quadratus lumborum block

腰方肌阻滞
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多模式镇痛在增强术后恢复中起着关键作用。在这里,我们描述了一项研究羟考酮与羟考酮的作用的试验方案。基于舒芬太尼的患者自控镇痛联合腰方肌阻滞(QLB)与腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)对腹腔镜胃肠大手术后恢复质量的影响。
    和分析:这是一个前瞻性的,随机化,2×2阶乘设计的对照临床试验。共有120名接受腹腔镜胃肠大手术的成人患者将被随机分配,以1:1:1:1的比例,接受两种患者自控镇痛方案之一(基于羟考酮或舒芬太尼)和两种区域阻滞方案之一(QLB或TAPB)。该试验的主要结果指标是手术后24小时的恢复质量,使用15项恢复质量(QoR-15)量表进行评估。次要结局包括术后48小时和72小时的QoR-15评分;术后1、6、24和48小时休息和咳嗽时的内脏和切口疼痛;术后0-24小时和24-48小时内的镇痛剂消耗;需要抢救镇痛;术后肛门排气时间;术后不良事件(镇静,恶心和呕吐,使用止吐药,呼吸抑制,和头晕);以及术后住院时间。
    该试验的结果将为最佳的多模式镇痛策略提供证据,以提高接受腹腔镜胃肠大手术的患者的恢复质量。
    该试验已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(www。chictr.org.cn,标识符:ChiCTR2400080766)。
    UNASSIGNED: Multimodal analgesia plays a key role in enhanced recovery after surgery. Herein, we describe a trial protocol investigating the effects of oxycodone-vs. sufentanil-based patient-controlled analgesia in combination with quadratus lumborum block (QLB) vs. transverse abdominis plane block (TAPB) on quality of recovery following major laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: and analysis: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design. A total of 120 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic major gastrointestinal surgery will be randomized, in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, to receive one of two patient-controlled analgesia regimens (based on oxycodone or sufentanil) and one of two regional blocks (QLB or TAPB). The primary outcome measure of this trial is the quality of recovery at 24 h after surgery, assessed using the 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) scale. The secondary outcomes include QoR-15 scores at 48 and 72 h after surgery; visceral and incisional pain at rest and while coughing at 1, 6, 24 and 48 h postoperatively; analgesic consumption within 0-24 h and 24-48 h postoperatively; need for rescue analgesia; postoperative flatus time; postoperative adverse events (sedation, nausea and vomiting, use of antiemetics, respiratory depression, and dizziness); and length of postoperative hospital stay.
    UNASSIGNED: The results of this trial will provide evidence for the optimal multimodal analgesic strategy to improve the quality of recovery for patients undergoing laparoscopic major gastrointestinal surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: This trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR2400080766).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究评估了腰方肌阻滞(QLB)在治疗与小肾块冷冻消融相关的手术和围手术期疼痛中的疗效。据我们所知,这是第一项研究,在肾细胞癌(RCC)经皮冷冻消融术中使用QLB治疗疼痛.对在2020年10月至2021年10月期间接受QLB冷冻消融治疗RCC的患者进行了单中心回顾性研究。主要研究终点包括手术清醒镇静和给药的总剂量,术后镇痛。在每种情况下都实现了冷冻消融的技术成功。在手术期间或之后,没有患者需要额外的镇痛药,并且没有因使用QLB而导致的并发症。QLB手术似乎是治疗与肾脏肿块冷冻消融相关的手术和围手术期疼痛的有效局部区域阻滞。
    This study assesses the efficacy of the quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in the management of procedural and periprocedural pain associated with small renal mass cryoablation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that examines the use of QLB for pain management during percutaneous cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A single-center retrospective review was conducted for patients who underwent cryoablation for RCC with QLB between October 2020 and October 2021. The primary study endpoint included a total dose of procedural conscious sedation and administered, postprocedural analgesia. Technical success in cryoablation was achieved in every case. No patients required additional analgesic during or after the procedure, and no complications resulted from the use of the QLB. The QLB procedure appears to be an effective locoregional block for the management of procedural and periprocedural pain associated with renal mass cryoablation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估使用低容量(LV)或高容量(HV)布比卡因的双侧超声(US)引导腰方肌阻滞(QLB)的围手术期镇痛效果,与对照组相比,在接受卵巢切除术的猫中。
