Considered rare, the synovitis-acne-pustulosis-hyperostosis-osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome is a distinct clinical entity, associating skin manifestations and osteoarticular symptoms. Anterior chest wall pain centered at sternoclavicular and sternocostal joints is an important and characteristic clinical finding that can lead to its diagnosis. Radiologists and clinicians must be aware of synovitis-acne-pustulosis-hyperostosis-osteitis syndrome as it can mimic some of the more common disease entities such as Paget\'s disease. We report the case of a 63-year-old male patient, with no significant medical history, who presented to the dermatology department, with severe palmar and plantar pustulosis associated with polyarthralgia. Computerized tomography scan showed sternoclavicular hyperostosis, in favor of SAPHO syndrome, with regression of clinical symptoms after non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment.

BACKGROUND: The comparative efficacy of anti-IL (interleukin)-17A biological agents in palmoplantar psoriasis (PP) and palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) are not well established.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of different dosage regimens of anti-IL-17A biological agents compared with placebo in PP and PPP.
METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, clinicaltrials.gov, and Embase. Meta-analysis was performed for all outcomes of randomized controlled trials, while network meta-analysis was only performed for the primary outcome.
RESULTS: In total, 21 articles exploring the efficacy of 5 treatment options were included, 4 cohort studies were also reviewed. Meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference favoring anti-IL-17A biological agents versus placebo (OR = 6.84, 95 %[CI] [5.34, 8.76]). On-label secukinumab was identified as the most effective treatment option for patients with PP (OR = 33.50, 95 %[CI] [4.37,256.86]). PPP treated with secukinumab 300 mg showed benefit in terms of PPPASI 75 responses over 52 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: IL-17A biological agents had better PP disease clearance compared with placebo and on-label secukinumab was identified as the most effective treatment option for PP patients. Secukinumab 300 mg showed benefit for PPP patients.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Early diagnosis of SAPHO syndrome is easily confused with other common spine-related diseases and infections. There is currently no consensus regarding the diagnosis of SAPHO syndrome, and specific treatments are empirical because of its rarity.
UNASSIGNED: A 62-year-old woman was referred to our department with complaints of low back and lower extremity pain for 2 years, 1.5 years after lumbar spine surgery, and recurrent low back pain for 1 year. Laboratory test results revealed elevated hs-CRP levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Combined with her surgical history and lumbar CT results, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) was first considered. NSAIDs, analgesics, and supplemental therapies were also administered. However, the patient\'s symptoms were not significantly relieved. During re-examination, hyperkeratosis with active pustulosis was observed on the patient\'s palms. Osteitis of the left sacroiliac joint was revealed on imaging. Skeletal ECT revealed a typical \"horn sign\". The patient was diagnosed with SAPHO syndrome. Based on the original treatment, sulfasalazine enteric-coated tablets, adalimumab (a biological agent of TNF-α), pregabalin, and tramadol sustained-release tablets were administered. The patient reported that her pain was significantly relieved. He was discharged from the hospital and received adalimumab treatment (40 mg once per fortnight in the first 6 months and 40 mg once per month after month 6) in the outpatient clinic. The hyperkeratosis with active pustulosis on both palms fully recovered after 12 months of treatment. The patient was followed up 6 months after full recovery, and no recurrence was found in the symptoms of low back and lower extremity pain and palmar hyperkeratosis with active pustulosis.
UNASSIGNED: SAPHO syndrome should be suspected in patients present with osteoarticular and/or dermatological manifestations. Biological agents can be used to treat patients with refractory SAPHO syndrome.

Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic, relapsing, inflammatory disease that can occur alone or in association with arthritis. There is still controversy about whether it should be separated from psoriasis or classified as pustular psoriasis. Furthermore, drug-induced paradoxical PPP is a special variant of PPP that differs from classic PPP in several ways. Treatment of PPP is still challenging, and there are a number of treatment-resistant cases. This review summarizes the risk factors for the development of PPP and the currently available treatment modalities. Female sex, smokers or ex-smokers, obesity, thyroid dysfunction, and treatment with a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitor have been identified as risk factors for the disease\'s development, severity, and course. Topical treatments and phototherapy are effective for some patients and are used as a first-line or adjuvant treatment modality. Conventional treatments including retinoids and fumaric acid show good effects and can increase the efficacy of treatment with psoralen + ultraviolet light therapy (PUVA). Ciclosporin is fast acting, but relapse mostly occurs immediately after cessation. TNF-α inhibitors are efficient, and an even better response can be achieved with IL-17 and IL-23 blockers as well as apremilast. The effect of Janus kinase inhibitors seems to be promising according to case reports, but further investigations with larger cohorts are needed.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the anti-interleukin-36 receptor antibody spesolimab in patients with moderate-to-severe palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP).
METHODS: This phase IIb trial comprised a loading dose period to week (W) 4, then maintenance dosing to W52. Patients were randomised 2:1:1:1:2 to subcutaneous spesolimab 3000 mg to W4 then 600 mg every 4 weeks (q4w), spesolimab 3000 mg to W4 then 300 mg q4w, spesolimab 1500 mg to W4 then 600 mg q4w, spesolimab 1500 mg to W4, 300 mg q4w to W16 then 300 mg every 8 weeks (q8w), or placebo switching to spesolimab 600 mg q4w at W16. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline in Palmoplantar Pustular Area and Severity Index (PPP ASI) at W16. Secondary endpoints included a Palmoplantar Pustular Physician\'s Global Assessment (PPP PGA) score of 0/1. Safety (including adverse events [AEs], local tolerability) was assessed.
RESULTS: 152 patients were treated. The primary endpoint was not met; mean differences for spesolimab versus placebo ranged from - 14.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: - 31.5%, 2.2%) to - 5.3% (95% CI: - 19.1%, 8.6%); none reached significance. At W16, 23 (21.1%) and two (4.7%) patients in the combined spesolimab and placebo groups, respectively, achieved PPP PGA 0/1 (mean difference 16.4%; 95% CI: 3.8%, 25.7%), increasing to 59 (54.1%; combined spesolimab) and 12 (27.9%; placebo switch to spesolimab) patients at W52. Non-Asian patients had significant improvements in the primary endpoint (mean difference - 17.7%; nominal P = 0.0394) and PPP PGA 0/1 at W16 with spesolimab versus placebo. Rates of AEs and AE-related discontinuations were similar for spesolimab and placebo. Local tolerability events and injection-site reactions were more frequent with spesolimab than placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: The primary objective to demonstrate a non-flat dose-response relationship and proof-of-concept was not achieved; improvements with spesolimab occurred in secondary endpoints and in non-Asian patients, indicating potential modest benefits. Spesolimab was generally well tolerated (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04015518).
A clinical trial of spesolimab for patients with palmoplantar pustulosis. Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a painful, difficult-to-treat skin disease that is found on patients’ palms and the soles of their feet. In this clinical trial, we studied an injected medicine called spesolimab for treating patients with PPP. Patients were split into five groups; four groups received different doses of spesolimab and one received placebo (an injection without spesolimab). After 16 weeks, patients receiving placebo switched to spesolimab. We measured the body area affected by PPP and how severe PPP was at week 16. Patients’ doctors also assessed skin affected by PPP. At 16 weeks of treatment, there was no significant difference between spesolimab and placebo in terms of the PPP-affected area and severity. However, more patients had clear or almost clear skin with spesolimab than placebo. Among non-Asian patients, more showed an improvement in their PPP with spesolimab than with placebo; this was not the case with Asian patients. Patients taking spesolimab or placebo reported side effects, of which the most common were colds, aches and headaches. More patients receiving spesolimab reported a reaction at the injection site compared with placebo. We monitored patients for up to 1 year, and results remained similar. We showed that spesolimab may have a modest effect on the body area affected by PPP, as well as the severity of PPP, and did not seem to cause more side effects than placebo, except for reactions at the injection site.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

Synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis (SAPHO) is a rare chronic inflammatory disease that develops in adults. We present a case of SAPHO syndrome in a 37-year-old male presenting with gradually worsening back and neck pain for a 7-year period. The episodes were preceded by a history of pustular skin eruptions, which first appeared on the upper trunk and then involved his face and were pustular and scarring. The purpose of presenting this case report from Iraq is to raise awareness about this rare condition, which is frequently misdiagnosed and under-recognized.

Synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis (SAPHO) is a relatively rare and often underdiagnosed disorder characterized by chronic inflammation affecting the bones, joints, and skin. While the precise cause of SAPHO syndrome remains elusive, multiple factors such as genetics, immunological dysregulation, and bacterial influences have been implicated in its pathogenesis. One notable aspect of SAPHO syndrome is the wide variability of symptoms experienced by afflicted individuals. A diverse array of osteoarticular manifestations may be observed, with common sites of involvement including the anterior chest wall, sacroiliac joints, and peripheral joints. Concurrently, patients often present with various skin disorders, such as palmoplantar pustulosis or acne, further adding to the complexity of the syndrome\'s clinical presentation. Treatment strategies for SAPHO syndrome primarily focus on managing symptoms and improving the quality of life for affected individuals. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, methotrexate (MTX), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are considered to modulate the immune response and provide relief. One of the challenges encountered in diagnosing SAPHO syndrome is its potential overlap with other related conditions, leading to diagnostic confusion and difficulties. Distinguishing SAPHO syndrome from similar entities can be complex, requiring a comprehensive evaluation of clinical features, imaging studies, and laboratory investigations. We would like to share an intriguing case involving a 28-year-old woman who arrived with perplexing symptoms of pain in her bilateral hands and feet, her lower back, and acne in the bilateral upper arms and thighs. Through a comprehensive workup, the underlying SAPHO syndrome was uncovered, and it was effectively managed using adalimumab.