psychosocial interventions

心理社会干预
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    儿童痴呆症是一组罕见的,致命的神经退行性疾病,以全球认知能力下降为特征,丧失先前获得的发展技能和痴呆的行为和心理症状(BPSD)。Batten病,或神经元类脂褐菌病,和Sanfilippo综合征,或III型粘多糖贮积症,是全球儿童痴呆症中两种较为常见的形式。虽然心理社会干预是成人发作性痴呆BPSD管理的最佳可用治疗方法,关于儿童痴呆的文献或临床经验非常有限.为了解决这个差距,我们对BPSD概况进行了描述性案例分析,在两名儿童痴呆症患者(Sanfilippo综合征和CLN3(青少年发作)Batten病)中,相关的促成因素和有针对性的心理社会干预措施被转诊至澳大利亚痴呆症支持,澳大利亚的国家痴呆症行为支持服务。在这些疾病中发现的原发性BPSD包括身体和言语攻击以及易怒/不稳定。在这些情况下,促进BPSD发展的因素不是单一的,包含疼痛,护理人员的方法和过度或过度刺激。使用神经精神清单-队列观察到BPSD的改善,并根据家庭和护理人员报告的定性反馈进行全球记录。以人为本,在这些病例中,多模式心理社会干预被认为是解决BPSD的有效疗法.总之,案例研究描述了BPSD在两种常见的儿童痴呆症中的性质和表现,并证明了以人为中心的心理社会干预(通过国家痴呆症特定支持计划提供)在缓解这些疾病中的易怒和攻击性等BPSD方面的潜在益处.
    Childhood dementias are a group of rare, fatal neurodegenerative disorders, characterised by global cognitive decline, loss of previously acquired developmental skills and behaviours and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Batten disease, or neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, and Sanfilippo syndrome, or mucopolysaccharidosis type III, are two of the more common forms of childhood dementia disorders worldwide. While psychosocial interventions are the best available therapeutic approach for BPSD management in adult-onset dementia, there is very limited literature or clinical experience in the context of childhood dementia. To address this gap, we conducted a descriptive case analysis of BPSD profiles, associated contributing factors and targeted psychosocial interventions in two cases with childhood dementia disorders (Sanfilippo syndrome and CLN3 (juvenile onset) Batten disease) who were referred to Dementia Support Australia, a national dementia behaviour support service in Australia. Primary BPSD identified in these disorders included physical and verbal aggression and irritability/lability. In these cases, contributing factors to the development of BPSD were not monolithic, encompassing pain, caregiver\'s approach and over or under-stimulation. Improvement in BPSD were observed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Quesionnaire and globally noted as per the qualitative feedback reported by family and caregivers. Person-centred, multimodal psychosocial interventions were recognised as effective therapies in resolving BPSD in these cases. In conclusion, the case studies described the nature and presentation of BPSD in two common forms of childhood dementia and demonstrated the potential benefits of person-centred psychosocial interventions (delivered through national dementia-specific support programs) in alleviating BPSD such as irritability and aggression in these disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,心理健康状况的治疗存在很大差距,在那里,大多数接受任何护理的患者都来自非专业初级卫生保健工作者(PHCW)。我们试图研究在尼日利亚初级卫生保健(PHC)环境中为患有抑郁症的老年人提供护理的PHCW的经验。
    方法:定性研究设计。共有24名PHCW参加。使用深入的关键线人访谈(KIIs),我们探索了从尼日利亚西南部10个农村和城市PHC中选择的15个PHCW的观点。还举行了由9名与会者组成的另一个焦点小组讨论,讨论基伊研究所的新主题。采用专题分析法对数据进行分析。
    结果:确定了三个总体主题:关于抑郁症的观点,治疗方案,和社区外展影响。参与者认为老年人的抑郁症以一系列情绪为特征,行为,和认知症状,这使得临床评估特别具有挑战性。PHCW使用的常见治疗方案包括一般建议和咨询,以及经常需要开温和的镇痛药,维生素和偶尔的镇静剂符合患者的期望。即使PHCW获得授权,也很少使用抗抑郁药。虽然家访是他们预期工作时间表的一部分,由于没有运输设施,PHCW很少实施这些措施。移动技术被认为是克服这种限制的一种可能方法,可以为老年人提供基于社区的精神保健。
    结论:PHCW认为患者认知能力较差,期望开镇静剂,镇痛药和维生素,以及不存在基于社区的服务是在研究环境中为患有抑郁症的老年人提供基于证据的持续护理的现有障碍.
