racial and ethnic disparities

种族和民族差异
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    癌症相关恶病质(CC)是一种进行性综合征,其特征是无意的体重减轻,肌肉萎缩,疲劳,和影响大多数胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者的不良结局。在疾病过程的早期识别和分类CC阶段的能力具有挑战性,但对于管理至关重要。
    本研究的主要目的是使用临床方法确定初治PDAC病例中CC阶段总体和性别、种族和民族的患病率,营养,和功能标准。次要目标包括确定较高症状负担的患病率和预测因素,支持性护理需求,和生活质量(QoL),并检查它们对总生存期(OS)的影响。
    一项基于人群的多机构前瞻性队列研究PDAC患者于2018年至2021年由佛罗里达胰腺协作组织进行。利用患者报告的数据和实验室值,参与者在基线时分为四个阶段[非恶病质(NCa),恶病质前期(PCa),恶病质(Ca),和难治性恶病质(RCa)]。多元回归,KaplanMeier分析,并进行Cox回归评估相关性.
    估计309例PDAC的CC阶段(156名女性,153名男性)。NCa的总体患病率,PCa,Ca,RCa为12.9%,24.6%,54.1%,和8.4%,分别。在所有CC阶段中,男性,种族和少数民族的CC患病率最高。标准将NCa病例与其他组区分开来,但没有区分PCa和Ca。最常见的症状包括体重减轻,疲劳,疼痛,焦虑,和抑郁症,随着时间的推移,疼痛明显恶化。最大的支持性护理需求包括情感和身体领域。男性,黑人,那些有RCa的人操作系统最差。
    使用临床,营养,和功能标准,在我们多样化的PDAC病例中,近四分之一,多机构队列在诊断时患有PCa,62.5%的患者患有Ca或RCa.PCa估计值高于先前研究中报道的。我们建议使用这些标准来帮助CC分类,监测,以及所有事故PDAC病例的管理。调查结果还强调了持续情感支持的建议,帮助减轻疼痛,以及整个PDAC治疗过程中的支持性护理需求。
    UNASSIGNED: Cancer-associated cachexia (CC) is a progressive syndrome characterized by unintentional weight loss, muscle atrophy, fatigue, and poor outcomes that affects most patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The ability to identify and classify CC stage along its continuum early in the disease process is challenging but critical for management.
    UNASSIGNED: The main objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of CC stage overall and by sex and race and ethnicity among treatment-naïve PDAC cases using clinical, nutritional, and functional criteria. Secondary objectives included identifying the prevalence and predictors of higher symptom burden, supportive care needs, and quality of life (QoL), and examining their influence on overall survival (OS).
    UNASSIGNED: A population-based multi-institutional prospective cohort study of patients with PDAC was conducted between 2018 and 2021 by the Florida Pancreas Collaborative. Leveraging patient-reported data and laboratory values, participants were classified at baseline into four stages [non-cachexia (NCa), pre-cachexia (PCa), cachexia (Ca), and refractory cachexia (RCa)]. Multivariate regression, Kaplan Meier analyses, and Cox regression were conducted to evaluate associations.
    UNASSIGNED: CC stage was estimated for 309 PDAC cases (156 females, 153 males). The overall prevalence of NCa, PCa, Ca, and RCa was 12.9%, 24.6%, 54.1%, and 8.4%, respectively. CC prevalence across all CC stages was highest for males and racial and ethnic minorities. Criteria differentiated NCa cases from other groups, but did not distinguish PCa from Ca. The most frequently reported symptoms included weight loss, fatigue, pain, anxiety, and depression, with pain significantly worsening over time. The greatest supportive care needs included emotional and physical domains. Males, Black people, and those with RCa had the worst OS.
