quality and outcomes

质量和成果
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT)优化可以改善心力衰竭的预后,降低射血分数。
    本研究的目的是确定新的可计算算法是否适当地推荐GDMT。
    来自GUIDE-IT(指导使用生物标志物强化治疗心力衰竭的循证治疗)和HF-ACTION(心力衰竭:运动训练的对照试验研究结果)试验的临床试验数据使用可计算的药物优化算法进行评估,该算法输出GDMT建议和药物优化评分(MOS)。将基于算法的建议与药物变化进行比较。Cox比例风险模型用于评估两个试验的MOS与复合主要终点之间的关联。
    算法建议启动血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂,β受体阻滞剂,盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂占52.8%,34.9%,和68.1%的GUIDE-IT访问,分别,当没有开处方的时候。启动仅发生在20.8%,56.9%,以及15.8%的后续访问量。该算法还确定了48.8%的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂和39.4%的β受体阻滞剂的剂量滴定。这些增长仅发生在随后访问的24.3%和36.8%中。在GUIDE-IT中,较高的基线MOS与较低的心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院风险(HR:0.41;95%CI:0.21-0.80;P=0.009)以及HF-ACTION中的全因死亡和住院风险(HR:0.61;95%CI:0.44-0.84;P=0.003)相关。
    该算法准确地识别了GDMT优化的患者。即使在具有强大协议的临床试验中,GDMT可以在有意义的访问次数中进一步优化。算法生成的MOS与较低的临床结果风险相关。实施临床护理可以识别和解决射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的次优GDMT。
    UNASSIGNED: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) optimization can improve outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study was to determine if a novel computable algorithm appropriately recommended GDMT.
    UNASSIGNED: Clinical trial data from the GUIDE-IT (Guiding Evidence-Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment in Heart Failure) and HF-ACTION (Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training) trials were evaluated with a computable medication optimization algorithm that outputs GDMT recommendations and a medication optimization score (MOS). Algorithm-based recommendations were compared to medication changes. A Cox proportional-hazards model was used to estimate the associations between MOS and the composite primary end point for both trials.
    UNASSIGNED: The algorithm recommended initiation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in 52.8%, 34.9%, and 68.1% of GUIDE-IT visits, respectively, when not prescribed the drug. Initiation only occurred in 20.8%, 56.9%, and 15.8% of subsequent visits. The algorithm also identified dose titration in 48.8% of visits for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers and 39.4% of visits for beta-blockers. Those increases only occurred in 24.3% and 36.8% of subsequent visits. A higher baseline MOS was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.21-0.80; P = 0.009) in GUIDE-IT and all-cause death and hospitalization (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.44-0.84; P = 0.003) in HF-ACTION.
    UNASSIGNED: The algorithm accurately identified patients for GDMT optimization. Even in a clinical trial with robust protocols, GDMT could have been further optimized in a meaningful number of visits. The algorithm-generated MOS was associated with a lower risk of clinical outcomes. Implementation into clinical care may identify and address suboptimal GDMT in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前尚不清楚卒中后认知轨迹在卒中类型和缺血性卒中亚型之间有何不同。我们研究了中风类型(缺血性,出血性),缺血性卒中亚型(心脏栓塞,大动脉粥样硬化,腔隙/小血管,隐源性/其他确定的病因),和卒中后认知能力下降。
    这项来自四项美国队列研究(1971-2019年)的汇总队列分析确定了1,143名在随访期间患有急性中风的无痴呆个体:1,061(92.8%)缺血性,82(7.2%)出血性,49.9%女性,黑色30.8%。卒中年龄中位数为74.1岁(IQR,68.6,79.3)年。结果是整体认知的变化(主要)和执行功能和记忆的变化(次要)。结果被标准化为T分数(平均值[SD],50[10]);1点差异代表认知差异0.1-SD。主要结局的中位随访为6.0(IQR,3.2、9.2)年。线性混合效应模型估计卒中后认知的变化。
    平均而言,缺血性卒中幸存者的初始卒中后总体认知评分为50.78分(95%CI,49.52,52.03),出血性卒中幸存者没有差异(差异,-0.17分[95%CI,-1.64,1.30];P=0.82)在调整人口统计学和卒中前认知后。平均而言,缺血性卒中幸存者显示全球认知能力下降,执行功能,和记忆。中风后全球认知能力下降,执行功能,出血性和缺血性卒中幸存者的记忆无差异.955缺血性卒中有亚型:200(20.9%)心脏栓塞,77(8.1%)大动脉粥样硬化,207(21.7%)腔隙/小血管,471(49.3%)隐源性/其他确定的病因。平均而言,小血管卒中幸存者表现出整体认知和记忆力下降,但不是执行功能。小血管幸存者和其他缺血性卒中亚型幸存者的初始卒中后认知评分和认知下降没有差异。卒中后血管危险因素水平并未减弱相关性。
    卒中幸存者在多个领域有认知能力下降。卒中类型或缺血性卒中亚型的下降没有差异。
    UNASSIGNED: It is unclear how post-stroke cognitive trajectories differ by stroke type and ischemic stroke subtype. We studied associations between stroke types (ischemic, hemorrhagic), ischemic stroke subtypes (cardioembolic, large artery atherosclerotic, lacunar/small vessel, cryptogenic/other determined etiology), and post-stroke cognitive decline.