    方法:48只健康雌性猫。
    方法:用IM右美托咪定(5µg/kg)镇静猫,氯胺酮(1毫克/千克),和美沙酮(0.2mg/kg),然后静脉丙泊酚诱导和异氟烷维持。猫被随机分配到3组,每组16例患者:QLB-LV组(0.3mL/kg/侧),QLB-HV组(0.5mL/kg/侧),对照组(无QLB)。双边,在飞机上,US引导的QLB在L2横突处用0.2%布比卡因进行横向入路。术中由蒙面研究者记录生理变量。如果术中发生伤害性,静脉注射芬太尼(1µg/kg)。抢救术后镇痛(丁丙诺啡,在4小时评估期后,如果猫科动物格里斯量表评分≥4,则施用0.2mg/kg)。
    结果:在对照组中,第一次卵巢操作时心率(HR)高于QLB-LV组(P<.001),两次卵巢操作时心率高于QLB-HV组(P<.001和P=.006).与QLB-HV组相比,QLB-LV组(P=0.005和P=0.047)和对照组(P<.001和P<.001)的术中抢救镇痛需求和术后疼痛评分明显更高。对照组给予丁丙诺啡1次。未观察到布比卡因毒性或QLB并发症的临床迹象。
    结论:双侧超声引导下的QLB-HV可以有效地提供猫科动物卵巢切除术患者的围手术期镇痛。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the perioperative analgesic effects of bilateral ultrasound (US)-guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) using low-volume (LV) or high-volume (HV) bupivacaine, compared to a control group, in cats undergoing ovariectomy.
    METHODS: 48 healthy female cats.
    METHODS: Cats were sedated with IM dexmedetomidine (5 µg/kg), ketamine (1 mg/kg), and methadone (0.2 mg/kg) followed by IV propofol induction and isoflurane maintenance. Cats were randomly assigned to 3 groups of 16 patients each: QLB-LV group (0.3 mL/kg/side), QLB-HV group (0.5 mL/kg/side), and control group (no QLB). Bilateral, in-plane, US-guided QLB was performed with lateral approach at the L2 transverse process with bupivacaine 0.2%. Physiological variables were recorded intraoperatively by a masked investigator. If intraoperative nociception occurred, fentanyl (1 µg/kg) was administered IV. Rescue postoperative analgesia (buprenorphine, 0.2 mg/kg) was administered in case of a Feline Grimace Scale score ≥ 4 after a 4-hour evaluation period.
    RESULTS: In the control group, heart rate (HR) was higher than the QLB-LV group during the first ovarian manipulation (P < .001) and higher than the QLB-HV group during both ovarian manipulations (P < .001 and P = .006). The need for intraoperative rescue analgesia and postoperative pain scores were significantly higher in the QLB-LV (P = .005 and P = .047) and control (P < .001 and P < .001) groups compared to the QLB-HV group. Buprenorphine was administered once in the control group. No clinical signs of bupivacaine toxicity or QLB complications were observed.
    CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral US-guided QLB-HV may effectively provide perioperative analgesia in feline patients undergoing ovariectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:改善剖宫产术后疼痛控制仍然是一个具有挑战性的目标。尽管据报道,与安慰剂相比,剖腹产后侧方肌阻滞和针灸可提供更好的术后镇痛效果,这些技术的功效从未进行过正面比较。
    目的:本研究旨在研究选择性剖宫产术后腰方阻滞和针刺的镇痛效果。
    方法:在此前瞻性中,随机化,对照临床试验,共纳入了190例计划在腰-硬膜外麻醉下进行剖宫产的单胎足月妊娠患者.患者按1:1随机分为针刺组或腰方肌阻滞组。腰方肌外侧阻滞组给予0.33%罗哌卡因双侧腰方肌外侧阻滞加假针刺,针刺组采用经皮穴位电刺激压针治疗和假腰方肌阻滞。所有患者均接受规范的术后疼痛治疗。主要结果是24小时运动时的疼痛评分。次要终点包括术后前48小时的疼痛评分,患者自控静脉镇痛需求,镇痛相关的不良反应,术后并发症,QoR-15,动员时间,和胃肠功能。
    结果:在接受针刺或腰方肌外侧阻滞的患者中,运动时24h疼痛评分的中位数(IQR[range])相似(3(2-4)与3(2-4)分别为;P=0.40)。术后48h内患者自控静脉镇痛用量和疼痛评分两组间也无差异。针刺改善术后24h和48h的QoR-15评分(P<0.001),与外侧方肌阻滞相比,缩短了首次排气(P=0.03)和首次饮酒(P<0.001)的时间。此外,与针刺组相比,腰方肌阻滞组的中位动员时间明显延长(17.0(15.0-19.0)hvs.15.3(13.3-17.0)h,估计的中位数差异,1.5;95CI,1-2;P<0.001;)。
    结论:作为剖宫产术后多模式镇痛方案的组成部分,与腰方肌外侧阻滞相比,针刺并未降低术后疼痛评分或减少镇痛药物消耗。
    BACKGROUND: Improved pain control after cesarean section remains a challenging objective. Although both the lateral quadratus lumborum block (L-QLB) and acupuncture have been reported to provide superior postoperative analgesia after cesarean section when compared to placebo, the efficacy of these techniques has never been compared head-to-head.
    OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to investigate the comparative analgesic efficacy of L-QLB and acupuncture following elective cesarean section.
    METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial, a total of 190 patients with singleton-term pregnancies scheduled for cesarean section under spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to acupuncture group or L-QLB group. L-QLB group received bilateral L-QLB with 0.33% ropivacaine and sham acupuncture, acupuncture group received transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation and press needle therapy, and sham L-QLB. All patients received the standard postoperative pain treatment. The primary outcome was pain scores on movement at 24 hours. Secondary endpoints included pain scores in the first 48 hours postoperatively, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) demands, analgesia-related adverse effects, postoperative complications, QoR-15, the time to mobilization, and gastrointestinal function.
    RESULTS: Median (interquartile range [range]) pain scores at 24 hours on movement were similar in patients receiving acupuncture or L-QLB (3 [2-4] vs 3 [2-4], respectively; P=.40). PCIA consumption and pain scores within 48 hours postoperatively also showed no difference between the two groups. The acupuncture improved QoR-15 scores at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively (P<.001), as well as shortened the time to first flatus (P=.03) and first drinking (P<.001) compared to L-QLB. In addition, the median time to mobilization in the L-QLB group was markedly prolonged compare with acupuncture group (17.0 [15.0-19.0] hours vs 15.3 [13.3-17.0] hours, estimated median difference, 1.5; 95% CI, 1-2; P<.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: As a component of multimodal analgesia regimen after cesarean section, acupuncture did not lower postoperative pain scores or reduce analgesic medication consumption compared to L-QLB.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在兽医学中,局部区域麻醉技术的使用正在增加。QuadratusLumborum阻滞(QL)是一种干扰筋膜局部区域技术,涉及在QuadratusLumborum和小腰肌(Pm)之间释放局部麻醉剂(LA)。该研究旨在评估QL阻滞对减少阴囊睾丸切除术前犬阿片类药物总量的影响。一组36只狗被纳入一项随机盲法研究。将动物分成两组:实验组(QL)18只,对照组(C)18只。QL组接受0.4mLkg-1的罗哌卡因0.5%的每个偏腹(总量为3mgkg-1的罗哌卡因,每侧1.5mgkg-1)。C组在接受与QL组相同的剪裁后进入手术室(OR)。在术中,QL组的阿片类药物消耗量明显低于C组。在术后阶段没有发现差异。进行QL技术时没有副作用的报道。在L6水平进行的QL阻滞似乎是减少使用阴囊前手术方法进行睾丸切除术的犬中阿片类药物使用的有效方法。
    In veterinary medicine, the use of loco-regional anesthesia techniques is increasing. The Quadratus Lumborum block (QL) is an interfascial loco-regional technique that involves the release of local anesthetic (LA) between the Quadratus Lumborum and the Small Psoas (Pm) muscle. The study aims to evaluate the effect of the QL block on reducing the total amount of opioids in dogs undergoing pre-scrotal orchiectomy. A group of 36 dogs was enrolled in a randomized blinded study. The animals were divided into two groups: 18 in the experimental group (QL) and 18 in the control group (C). The QL group received 0.4 mL kg-1 of ropivacaine 0.5% for each hemiabdomen (total amount of 3 mg kg-1 of ropivacaine, 1.5 mg kg-1 per side). The C group was brought into the operating room (OR) after receiving the same clipping as the QL group. In the intraoperative period, opioid consumption in the QL group was significantly lower than in the C group. No differences were found in the post-operative phase. No side effects were reported when performing the QL technique. The QL block performed at the level of L6 appears to be a valid approach to reducing opioid use in dogs undergoing orchidectomy with a pre-scrotal surgical approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:源自腰方肌(QL)的腰椎拉伤是下腰痛的重要原因;然而,它的诊断经常被遗漏,治疗往往是不够的。这导致不必要的诊断检查和疼痛的慢性化。因此,有效和安全地治疗它是重要的。在这项研究中,我们旨在了解超声(US)引导下QL阻滞在由QL劳损引起的急性亚急性下腰痛中的作用。
