.0 years; 66.2% female) demonstrated moderate-to-severe depression according to clinical assessment and a mean Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale score of 32.6 (8.0); however, severity, subtype, and comorbidities were heterogeneous across the cohorts. Earlier use of esketamine and prior to alternative treatments occurred during the later cohorts.
UNASSIGNED: These findings demonstrated a high burden of TRD in these patients and that esketamine is used in TRD treatment regardless of their disease severity, subtype, or existing comorbidities. These results also suggest that esketamine is potentially a clinically useful alternative treatment, particularly with healthcare professionals gaining greater familiarity with and easier access to esketamine.
ESKALE is a long-term, French, multicentre, observational study based on secondary data in adult patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) who initiated esketamine treatment in one of three mutually exclusive cohorts: the Temporary Authorisation for Use (ATU), post-ATU, and post-launch cohorts.ESKALE is one of the largest European real-world studies investigating the profiles of more than 150 patients and their treatment with esketamine before and after marketing authorisation.A majority of patients had moderate to severe TRD, with multiple treatment failures with medications and/or neurostimulation prior to esketamine initiation.Esketamine nasal spray administration was undertaken more frequently in an outpatient setting, with the post-administration period monitoring being undertaken mostly by nurses.Esketamine was used in patients with TRD in real-world conditions regardless of their disease severity and subtype or existing comorbidities.These results highlight both the need for an effective treatment for TRD and the adoption of esketamine by multidisciplinary teams that are involved in esketamine prescription and administration.

暂无摘要。

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive disorder with progressive muscle atrophy and weakness, caused by biallelic mutations in the survival motor neuron 1 (SNM1) gene. Onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA) is an approved gene replacement therapy for patients with SMA. We report on two patients with SMA type 1, weighing 20 kg, previously treated with Nusinersen, who received OA infusion at 7 years of age. To our knowledge, these two patients are the heaviest treated in the real-world and we describe their different courses after gene therapy, including liver impairment requiring long-term steroid treatment and additional immunosuppression, with only transitory improvement in functional outcomes. Our cases illustrate how careful risk-benefit consideration is required in treating older and heavier SMA patients with OA, especially in view of the multiple treatment choices available for older patients with SMA.

Overall, it is estimated that more than 3,500,000 patients have received Bevacizumab as part of systemic oncologic treatment. Bevacizumab and its biosimilars are currently marketed in over 130 countries. Given the wide usage of Bevacizumab in current oncological practice, it is very important to compare the \"real-world\" results to those obtained in controlled clinical trials. This study aims to describe the clinical experience of using Bevacizumab in a large cohort of cancer patients in \"non-controlled real-world\" conditions with regard to effectiveness, safety, and cost of therapy.
METHODS: For this purpose, we conducted an open, observational, retrospective study involving all patients treated for solid malignant tumors in the Bucharest Institute of Oncology with \"Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu\" with Bevacizumab-based systemic therapy, between 2017 and 2021.
RESULTS: The study consisted of 657 treatment episodes in 625 patients (F/B = 1.62/1, with a median age of 57.6 years) which were treated for malignant tumors (majority colorectal, non-small cell lung, ovarian, and breast cancer). First-line treatment was administered in 229 patients, and the rest received Bevacizumab as second or subsequent lines of treatment. The overall response rate to Bevacizumab-based therapies was around 60-65% across all indication except for subsequent treatment lines in colorectal and ovarian cancers, where lower values were recorded (27.1%, and 31.5% respectively). Median PFS for the entire cohort was 8.2 months (95% CI 6.8-9.6), and the median OS was 13.2 months (95% CI 11.5-14.9). Usual bevacizumab-related toxicities were observed, including bleeding, hypertension, wound-healing complications, gastrointestinal perforation, other types of fistulas, septic complications, and thromboembolic events. Although the clinical benefits are undeniable, the addition of Bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy increased the overall treatment cost by 213%.
CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab remains a high-cost therapy, but it can add to clinical benefits (like overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rate) when used in conjunction with standard chemotherapy. Similar results as those presented in various controlled trials are observable even on unselected cohorts of patients in the uncontrolled conditions of \"real-world\" oncological practice. Off-label usage is encountered in clinical practice, and this aspect should be monitored given the potential adverse effects of the therapy.

