背景:抗水通道蛋白4抗体阳性(AQP4-Ab+)视神经脊髓炎谱系障碍(NMOSD)是一种补体介导的自身免疫性疾病,其中对中枢神经系统的不可预测和复发性攻击导致不可逆和累积的损伤。新的NMOSD疗法的比较疗效,比如ravulizumab,与既定的治疗是至关重要的,作出明智的治疗决定。
方法:ravulizumab相对于已建立的AQP4-Ab+NMOSD治疗的功效,比如eculizumab,inebilizumab,和satralizumab,在贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA)中进行了评估。数据来自通过系统文献综述确定的试验。最终证据库由17份出版物组成,代表五项独特的全球研究(PREVENT,N-MOmentum,SAkuraSky,SAkuraStar,和冠军-NMOSD)。主要终点是首次复发时间;其他结果包括年度复发率(ARR)。
结果:对于接受单一疗法(仅单克隆抗体)的患者,与纳比珠单抗(风险比[HR]0.09,95%可信区间[CrI]0.02,0.57)或satralizumab(HR0.08,95%CrI0.01,0.55)相比,ravulizumab与较低的复发风险相关,并且与eculizumab相当(HR0.86,95%Crl0.16,4.52).与satralizumab+IST相比,Ravulizumab+免疫抑制治疗(IST)与较低的复发风险相关(HR0.15,95%CrI0.03,0.78);与eculizumab+IST的比较没有差异。没有用奈珠单抗治疗的患者接受背景IST,因此被排除在分析之外。ravulizumab单药治疗的ARR比inebilizumab(比率[RR]0.02,95%Crl0.00,0.38)和satralizumab(RR0.02,95%Crl0.00,0.42)单药治疗低98%。与其他干预措施相比,使用ravulizumab±IST的ARR显示出最强的治疗效果估计。
结论:在没有头对头随机对照试验的情况下,NMA结果表明ravulizumab,C5抑制剂,与具有不同作用方法的其他治疗方法相比,可能更有效地预防AQP4-AbNMOSD患者的NMOSD复发。
抗水通道蛋白-4抗体阳性视神经脊髓炎谱系障碍,也称为AQP4-Ab+NMOSD,是一种罕见的自身免疫性疾病,会导致失明等症状的反复发作,胳膊/腿无力,痛苦的痉挛,呕吐,打嗝,在其他症状中。每次发作都会导致神经系统损害恶化,使恢复到正常能力变得更加困难。反复发作很可能造成永久性损伤,比如失明和瘫痪。减少发作的药物治疗也减少了损害,症状可能成为永久性的。一种治疗,ravulizumab,正在研究用AQP4-Ab+NMOSD治疗成人。该分析查看了已发表的临床研究的信息,以比较ravulizumab与其他三种治疗方法(eculizumab,inebilizumab,和satralizumab)以确定每种治疗减少NMOSD发作的程度。没有研究在一项研究中测试了所有四种治疗方法。这里,通过一种用于评估治疗效果优于其他治疗方法的可能性的方法对治疗方法进行了比较.虽然所有四种治疗方法在他们自己的研究中都成功地减少了发作,这项分析预测,与单独使用或与其他免疫抑制治疗联合使用的inebilizumab或satralizumab相比,ravulizumab可能在预防发作方面效果最好.这些发现,考虑到其他相关因素,如成本,安全,给药输送方法,和治疗的频率,可以帮助医生和患者决定每个患者的最佳治疗选择,以防止成人AQP4-Ab+NMOSD的发作。
BACKGROUND: Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody-positive (AQP4-Ab+) neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a complement-mediated autoimmune disease in which unpredictable and relapsing attacks on the central nervous system cause irreversible and accumulating damage. Comparative efficacy of new NMOSD therapies, such as
ravulizumab, with established therapies is critical in making informed treatment decisions.
METHODS: Efficacy of
ravulizumab relative to established AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD treatments, such as eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab, was evaluated in a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Data were extracted from trials identified by a systematic literature review. The final evidence base consisted of 17 publications representing five unique and global studies (PREVENT, N-MOmentum, SAkuraSky, SAkuraStar, and CHAMPION-NMOSD). The primary endpoint was time-to-first relapse; other outcomes included annualized relapse rates (ARRs).
RESULTS: For patients receiving monotherapy (monoclonal antibody only), ravulizumab was associated with a lower risk of relapse than inebilizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.09, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.02, 0.57) or satralizumab (HR 0.08, 95% CrI 0.01, 0.55) and was comparable to eculizumab (HR 0.86, 95% Crl 0.16, 4.52). Ravulizumab + immunosuppressive therapy (IST) was associated with a lower risk of relapse than satralizumab + IST (HR 0.15, 95% CrI 0.03, 0.78); the comparison with eculizumab + IST suggested no difference. No patients treated with inebilizumab received background IST and were thus excluded from analysis. The ARR with
ravulizumab monotherapy was 98% lower compared with inebilizumab (rate ratio [RR] 0.02, 95% Crl 0.00, 0.38) and satralizumab (RR 0.02, 95% Crl 0.00, 0.42) monotherapies. The ARR with ravulizumab ± IST showed the strongest treatment-effect estimates compared with other interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of head-to-head randomized controlled trials, NMA results suggest ravulizumab, a C5 inhibitor, is likely to be more effective in preventing NMOSD relapse in patients with AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD when compared with other treatments having different methods of action.
Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, also called AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD, is a rare autoimmune disease that causes repeated episodes of symptoms such as blindness, arm/leg weakness, painful spasms, vomiting, and hiccups, among other symptoms. Each episode can cause nervous system damage to worsen, making it more difficult to recover back to regular abilities. Repeated episodes are likely to cause permanent damage, such as blindness and paralysis. Medical treatments that reduce episodes also reduce the damage and the chances symptoms will become permanent. One treatment,
ravulizumab, is being studied to treat adults with AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD. This analysis looked at information from published clinical studies to compare
ravulizumab with three other treatments (eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab) to determine how well each treatment reduced NMOSD episodes. There are no studies that have tested all four treatments in one study. Here, the treatments were compared by a method used to estimate the likelihood of a treatment being better than the others. While all four treatments successfully reduced episodes in their own studies, this analysis predicts that ravulizumab would likely be best in preventing episodes compared with inebilizumab or satralizumab when used alone or in combination with other immunosuppressive treatments. These findings, in consideration along with other relevant factors such as cost, safety, dosing delivery method, and frequency of treatment, may help doctors and patients decide what is the best treatment option for each individual patient to prevent attacks in adults with AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD.