radiothérapie

Radioth é rapie
  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    叶状肿瘤,边界线(BPT)和恶性(MPT),代表一组罕见的乳腺纤维上皮肿瘤。由于它们的稀有性,他们的治疗仍然缺乏编纂。这些肿瘤的确切发生率仍然未知。TPM代表一半的乳腺肉瘤和1%的乳腺肿瘤。他们在局部阶段的治疗是基于手术,可以是保守手术或乳房切除术.没有记录到肿瘤增生技术和立即乳房重建的影响。BPT和MPT的切除边缘必须是自由的,在TPM的情况下,更宽的边缘可以在局部复发以及总体生存率方面带来益处.切除边缘的最佳宽度未知。如果利润率为正,第二次手术可以弥补第一次手术不足的结果。化疗似乎对无复发生存率没有任何益处,但是可用的数据特别薄弱。辅助放疗的数据更为重要。这在保乳手术的情况下允许更好的局部控制。乳房切除术后放疗的益处较少记载,但在预后不良的情况下可以考虑。TPM在转移阶段的管理是基于化疗的使用(蒽环类,异环磷酰胺)和寡转移疾病的局部治疗。由于这些肿瘤的稀有性,必须在合格的专业人员网络(NETSARC)中讨论他们的管理。
    Phyllodes tumors, borderline (BPT) and malignant (MPT), represent a rare group of fibroepithelial breast tumors. Due to their rarity, their treatment remains poorly codified. The precise incidence of these tumors remains unknown. TPMs represent half of breast sarcomas and 1 % of breast tumors. Their treatment at the localized stage is based on surgery, that can be conservative surgery or a mastectomy. The impact of oncoplastic techniques and immediate breast reconstruction is not documented. The excision margins of the BPT and MPT must be free, a wider margin can provide a benefit in local recurrence but in also overall survival in the case of TPM. The optimal width of the excision margin is not known. In the event of positive margins, a second surgery could make up the result of an insufficient first surgery. Chemotherapy does not seem to provide any benefit on recurrence-free survival, but the available data are particularly weak. The data on adjuvant radiotherapy are more important. This allows better local control in the event of breast-conserving surgery. The benefit of post-mastectomy radiotherapy is less documented but can be considered in cases of poor prognostic factors. The management of TPM at the metastatic stage is based on the use of chemotherapy (anthracyclines, Ifosfamide) and local treatment of metastases in cases of oligometastatic disease. Due to the rarity of these tumors, it is essential that their management be discussed within a network of qualified professionals (NETSARC+).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:随着III期黑色素瘤患者免疫治疗的良好结果,切除和完全淋巴结清扫后辅助放疗的作用必须重新评估.我们评估了辅助放疗和免疫治疗与仅在切除的III期黑色素瘤患者中的免疫治疗相比的结果和安全性。
    方法:这项回顾性和单机构研究包括2019年1月至2022年12月接受完全淋巴结清扫和辅助免疫治疗的III期黑色素瘤患者。与免疫治疗相关的放疗组定义为淋巴结清扫区完成免疫治疗和辅助放疗。主要终点是无病生存期。次要终点是局部进展,局部复发高危患者的3级或以上不良事件发生率和无病生存率.
    结果:纳入33例患者。其中,12人接受辅助淋巴结野放疗。中位随访时间为17个月(范围:8-45个月)。接受放射治疗和免疫治疗的患者的疾病分期明显更高,囊外延伸更为频繁。12个月时,仅接受免疫治疗的患者的无病生存率为66.7%(95%CI:42.5~82.5%),接受放疗和免疫治疗的患者的无病生存率为83.3%(95%CI:48.2~95.6%;P=0.131).接受免疫治疗的患者局部区域进展率为24%,接受免疫治疗和放疗的患者为8%(P=0.379)。辅助治疗后,6%的患者发生3级或以上的免疫治疗相关事件,没有发生3级或以上的放射相关不良事件。
    结论:在III期黑色素瘤患者中,辅助淋巴结野放疗联合免疫疗法似乎与更长的无病生存期相关,具有可接受的公差。然而,这些结果需要长期和前瞻性研究的证实.
    OBJECTIVE: With the promising results of immunotherapy in patients with stage III melanoma, the role of adjuvant radiotherapy after resection and complete lymph-node dissection must be reassessed. We evaluate the outcomes and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy and immunotherapy compared to immunotherapy only in patients with resected stage III melanoma.
    METHODS: This retrospective and single institution study included patients treated for a stage III melanoma with complete lymph-node dissection and adjuvant immunotherapy from January 2019 to December 2022. The radiotherapy associated with immunotherapy group was defined by completion of immunotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy in the lymph-node dissection area. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival. The secondary endpoints were locoregional progression, incidence of adverse events grade 3 or above and disease-free survival rate in patients with high risk of locoregional recurrence.
    RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were included. Among them, twelve received adjuvant lymph-node field radiotherapy. The median duration of follow-up was 17months (range: 8-45months). Patients receiving radiotherapy and immunotherapy had a significantly higher disease stage and more frequent extracapsular extension. At 12months, the disease-free survival rate was 66.7% for the patients receiving immunotherapy alone (95% CI: 42.5-82.5%) and 83.3% for those receiving radiotherapy and immunotherapy (95% CI: 48.2-95.6%; P=0.131). The locoregional progression rate was 24% in patients receiving immunotherapy and 8% in patients receiving immunotherapy and radiotherapy (P=0.379). After adjuvant treatment, 6% of patients developed grade 3 or above immunotherapy-related events and none developed grade 3 or above radiation-related adverse events.
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stage III melanoma, adjuvant lymph-node field radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy seems to be associated with longer disease-free survival, with acceptable tolerance. However, these results need to be confirmed by long-term and prospective studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    目的:前列腺癌是男性中最常见的癌症,放疗大分割方案已成为局部阶段的标准治疗方法。但仍必须证明剂量递增不会增加急性和晚期泌尿生殖系统或胃肠道毒性的风险.
    方法:研究人群包括2016年2月至2018年3月在居里机构接受外部辐射治疗的所有局限性前列腺腺癌患者,使用图像引导的适形强度调制技术,在计划目标体积中2.5Gy的30个分数中,总剂量为75Gy,包括前列腺和精囊,近端可以与46Gy的预防性淋巴结放射疗法配对,分为23个部分,同时进行整合增强。
    结果:共纳入166例患者。其中,68.6%是不利的中等或(非常)高风险。中位年龄和随访时间分别为71.4岁和3.96岁。149例患者接受预防性淋巴结放疗(89.8%)。131例患者接受了激素治疗(78.9%)。放疗期间2级或以上的生殖器-尿液毒性事件,6个月时,1年和5年分别为36.7%,8.8%,3.1%和4.7%。两名患者在5岁时出现晚期4级毒性(1.6%)。放疗期间2级胃肠道毒性事件,6个月,1年和5年分别为15.1%,1.9%,14.6%和9.3%。其中,8例患者出现3级毒性(6.2%).没有4级毒性。分析没有发现任何毒性预测因素。5年总体来说,无进展,生存率分别为82.4%,85.7%,和93.3%。发现血清前列腺特异性抗原浓度和心血管危险因素是总生存期恶化的预测因素(两者P=0.0028)。
    结论:我们的中度小分割剂量递增方案用于局部前列腺癌的外放疗耐受性良好。在没有增加晚期毒性的情况下,对长期复发模式的分析将有助于确定这种剂量递增对局部和远处复发的益处.
    OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer is the most frequent cancer among men and radiotherapy hypofractionation regimens have become standard treatments for the localized stages, but the absence of increased risk of acute and late genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity of the dose escalation still must be demonstrated.