    方法:我们的研究是回顾性的,50例急性-亚急性局部下腰痛患者1周内视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评分的变化,单侧腰椎劳损,触诊压痛,椎旁痉挛,QL肌肉的腰椎活动范围减少,我们将美国指导的阻滞应用于QL肌肉,进行了分析。
    结果:手术后患者的平均VAS和ODI评分显著下降。VAS和ODI评分的改善率与年龄和体重指数(BMI)之间呈负相关。女性患者的恢复率高于男性患者。
    结论:可以说,超声引导下QL阻滞是QL诱发腰椎劳损的有效治疗方法,和年轻的年龄,女性性别,较低的BMI与注射后更好的反应相关。
    BACKGROUND: Lumbar strain originating from the quadratus lumborum (QL) is an important cause of low back pain; however, its diagnosis is often missed, and treatment is often inadequate. This leads to unnecessary diagnostic investigations and chronicization of pain. Therefore, it is important to treat it effectively and safely. In this study, we aimed to find out the effect of ultrasound (US)-guided QL block in acute-subacute low back pain caused by a strain of QL.
    METHODS: Our study was retrospective, and the changes in the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores within one week in 50 patients with acute-subacute localized low back pain, unilateral lumbar strain, palpation tenderness, paravertebral spasm, and decreased lumbar range of motion in the QL muscle, in whom we applied US-guided block to the QL muscle, were analyzed.
    RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in the mean VAS and ODI scores of the patients after the procedure. There was a negative correlation between improvement rates in VAS and ODI scores and age and body mass index (BMI). Recovery rates were higher in female patients than in male patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: It can be said that US-guided QL block is an effective treatment method for QL-induced lumbar strains, and younger age, female gender, and lower BMI are associated with better responses after injection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定罗哌卡因单次注射双侧后方肌阻滞(QLB)是否可以改善腹腔镜肝切除术后最初24h的术后镇痛效果。与0.9%盐水相比。
    方法:前瞻性,双盲,随机对照试验。
    方法:从2021年11月到2023年1月建立一个单一的三级护理中心。
    方法:共有94例因肝细胞癌而计划进行腹腔镜肝切除术的患者。
    方法:将94例患者随机分为QLB组(每侧接受20mL0.375%罗哌卡因,总共150毫克)或对照组(每侧接受20毫升0.9%盐水)。
    方法:主要结果是术后最初24小时内的累积阿片类药物消耗量。次要结果包括疼痛评分和术中和恢复参数。
    结果:QLB组(n=46)术后24小时的平均累积阿片类药物消耗量为30.8±22.4mg,对照组为34.0±19.4mg(n=46,平均差异:-3.3mg,95%置信区间,-11.9至5.4,p=0.457)。QLB组术后1h的平均静息疼痛评分明显低于对照组(5[4-6.25]vs.7[4.75-8],p=0.035)。在其他时间点或其他次要结局中,静息或咳嗽疼痛评分未观察到显着的组间差异。
    结论:术前双侧后QLB没有减少腹腔镜肝切除术后最初24小时内的累积阿片类药物消耗量。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine if single-injection bilateral posterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) with ropivacaine would improve postoperative analgesia in the first 24 h after laparoscopic hepatectomy, compared with 0.9% saline.
    METHODS: Prospective, double blinded, randomized controlled trial.
    METHODS: A single tertiary care center from November 2021 and January 2023.
    METHODS: A total of 94 patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic hepatectomy due to hepatocellular carcinoma.
    METHODS: Ninety-four patients were randomized into a QLB group (receiving 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine on each side, 150 mg in total) or a control group (receiving 20 mL of 0.9% saline on each side).
    METHODS: The primary outcome was the cumulative opioid consumption during the initial 24-h post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included pain scores and intraoperative and recovery parameters.