    UNASSIGNED: This pooled cohort analysis from four US cohort studies (1971-2019) identified 1,143 dementia-free individuals with acute stroke during follow-up: 1,061 (92.8%) ischemic, 82 (7.2%) hemorrhagic, 49.9% female, 30.8% Black. Median age at stroke was 74.1 (IQR, 68.6, 79.3) years. Outcomes were change in global cognition (primary) and changes in executive function and memory (secondary). Outcomes were standardized as T-scores (mean [SD], 50 [10]); a 1-point difference represents a 0.1-SD difference in cognition. Median follow-up for the primary outcome was 6.0 (IQR, 3.2, 9.2) years. Linear mixed-effects models estimated changes in cognition after stroke.
    UNASSIGNED: On average, the initial post-stroke global cognition score was 50.78 points (95% CI, 49.52, 52.03) in ischemic stroke survivors and did not differ in hemorrhagic stroke survivors (difference, -0.17 points [95% CI, -1.64, 1.30]; P=0.82) after adjusting for demographics and pre-stroke cognition. On average, ischemic stroke survivors showed declines in global cognition, executive function, and memory. Post-stroke declines in global cognition, executive function, and memory did not differ between hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke survivors. 955 ischemic strokes had subtypes: 200 (20.9%) cardioembolic, 77 (8.1%) large artery atherosclerotic, 207 (21.7%) lacunar/small vessel, 471 (49.3%) cryptogenic/other determined etiology. On average, small vessel stroke survivors showed declines in global cognition and memory, but not executive function. Initial post-stroke cognitive scores and cognitive declines did not differ between small vessel survivors and survivors of other ischemic stroke subtypes. Post-stroke vascular risk factor levels did not attenuate associations.
    UNASSIGNED: Stroke survivors had cognitive decline in multiple domains. Declines did not differ by stroke type or ischemic stroke subtype.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:颅内出血(ICH)和机械心脏瓣膜患者的抗凝治疗通常存在ICH扩张的风险;然而,急性缺血性卒中(AIS)存在竞争风险.恢复抗凝的最佳时机仍不确定。
    结果:我们回顾性研究了2000年至2018年的ICH和机械心脏瓣膜患者。主要结局是有症状的血肿扩大或新的ICH的复合终点。AIS,和心内血栓直到ICH后30天。暴露时间为重新开始抗凝治疗的时间,分类为早期(ICH后7天恢复)。晚期(ICH后≥7天,最多30天),如果未恢复或在ICH后30天恢复,则永远不会。我们纳入了184例ICH和机械心脏瓣膜患者(65例早期抗凝,晚了100,19在ICH后30天未恢复)。12名患者患有AIS,16个新的ICH,和6个心内血栓形成。从ICH到抗凝的平均时间为12.7天。复合结局发生在12例患者早期恢复(18.5%),14延迟恢复(14.0%),4个从未恢复(21.1%)。复合结局的危险没有增加(危险比[HR],1.1[95%CI,0.2-6.0]),AIS,或恶化或新的ICH患者早晚恢复。从未恢复与恢复的患者之间的复合没有差异。从未恢复抗凝治疗的患者的ICH明显更严重(格拉斯哥昏迷评分中位数:10.6、13.9和13.9,早期,迟到了,分别为;P=0.0001),住院死亡率较高(56.5%,0%,0%,分别为;P<0.0001),和升高的30天AIS风险(HR,15.9[95%CI,1.9-129.7],P=0.0098)。
    结论:在这项对ICH和机械心脏瓣膜患者的研究中,与ICH后7~30天恢复抗凝治疗相比,30天血栓性和出血性脑相关结局无差异.停药抗凝治疗>30天与严重基线ICH相关,住院病死率较高,和AIS风险升高。
    BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation in patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and mechanical heart valves is often held for risk of ICH expansion; however, there exists a competing risk of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Optimal timing to resume anticoagulation remains uncertain.