    METHODS: The study population included all patients with localized prostatic adenocarcinoma treated at the institut Curie from February 2016 to March 2018 by external radiation delivered by a linear accelerator using an image-guided conformal intensity modulation technique at a total dose of 75Gy in 30 fractions of 2.5Gy in the planning target volume that included the prostate and the proximal seminal vesicles, and could be paired with a prophylactic lymph node radiotherapy at 46Gy in 23 fractions with simultaneous integrated boost.
    RESULTS: A total of 166 patients were included. Among them, 68.6% were unfavourable intermediate or (very) high risk. The median age and follow-up were 71.4years and 3.96years. One hundred and forty-nine patients received prophylactic lymph node radiotherapy (89.8%). One hundred and thirty-one patients received hormonotherapy (78.9%). Genito-urinary toxicity events of grades 2 or above during radiotherapy, at 6months, 1year and 5years were respectively 36.7%, 8.8%, 3.1% and 4.7%. Two patients had late grade 4 toxicity at 5years (1.6%). Grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity events during radiotherapy, 6months, 1year and 5years were respectively 15.1%, 1.9%, 14.6% and 9.3%. Of these, eight patients had grade 3 toxicity (6.2%). There was no grade 4 toxicity. Analyses did not reveal any predictive factor for toxicity. The 5-year overall, progression-free, and specific survival rates were respectively 82.4%, 85.7%, and 93.3%. Serum prostate specific antigen concentration and cardiovascular risk factors were found to be predictive factors of deterioration in overall survival (P=0.0028 for both).
    CONCLUSIONS: External radiotherapy for localized prostatic cancer with our moderately hypofractionated dose escalation regimen is well tolerated. In the absence of increased late toxicity, the analysis of the modes of long-term relapses will be interesting to determine the benefit of this dose escalation on local and distant relapses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:许多系列比较了cT1声门癌放疗或手术后的声音质量。不同的荟萃分析确定了更好的结果为放疗,而其他不确定任何差异,有些人终于找到了手术的优越性。这项研究的目的是比较接受经口手术与单纯放疗治疗cT1声门癌的患者的长期语音质量。
    方法:VOQUAL研究是一项多中心横断面试验比较研究。主要终点是两组(放疗或手术)之间的语音障碍指数比较。语音评估还包括按年级对语音质量的异质评估,粗糙度,呼吸,Asthenia,和平野报告的应变等级量表。
    结果:该研究包括41例cT1声带癌的成人患者,在两个肿瘤中心接受了声带切除术或单纯放疗。手术组的语音障碍指数值中位数为20[8;32.5],放疗组为10[4;18.5]。中值与各成分F之间无统计学差异,问卷的P和E(P=0.1585)。数字发音障碍等级的中值,粗糙度,呼吸,Asthenia,手术组为2[0;5],放疗组为2[0.25;3.75]。这些值之间没有统计学上的显著差异(P=0.78)。
    结论:我们的研究在语音障碍指数和等级的主要终点上没有显示任何显着差异,粗糙度,呼吸,Asthenia,和应变分数。
    方法:III.
    背景:VOQUAL研究于2020年7月在ClinicalTrials.gov平台上注册,编号为NCT04447456。
    OBJECTIVE: Many series have compared voice quality after radiotherapy or surgery for cT1 glottic carcinoma. Different meta-analyses identify better results for radiotherapy while others do not identify any difference, some finally find a superiority of surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the voice quality in the long term of patients who underwent transoral surgery versus exclusive irradiation for the treatment of cT1 glottic carcinoma.
    METHODS: The VOQUAL study was a pilot comparative multicenter cross-sectional study. The primary endpoint was the Voice Handicap Index comparison between two groups (radiotherapy or surgery). The voice assessment also consisted in the heteroevaluation of voice quality by the Grade, Roughness, Breathness, Asthenia, and Strain rating scale reported by Hirano.
