rapid recovery

快速恢复
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:虽然快速恢复TJA的安全性已经确立,对其对术后护理利用模式的影响知之甚少。我们希望检查当天出院及其相关的医院术后护理和教育的减少是否转化为在一年的恢复期需要更多的术后支持。
    方法:对2020年1月至2023年10月住院时间为0天或1天的1,237例全髋关节置换术(THA)和1,710例全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者进行了回顾性回顾。主要结果是术后一年期间在我们机构接受TJA提供者的随访次数。次要结果包括30天急诊科(ED)的回报,再入院,一年的物理治疗利用率,以及术后6至12个月患者报告的结果测量信息系统身体功能(PROMIS-PF)评分的改善。进行了双变量和多变量分析,以比较0天和1天LOSTHA和TKA患者之间的结果。
    结果:在THA和TKA人群中,0天LOS患者较年轻,平均体重指数较低,更有可能是白人,男人,与1天LOS患者相比,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分<3。在控制了组间的差异后,一年随访次数无显著差异,物理治疗访问,ED回报,或在THA或TKA患者0至1天之间再入院。在TKA患者中,1天LOS与PROMIS-PF评分改善较低相关。
    结论:风险调整后,在术后1年期间,THA和TKA患者当天出院未导致资源利用率增加.在护士导航员支持下的协调关节成形术计划中,在适当选择同时接受THA和TKA的患者中,可以安全地进行当天出院,而不需要增加术后护理.
    BACKGROUND: While the safety of rapid recovery total joint arthroplasty is well established, less is known about its impact on postoperative care utilization patterns. We wished to examine whether same-day discharge-and its associated presumed reduction in hospital-based postoperative care and education-translates to the need for more postoperative support during the 1-year recovery period.
    METHODS: A retrospective review of 1,237 total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 1,710 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who had 0- or 1-day length of stay (LOS) from January 2020 to October 2023 was conducted. The primary outcome was the number of follow-up visits with total joint arthroplasty providers at our institution during the 1-year postoperative period. Secondary outcomes included 30-day emergency department returns, readmissions, 1-year physical therapy utilization, and improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function scores at 6 to 12 months postoperatively. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed to compare outcomes between 0-day and 1-day LOS THA and TKA patients.
    RESULTS: In both the THA and TKA populations, 0-day LOS patients were younger, had a lower average body mass index, were more likely to be White, men, and had an American Society of Anesthesiologists score < 3 than 1-day LOS patients. After controlling for differences between groups, no significant differences in the number of one-year follow-up visits, physical therapy visits, emergency department returns, or readmissions were seen between 0 and 1-day THA or TKA patients. In TKA patients, 1-day LOS was associated with lower improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function scores.
    CONCLUSIONS: After risk adjustment, same-day discharge of THA and TKA patients did not result in increased resource utilization during the one-year postoperative period. In the setting of a coordinated joint arthroplasty program with nurse navigator support, same-day discharge can be safely performed without increasing the need for postoperative care in appropriately selected patients undergoing both THA and TKA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多项研究表明,椎管内麻醉对初次全关节置换术(TJA)有较好的疗效。然而,对于高容量关节置换术中心采用的翻修TJA的现代全身麻醉(GA)方法,目前缺乏可用数据.
    方法:我们回顾性回顾了在使用现代GA方案的单一机构进行的为期四年的850次连续修正TJAs(405次修正全髋关节置换术[rTHA]和445次修正全膝关节置换术[rTKA]),并报告了住院时间。早期恢复率,围手术期并发症,和再入院。
    结果:翻修关节置换术患者,74.4%(850人中的632人)在术后第一天出院,68.5%(850人中的582人)的受试者能够在手术当天参加物理治疗。术后只有6名患者(0.7%)需要重症监护病房。90天的再入院率为11.3%(n=96),再次手术率为9.4%(n=80)。
    结论:虽然在进行TJA翻修时通常首选神经轴麻醉,我们已经证明了将GA与当代增强的恢复途径结合使用的良好安全性和效率指标。我们的数据支持现代GA技术可以成功用于翻修全关节置换术的观点。
    BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that spinal anesthesia gives superior outcomes for primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, there is a lack of available data regarding contemporary general anesthesia (GA) approaches for revision TJA utilized at high-volume joint arthroplasty centers.
    METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of 850 consecutive revision TJAs (405 revision total hip arthroplasties and 445 revision total knee arthroplasties) performed over 4 years at a single institution that uses a contemporary GA protocol and reported on the lengths of stay, early recovery rates, perioperative complications, and readmissions.
    RESULTS: Of the revision arthroplasty patients, 74.4% (632 of 850) were discharged on postoperative day 1 and 68.5% (582 of 850) of subjects were able to participate in physical therapy on the day of surgery. Only 6 patients (0.7%) required an intensive care unit stay postoperatively. The 90-day readmission rate over this time was 11.3% (n = 96), while the reoperation rate was 9.4% (n = 80).
    CONCLUSIONS: While neuraxial anesthesia is commonly preferred when performing revision TJA, we have demonstrated favorable safety and efficiency metrics utilizing GA in conjunction with contemporary enhanced recovery pathways. Our data support the notion that modern GA techniques can be successfully used in revision TJA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探索短期,以医院为基础,多模式术前康复干预对妇科恶性肿瘤患者围手术期功能的影响。
    方法:根据他们接受手术的顺序,将97例患者分为对照组(48例)和干预组(49例)。对照组给予常规术前指导,而干预组在对照组干预的基础上给予短期多模式康复指导。入院当天进行6分钟步行测试,手术前一天,手术后的第30天.
    结果:与对照组相比,干预组在术前1天和术后第30天6min步行距离明显优于对照组(P<0.001)。手术后连续三天,干预组恢复质量明显高于对照组(P<0.001),干预组首次下床活动时间和排气时间明显早于对照组(P<0.05)。
    结论:术前干预组可改善妇科肿瘤患者的术前运动能力,减轻患者的焦虑情绪。此外,这种干预改善了患者的整体健康状况,并加速了患者的术后恢复.
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of a short-term, hospital-based, multimodal preoperative prehabilitation intervention on perioperative functional ability of patients with gynecological malignant tumors.
    METHODS: According to the order in which they underwent surgery, 97 patients were divided into the control group (48 cases) and the intervention group (49 cases). The control group was given routine preoperative guidance, whereas the intervention group was given short-term multimodal prehabilitation guidance on the basis of the control group intervention. The 6-min walk test was performed on the day of admission to the hospital, the day before surgery, and the 30th day after surgery.
    RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the intervention group had significantly better 6-min walk distance and superior physical and psychological status on the day before surgery and the 30th day after surgery (P < 0.001). For three consecutive days after surgery, the quality of recovery in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.001), and the first ambulation time and exhaust time were achieved earlier in the intervention group than in the control group (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative intervention group showed improved preoperative exercise ability and reduced anxiety in patients with gynecological cancer. Furthermore, this intervention improved the overall health of patients and accelerated their postoperative recovery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,单孔胸腔镜手术技术广泛应用于各大医疗中心和胸部专科医院治疗肺部疾病。然而,单孔微创手术方法侧重于一个切口,所有手术器械都需要穿过同一个孔,导致手术切口反复挤压和组织损伤。因此,我们改进了传统手术切口的缝合方法,以降低伤口感染和裂开的概率,促进早期愈合,减少术后伤口瘢痕的严重程度,从而促进患者术后快速康复。目的探讨改良手术切口缝合技术应用于单孔胸腔镜肺切除术的临床疗效。
    本研究回顾性分析了2019年1月至2021年10月在苏州市市立医院北区收治的151例胸外科收治的肺切除术患者。根据手术切口缝合方法的不同将患者分为改良组和常规组。术后一般临床指标,切口感染率,二次缝合率,术后切口疼痛评分,对比分析两组患者术后切口瘢痕严重程度。
    两组在胸管时间或术后引流量和术后切口疼痛评分方面无统计学差异;切口感染率(1.3%vs.6.7%,P<0.05),二次缝合率(2.6%vs.9.4%,P<0.05),和术后瘢痕评分(4.853vs.5.543,P=0.03)改良组优于常规组,两组间差异有统计学意义。
    我们的改良缝合方法减少了感染和分裂的机会以及术后切口瘢痕形成的严重程度,促进早期愈合。可安全有效地应用于单孔胸腔镜肺切除术的切口缝合,促进患者术后快速恢复。
    UNASSIGNED: In recent years, single-hole thoracoscopic surgery technology is widely used in major medical centers and chest-specialized hospitals for the treatment of lung diseases. However, the single-hole minimally invasive surgery method focuses on one incision, and all surgical instruments need to pass through the same hole, resulting in repeated extrusion and tissue damage of the surgical incision. Therefore, we have improved the suture method of conventional surgical incision in order to reduce the probability of wound infection and dehiscence, promote early healing, and reduce the severity of postoperative wound scar, thereby enhancing the postoperative rapid recovery of patients. The purpose of this study is to explore the clinical efficacy of a modified surgical incision suture technique applied to uniportal thoracoscopic pulmonary resection.