    RESULTS: We retrospectively studied patients with ICH and mechanical heart valves from 2000 to 2018. The primary outcome was a composite end point of symptomatic hematoma expansion or new ICH, AIS, and intracardiac thrombus up to 30 days post-ICH. The exposure was timing of reinitiation of anticoagulation classified as early (resumed up to 7 days after ICH), late (≥7 and up to 30 days after ICH), and never if not resumed or resumed after 30 days post-ICH. We included 184 patients with ICH and mechanical heart valves (65 anticoagulated early, 100 late, 19 not resumed by day 30 post-ICH). Twelve patients had AIS, 16 new ICH, and 6 intracardiac thromboses. The mean time from ICH to anticoagulation was 12.7 days. Composite outcomes occurred in 12 patients resumed early (18.5%), 14 resumed late (14.0%), and 4 never resumed (21.1%). There was no increased hazard of the composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 1.1 [95% CI, 0.2-6.0]), AIS, or worsening or new ICH among patients resumed early versus late. There was no difference in the composite among patients never resumed versus resumed. Patients who never resumed anticoagulation had significantly more severe ICH (median Glasgow Coma Scale: 10.6, 13.9, and 13.9 among those who resumed never, early, and late, respectively; P=0.0001), higher in-hospital mortality (56.5%, 0%, and 0%, respectively; P<0.0001), and an elevated 30-day AIS risk (HR, 15.9 [95% CI, 1.9-129.7], P=0.0098).
    CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with ICH and mechanical heart valves, there was no difference in 30-day thrombotic and hemorrhagic brain-related outcomes when anticoagulation was resumed within 7 versus 7 to 30 days after ICH. Withholding anticoagulation >30 days was associated with severe baseline ICH, higher in-hospital case fatality, and elevated AIS risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的护理需要多学科团队方法来降低心血管(CV)风险,但有效的综合策略的实施受到限制。
    我们报告了以患者为中心的2年结果,克利夫兰大学医院医学中心的基于团队的干预措施称为CINEMA。有心血管事件高风险的T2DM或前驱糖尿病患者,包括那些已经建立了动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的人,冠状动脉钙积分升高≥100,射血分数降低的慢性心力衰竭,纳入慢性肾脏病(CKD)2-4期和/或普遍存在的代谢综合征.从2020年5月到2022年9月,426名患者被纳入CINEMA计划。共有227例(54%)在初始基线访视后完成≥1次随访,随访时间中位数(IQR)为4[3]。[4],[5],[6],[7]个月,最长随访时间19个月。平均年龄是60岁,47%是女性,37%是黑人,85%患有T2DM,48%的人建立了ASCVD,29%患有慢性HF,27%患有CKD,平均基线10年ASCVD风险估计为25.1%;SGLT2i或GLP-1RA的基线使用为21%和18%,分别。患者体重从基线显着减少(-5.5磅),体重指数(-0.9kg/m2),收缩压(-3.6mmHg)和舒张压(-1.2mmHg),糖化血红蛋白(-0.5%),总胆固醇(-10.7mg/dL)和低密度脂蛋白(-9.0mg/dL),和甘油三酯(-13.5mg/dL)(全部p<0.05)。干预后,绝对10年预测的ASCVD风险降低了2.4%(p<0.001)。此外,在随访期间,以指南为指导的心脏代谢药物处方的比率显着增加,SGLT2i和GLP-1RA的使用率发生了最实质性的变化,比基线增加了大约两倍(SGLT2i为21%至57%,GLP-1RA为18%至65%,两者的p<0.001)。
    CINEMA计划,一个综合的,以病人为中心,针对心血管疾病高危的T2DM或糖尿病前期患者的团队干预持续显示出有效性,显著改善了ASCVD危险因素,并改善了循证治疗的使用.成功实施和传播这种护理模式仍然是一个关键优先事项。
    UNASSIGNED: The care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) necessitates a multidisciplinary team approach to reduce cardiovascular (CV) risk but implementation of effective integrated strategies has been limited.