    OBJECTIVE: There is a large treatment gap for mental health conditions in sub-Saharan Africa where most patients who receive any care do so from lay primary health care workers (PHCW). We sought to examine the experiences of PHCW who provide care for older people with depression in Nigerian primary health care (PHC) settings.
    METHODS: Qualitative study design. A total of 24 PHCW participated. Using in-depth key informant interviews (KIIs), we explored the views of 15 PHCW selected from 10 rural and urban PHCs in South-Western Nigeria. An additional focus group discussion comprising nine participants was also conducted to discuss emerging themes from KIIs. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
    RESULTS: Three overall themes were identified: views about depression, treatment options, and community outreach implications. Participants perceived depression in older people as being characterised by a range of mood, behavioural, and cognitive symptoms which made clinical assessments particularly challenging. Common treatment options used by PHCW included general advice and counselling, as well as frequent need to prescribe mild analgesics, vitamins and occasional sedatives in line with patients\' expectations. Antidepressants were rarely used even though PHCW are authorised. While home visits are part of their expected work schedule, PHCW rarely implemented these due to non-availability of transport facilities. Mobile technology was identified as a possible way of overcoming this constraint to providing community based mental healthcare for older people.
    CONCLUSIONS: PHCWs perceived that patients\' poor cognitive performance, expectations to prescribe sedatives, analgesics and vitamins, as well as non-existence of community-based services were existing barriers to providing evidenced based continued care for older people with depression in the study settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    我们解决了对精神疾病的无意识偏见,强调有利于某些诊断的分层视角。我们的目标是找出这些不平等的原因,强调需要转向基于病理生理学的命名法,以促进对每种疾病的平等支持,加强治疗依从性,鼓励公开讨论。
    We address the unconsciously biased perception of psychiatric disorders, highlighting a hierarchical perspective that favours certain diagnoses over others. We aim to uncover reasons for these inequities, emphasising the need for a shift toward pathophysiology-based nomenclature that can promote equal support for each disorder, enhance treatment adherence and encourage open discussions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与精神分裂症相关的认知障碍(CIAS)是该疾病的核心特征之一,对精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)患者的功能和康复结果具有重大影响。这项关键审查的目的是强调CIAS有效治疗的最新证据,讨论这一领域目前的挑战,并提出可能有助于克服它们的未来观点。关于精神药理学方法,治疗和预防CIAS最常用的策略之一是支持第二代抗精神病药物,并避免使用抗胆碱能药物和苯二氮卓类药物进行长期大剂量治疗.此外,非药理学方法,如认知修复和基于体育锻炼的项目,代表了CIAS治疗中基于证据的干预措施,这些措施已显示出对认知和功能结局均有效的可靠证据.这些治疗,然而,仍然以不均衡的方式提供给被诊断为CIAS的精神卫生服务的人,即使是在高收入国家。学术和临床伙伴关系与合作,以及服务用户的倡导,家庭,看护者,和利益相关者组织可以帮助减少CIAS治疗中的工作台与床边的差距。未来的前景包括开发新的药物,可以有效治疗CIAS,在提供循证干预措施以提高可访问性和参与度方面实施远程医疗和虚拟现实等新技术,以及在非侵入性脑刺激领域的进一步研究。
    Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) represents one of the core features of the disorder and has a significant impact on functional and rehabilitation outcomes of people living with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD). The aim of this critical review is to highlight the most recent evidence on effective treatments available for CIAS, to discuss the current challenges in this field, and to present future perspectives that may help to overcome them. Concerning psychopharmacological approaches, among the most indicated strategies for the management and prevention of CIAS is to favor second-generation antipsychotic medications and avoid long-term and high-dose treatments with anticholinergic medications and benzodiazepines. Moreover, non-pharmacological approaches such as cognitive remediation and physical exercise-based programs represent evidence-based interventions in the treatment of CIAS that have shown reliable evidence of effectiveness on both cognitive and functional outcomes. These treatments, however, are still delivered to people accessing mental health services with a diagnosis of CIAS in an uneven manner, even in high-income countries. Academic and clinical partnership and collaboration, as well as advocacy from service users, families, carers, and stakeholders\' organizations could help to reduce the bench to bedside gap in the treatment of CIAS. Future perspectives include the development of novel pharmacological agents that could be effective in the treatment of CIAS, the implementation of novel technologies such as telemedicine and virtual reality in the delivery of evidence-based interventions to improve accessibility and engagement, and further research in the field of non-invasive brain stimulation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Assessment tools for engagement in people with dementia often rely on self-reported measures which restricts their use in people with severe cognitive limitations. The Engagement of a Person with Dementia Scale (EPWDS) is a valid and reliable tool to assess behavioral and emotional expressions and responses of engagement in people with dementia through observation; however, the EPWDS is not yet available in the German language.