    UNASSIGNED: This study retrospectively analyzed 151 patients who were admitted to the Department of Thoracic Surgery and underwent pulmonary resection from January 2019 to October 2021 in the North District of Suzhou Municipal Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups according to the different surgical incision suture methods: a modified group and a conventional group. The postoperative general clinical indexes, incision infection rate, secondary suture rate, postoperative incision pain score, and the severity of postoperative incision scar were compared and analyzed between the two groups.
    UNASSIGNED: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of chest tube duration or postoperative drainage and postoperative incision pain scores; the incision infection rate (1.3% vs. 6.7%, P<0.05), secondary suture rate (2.6% vs. 9.4%, P<0.05), and postoperative scar score (4.853 vs. 5.543, P=0.03) were better in the modified group than in the conventional group, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant.
    UNASSIGNED: Our modified suture method reduces the chance of infection and splitting and the severity of postoperative incision scar formation, promoting early healing. It can be safely and effectively applied to the incision suture of uniportal thoracoscopic pulmonary resection, enhancing the rapid postoperative recovery of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:主要选择性全膝关节置换术(TKA)和全髋关节置换术(THA)向当日出院(SDD)的转变产生了优化患者选择和改善当日恢复途径的需求。本研究的目的是1)确定我们机构失败的最常见原因,和2)评估与失败的SDD相关的风险因素。
    方法:对2021年1月至2022年9月接受原发性TKA或THA的SDD患者进行回顾性回顾。记录SDD失败的原因,并通过多变量逻辑回归评估成功和失败的SDD病例之间的差异。
    结果:总体而言,85.3%(753例患者中的651例)的SDDs成功。失败的SDD发生在16.8%(441例中的74例)的TKA和11.8%(322例中的38例)的THA病例中。主要原因包括未能明确物理治疗(33.0%,37/112),术后低血压(20.5%,23/112),尿潴留(16.9%,19/112)。分析显示,整体失败的SDD病例更有可能具有先前的阿片类药物和更长的手术时间。失败的TKASDD病例更可能有更长的手术时间和未接受术前神经阻滞,虽然失败的THASDD病例更可能年龄较大。
    结论:SDD选择标准和途径不断发展,多个因素导致SDD失败。改进患者选择算法和优化术后路径可以增强我们成功选择SDD候选的能力。
    BACKGROUND: A shift toward same-day discharge (SDD) in primary elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) has created a need to optimize patient selection and improve same-day recovery pathways. The objectives of this study were (1) to identify our institution\'s most common causes for failed SDD, and (2) to evaluate risk factors associated with failed SDD.
    METHODS: A retrospective review of SDD patients undergoing primary TKA or THA from January 2021 to September 2022 was conducted. Reasons for SDD failure were recorded and differences between successful and failed SDD cases were assessed via a multivariate logistic regression.
    RESULTS: Overall, 85.3% (651 of 753) of patients included were successful SDDs. Failed SDD occurred in 16.8% (74 of 441) of TKA and 11.8% (38 of 322) of THA cases. Primary reasons included failure to clear physical therapy (33.0%, 37 of 112), postoperative hypotension (20.5%, 23 of 112), and urinary retention (16.9%, 19 of 112). Analysis revealed that overall failed SDD cases were more likely to have had prior opioid use and a longer surgical time. Failed TKA SDD cases were more likely to have had a longer surgical time and not have receive a preoperative nerve block, while failed THA SDD cases were more likely to be older.