    UNASSIGNED: Using clinical, nutritional, and functional criteria, nearly one-quarter of the PDAC cases in our diverse, multi-institutional cohort had PCa and 62.5% had Ca or RCa at the time of diagnosis. The PCa estimate is higher than that reported in prior studies. We recommend these criteria be used to aid in CC classification, monitoring, and management of all incident PDAC cases. Findings also highlight the recommendation for continued emotional support, assistance in alleviating pain, and supportive care needs throughout the PDAC treatment journey.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:临床下一代测序是识别致病序列变异的有效方法,这些变异对参与者和家属来说在医学上是可行的,但与参与者的初步诊断无关。这些变体称为次要发现(SF)。根据文献,在包括大量非裔美国人参与者的大型儿科队列中,尚无SF类型和频率的报道。我们试图调查类型(包括美国医学遗传学和基因组学学院[ACMG]和非ACMG推荐的基因列表),频率,和SF的费率,以及SF披露对费城儿童医院(CHOP)应用基因组学中心大型儿科队列参与者和家庭的影响。
    方法:我们系统地鉴定了已建立的致病基因中的致病性(P)和可能的致病性(LP)变异,遵守ACMGv3.2次要发现指南和超越。对于非ACMG次要发现,类似于临床环境中的偶然发现,我们使用了一组针对儿科发病的标准,高外显率,中度至重度表型,和变异的临床可操作性。应用这种基于标准的方法,而不是使用固定的基因列表,以确保所识别的变异可能显着影响参与者的健康。为了识别和分类这些变体,我们根据ACMG/AMP建议采用了临床等级变异分类标准;此外,我们进行了详细的文献检索,以确保全面探索与儿科参与者相关的潜在次要发现.
    结果:我们报告了在16,713名参与者中1,464个P/LPSF变体的独特分布。ACMG基因中有427个独特变体,非ACMG基因中有265个独特变体。ACMG和非ACMG基因列表中最常见的突变基因是TTR(41.6%)和CHEK2(7.16%),分别。总的来说,在ACMG(5.81%)和非ACMG(2.95%)基因中,8.76%的参与者发现了可能具有医学重要性的变异.
    OBJECTIVE: Clinical next-generation sequencing is an effective approach for identifying pathogenic sequence variants that are medically actionable for participants and families but are not associated with the participant\'s primary diagnosis. These variants are called secondary findings (SFs). According to the literature, there is no report of the types and frequencies of SFs in a large pediatric cohort which includes substantial African-American participants. We sought to investigate the types (including American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics [ACMG] and non-ACMG recommended gene lists), frequencies, and rates of SFs, as well as the effects of SF disclosure on the participants and families of a large pediatric cohort at the Center for Applied Genomics at The Children\'s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP).
    METHODS: We systematically identified pathogenic (P) and likely pathogenic (LP) variants in established disease-causing genes, adhering to ACMG v3.2 secondary finding guidelines and beyond. For non-ACMG secondary findings, akin to incidental findings in clinical settings, we utilized a set of criteria focusing on pediatric onset, high penetrance, moderate to severe phenotypes, and the clinical actionability of the variants. This criteria-based approach was applied rather than using a fixed gene list to ensure that the variants identified are likely to impact participant health significantly. To identify and categorize these variants, we employed a clinical-grade variant classification standard per ACMG/AMP recommendations; additionally, we conducted a detailed literature search to ensure a comprehensive exploration of potential secondary findings relevant to pediatric participants.