    RESULTS: The study included 41 adult patients with cT1 carcinoma of the vocal cord treated by cordectomy or exclusive radiation in two oncologic centers. The median Voice Handicap Index value was 20 [8; 32.5] in the surgery group and 10 [4; 18.5] in the radiotherapy group. There was no statistically significant difference between the median values and the various components F, P and E of the questionnaire (P=0.1585). The median value of the numeric dysphonia Grade, Roughness, Breathness, Asthenia, and Strain scale was 2 [0; 5] in the surgery group and 2 [0.25; 3.75] in the radiotherapy group. There was no statistically significant difference between these values (P=0.78).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not show any significant difference on the primary endpoints of Voice Handicap Index and Grade, Roughness, Breathness, Asthenia, and Strain scores.
    METHODS: III.
    BACKGROUND: The VOQUAL study was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov platform under the number NCT04447456, in July 2020.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:神经细胞瘤占原发性脑肿瘤的0.25%至0.5%,主要见于年轻人。这些肿瘤具有神经元分化。基础治疗是神经外科。其他疗法的疗效,包括放射治疗,还不清楚。这项研究的目的是评估中枢神经细胞瘤的治疗和放射治疗的作用。
    方法:纳入了法国2006年至2015年间新诊断为组织学确诊的神经细胞瘤的所有成年患者(18岁或以上)。
    结果:研究期间有116例患者被诊断为中枢神经细胞瘤。所有患者均行手术切除,6人接受了辅助放疗。11例患者因病情进展接受放疗。在中位随访68.7个月后,29例患者发生局部衰竭。5年局部控制率为73.4%。根据单变量分析,增殖标志物Ki67指数大于2%(风险比[HR]:1.48;置信区间[CI]:1.40-1.57;P=0.027)和次全切除(HR:8.48;CI:8.01-8.99;P<0.001)与局部衰竭增加相关.总切除与癫痫后遗症(HR:3.62;CI:3.42-3.83;P<0.01)和记忆障碍(HR:1.35;CI:1.07-1.20;P<0.01)的风险较高。随访期间死亡10例(8.6%)。10年总生存率为89.0%。没有发现总生存期的预后因素。
    结论:分析表明,接受手术次全切除的患者,特别是当肿瘤的Ki67指数大于2%时,局部复发的风险增加。这些患者可以从辅助放疗中获益。
    OBJECTIVE: Neurocytomas represent 0.25 to 0.5% of primary brain tumours and are mainly found in young adults. These tumours have neuronal differentiation. The cornerstone treatment is neurosurgery. The efficacy of other therapies, including radiotherapy, is still unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the management of central neurocytomas and the role of radiotherapy.
    METHODS: All adult patients (age 18 years or older) newly diagnosed with a histologically confirmed neurocytoma between 2006 and 2015 in France were included.
    RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen patients were diagnosed with a central neurocytoma during the study period. All patients underwent surgical resection, and six received adjuvant radiotherapy. Eleven patients received radiotherapy due to progression. After a median follow-up of 68.7 months, local failure occurred in 29 patients. The 5-year local control rate was 73.4%. According to univariate analysis, marker of proliferation Ki67 index greater than 2% (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.48; confidence interval [CI]: 1.40-1.57; P=0.027) and subtotal resection (HR: 8.48; CI: 8.01-8.99; P<0.001) were associated with an increase in local failure. Gross total resection was associated with a higher risk of sequelae epilepsy (HR: 3.62; CI: 3.42-3.83; P<0.01) and memory disorders (HR: 1.35; CI: 1.07-1.20; P<0.01). Ten patients (8.6%) died during the follow-up. The 10-year overall survival rate was 89.0%. No prognostic factors for overall survival were found.