    UNASSIGNED: We report 2-year results from a patient-centered, team-based intervention called CINEMA at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center. Patients with T2DM or prediabetes at high-risk for CV events, including those with established atherosclerotic CVD, elevated coronary artery calcium score ≥100, chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 2-4, and/or prevalent metabolic syndrome were included. From May 2020 through September 2022, 426 patients were enrolled in the CINEMA program. A total of 227 (54%) completed ≥1 follow-up visit after an initial baseline visit with median (IQR) follow-up time 4 [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] months with maximum follow-up time 19 months. Mean age was 60 years, 47 % were women, and 37 % were Black and 85% had prevalent T2DM, 48 % had established ASCVD, 29% had chronic HF, 27% had CKD and mean baseline 10-year ASCVD risk estimate was 25.1 %; baseline use of a SGLT2i or GLP-1RA was 21 % and 18 %, respectively. Patients had significant reductions from baseline in body weight (-5.5 lbs), body mass index (-0.9 kg/m2), systolic (-3.6 mmHg) and diastolic (-1.2 mmHg) blood pressure, Hb A1c (-0.5 %), total (-10.7 mg/dL) and low-density lipoprotein (-9.0 mg/dL) cholesterol, and triglycerides (-13.5 mg/dL) (p<0.05 for all). Absolute 10-year predicted ASCVD risk decreased by ∼2.4 % (p<0.001) with the intervention. In addition, rates of guideline-directed cardiometabolic medication prescriptions significantly increased during follow-up with the most substantive changes seen in rates of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA use which approximately tripled from baseline (21 % to 57 % for SGLT2i and 18 % to 65 % for GLP-1RA, p<0.001 for both).
    UNASSIGNED: The CINEMA program, an integrated, patient-centered, team-based intervention for patients with T2DM or prediabetes at high risk for cardiovascular disease has continued to demonstrate effectiveness with significant improvements in ASCVD risk factors and improved use of evidence-based therapies. Successful implementation and dissemination of this care delivery paradigm remains a key priority.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:缺血性卒中(IS)的二级预防需要充分的诊断评估以确定可能的病因亚型。我们在全国大型注册表中描述了诊断测试和IS亚型的医院级别差异。
    结果:我们在2016年1月1日至2017年9月30日期间,在1906家医院使用GWTG-卒中(GetWithTheGuidelines-Stroke)注册表来确定诊断为急性IS的住院患者。我们比较了记录率和风险因素的存在,诊断测试,成就/质量措施,以及有和没有报告IS亚型的患者之间的结局。除了隐源性外,所有IS亚型的诊断评估记录都是可选的,在需要的地方。607563例IS患者中,病因学IS亚型记录占57.4%,缺失占42.6%.卒中发病机制缺失率和隐源性卒中比例在医院间差异很大。缺乏卒中发病机制的患者较少记录了危险因素,基于证据的干预措施,或出院回家。主要诊断测试的报告率,包括超声心动图,颈动脉和颅内血管成像,和短期心脏监测<50%的患者有记录的发病机制,尽管这些变量在>40%的患者中缺失。很少有长期心律监测报告,即使是隐源性中风。
    结论:IS病因亚型和辅助诊断检测的报告总体较低,具有高的可选数据缺失率。需要改进这些数据元素的捕获,以确定在中风的诊断评估和二级预防中质量改进的机会。
    Secondary prevention of ischemic stroke (IS) requires adequate diagnostic evaluation to identify the likely etiologic subtype. We describe hospital-level variability in diagnostic testing and IS subtyping in a large nationwide registry.
    We used the GWTG-Stroke (Get With The Guidelines-Stroke) registry to identify patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of acute IS at 1906 hospitals between January 1, 2016, and September 30, 2017. We compared the documentation rates and presence of risk factors, diagnostic testing, achievement/quality measures, and outcomes between patients with and without reported IS subtype. Recording of diagnostic evaluation was optional in all IS subtypes except cryptogenic, where it was required. Of 607 563 patients with IS, etiologic IS subtype was documented in 57.4% and missing in 42.6%. Both the rate of missing stroke pathogenesis and the proportion of cryptogenic strokes were highly variable across hospitals. Patients missing stroke pathogenesis less frequently had documentation of risk factors, evidence-based interventions, or discharge to home. The reported rates of major diagnostic testing, including echocardiography, carotid and intracranial vascular imaging, and short-term cardiac monitoring were <50% in patients with documented IS pathogenesis, although these variables were missing in >40% of patients. Long-term cardiac rhythm monitoring was rarely reported, even in cryptogenic stroke.
