rate control drugs

速率控制药物
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:心房颤动(AF)是最常见的心律失常,与患者和医疗保健系统的重大负担有关。房室(AV)结通过过滤心房的电脉冲在AF期间调节心率中起着至关重要的作用。然而,它通常不足以保持健康的心率,因此,使用速率控制药物可以改变房室结的特性。此外,永久性房颤期间的治疗选择目前是凭经验进行的。量化房室结功能的昼夜和短期变异性的个体差异可以帮助个性化治疗选择。方法:本研究提出了一种新的方法来估计不应期(RP)和传导延迟(CD)趋势,以及使用非侵入性数据在24小时内房室结两条途径的不确定性。这是通过利用网络模型以及特定于问题的遗传算法和近似贝叶斯计算算法来实现的。通过白天和夜间估计之间的差异来量化估计RP和CD的昼夜变化。通过24小时趋势中相邻10分钟段之间的Kolmogorov-Smirnov距离来量化短期变异性。此外,我们使用多种机器学习工具研究了衍生参数趋势对药物结局的预测价值.结果:分析了基线期间51例永久性房颤患者的动态心电图,研究了RP和CD变化对四种心率控制药物治疗后心率降低的预测能力。昼夜变异性与治疗结果无关,并且使用机器学习工具无法预测药物结果。然而,快速途径中RP和CD的短期变异性与美托洛尔治疗期间导致的心率降低之间的相关性(RP中的ρ=0.48,p<0.005,在CD中发现ρ=0.35,p<0.05)。讨论:所提出的方法可以在24小时内对房室结特性进行非侵入性估计,短期变异性和心率降低之间的相关性表明,这可能有助于选择治疗方案。
    Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia, associated with significant burdens to patients and the healthcare system. The atrioventricular (AV) node plays a vital role in regulating heart rate during AF by filtering electrical impulses from the atria. However, it is often insufficient in regards to maintaining a healthy heart rate, thus the AV node properties are modified using rate-control drugs. Moreover, treatment selection during permanent AF is currently done empirically. Quantifying individual differences in diurnal and short-term variability of AV-nodal function could aid in personalized treatment selection. Methods: This study presents a novel methodology for estimating the refractory period (RP) and conduction delay (CD) trends, and their uncertainty in the two pathways of the AV node during 24 h using non-invasive data. This was achieved by utilizing a network model together with a problem-specific genetic algorithm and an approximate Bayesian computation algorithm. Diurnal variability in the estimated RP and CD was quantified by the difference between the daytime and nighttime estimates, and short-term variability was quantified by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance between adjacent 10-min segments in the 24-h trends. Additionally, the predictive value of the derived parameter trends regarding drug outcome was investigated using several machine learning tools. Results: Holter electrocardiograms from 51 patients with permanent AF during baseline were analyzed, and the predictive power of variations in RP and CD on the resulting heart rate reduction after treatment with four rate control drugs was investigated. Diurnal variability yielded no correlation to treatment outcome, and no prediction of drug outcome was possible using the machine learning tools. However, a correlation between the short-term variability for the RP and CD in the fast pathway and resulting heart rate reduction during treatment with metoprolol (ρ = 0.48, p < 0.005 in RP, ρ = 0.35, p < 0.05 in CD) were found. Discussion: The proposed methodology enables non-invasive estimation of the AV node properties during 24 h, which-indicated by the correlation between the short-term variability and heart rate reduction-may have the potential to assist in treatment selection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心房颤动(AF)期间的心率高度取决于房室(AV)结的传导特性。使用β受体阻滞剂或钙通道阻滞剂可以影响这些特性,主要是凭经验选择的。个体房室结传导的表征可有助于AF期间的个性化治疗选择。根据60例永久性房颤患者的24小时动态心电图,对个别房室结不应期和传导延迟进行了表征。这是通过使用特定于问题的遗传算法从先前创建的AV节点的数学网络模型估计模型参数来完成的。根据估计的模型参数,使用线性混合效应方法,通过余弦分析,在人群水平上量化了使用两种β受体阻滞剂和两种钙通道阻滞剂的昼夜节律变化及其药物依赖性差异.混合效应分析表明所有药物相对于基线的难治性增加。对于β-阻滞剂,观察到表示传导延迟的参数的昼夜节律变化的额外降低。这表明两种药物类型对AV-nodal传导特性的影响具有可量化的差异。这些差异可能对治疗结果很重要,因此量化它们可以帮助选择治疗。