    CONCLUSIONS: The analysis showed that patients who underwent subtotal surgical resection, particularly when the tumour had a Ki67 index greater than 2%, had an increased risk of local recurrence. These patients could benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:放射性视神经病变(RION)很少见,但可能导致失明。发生这种情况的机制包括内皮和神经元损伤,但是RION在高能质子治疗的眼外肿瘤中的评估很少,它的使用正在全球范围内扩大。我们通过光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCT-A)评估了接受高能质子治疗的视旁颅内或头颈部肿瘤患者的乳头周围微血管变化。
    方法:在这项前瞻性机构审查委员会批准的研究中,2018-2020年接受视神经最大PBT剂量>40Gy_RBE的患者接受了OCT-A定量分析.使用ImageJ软件使用血管面积密度(VAD)评估乳头状周围浅表血管复合体(SVC)的变化,血管长度密度(VLD)和分形维数(FDsk)。进行了单因素和多因素分析。
    结果:47例(78眼),随访29±6个月(范围18-42),29例患者(61.7%)之前曾接受过手术,18例(32.1%)在质子治疗之前有微血管异常。总放疗剂量是乳头周围微血管减少的最相关因素。随访时间与较低的VAD相关(P=0.005),平均视网膜神经纤维层(RNFLm)厚度也降低。OCT-A变化与平均视觉缺损之间没有显着相关性。
    结论:乳头周围微血管改变可能是由于肿瘤压迫或手术和质子治疗眼外肿瘤引起的。OCT-A可以在临床症状发生之前提供对RION的定量和机械见解。
    OBJECTIVE: Radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) is rare but may lead to blindness. The mechanisms by which this occurs include endothelial and neuronal damage, but RION has been assessed very little in the case of extraocular tumors treated with high-energy proton therapy, the use of which is expanding worldwide. We assessed peripapillary microvascular changes by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) in patients undergoing high-energy proton therapy for para-optic intracranial or head and neck tumors.
    METHODS: In this prospective institutional review board approved study, patients receiving>40Gy_RBE maximal PBT dose to their optic nerve between 2018 and 2020 underwent quantitative OCT-A analyses. ImageJ software was used to assess changes in the peripapillary superficial vascular complex (SVC) using vascular area density (VAD), vessel length density (VLD) and fractal dimension (FDsk). Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed.
    RESULTS: Of 47 patients (78 eyes) with 29±6 months of follow-up (range 18-42), 29 patients (61.7%) had previously undergone surgery and 18 (32.1%) had microvascular abnormalities prior to proton therapy. Total radiotherapy dose was the most relevant factor in decreased peripapillary microvasculature. Duration of follow-up was associated with lower VAD (P=0.005) and mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFLm) thickness also decreased. There was no significant correlation between OCT-A changes and mean visual defect.
    CONCLUSIONS: Peripapillary microvasculature changes may occur from tumor compression or surgery and proton therapy for extraocular tumors. OCT-A may provide quantitative and mechanistic insights into RION before the occurrence of clinical symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究的目的是评估多标准优化是否可以限制放射治疗计划中的操作者之间的差异,并评估该方法是否可以有助于目标体积覆盖和减少头颈部癌症的强度调节根治性放射治疗的风险器官。
    方法:我们对20例口咽或口腔鳞状细胞癌患者进行了回顾性分析。我们对使用Precision®软件制作的手动计划进行了比较剂量学研究,与使用多准则优化方法(RayStation®)提出的计划进行比较。我们评估了前六名患者的操作员间可重复性,以及使用多标准优化方法节省处于危险中的器官的剂量学贡献。
    结果:年龄中位数为69岁,大多数病变是口咽癌(65%),35%的病变为T3期。首先,我们获得了每个患者在每个器官水平的四次操作员测量结果之间的高度相似性.组内相关系数大于0.85。第二,我们观察到对侧腮腺有显著的剂量学益处,同侧和对侧咬肌,同侧和对侧翼状肌以及喉部(P<0.05)。对于对侧腮腺,多标准优化和手动计划之间的平均剂量差为-2.0Gy(P=0.01)。关于喉部,两种方案的平均剂量差为-4.6Gy(P<0.001)。
    结论:多标准优化是一种可重复的技术,比手动优化更快。它允许有危险器官的剂量学优势,特别是对于那些通常不考虑手动剂量测定。这可能导致生活质量的提高。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess if multicriteria optimization could limit interoperator variability in radiation therapy planning and assess if this method could contribute to target volume coverage and sparing of organ at risk for intensity-modulated curative radiation therapy of head and neck cancers.
    METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis on 20 patients treated for an oropharyngeal or oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. We carried out a comparative dosimetric study of manual plans produced with Precision® software, compared with the plans proposed using the multicriteria optimization method (RayStation®). We assessed interoperator reproducibility on the first six patients, and dosimetric contribution in sparing organs at risk using the multicriteria optimization method.
    RESULTS: Median age was 69 years, most lesions were oropharyngeal carcinoma (65%), and 35% lesions were stage T3. First, we obtained a high degree of similarity between the four operator measurements for each patient at the level of each organ. Intraclass correlation coefficients were greater than 0.85. Second, we observed a significant dosimetric benefit for contralateral parotid gland, homolateral and contralateral masseter muscles, homolateral and contralateral pterygoid muscles and for the larynx (P<0.05). For the contralateral parotid gland, the mean dose difference between the multicriteria optimization and manual plans was -2.0Gy (P=0.01). Regarding the larynx, the mean dose difference between the two plans was -4.6Gy (P<0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Multicriteria optimization is a reproducible technique and faster than manual optimization. It allows dosimetric advantages on organs at risk, especially for those not usually taken into consideration in manual dosimetry. This may lead to improved quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    背景:高达30%新诊断为晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的患者存在脑转移。在没有致癌成瘾的情况下,一线免疫疗法,单独或与化疗联合使用,是目前的护理标准。这篇综述旨在综合有关这些患者的免疫治疗疗效的现有数据,并讨论其与放疗等局部治疗相协调的可能性。
    背景:伴有脑转移的NSCLC患者与无脑转移的NSCLC患者的免疫疗法相似,具有生存益处。然而,这一发现主要基于前瞻性研究,这些研究包括经过高度筛选的治疗前和稳定的脑转移患者.几项回顾性研究和两项前瞻性单臂研究证实了免疫治疗的颅内疗效,单独或联合化疗。
    结论:脑放疗的适应症和最佳时机仍是争论的话题。迄今为止,没有随机研究评估在一线免疫疗法中增加脑放疗.那就是说,最近的一项荟萃分析显示,放疗补充免疫治疗后,脑内反应增加.
    结论:对于伴有脑转移的NSCLC患者,现有数据表明,一线免疫疗法具有明显的益处,无论是单独或联合化疗。然而,这些数据大部分来自回顾性研究,小样本量的非随机研究。
    BACKGROUND: Up to 30% patients newly diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with brain metastases. In the absence of oncogenic addiction, first-line immunotherapy, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, is the current standard of care. This review aims to synthesize the available data regarding the efficacy of immunotherapy in these patients, and to discuss the possibility of its being coordinated with local treatments such as radiotherapy.