    Reporting of IS etiologic subtype and supporting diagnostic testing was low overall, with high rates of missing optional data. Improvement in the capture of these data elements is needed to identify opportunities for quality improvement in the diagnostic evaluation and secondary prevention of stroke.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Practice Guideline
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:近期心肌梗死(MI)对于需要任何血管手术的患者来说是一个真正的挑战。目前缺乏关于术前MI对颈动脉血运重建方法(颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA),经股颈动脉支架置入术(TFCAS),或经颈动脉血运重建(TCAR))。这项研究旨在确定最近接受颈动脉血运重建的MI患者的模态特异性结局。
    方法:从VQI(2016-2022)收集了美国和加拿大最近患有MI(<6个月)的颈动脉狭窄患者的数据。)正在接受CEA,TFCAS,或TCAR。比较了TFCAS与CEA和TCAR与CEA后的住院结局。在二次分析中比较了TCAR与TFCAS。我们使用逻辑回归模型来比较这三种方法在近期MI患者中的结果。调整潜在的混杂因素。主要结果包括30天住院卒中发生率,死亡,还有MI。次要结果包括卒中/死亡,中风/死亡/MI,术后高血压,术后低血压,延长住院时间(>2天),30天死亡率
    结果:最终队列包括1,217(54.2%)CEA,445(19.8%)TFCAS,584例(26.0%)TCAR病例。接受CEA的患者更有可能先进行CABG/PCI并使用抗凝剂。接受TFCAS的患者更有可能出现症状,有先前的CHF,COPD,CKD,并进行紧急行动。接受TCAR的患者更有可能有更高的ASAIV-V级,P2Y12抑制剂,和鱼精蛋白的使用。在单变量分析中,CEA与较低的同侧卒中发生率相关(P=0.079),死亡(P=0.002),30天死亡率(P=0.007)。在调整了混杂因素后,TFCAS与卒中/死亡风险增加相关(aOR=2.69[95%CI:1.36-5.35]P=0.005)和卒中/死亡/MI(aOR=1.67,[95%CI:1.07-2.60],P=0.025)与CEA相比。然而,与CEA相比,TCAR具有相似的结果。TFCAS和TCAR均与术后低血压风险增加相关(分别为aOR=1.62[95%CI:1.18-2.23]P=0.003和aOR=1.74[95%CI:1.31-2.32]P=<0.001),术后高血压风险降低(aOR=0.59[95%CI:0.36-0.95]与aOR=0.50[95%CI]P=0.001),CE71:
    结论:尽管最近MI已被确立为CEA的高风险标准和TFCAS的批准适应症,这项研究表明,与TFCAS相比,CEA在卒中/死亡和卒中/死亡/MI风险较低的人群中更安全.在近期MI患者中,与CEA相比,TCAR的卒中/死亡/MI结局相似。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证实我们的发现。
    Recent myocardial infarction (MI) represents a real challenge in patients requiring any vascular procedure. There is currently a lack of data on the effect of preoperative MI on the outcomes of carotid revascularization methodology (carotid enterectomy [CEA], transfemoral carotid artery stenting [TFCAS], or transcarotid artery revascularization [TCAR]). This study looks to identify modality-specific outcomes for patients with recent MI undergoing carotid revascularization.
    Data was collected from the Vascular Quality Initiative (2016-2022) for patients with carotid stenosis in the United States and Canada with recent MI (<6 months) undergoing CEA, TFCAS, or TCAR. In-hospital outcomes after TFCAS vs CEA and TCAR vs CEA were compared. TCAR vs TFCAS were compared in a secondary analysis. We used logistic regression models to compare the outcomes of these three procedures in patients with recent MI, adjusting for potential confounders. Primary outcomes included 30-day in-hospital rates of stroke, death, and MI. Secondary outcomes included stroke/death, stroke/death/MI, postoperative hypertension, postoperative hypotension, prolonged length of stay (>2 days), and 30-day mortality.