    RESULTS: We report a distinctive distribution of 1,464 P/LP SF variants in 16,713 participants. There were 427 unique variants in ACMG genes and 265 in non-ACMG genes. The most frequently mutated genes among the ACMG and non-ACMG gene lists were TTR (41.6%) and CHEK2 (7.16%), respectively. Overall, variants of possible medical importance were found in 8.76% of participants in both ACMG (5.81%) and non-ACMG (2.95%) genes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的本研究旨在确定预测胆囊腺癌患者死亡率的因素,并使用2016年至2020年间使用医疗保健成本和利用项目国家住院数据库(HCUP-NIS)数据库的数据开发风险评分来预测不良结局。方法对8596例胆囊腺癌患者进行回顾性队列研究。使用国际疾病分类(ICD)第10版临床修改(CM)代码C23提取数据。分析的变量包括年龄,性别,医院部门,种族,收入四分位数,和APRDRG死亡风险。使用Logistic回归来确定死亡率的预测因子并开发风险评分系统。描述性统计和卡方检验评估了变量与死亡率之间的关系,p值表示显著性。结果研究人群平均年龄为68.3岁,66.6%为女性患者。总死亡率为7.2%。死亡率的主要预测因素包括所有患者精细诊断相关组(APRDRG)死亡风险较高(p<0.001),年龄(p=0.04),和女性(p=0.033)。种族和医院划分与死亡率显着相关(分别为p<0.001和p=0.015)。包含这些变量的逻辑回归模型在受试者工作特征曲线下的面积为0.82,表明具有良好的判别能力。开发的风险评分将患者分类为低,中等,和高危人群,相应的死亡率为0.88%,5.28%,17.78%。结论本研究确定了胆囊腺癌患者死亡率的关键预测因子。APRDRG的死亡风险和年龄最为显著。开发的风险评分有效地按风险对患者进行分层,潜在的指导临床决策和改善患者预后。
    Objective This study aims to identify factors predictive of mortality in patients with gallbladder adenocarcinoma and to develop a risk score to predict poor outcomes using data from the Using Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Database (HCUP-NIS) database between 2016 and 2020. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study analyzing 8596 patients diagnosed with gallbladder adenocarcinoma. Data were extracted using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10th Edition Clinical Modification (CM) code C23. Variables analyzed included age, gender, hospital division, race, income quartile, and APRDRG mortality risk. Logistic regression was utilized to determine the predictors of mortality and develop a risk-scoring system. Descriptive statistics and Chi-squared tests assessed the relationship between variables and mortality, with p-values indicating significance. Results The study population had a mean age of 68.3 years, with 66.6% female patients. The overall mortality rate was 7.2%. Key predictors of mortality included higher All Patients Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR DRG) risk of mortality (p<0.001), age (p=0.04), and female gender (p=0.033). Race and hospital division were significantly associated with mortality (p<0.001 and p=0.015, respectively). A logistic regression model incorporating these variables yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.82, indicating good discriminative ability. The developed risk score categorized patients into low, medium, and high-risk groups, with corresponding mortality rates of 0.88%, 5.28%, and 17.78%. Conclusion This study identified critical predictors of mortality in gallbladder adenocarcinoma patients, with APR DRG risk of mortality and age being the most significant. The developed risk score effectively stratifies patients by risk, potentially guiding clinical decision-making and improving patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:充血性心力衰竭(CHF)是导致住院和再入院的主要原因,给医疗保健系统带来沉重负担。确定与再入院风险相关的因素对于制定有针对性的干预措施和改善患者预后至关重要。本研究旨在调查社会经济和人口因素对主要因CHF入院的患者30天和90天再入院率的影响。方法本研究采用横断面研究设计,数据来自2016年至2020年的全国再入院数据库(NRD)。包括初步诊断为CHF的成年患者。主要结果是30天和90天全因再入院率。多变量逻辑回归用于确定与再入院独立相关的因素,包括种族,种族,保险状况,收入水平,和生活安排。结果本研究共纳入219,904例初步诊断为CHF的患者。总体30天和90天再入院率分别为17.3%和23.1%,分别。在多变量分析中,30天再入院风险较高的独立相关因素包括西班牙裔种族(OR1.18,95%CI1.03-1.35),非裔美国人种族(OR1.15,95%CI1.04-1.28),医疗保险(OR1.24,95%CI1.12-1.38),和城市住宅(OR1.11,95%CI1.02-1.21)。较高的收入与较低的再入院风险相关(OR0.87,95%CI0.79-0.96最低四分位数)。在90天的再入院中观察到类似的模式。结论社会经济和人口因素,包括种族,种族,保险状况,收入水平,和生活安排,显著影响CHF患者30天和90天的再入院率。这些发现强调了有针对性的干预措施和政策的必要性,以解决健康的社会决定因素并促进CHF管理中的健康公平。未来的研究应侧重于发展和评估文化敏感性,以社区为基础的策略,以减少再入院和改善高危CHF患者的预后。