    OBJECTIVE: 1) Translation and cross-culturally adaptation of the original English version of the EPWDS into the German language (EPWDS-GER) and 2) to gain insights into assessing data with the newly developed instrument.
    METHODS: International recommendations were followed to cross-culturally adapt the English original version of the EPWDS into the German language in 5 steps: translation by three independent translators, synthesis, back translation, expert committee review (N = 10) and test of the prefinal version in nursing practice (N = 22) on a 5-point Likert scale to assess comprehensibility, practicability and suitability of the EPWDS-GER.
    RESULTS: The EPWDS-GER achieved high ratings for the five subscales on ease of understanding, ease of answering and importance of single items for assessing engagement. Average agreement for all items ranged from 3.86 to 4.43 (SD = 0.68-1.29). Overall rating of EPWDS-GER resulted in a mean agreement of 4.18 (SD = 0.73) for suitability and of 4.09 (SD = 0.81) for practicability.
    CONCLUSIONS: The EPWDS-GER is an easy to use tool for measuring behavioral and emotional expressions and responses of engagement of a person with dementia and can now be utilized in clinical practice and research.
    UNASSIGNED: HINTERGRUND: Instrumente zur Bewertung der sozialen Beteiligung von Menschen mit Demenz beruhen oft auf Selbstauskünften, was ihre Verwendung bei Personen mit schwereren kognitiven Einschränkungen limitiert. Die Engagement of a Person with Dementia Scale (EPWDS) ist ein valides und zuverlässiges Instrument zur Bewertung von Reaktionen, Verhaltens- und Gefühlsäußerungen der Beteiligung bei Menschen mit Demenz durch Beobachtung. Allerdings ist die EPWDS noch nicht in deutscher Sprache verfügbar.
    UNASSIGNED: 1) Übersetzung und kulturübergreifende Anpassung der englischen Originalversion in die deutsche Sprache (EPWDS-GER) und 2) Gewinnung von Erkenntnissen über die Datenerhebung mit der EPWDS-GER.
    METHODS: Die Originalversion der EPWDS wurde gemäß internationaler Leitlinien in fünf Schritten in die deutsche Sprache übersetzt: Übersetzung durch drei unabhängige Personen, Synthese, Rückübersetzung, Überprüfung durch ein Expertenkomitee (N = 10) und Test der vorläufigen Version in der Pflegepraxis (N = 22), um Verständlichkeit, Eignung und Praktikabilität der EPWDS-GER auf einer 5‑stufigen Likert Skala zu beurteilen.
    UNASSIGNED: Die EPWDS-GER erzielte hohe positive Bewertungen der Subskalen für leichte Verständlichkeit, leichte Beantwortung und gegebene Relevanz einzelner Items. Die mittlere Zustimmung für alle Items reichte von 3,86 bis 4,43 (SD = 0,68–1,29). Die Gesamtbewertung der EPWDS-GER erzielte eine hohe Zustimmung von durchschnittlich 4,18 (SD = 0,73) für Eignung und 4,09 (SD = 0.81) für Praxistauglichkeit.