    BACKGROUND: NSCLC patients with brain metastases appear to have survival benefits with immunotherapy similar to those of NSCLC patients without brain metastases. However, this finding is based on mainly prospective studies having included highly selected patients with pre-treated and stable brain metastases. Several retrospective studies and two prospective single-arm studies have confirmed the intracranial efficacy of immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: The indications and optimal timing for cerebral radiotherapy remain subjects of debate. To date, there exists no randomized study assessing the addition of brain radiotherapy to first-line immunotherapy. That said, a recent meta-analysis showed increased intracerebral response when radiotherapy complemented immunotherapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: For NSCLC patients with brain metastases, the available data suggest a clear benefit of first-line immunotherapy, whether alone or combined with chemotherapy. However, most of these data are drawn from retrospective, non-randomized studies with small sample sizes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    目的:头颅照射可导致长期神经系统并发症,特别是记忆障碍。这项前瞻性研究的目的是评估位于海马附近的良性颅底肿瘤的照射对自传体记忆的影响。
    方法:2016年至2019年,纳入接受正常分割照射治疗的海绵窦脑膜瘤或垂体腺瘤患者。患者在基线时接受了全面的神经心理学评估,治疗后1年和2年。为了可比性,将神经心理学测试转换为Z评分。
    结果:纳入的19例患者中有12例在2年时进行了完整的神经心理学评估,并进行了分析。在“TEMPau”测试中,在2年的自传体记忆中没有发现显着差异,不管自传记忆的时期。平均海马剂量对自传体记忆的变化没有影响。在评估的其他领域没有明显的认知障碍,如注意力,顺行记忆,工作记忆和执行功能。自传记忆独立于这些其他认知领域,这证明了它的具体研究。
    结论:对良性病理的颅底进行放射治疗不会导致明显的认知障碍。需要更长时间的随访来确认这些结果。
    OBJECTIVE: Cranial irradiation can lead to long-term neurological complications, in particular memory disorders. The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the impact of irradiation of benign skull base tumours located near the hippocampi on autobiographical memory.
    METHODS: From 2016 to 2019, patients with cavernous sinus meningioma or pituitary adenoma treated with normofractionated irradiation were included. Patients underwent full neuropsychological assessment at baseline, 1year and 2years post-treatment. Neuropsychological tests were converted to Z-Score for comparability.
    RESULTS: Twelve of the 19 patients included had a complete neuropsychological evaluation at 2years and were analysed. On the \"TEMPau\" test, no significant difference in autobiographical memory was found at 2years, regardless of the period of autobiographical memory. The mean hippocampal dose had no impact on the variation in autobiographical memory. There was no significant cognitive impairment in the other domains assessed, such as attention, anterograde memory, working memory and executive functions. Autobiographical memory was independent of these other cognitive domains, which justifies its specific study.
    CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy to the skull base for a benign pathology does not lead to significant cognitive impairment. Longer follow-up would be needed to confirm these results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Graves眼病的眼眶放射治疗是非肿瘤放射治疗的一个例子。在1930年代首次引入,自20世纪80年代以来,这种治疗方法已被广泛使用,多项研究证明了其有效性和安全性:70%~80%的患者减少了软组织受累,30%~80%的患者改善了眼活动度.如今,它是糖皮质激素失败后中度至重度和活动性疾病管理中Graves眼眶病欧洲小组认可的二线治疗选择之一。在那种背景下,眼眶放疗应联合糖皮质激素。据我们所知,对于Graves眼病应如何计划和实施眼眶放疗,目前尚无切实可行的建议.最佳剂量未定义,但最常见的方案包括20Gy在10个部分的2Gy,尽管其他选择可能会产生更好的结果。最后,与使用横向相对视野的三维放射治疗相比,使用现代放射治疗技术,如强度调节放射治疗,可以更好地保护有风险的器官。
    Orbital radiotherapy for Graves\' ophthalmopathy is an example of non-oncological radiotherapy. First introduced in the 1930s, this treatment has become widely used since the 1980s with several studies showing proof of both effectiveness and safety: a decrease of soft tissue involvement in 70 to 80% of patients and an improvement of ocular mobility in 30 to 80% of patients. Nowadays, it\'s one of the second line treatment options recognized by the European Group on Graves\' orbitopathy in the management of a moderate to severe and active disease after failure of glucocorticoids. In that setting, orbital radiotherapy should be combined with glucocorticoids. To our knowledge, there are no practical recommendations on how orbital radiotherapy should be planned and conducted for Graves\' ophthalmopathy. Optimal dose is not defined however the most frequent regimen consists of 20Gy in ten fractions of 2Gy, though other options may yield better results. Lastly, the use of modern technique of radiotherapy such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy may allow a better sparing of organs at risk compared to three-dimensional radiotherapy using lateral opposing fields.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号