    RESULTS: The mean cumulative opioid consumption during the initial 24-h post-surgery was 30.8 ± 22.4 mg in the QLB group (n = 46) and 34.0 ± 19.4 mg in the control group (n = 46, mean differences: -3.3 mg, 95% confidence interval, -11.9 to 5.4, p = 0.457). The mean resting pain score at 1 h post-surgery was significantly lower in the QLB group than in the control group (5 [4-6.25] vs. 7 [4.75-8], p = 0.035). No significant intergroup differences were observed in the resting or coughing pain scores at other time points or in other secondary outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative bilateral posterior QLB did not reduce cumulative opioid consumption during the first 24 h after laparoscopic hepatectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估术前双侧超声引导下腰方神经阻滞(QLB)对微创子宫切除术后恢复质量的影响,在强化手术后恢复(ERAS)设置中。
    方法:随机化,控制,双盲试验(加拿大工作组一级)地点:大学附属三级医疗中心患者:所有接受选择性机器人或腹腔镜子宫切除术的妇女.患有慢性疼痛的女性,慢性抗凝,排除体重指数(BMI)>50kg/m2。
    方法:患者以1:1的比例随机分配,以下两个手臂之一,并根据机器人与腹腔镜方法进行分层。1.QLB:QLB(布比卡因)+假局部套管针浸润(生理盐水)。2.局部浸润:假QLB(生理盐水)+局部浸润(布比卡因)测量和主要结果:主要结果定义为基于验证问卷(QOR-40)的恢复质量评分,术后24小时完成。次要结果包括:动态疼痛评分,累积的阿片类药物消耗长达24小时,术后恶心呕吐,手术并发症,住院时间,麻醉后监护病房(PACU)首次止痛药的时间和不良事件。76名女性被纳入研究。两组的人口统计学特征相似。中位年龄为44(IQR39-50)岁,47%的参与者是非裔美国人,平均BMI为32.8(SD8.1)kg/m2。QLB的平均QOR-40评分为179.1(+/-10.3SD),局部麻醉组的平均QOR-40评分为175.6(+/-9.7SD)(p=0.072)。所有次要结果在组间具有可比性。
    结论:与局部麻醉端口部位浸润相比,择期机器人或腹腔镜子宫切除术后QLBs并没有显著改善恢复质量。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of preoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum nerve block (QLB) on quality of recovery after minimally invasive hysterectomy, in an enhanced recovery after surgery setting.
    METHODS: Randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial (Canadian Task Force level I).
    METHODS: University-affiliated tertiary medical center.
    METHODS: All women undergoing an elective robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy. Women with chronic pain, chronic anticoagulation, and body mass index >50 kg/m2 were excluded.
    METHODS: Patients were randomized with a 1:1 allocation, to one of the following 2 arms, and stratified based on robotic versus laparoscopic approach. 1. QLB: QLB (bupivacaine) + sham local trocar sites infiltration (normal saline) 2. Local infiltration: sham QLB (normal saline) + local infiltration (bupivacaine) MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was defined as the quality of recovery score based on the validated questionnaire Quality of Recovery, completed 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included dynamic pain scores, accumulated opioid consumption up to 24 hours, postoperative nausea and vomiting, surgical complications, length of hospital stay, time to first pain medication administration in the postanesthesia care unit, and adverse events. A total of 76 women were included in the study. Demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Median age was 44 years (interquartile range 39-50), 47% of the participants were African American, and mean body mass index was 32.8 kg/m2 (standard deviation [SD] 8.1). The mean Quality of Recovery score was 179.1 (SD ± 10.3) in the QLB and 175.6 (SD ± 9.7) for the local anesthesia group (p = .072). All secondary outcomes were comparable between groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: QLBs do not significantly improve quality of recovery after elective robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with local anesthetic port site infiltration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管硬膜外阻滞(EB)的疗效和安全性相当高,并发症,如无意的硬脑膜穿刺可能会限制其使用。超声引导腰方肌阻滞(QLB)是一种相对较新的区域技术,可为儿科患者提供围手术期躯体和内脏镇痛。该试验比较了接受QLB或EB的腹部手术的儿科患者的疼痛缓解质量。
    方法:患者随机分为两组:E组(n=29):接受EB;QL组(n=29):接受QLB。两组均注射0.25%布比卡因(0.5ml/kg)。评估镇痛总消耗量是主要结果指标,而次要结局指标是通过东安大略儿童医院疼痛量表(CHEOPS)评估术后镇痛效果和首次镇痛请求时间。
    结果:我们的研究表明,两组平均芬太尼总消耗量相当(E组和QL组38.67±5.02和36.47±5.13µg,分别,P=0.246)。只有5例患者不需要抢救镇痛(E组3,2在QL组中,P=0.378)。两组的平均镇痛时间差异无统计学意义(E组和QL组分别为9.9±1.58和11.02±1.74h,分别,P=0.212)。在PACU中立即和术后24h的CHEOPS评分值的评估显示,两个研究组之间没有显着差异(P>0.05)。
    结论:QLB可以达到与EB相当的镇痛效果,作为腹部手术患儿多模式镇痛的关键部分。
    背景:PACTR202203906027106。
    BACKGROUND: Although the efficacy and safety of epidural block (EB) are fairly high, complications such as inadvertent dural puncture may limit its use. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a relatively new regional technique that provides perioperative somatic and visceral analgesia for pediatric patients. This trial compared the quality of pain relief in pediatric patients undergoing abdominal surgery who received either QLB or EB.