暂无摘要。

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory disorder affecting the colon, and typically, during the disease course, the condition may exacerbate, relapse, and remit. One of the most successful lines for inducing and maintaining clinical remission in subjects with UC is biological therapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNF) agents, including adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX). This meta-analysis is an attempt to obtain complementary information driven by real-world experience (RWE) concerning the efficacy and safety of two of the most popular anti-TNFs in treating UC. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of RWE studies comparing ADA and IFX as naïve anti-TNF agents for the treatment of subjects with UC. Studies were obtained by searching Scopus, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and the PubMed Central databases. Patients treated with IFX showed significantly higher induction responses. No statistically significant difference was found in the comparison of response in the maintenance treatment period. Higher overall adverse events were related to IFX treatment, with serious adverse events that were nonsignificantly higher in the ADA-treated group. In conclusion, IFX demonstrated significantly higher induction responses compared to ADA in patients with moderate-to-severe UC. IFX was associated with higher overall adverse events, whereas serious adverse events were non-significantly higher in the ADA-treated group. IFX may be favored as a first-line agent for its induction efficacy, and the choice between IFX and ADA should be individualized based on comprehensive clinical evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have shown good efficacy in migraine prophylaxis. However, a subset of patients does not respond to the first mAb treatment and switches among the available mAbs. The goal of this study is to characterize the switching pattern of migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP(-receptor, -R) mAbs, and to describe the headache burden of those who did not switch, switched once, and switched twice.
METHODS: This study used real world data from the NeuroTransData Cohort, a registry of migraine patients treated at outpatient neurology clinics across Germany. Patients who had received at least one anti-CGRP(-R) mAb were included. Headache diaries were collected at baseline and during treatment, along with quality of life measures every three months. Results were summarized for the subgroups of patients who did not switch and those with one and two switches.
RESULTS: Of the 655 eligible patients, 479 did not switch, 135 switched once, 35 twice, and 6 three or more times. The ≥ 50% response rates for monthly migraine days were 64.7%, 50.7%, and 25.0% for the no switch, one switch, and two switches groups in their last treatment cycles, respectively. Quality of life measures improved for the no switch and one switch groups, but not for the two switches group.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who switched among anti-CGRP(-R) mAbs during the course of their treatment still benefited overall but to a lesser extent than those who did not switch. Treatment response in patients who switched twice was markedly lower compared to the no switch and one switch subgroup.

UNASSIGNED: With the treatment landscape continually evolving, it is vital that the hemophilia community have an overview of all published data for approved therapies, such as emicizumab, to support shared decision making.
UNASSIGNED: To bring together the clinical and real-world data for emicizumab use in people with congenital hemophilia A, regardless of age, disease severity, or factor VIII inhibitor status. Key focus areas were safety, efficacy, and quality of life (QoL).
UNASSIGNED: This scoping review used citation databases (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) and manual searches of abstract books. Publications reporting original data for emicizumab in people with hemophilia A, published in English after December 2014, and reporting select endpoints were included. This narrative synthesis focused on zero bleeds, treated annualized bleeding rate (ABR), adverse events, and QoL measures.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, 97 publications were included (cut-off: August 9, 2022). Treated ABR remained low (calculated mean and median treated ABRs ranged between 0.7-1.3 and 0.0-1.4, respectively), and the median percentage of people with zero treated bleeds was 66.7%. The proportion of people experiencing treatment-related adverse events ranged from 0.0% to 60.0%; most were injection-site reactions. Across 37 publications reporting on safety and enrolling >2300 individuals, 11 thrombotic events and 4 thrombotic microangiopathies were reported. Data from well-established tools show QoL benefits with emicizumab.
UNASSIGNED: This scoping review consolidates the global published experience for emicizumab in people with hemophilia A and supports the fact that emicizumab has an acceptable safety profile, is effective and efficacious in bleed prevention, and is associated with improvements in QoL.

UNASSIGNED: The first-line treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) involves a combination of trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and a taxane (TPH). This study assessed the efficacy of trastuzumab and pertuzumab (PH) in routine practice, following the treatment protocols of Uruguay\'s National Resources Fund (FNR), akin to clinical trials.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with advanced MBC treated with PH between 2008 and 2022 per FNR protocols were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meyer method and log-rank test were utilized for analyzing overall survival (OS). Demographic and clinical variables, including age, menopausal status, and hormone receptors (HR), were analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: The study included 318 PH-treated patients. The median age was 56 years, with 63.2% being postmenopausal and 60.4% HR and HER-2 positive. With a median follow-up of 17.2 months, the median OS was 29 months. OS varied based on HR status and the presence of metastases at different sites, significantly lower in patients with brain, cutaneous/subcutaneous, and pulmonary metastases. Additionally, OS was higher in patients treated at private institutions compared to public ones.
UNASSIGNED: This study demonstrates the disparity in oncological treatment efficacy between clinical trials and clinical reality in Uruguay, emphasizing the importance of authentic environment research for more representative and effective medicine in Latin America.