    Background Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a leading cause of hospitalizations and readmissions, placing a significant burden on the healthcare system. Identifying factors associated with readmission risk is crucial for developing targeted interventions and improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of socioeconomic and demographic factors on 30-day and 90-day readmission rates in patients primarily admitted for CHF. Methods The study was carried out using a cross-sectional study design, and the data were obtained from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2016 to 2020. Adult patients with a primary diagnosis of CHF were included. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day all-cause readmission rates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with readmissions, including race, ethnicity, insurance status, income level, and living arrangements. Results A total of 219,904 patients with a primary diagnosis of CHF were used in the study. The overall 30-day and 90-day readmission rates were 17.3% and 23.1%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with higher 30-day readmission risk included Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.35), African American race (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.28), Medicare insurance (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.12-1.38), and urban residence (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.21). Higher income was associated with lower readmission risk (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79-0.96 for highest vs. lowest quartile). Similar patterns were observed for 90-day readmissions. Conclusion Socioeconomic and demographic factors, including race, ethnicity, insurance status, income level, and living arrangements, significantly impact 30-day and 90-day readmission rates in patients with CHF. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions and policies that address social determinants of health and promote health equity in the management of CHF. Future research should focus on developing and evaluating culturally sensitive, community-based strategies to reduce readmissions and improve outcomes for high-risk CHF patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究调查了按种族划分的阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(ADRD)的医疗保险支付的差异,种族,和邻里社会脆弱性,以及受益人在责任护理组织(ACO)中的登记费用变化。
    方法:我们使用了纵向医疗保险受益人摘要文件(2016-2020)的合并数据集,社会脆弱性指数(SVI),以及Medicare共享储蓄计划(MSSP)ACO,以衡量ADRD诊断年度的受益人级ACO注册人数。我们分析了诊断前一年和随后3年新诊断为ADRD的患者的Medicare付款。该数据集包括742,175名65岁及以上的Medicare服务费(FFS)受益人,2017年新诊断为ADRD,他们从2016年到2020年仍在MedicareFFS计划中。
    结果:在新诊断的人群中,与白人患者相比,黑人和西班牙裔患者的总费用更高,与生活在其他地区的患者相比,生活在最脆弱地区的ADRD患者的总费用最高。这些费用差异在诊断后3年内持续存在。参加ACO的患者在所有种族和族裔群体以及SVI地区的费用较低。对于生活在最脆弱地区的ADRD患者,在ADRD诊断后的三年内,ACO在Medicare总费用中的费用差异从4,403.1美元到6,922.7美元不等,受益人的节省额从114.5美元到726.6美元不等。
    结论:黑人和西班牙裔ADRD患者以及生活在社会脆弱性较高地区的ADRD患者将从ACO招募中获得更多收益。
    OBJECTIVE: This study investigated variations in Medicare payments for Alzheimer\'s disease and related dementia (ADRD) by race, ethnicity, and neighborhood social vulnerability, together with cost variations by beneficiaries\' enrollment in Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs).
    METHODS: We used merged datasets of longitudinal Medicare Beneficiary Summary File (2016-2020), the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), and the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) ACO to measure beneficiary-level ACO enrollment at the diagnosis year of ADRD. We analyzed Medicare payments for patients newly diagnosed with ADRD for the year preceding the diagnosis and for the subsequent 3 years. The dataset included 742,175 Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries aged 65 and older with a new diagnosis of ADRD in 2017 who remained in the Medicare FFS plan from 2016 to 2020.