    CONCLUSIONS: The SDD selection criteria and pathways continue to evolve, with multiple factors contributing to failed SDD. Improving patient selection algorithms and optimizing post-operative pathways can enhance the ability to successfully choose SDD candidates.
    METHODS: III.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一些营养因素被认为可以改善肩袖(RC)修复术后的预后,但是饮食对手术后恢复速度的影响仍然不确定。为了调查饮食习惯在这种情况下的潜在作用,我们分析了55例RC修复患者12个月的随访数据,发现这些患者根据术后恢复方式可分为快速恢复组(n=35)和缓慢恢复组(n=20).基于群体的逻辑分析显示,习惯性的肉类摄入量(OR=1.84,95CI,1.22-2.76,p=0.003),水果(OR=2.33,95CI,1.26-5.67,p=0.01),和小麦粉食品(OR=1.62,95CI,1.2-2.25,p=0.002)与快速恢复显着相关。此外,在所有小麦粉食品的摄入量中,蒸和煮面粉产品的摄入量也与快速恢复有关。进一步的调解分析表明,嗜酸性粒细胞(EOS)显着介导了快速RC恢复与习惯性摄入肉之间的关联(调解比例=17.5%,P-中介<0.0001),水果(17.9%,p<0.0001),和小麦粉食品(11.4%,p<0.0001)。因此,我们的研究表明,某些饮食习惯在RC修复术后恢复中起着有益的作用.
    Some nutritional factors have been suggested to improve postoperative outcomes in rotator cuff (RC) repair, but dietary effects on the recovery speed after the surgery remain undefined. To investigate the potential roles of dietary habits in this context, we analyzed the 12-month follow-up data of 55 patients with RC repair and found that these patients could be categorized into a rapid recovery group (n = 35) and slow recovery group (n = 20) according to their postoperative recovery patterns. Group-based logistic analysis revealed that habitual intakes of meat (OR = 1.84, 95%CI, 1.22-2.76, p = 0.003), fruits (OR = 2.33, 95%CI, 1.26-5.67, p = 0.01), and wheat-flour foods (OR = 1.62, 95%CI, 1.2-2.25, p = 0.002) were significantly associated with rapid recovery. Moreover, among all intakes of wheat-flour foods, intakes of steamed and boiled flour products were also associated with rapid recovery. Further mediation analysis showed that eosinophilic granulocytes (EOs) significantly mediated the association between rapid RC recovery and the habitual intakes of meat (mediation proportion = 17.5%, P-mediation < 0.0001), fruits (17.9%, p < 0.0001), and wheat-flour foods (11.4%, p < 0.0001). Thus, our study suggests that certain dietary habits play beneficial roles in the context of postoperative recovery for RC repair.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    目的:大多数麻醉后监护病房(PACU)协议要求接受脊髓麻醉的患者在出院前恢复下肢运动功能。这项研究的目的是评估替代恢复方案的影响,该方案可促进接受初次全髋和膝关节置换术(THA/TKA)的患者在从脊髓麻醉中完全恢复之前的下一阶段护理。具体来说,我们评估了:1)术后低血压或快速反应的发生率;2)对PACU住院时间(LOS)的影响;3)PACU和手术层不良血流动力学事件的发生率.