    METHODS: Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups: Group E(n = 29): received EB; Group QL(n = 29): received QLB. Both groups were injected with 0.25% bupivacaine (0.5 ml/kg). Assessment of total analgesia consumption was the primary outcome measure, whereas the secondary outcome measures were assessment of postoperative analgesic effect by Children\'s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) and time of first analgesic request.
    RESULTS: Our study showed that the mean total fentanyl consumption was comparable between both groups(38.67 ± 5.02 and 36.47 ± 5.13 µg in the E and QL groups, respectively, P = 0.246). Only five patients did not require rescue analgesia (3 in the E group,2 in the QL group, P = 0.378). The mean duration of analgesia showed no significant difference between the two groups (9.9 ± 1.58 and 11.02 ± 1.74 h in the E and QL groups, respectively, P = 0.212). Evaluation of CHEOPS score values immediately in PACU and for the initial 24 h following operation showed no significant difference between the two study groups(P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: QLB can achieve analgesic effects comparable to those of EB as a crucial part of multimodal analgesia in children undergoing abdominal surgeries.
    BACKGROUND: PACTR202203906027106.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    四足肌痛阻滞(QLB)是前腹壁的隔室阻滞。手术创伤产生神经内分泌手术应激反应,通过麻醉块修改。这项研究的目的是评估超声(US)引导的QLB对接受肾盂成形术的儿科患者的镇痛和手术神经内分泌应激反应的影响。
    一项随机试验在60名1-7岁儿童中进行了选择性开放性肾盂成形术。患者被随机分为QLB组[全身麻醉(GA)诱导后使用0.5ml/kg的0.25%罗哌卡因的美国指导QLB],和GA组,只收到GA。围手术期血流动力学参数,血清皮质醇,血糖,记录镇痛剂用量和术后FLACC评分.不成对t检验,使用Wilcoxon秩和检验或Mann-WhitneyU检验比较两组之间的变量。使用双向方差分析或Friedmann检验来比较组内各个点的定量变量。
    QLB组在手术切口后30min和术后24h观察到血清皮质醇和血糖值与术前相比降低,与GA组相比(P<0.05)。经FLACC量表评定的镇痛质量QLB组明显优于对照组。在术中和术后期间,GA组的芬太尼消耗量(µg/kg)高于QLB组(P<0.05)。
    QLB作为多模式镇痛的一部分是有效的,并且可以减轻接受开放性肾盂成形术的儿科患者的神经内分泌应激。
    UNASSIGNED: Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a compartmental block of the anterior abdominal wall. Surgical trauma produces neuroendocrine surgical stress responses, which are modified by anaesthetic blocks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ultrasound (US)-guided QLB on analgesia and surgical neuroendocrine stress response in paediatric patients undergoing pyeloplasty.
    UNASSIGNED: A randomised trial was conducted in 60 children aged 1-7 years undergoing elective open pyeloplasty. Patients were randomised into Group QLB [US-guided QLB with 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine after induction of general anaesthesia (GA)], and Group GA, which received only GA. Perioperative haemodynamic parameters, serum cortisol, blood glucose, analgesic consumption and postoperative FLACC scores were recorded. Unpaired t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare variables between the two groups. Two-way analysis of variance or the Friedmann test was used to compare quantitative variables at various points within a group.
    UNASSIGNED: A decrease in serum cortisol and blood glucose values was observed in Group QLB at 30 min after surgical incision and 24 h after surgery compared to the preoperative value and compared to Group GA (P < 0.05). The quality of analgesia assessed by the FLACC scale was significantly better in group QLB. Dose of fentanyl consumption (µg/kg) was higher in Group GA compared to Group QLB in the intraoperative and postoperative period (P < 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: QLB is effective as part of multimodal analgesia and attenuates the neuroendocrine stress in paediatric patients undergoing open pyeloplasty.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号