    RESULTS: Among those newly diagnosed, Black and Hispanic patients encountered higher total costs compared to White patients, and ADRD patients living in the most vulnerable areas experienced the highest total costs compared to patients living in other regions. These cost differences persisted over 3 years postdiagnosis. Patients enrolled in ACOs incurred lower costs across all racial and ethnic groups and SVI areas. For ADRD patients living in the areas with the highest vulnerability, the cost differences by ACO enrollment of the total Medicare costs ranged from $4,403.1 to $6,922.7, and beneficiaries\' savings ranged from $114.5 to $726.6 over three years post-ADRD diagnosis by patient\'s race and ethnicity.
    CONCLUSIONS: Black and Hispanic ADRD patients and ADRD patients living in areas with higher social vulnerability would gain more from ACO enrollment compared to their counterparts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:回顾在过去20年中,在美国接受重大关节置换(MJR)的个体中,急性后护理(PAC)的使用以及与种族、民族和乡村相关的差异的证据。
    方法:系统评价。
    方法:我们纳入了研究,这些研究检查了美国PAC趋势以及MJR后住院≥18年的个体之间的种族和族裔和/或城市与农村差异。
    方法:我们搜索了大型学术数据库(PubMed,CINAHL,Embase,WebofScience,和Scopus)进行同行评审,2000年1月1日和2022年1月26日的英语文章。
    结果:回顾了17项研究。研究(n=16)一致表明,MJR后向熟练护理机构(SNF)或疗养院(NHs)的放电随着时间的推移而减少,而出院到住院康复设施(IRF)的证据,家庭保健(HHC),没有HHC服务的家庭是混合的。大多数研究(n=12)发现种族和少数族裔个体,尤其是黑人,比白人更频繁地被释放到PAC机构。人口因素(即,年龄,性别,合并症)和婚姻状况不仅与机构PAC的出院独立相关,而且在种族和少数民族中也是如此。只有一项研究发现PAC使用的城乡差异,表明城市居民比农村居民更经常被排放到SNF/NH和HHC。
    结论:尽管随着时间的推移,MJR后机构PAC的使用有所下降,与白人相比,种族和少数群体的机构PAC出院率继续更高。为了解决这些差距,政策制定者应考虑针对多发病率以及社会弱势群体缺乏社会和结构支持的措施。政策制定者还应考虑采取举措,通过扩大远程保健服务和改善护理协调来解决农村地区遇到的经济和结构性障碍。
    OBJECTIVE: To review evidence on post-acute care (PAC) use and disparities related to race and ethnicity and rurality in the United States over the past 2 decades among individuals who underwent major joint replacement (MJR).
    METHODS: Systematic review.
    METHODS: We included studies that examined US PAC trends and racial and ethnic and/or urban vs rural differences among individuals who are aged ≥18 years with hospitalization after MJR.
    METHODS: We searched large academic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus) for peer-reviewed, English language articles from January 1, 2000, and January 26, 2022.
