qualityoflife

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:切口疝主要通过开放或腹腔镜手术治疗,每种方法都会影响康复和患者报告的结局。这强调了需要可靠的评估工具,例如EuraHS-QoL问卷来评估手术后的生活质量。方法:这项前瞻性单中心研究旨在评估腹腔镜与开放式疝修补术后的手术结果和患者满意度。它涉及222名按方法类型分类的患者。术前以及术后1个月和3个月使用EuraHS-QoL问卷,使用OriginPro2018和SPSS软件28.0版进行数据分析。结果:在参与者中,152名女性和70名男性,78%接受开腹手术,22%接受腹腔镜手术。研究结果表明,在疼痛管理方面,腹腔镜修复术的患者预后较好,日常活动,和审美满意度。患者报告腹腔镜手术后疼痛程度明显降低,日常活动限制较少。虽然最初的术后美容结果有利于腹腔镜方法,腹部形状的感知差异随着时间的推移而减少。结论:与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜修复术显著提高了患者的生活质量,如EuraHS-QoL评分所示。这些结果支持在适当情况下使用腹腔镜技术,因为它们在减轻疼痛和更快的功能恢复方面具有优势。
    Background: Incisional hernias are predominantly treated through open or laparoscopic surgery, with each method influencing recovery and patient-reported outcomes. This underscores the need for reliable assessment tools such as the EuraHS-QoL questionnaire to evaluate quality of life after surgery. Methods: This prospective single-center study was aimed at evaluating aestethic outcomes and patient satisfaction following laparoscopic versus open hernia repair. It involved 222 patients categorized by type of approach. The EuraHS-QoL questionnaire was used preoperatively and at 1- and 3-months post-surgery, with data analysis performed using Origin Pro 2018 and SPSS software version 28.0. Results: Among the participants, 152 were females and 70 males, with 78% undergoing open surgery and 22% laparoscopic. Findings revealed superior patient outcomes with laparoscopic repair in terms of pain management, daily activities, and aesthetic satisfaction. Patients reported significantly lower pain levels and fewer restrictions in daily activities post-laparoscopic surgery. While initial postoperative cosmetic results favored laparoscopic methods, the perceived differences in abdominal shape diminished over time. Conclusions: Laparoscopic repair significantly improves quality of life compared to open surgery, as shown by EuraHS-QoL scores. These results support the use of laparoscopic techniques in appropriate cases due to their benefits in pain reduction and faster functional recovery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:全球,癌症是导致死亡的主要原因,结直肠肿瘤在全球发病率和死亡率方面排名第三。患者面临疾病和治疗特定的影响,这会显著影响他们的生活质量(QoL)。目的:本研究旨在提出一种方法来测量复杂结直肠癌(CRC)患者的住院和长期QoL。材料和方法:多中心前瞻性观察队列研究。结果:QoL是一个多维概念,包括物理标准,心理,情感,和患者感知的社会功能。定期评估QoL提供了可测量和客观的工具,可以在适当的时间进行干预,以减少CRC患者的生命损失和残疾年份。然而,一个结构化和功能性的系统需要专门和共同的机构努力。使用该协议的初步研究包括69名患者,65.12+-10.92年,M:F比率=56.5:43.5%。外科手术是右半结肠切除术,左结肠切除术,横结肠切除术,乙状结肠切除术,全结肠切除术,直肠切除术,结直肠切除伴造口(回肠造口术或结肠造口术)占21.7%,11.6%,2.9%,11.6%,1.4%,23.2%,以及27.5%的病例,分别。平均全球健康状况评分,症状评分,功能评分分别为82.36+-18.60、11.89+-10.27和86.27、74.50-94.11。结论:CRC的诊断对患者的生理和心理状态有重要影响,参与的医疗团队和医疗保健系统应集中力量改善整个治疗途径的QoL。
    Introduction: Globally, cancer is the leading cause of mortality, with colorectal neoplasia ranking third in terms of incidence and mortality worldwide. Patients face disease- and treatment-specific impacts, which can significantly influence their quality of life (QoL). Aim: This study aimed to propose a protocol to measure in-hospital and long-term QoL in patients with complicated colorectal cancer (CRC). Material and Methods: multicenter prospective observational cohort study. Results: QoL is a multidimensional concept that includes criteria for physical, mental, emotional, and social functionality as perceived by the patient. Periodically evaluating QoL offers measurable and objective tools to intervene at the appropriate time to decrease the Years of Life Lost and Years Lived with Disabilities for CRC patients. However, a structured and functional system requires dedicated and common institutional effort. A pilot study using this protocol included 69 patients, 65.12+-10.92 years, M:F ratio = 56.5:43.5%. Surgical procedure was right hemicolectomy, left colectomy, transverse colectomy, sigmoidectomy, total colectomy, rectal resection, and colorectal resection with stoma (ileostomy or colostomy) in 21.7%, 11.6%, 2.9%, 11.6%, 1.4%, 23.2%, and 27.5% of the cases, respectively. The mean Global Health Status Score, Symptom Score, and Functional Score was 82.36+-18.60, 11.89+-10.27, and 86.27, 74.50-94.11, respectively. Conclusions: CRC diagnosis has major effects on patients physical and psychological status, and concentrated efforts should be made by the involved medical team and healthcare systems to improve QoL throughout the treatment pathway.