    The heart rate during atrial fibrillation (AF) is highly dependent on the conduction properties of the atrioventricular (AV) node. These properties can be affected using β-blockers or calcium channel blockers, mainly chosen empirically. Characterization of individual AV-nodal conduction could assist in personalized treatment selection during AF. Individual AV nodal refractory periods and conduction delays were characterized based on 24-hour ambulatory ECGs from 60 patients with permanent AF. This was done by estimating model parameters from a previously created mathematical network model of the AV node using a problem-specific genetic algorithm. Based on the estimated model parameters, the circadian variation and its drug-dependent difference between treatment with two β-blockers and two calcium channel blockers were quantified on a population level by means of cosinor analysis using a linear mixed-effect approach. The mixed-effects analysis indicated increased refractoriness relative to baseline for all drugs. An additional decrease in circadian variation for parameters representing conduction delay was observed for the β-blockers. This indicates that the two drug types have quantifiable differences in their effects on AV-nodal conduction properties. These differences could be important in treatment outcome, and thus quantifying them could assist in treatment selection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是描述心率和节律的药理学管理,并评估哪些因素与非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)患者的这些药物处方有关。安全,心房颤动研究中的成本。
    这次回顾展,横断面研究描述了2012年期间在2007年至2011年诊断为非瓣膜性房颤的所有患者中采用的药理作用率和节律控制管理策略.数据来源是初级保健数据库研究改进信息系统,这是基于初级保健电子健康记录。为了回答研究目标,2012年进行了3个多元回归模型来评估与这些药物处方相关的独立因素。评估的速率和节律控制药物是β受体阻滞剂,非二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂,抗心律失常药,还有地高辛.
    共有21,304例患者被诊断为患有非瓣膜性房颤;2012年期间,有11,638例(54.6%)患者至少有一次心率测量。其中,7777(66.8%)在2012年接受了一种或多种速率和/或节律控制药物。大多数患者(7777人中的5751例[73.9%])仅接受一种药物以控制速率和/或节律。2012年最常用的是心率控制药物,其中β受体阻滞剂的处方最多(4091例[52.6%])。在多元回归模型中,各种不同的变量与速率和/或节律控制药物的处方相关。
    我们房颤人群中最常用的心率和节律控制药物治疗是β受体阻滞剂,表明在我们的设置中,速率控制策略是首选,被广泛推荐。
    The purpose of this study is to describe the pharmacologic management of rate and rhythm and assess which factors are associated with the prescription of these drugs in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) from the Effectiveness, Safety, and Costs in Atrial Fibrillation study.
    This retrospective, cross-sectional study describes the pharmacologic rate and rhythm control management strategies adopted during 2012 in all patients diagnosed as having nonvalvular AF in 2007 to 2011. The data source is the Information System for the Improvement of Research in Primary Care database, which is based on primary care electronic health records. To answer the study objectives, 3 multivariate regression models to assess the independent factors associated with the prescription of these drugs were conducted for 2012. The rate and rhythm control drugs assessed were β-blockers, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, antiarrhythmic agents, and digoxin.
    A total of 21,304 patients were diagnosed as having nonvalvular AF; 11,638 (54.6%) had at least one heart rate measure during 2012. Of them, 7777 (66.8%) received one or more rate and/or rhythm control drugs during 2012. Most patients (5751 [73.9%] of 7777) received only one drug for rate and/or rhythm control. Rate control agents were the most frequently used in 2012, with β-blockers the most prescribed group (4091 patients [52.6%]). A variety of different variables were associated with the prescription of rate and/or rhythm control drugs in the multivariate regression models.
    The most used pharmacologic treatment of rate and rhythm control in our AF population is β-blockers, indicating that a rate control strategy is preferred in our setting, as widely recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号