    RESULTS: Seventeen studies were reviewed. Studies (n = 16) consistently demonstrated that discharges post-MJR to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) or nursing homes (NHs) decreased over time, whereas evidence on discharges to inpatient rehab facilities (IRFs), home health care (HHC), and home without HHC services were mixed. Most studies (n = 12) found that racial and ethnic minority individuals, especially Black individuals, were more frequently discharged to PAC institutions than white individuals. Demographic factors (ie, age, sex, comorbidities) and marital status were not only independently associated with discharges to institutional PAC, but also among racial and ethnic minority individuals. Only one study found urban-rural differences in PAC use, indicating that urban-dwelling individuals were more often discharged to both SNF/NH and HHC than their rural counterparts.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite declines in institutional PAC use post-MJR over time, racial and minority individuals continue to experience higher rates of institutional PAC discharges compared with white individuals. To address these disparities, policymakers should consider measures that target multimorbidity and the lack of social and structural support among socially vulnerable individuals. Policymakers should also consider initiatives that address the economic and structural barriers experienced in rural areas by expanding access to telehealth and through improved care coordination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多发性骨髓瘤(MM)是一种浆细胞疾病,约占血液恶性肿瘤的10%。关于美国MM的长期趋势和差异的流行病学证据有限。我们使用来自监测的MM发病率数据进行了多时间点横断面研究,流行病学,和最终结果(SEER)数据库和死亡率数据来自CDC广泛的流行病学研究在线数据(CDCWONDER)1999年至2020年之间的死亡原因数据库。在此期间,MM发病率稳步上升,虽然MM死亡率稳步下降,有很大的种族和民族差异。非西班牙裔黑人的发病率最高,到2020年,这一数字从1999年的12.02(95%CI10.54,13.64)一直上升到每100,000人口14.20(95%CI12.93,15.55)。1999年,非西班牙裔美洲印第安人/土著阿拉斯加人和亚洲/太平洋岛民的发病率最低,为每100,000人口5.59(95%CI2.69,10.04)和3.56(95%CI2.94,4.27),为每100,000人口5.76(95%CI3.49,8.90)和3.92(95%CI3.46,4.42),分别,到2020年。按性别分列的差异,年龄,美国人口普查区,并观察到乡村,强调有针对性的重要性,针对风险人群的以公平为中心的干预措施和MM筛查计划。
    Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell disorder accounting for approximately 10% of hematologic malignancies. There is limited epidemiological evidence regarding the long-term trends and disparities in MM in the US. We conducted a multiple time point cross-sectional study using MM incidence rate data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and mortality data from the CDC Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) Underlying Cause of Death database between 1999 and 2020. During this period, MM incidence has steadily increased, while MM mortality has steadily decreased, with substantial racial and ethnic disparities. Non-Hispanic Black individuals exhibited the highest incidence rates, which consistently rose from 12.02 (95% CI 10.54, 13.64) in 1999 to 14.20 (95% CI 12.93, 15.55) per 100,000 population by 2020. Non-Hispanic American Indian/Native Alaskans and Asian/Pacific Islanders demonstrated the lowest incidence rates of 5.59 (95% CI 2.69, 10.04) and 3.56 (95% CI 2.94, 4.27) per 100,000 population in 1999 to 5.76 (95% CI 3.49, 8.90) and 3.92 (95% CI 3.46, 4.42) per 100,000 population, respectively, by 2020. Disparities by gender, age, US census region, and rurality were observed, underscoring the importance of targeted, equity-centered interventions and MM screening initiatives for at-risk populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    艾滋病毒感染者(PWH)中慢性病发病率的增加将增加对艾滋病毒治疗环境之外的专科护理的需求。为了减少美国与艾滋病毒相关的合并症的结果差异,至关重要的是,优化获得和专业护理的质量,为代表性不足的种族和少数民族(URM)艾滋病毒感染者。我们探索了URM患者在初次和后续预约期间在专科护理环境中患有HIV和其他合并症的经验。我们在2019年11月至2020年3月期间对美国三个拥有全面医疗保健提供系统的大型学术医疗中心的参与者进行了定性访谈。数据采用应用专题分析法进行分析。总共采访了27名URM艾滋病毒感染者。大多数是黑人或非裔美国人,并被转诊到心脏病学专科护理。大多数参与者在专业护理环境中都有积极的经验。转诊过程的促进者包括他们保持健康的动机,艾滋病毒提供者的转诊援助,获得可靠的运输,靠近专业保健中心。很少有参与者面对个人,人际关系,和结构性障碍,包括个人和设施对PWH的污名感,缺乏交通,与供应商缺乏融洽的关系。需要对面临障碍和负面经历的URM艾滋病毒感染者进行未来的案例研究。在专业护理环境中涉及PWH和医疗保健提供者的干预措施,重点是个人和结构层面的污名,可以支持专业护理的最佳使用。