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Background: Breast cancer is considered to be the second major cause of cancer death in women after lung cancer. Due to a remarkable progress, the treatments against breast cancer became more efficient and less toxic. In addition, the reconstructive procedures after mastectomy have improved significantly the quality of life especially in younger women. The aim of the study was to evaluate the quality of life of patients 3 months after breast reconstruction. Methods: We performed a prospective study on 25 female patients who underwent immediate or delayed reconstruction of the breast after mastectomy. A health-related quality of life questionnaire was distributed and the answers were evaluated. Results: The patients from the rural area reported that their health in general was much worse than one year ago. The patients with ductal carcinoma reported a serious limitation for vigorous activities, such as running, lifting heavy objects, participating in strenuous sports. 15 patients declared that their general health is good, 8 very good and just two women considered it excellent. Conclusions: Breast reconstruction following mastectomy have an effect on the patient\'s quality of life. Therefore, there is an increased need to recognize and evaluate the quality of life after post reconstruction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Background: Chronic pancreatitis is a progressive loss of exocrine and endocrine pancreatic function. Surgical procedures are required in cases of intractable pain, biliary obstruction or intestinal obstruction, complications from pseudocysts, or pancreatic fistulae. Objective: To assess the outcomes after surgical management of chronic pancreatitis, in a long-term follow-up. Methods: Patients that underwent surgical management of chronic pancreatitis,from 2006 to 2017, were reviewed. Demographics and complications of the procedures were recorded. Visual analogue pain scale was used for pain control evaluation. The 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire was used for quality of life assessment. Results: Sixty-five patients were included in the study. Mean follow-up was 60.26 months. Twenty patients underwent lateral pancreatojejunostomy, 22 to Roux-en-Y cystojejunostomy, 7 to transgastric cyst-gastrostomy,1 to Frey procedure, 4 to hepaticojejunostomy, 1 to Frey procedure and hepaticojejunostomy, 1 to lateral pancreatojejunostomy and cyst-gastrostomy, 7 to lateral pancreatojejunostomy and hepaticojejunostomy and 2 to cystojejunostomy and hepaticojejunostomy. No cases of perioperative deaths were recorded. A Pancreatic fistula was found in 5 cases, and all of them followed non-operative management. Of the 65 patients included in the study, 39 answered the questionnaires. Mean scores on SF-12, physical and mental scales were respectively 42.72 +- 10.76 and 49.84 +- 11.75. Conclusion: Surgical management of chronic pancreatitis is safe, with low mortality and morbidity rates. These procedures are effective in assuaging pain and in providing good quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Chronic pancreatitis is a common disease accompanied with considerable morbidity and mortality. Complications associated with chronic pancreatitis, such as pseudocysts, stenosis of adjacent anatomic structures or pain that cannot be managed conservatively, may be treatable surgically or interventionally by endoscopy. Surgery is superior to endoscopy in regard to long-term pain management. Duodenum preserving pancreatic resection is the surgical procedure of choice in patients with inflamed changes of the head of the pancreas. The best timing of surgery, the ideal standardized perioperative management are the focus of current research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号