    方法:将647例接受原发性THA(n=190)和TKA(n=457)的脊髓麻醉的患者分为2组:(1)早期PACU出院组:出院时部分或完全运动阻滞的患者和(2)对照PACU出院组:出院时完全运动恢复的患者。使用改良的Aldrete评分系统评估出院准备情况。主要结果是术后低血压或快速反应的发生率;次要结果是术后恶心和头晕的发生率以及在PACU中花费的时间。
    结果:两组的低血压发生率无显著差异(1.40vs.1.39%,P=1.0),没有发现快速反应。早期放电使平均PACU停留时间从平均值87缩短(标准偏差(SD),76至97)至70分钟(SD,68~72)(P<0.01)。恶心的发生率没有差异(0.6vs.0%;P=0.51)或头晕(2.2vs.0.4%;P=0.09)。
    结论:在这项回顾性观察性研究中,评估了改良的Aldrete评分恢复方案在脊髓麻醉下的原发性THA和TKA中的应用,我们发现,PACU早期排出不会增加手术底板的血流动力学后果.因此,对于接受THA和/或TKA的脊髓麻醉的患者,可以安全,更方便地从PACU出院,而无需等待运动功能恢复。
    Post anesthesia care units (PACU) await return of motor function in lower extremities, prior to discharge for patients undergoing spinal anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of a newly utilized recovery protocol that facilitated early discharges of patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasties (THA/TKA) to the floor before full motor recovery from spinal anesthesia is achieved.
    A total of 647 patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for primary THA (n = 190) and TKA (n = 457) were divided into 2 groups: (1) Early PACU discharge group: patients with partial or full motor blockade at discharge. (2) Control PACU discharge group: patients with full motor recovery at discharge. Readiness for discharge was assessed using a modified Aldrete Score system. The primary outcome was incidences of hypotension or rapid responses post-operatively.
    There was no significant difference in the incidence of hypotension between the two groups (1.4 versus 1.39%, P = 1.0) and zero rapid responses were noted. Early discharge shortened mean PACU LOS time from 86.50 minutes to 70.27 minutes (P < .01). There was no difference in the incidence of nausea (0.55 versus 0%; P = .51) ordizziness (2.22 versus 0.35%; P = .09).
    In this retrospective observational study, we found that early PACU discharge did not result in an increase in hemodynamic consequences on the surgical floor. Thus, discharge from PACU can be safely and more expeditiously performed without waiting for return of motor function in patients receiving spinal anesthesia for THA/TKA using a modified Aldrete Score recovery protocol.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    循环死亡测定(cDCD)后受控捐赠中的正常体温区域灌注(NRP)是一种与肺部快速恢复共存的腹部器官保存技术。我们旨在描述使用NRP同时从cDCD供体中回收两种移植物时,肺移植(LuTx)和肝移植(LiTx)的结果,并将其与从脑死亡(DBD)供体中回收的移植物进行比较。在2015年1月至2020年12月期间在西班牙符合这些标准的所有Lutx和LiTx都被纳入研究。在使用NRP的cDCD和1879(21%)DBD供体后,227(17%)个供体进行肺和肝脏的同时恢复(P<.001)。在两个Lutx组中,前72小时内的原发性移植物功能障碍3级相似(14.7%cDCD与10.5%DBD;P=.139)。在cDCD中,Lutx在1年和3年的生存率分别为79.9%和66.4%。DBD分别为81.9%和69.7%(P=0.403)。两个LiTx组原发性无功能和缺血性胆管病变的发生率相似。cDCD与cDCD相比,1年和3年的移植物存活率分别为89.7%和80.8%。DBDLiTx中的88.2%和82.1%(P=.669)。总之,在cDCD供体中,用NRP同时快速恢复肺和保存腹部器官是可行的,并且在Lutx和LiTx受者中与使用DBD移植物的移植结果相似.
    Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) in controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death (cDCD) is a growing preservation technique for abdominal organs that coexists with the rapid recovery of lungs. We aimed to describe the outcomes of lung transplantation (LuTx) and liver transplantation (LiTx) when both grafts are simultaneously recovered from cDCD donors using NRP and compare them with grafts recovered from donation after brain death (DBD) donors. All LuTx and LiTx meeting these criteria during January 2015 to December 2020 in Spain were included in the study. Simultaneous recovery of lungs and livers was undertaken in 227 (17%) donors after cDCD with NRP and 1879 (21%) DBD donors (P < .001). Primary graft dysfunction grade-3 within the first 72 hours was similar in both LuTx groups (14.7% cDCD vs. 10.5% DBD; P = .139). LuTx survival at 1 and 3 years was 79.9% and 66.4% in cDCD vs. 81.9% and 69.7% in DBD (P = .403). The incidence of primary nonfunction and ischemic cholangiopathy was similar in both LiTx groups. Graft survival at 1 and 3 years was 89.7% and 80.8% in cDCD vs. 88.2% and 82.1% in DBD LiTx (P = .669). In conclusion, the simultaneous rapid recovery of lungs and preservation of abdominal organs with NRP in cDCD donors is feasible and offers similar outcomes in both LuTx and LiTx recipients to transplants using DBD grafts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) combined with electroacupuncture (EA) on rehabilitation after abdominal surgery.