    The increased incidence of chronic diseases among people with HIV (PWH) is poised to increase the need for specialty care outside of HIV treatment settings. To reduce outcome disparities for HIV-associated comorbidities in the United States, it is critical to optimize access to and the quality of specialty care for underrepresented racial and ethnic minority (URM) individuals with HIV. We explored the experiences of URM individuals with HIV and other comorbidities in the specialty care setting during their initial and follow-up appointments. We conducted qualitative interviews with participants at three large academic medical centers in the United States with comprehensive health care delivery systems between November 2019 and March 2020. The data were analyzed using applied thematic analysis. A total of 27 URM individuals with HIV were interviewed. The majority were Black or African American and were referred to cardiology specialty care. Most of the participants had positive experiences in the specialty care setting. Facilitators of the referral process included their motivation to stay healthy, referral assistance from HIV providers, access to reliable transportation, and proximity to the specialty care health center. Few participants faced individual, interpersonal, and structural barriers, including the perception of individual and facility stigma toward PWH, a lack of transportation, and a lack of rapport with providers. Future case studies are needed for those URM individuals with HIV who face barriers and negative experiences. Interventions that involve PWH and health care providers in specialty care settings with a focus on individual- and structural-level stigma can support the optimal use of specialty care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:美国年轻成年男女的饮酒模式研究不足,特别是在亚裔美国人和西班牙裔等种族和族裔群体中。因为与酒精有关的种族和族裔健康差异在中年时期持续存在或增加,确定危险饮酒的高峰年龄可能有助于缩小差距。
    方法:我们使用了全国青少年对成人健康的纵向研究来检查:(1)非西班牙裔白人(NHW)过去12个月的大量间歇性饮酒(HED)和总酒精消费量,黑色,西班牙裔,以及年龄从12岁到41岁的亚洲男性和女性,以及(2)种族和族裔与饮酒的不同年龄关联。西班牙裔和亚洲裔按历史饮酒模式分类。时变效应模型是主要的人口混杂因素。
    结果:NHW男性和女性在20岁出头时经历了饮酒率上升,在30多岁时第二次升高。黑人男性和女性直到30多岁才开始酗酒。在西班牙裔男性和女性中,饮酒高峰期因性别和亚组饮酒模式而异。亚洲男性的HED峰值和总消费量在30年代初出现,而亚洲女性的HED高峰发生在20年代初。某些种族和族裔的男子和妇女在某些年龄饮酒与NHW的同龄人没有区别。
    结论:美国人口亚组饮酒增加的年龄因种族和性别而异。对这些群体差异的认识可以增强我们对干预时机的理解。
    BACKGROUND: Drinking patterns among young adult men and women in the United States have been understudied, especially among racial and ethnic groups such as Asian Americans and Hispanics. Because alcohol-related racial and ethnic health disparities persist or increase in midlife, identifying peak ages of hazardous drinking could help to reduce disparities.
    METHODS: We used the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health to examine: (1) past 12-month heavy episodic drinking (HED) and total alcohol volume consumption among non-Hispanic White (NHW), Black, Hispanic, and Asian men and women from ages 12 through 41, and (2) age-varying associations of race and ethnicity with drinking. Hispanic and Asian ethnic groups were disaggregated by historical drinking patterns. Time-varying effect models accounted for major demographic confounders.
    RESULTS: NHW men and women experienced elevated drinking rates in their early 20s, with a second elevation in their 30s. Black men and women did not have elevated drinking until their 30s. Among Hispanic men and women, peak drinking periods varied by gender and subgroup drinking pattern. Peak HED and total consumption emerged in the early 30s for Asian men, while peak HED occurred in the early 20s for Asian women. Drinking at certain ages for some racial and ethnic minoritized men and women did not differ from that in their NHW counterparts.
    CONCLUSIONS: Age periods during which subgroups in the U.S. population experience elevated alcohol consumption vary by ethnicity and gender. Recognition of these group differences could enhance our understanding of intervention timing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号