    The final cohort included 1217 CEA (54.2%), 445 TFCAS (19.8%), and 584 TCAR (26.0%) cases. Patients undergoing CEA were more likely to have prior coronary artery bypass graft/percutaneous coronary intervention and to use anticoagulant. Patients undergoing TFCAS were more likely to be symptomatic, have prior congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, and undergo urgent operations. Patients undergoing TCAR were more likely to have higher rates of American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV to V, P2Y12 inhibitor, and protamine use. In the univariate analysis, CEA was associated with a lower rate of ipsilateral stroke (P = .079), death (P = .002), and 30-day mortality (P = .007). After adjusting for confounders, TFCAS was associated with increased risk of stroke/death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-5.35; P = .005) and stroke/death/MI (aOR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.07-2.60; P = .025) compared with CEA. However, TCAR had similar outcomes compared with CEA. Both TFCAS and TCAR were associated with increased risk of postoperative hypotension (aOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.18-2.23; P = .003 and aOR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.31-2.32; P ≤ .001, respectively) and decreased risk of postoperative hypertension (aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.95; P = .029 and aOR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36-0.71; P ≤ .001, respectively) compared with CEA.
    Although recent MI has been established as a high-risk criterion for CEA and an approved indication for TFCAS, this study showed that CEA is safer in this population with lower risk of stroke/death and stroke/death/MI compared with TFCAS. TCAR had similar stroke/death/MI outcomes in comparison to CEA in patients with recent MI. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:血栓切除术的需求,医院间转移到综合卒中中心(CSCs),急性中风正在增加。迫切需要确定最有可能从转移中受益的患者。我们评估了CSC提供者在接受转移之前对神经影像学的审查是否改善了血栓切除术的患者选择并与更高的治疗率相关。
    方法:使用2015-2019年间转入斯坦福CSC进行血栓切除术的所有患者的回顾性数据库。预验收图像,可用于视觉审查时,由CSC卒中小组通过虚拟PACS进行审查,RAPID软件,或LifeImage平台。
    结果:525例患者符合纳入标准。147人(28%)在转移前有神经影像学检查。在那些没有在途中重新审视的人中,267例(50.8%)接受了血栓切除术。在接受之前可以进行影像学检查的患者接受血栓切除术的可能性更高(68%vs54%,RR1.26;p=0.006,95%CI1.09-1.48)。通过RAPID检查的患者图像是基于CT的灌注研究;这些更有可能接受血栓切除术(70%vs54%,RR1.30;p=0.01,1.09-1.56)。接受EVT的患者更有可能进行过转移前血管成像,无论是否有视觉审查(76%和59%,RR1.44;p<0.001,1.18-1.76)。
    结论:关注急性卒中考虑进行血栓切除术的患者,在接受转移之前进行了神经影像学检查,并且在到达时没有再通,则更有可能进行血栓切除术。需要更多的前瞻性研究来证实我们的发现。
    OBJECTIVE: Demand for thrombectomy, and interhospital transfer to comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs), for acute stroke is increasing. There is an urgent need to identify patients most likely to benefit from transfer. We evaluated whether CSC providers\' review of neuroimaging prior to transfer acceptance improved patient selection for thrombectomy and correlated with higher rates of treatment.
    METHODS: A retrospective database of all patients transferred to Stanford\'s CSC for thrombectomy between 2015-2019 was used. Pre-acceptance images, when available for visual review, were reviewed by the CSC stroke team via virtual PACS, RAPID software, or LifeImage platforms.
    RESULTS: 525 patients met inclusion criteria. 147 (28%) had neuroimaging available for review prior to transfer. Of those who did not recanalize en route, 267 (50.8%) underwent thrombectomy. Patients with imaging available for review prior to acceptance were significantly more likely to receive thrombectomy (68% vs 54%, RR 1.26; p=0.006, 95% CI 1.09-1.48). Patient images that were reviewed via RAPID were CT-based perfusion studies; these were more likely to receive thrombectomy (70% vs 54%, RR 1.30; p=0.01, 1.09-1.56). Patients who received EVT were more likely to have had pre-transfer vessel imaging, regardless of availability for visual review (76% vs 59%, RR 1.44; p<0.001, 1.18-1.76).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with concern for acute stroke transferred for consideration of thrombectomy who had neuroimaging visually reviewed prior to transfer acceptance and did not recanalize by time of arrival were significantly more likely to undergo thrombectomy. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号