    METHODS: A total of 320 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were randomly divided into a combination group (80 cases), a TEAS group (80 cases, 1 case discontinued), an EA group (80 cases, 1 case discontinued) and a control group (80 cases, 1 case discontinued). The patients in the control group received enhance recovery after surgery (ERAS) standardized perioperative management. On the basis of the treatment in the control group, the TEAS group was treated with TEAS at Liangmen (ST 21) and Daheng (SP 15); the EA group was treated with EA at Neiguan (PC 6), Hegu (LI 4), Zusanli (ST 36), Shangjuxu (ST 37) and Xiajuxu (ST 39); the combination group was treated with TEAS combined with EA, with continuous wave, 2-5 Hz in frequency, and the intensity was tolerable to the patients, 30 min each time, once a day, from the first day after surgery, until the anus resumed spontaneous defecation and the oral intake of solid food was tolerated. The gastrointestinal-2 (GI-2) time, first exhaust time, first defecation time, first tolerance of oral intake of solid food time, time of first get out of bed and hospital stay were observed in all the groups; the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score and incidence rates of nausea and vomiting 1, 2, 3 days after surgery were compared in all the groups; after treatment, the acceptability of each treatment was evaluated by patients in each group.
    RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the GI-2 time, first exhaust time, first defecation time, first tolerance of oral intake of solid food time were shortened (P<0.05), the VAS scores 2, 3 days after surgery were decreased (P<0.05) in the combination group, the TEAS group and the EA group; those in the combination group were shorter and lower than the TEAS group and the EA group (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the time of hospital stay in the combination group, the TEAS group and the EA group were shortened (P<0.05), and that in the combination group was shorter than the TEAS group (P<0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: TEAS combined with EA can accelerate the recovery of gastrointestinal function in patients after abdominal surgery, relieve postoperative pain, and shorten hospital stay.
    目的:观察经皮穴位电刺激联合电针对腹部手术后康复的影响。方法:将320例接受腹部手术的患者随机分为经皮穴位电刺激联合电针组(联合组,80例)、经皮穴位电刺激组(80例,中止1例)、电针组(80例,中止1例)和对照组(80例,中止1例)。对照组患者接受加速康复外科(ERAS)标准化围手术期管理。在对照组治疗基础上,经皮穴位电刺激组采用经皮穴位电刺激梁门、大横;电针组采用电针刺激内关、合谷、足三里、上巨虚、下巨虚;联合组采用经皮穴位电刺激联合电针治疗。予连续波,频率2~5 Hz,强度以患者能耐受为度,每次30 min,每日1次,自术后第1天开始,至肛门恢复自主排便,并能耐受经口进食固体食物为止。观察各组患者首次排便时间和耐受经口进食固体食物时间的综合结果(GI-2)时间、首次排气时间、首次排便时间、首次耐受经口进食固体食物时间、首次下床时间、住院天数,比较各组患者术后1、2、3 d疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分及恶心、呕吐发生率,治疗结束后评价患者对每种治疗方法的接受性。结果:与对照组比较,联合组、经皮穴位电刺激组、电针组GI-2时间、首次排气时间、首次排便时间、首次耐受经口进食固体食物时间缩短(P<0.05),术后2、3 d疼痛VAS评分降低(P<0.05),且联合组短于、低于经皮穴位电刺激组、电针组(P<0.05)。与对照组比较,联合组、经皮穴位电刺激组、电针组住院天数缩短(P<0.05),且联合组短于经皮穴位电刺激组(P<0.05)。结论:经皮穴位电刺激联合电针能加速腹部手术后患者胃肠功能的恢复,减轻术后疼痛,缩短住院时间。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号