    CONCLUSIONS: Die EPWDS-GER ist ein einfach anzuwendendes Instrument zur Messung der Beteiligung von Menschen mit Demenz sowie ihrer Reaktionen. Die EPWDS-GER ist nun in der klinischen Praxis und in der Forschung verfügbar.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在不同的治疗环境中,心理社会干预对老年抑郁症的有效性,regions,中国的合并症仍不清楚。因此,我们系统回顾了中国减少老年抑郁症的研究。
    方法:从数据库中检索了9个中文或英文数据库至2021年1月。纳入了对中国老年抑郁症患者进行社会心理干预的随机对照试验。主要结果是通过自我报告工具测量的干预后抑郁。随机效应模型用于汇集总效应大小Hedge的g。
    结果:在99项研究中,共有9369名患有抑郁症的老年人,与对照条件相比,心理社会干预是有效的(对冲:-1·48[95%CI:-1·83至-1·13])。身体疾病合并症显著影响合并效应大小(无合并症:Hedges\'g=-1.19,95%CI:-1.42至-0.95;合并症:Hedges\'g=-2.06,95%CI:-2.97至-1.14;p=0.062),异质性很大(没有合并症,I2=91·3%,95%CI:89·5%至92·7%;合并症,I2=94·3%,95%CI:93·1%至95·4%)。根据GRADE标准的证据质量通常是中等的。
    结论:所审查的研究之间的显著异质性是不可避免的,可能的发表偏倚可能导致对结果的高估。
    结论:社会心理干预措施在中国治疗老年抑郁症方面均有效,区域,或治疗取向。政策应支持中国社会心理干预措施的发展和实施。尤其是在社区环境中,减轻疾病负担。
    BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for geriatric depression across different treatment settings, regions, and comorbidities in China remains unclear. Therefore, we systematically reviewed studies geared towards reducing geriatric depression in China.
    METHODS: Nine databases in Chinese or English from database were searched from inception through January 2021. Randomized controlled trials investigating psychosocial interventions on older adults with depression in China were included. The primary outcome was post-intervention depression measured by self-report instruments. Random-effect model was used to pool the overall effect size Hedge\'s g.
    RESULTS: In 99 studies with a total of 9369 older adults with depression, psychosocial interventions were effective compared with control conditions (Hedges\' g: -1·48 [95 % CI: -1·83 to -1·13]). Comorbidity with physical disease significantly affect the pooled effect size (without comorbidity: Hedges\' g = -1.19, 95 % CI: -1.42 to -0.95; with comorbidity: Hedges\' g = -2.06, 95 % CI: -2.97 to -1.14; p = 0.062), and heterogeneity was substantial (without comorbidity, I2 = 91·3 %, 95 % CI: 89·5 % to 92·7 %; with comorbidity, I2 = 94·3 %, 95 % CI: 93·1 % to 95·4 %). The quality of evidence according to the GRADE criteria was generally moderate.
    CONCLUSIONS: Significant heterogeneity among the studies reviewed was unavoidable, and the possible publication bias could lead to overestimation of the result.
    CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial interventions are significantly effective for treating geriatric depression in China regardless of the setting, region, or therapeutic orientation. Policies should support the development and implementation of psychosocial interventions in China, especially in community settings, to reduce disease burden.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    戏剧疗法是一种流行的精神疾病管理形式,因为它超越了许多其他疗法。很少有研究检查这种介质的优点和缺点。这项定性研究考察了这两种情况,发现收益和危害。
    Drama therapy is a popular form of management in mental illness, as it reaches out beyond many other therapies. Few studies have examined both the advantages and disadvantages of this medium. This qualitative study examines both, and finds gains and hazards.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    心理社会干预对于治疗酒精使用障碍(AUD)至关重要,但是没有关于其有效性的全面证据。因此,本研究旨在确定心理社会干预对青少年和青少年AUD治疗的有效性.
    在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,文章是从EMBASE搜索的,PubMed,Medline,CINAHL,WebofScience,PsycINFO,还有Scopus.此外,文章从灰色文献中检索。已使用Cochrane偏差风险评估来评估文章的质量。
    共纳入12项随机对照试验。综合家庭和CBT,CBT,引导自我改变,基于生态的家庭治疗在减少酒精使用频率方面效果温和。另一方面,综合动机增强疗法和CBT(-0.71[95%CI:-0.97,-0.45])和常见元素治疗方法(4.5[95%CI:6.9,2.2])在减少酒精使用频率和数量方面具有最高的效果,分别。总之,大多数干预措施对不同的饮酒结局没有显著影响.尽管如此,综合干预措施的有效性超过了单一干预措施.心理社会干预对禁欲的影响尚无定论。因此,未来的研究将探索替代方案,新出现的第三波治疗方法。
    PROSPERO,CRD42023435011,https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?RecordID=435011。
    UNASSIGNED: Psychosocial intervention is imperative for treating alcohol use disorder (AUD), but there is no comprehensive evidence regarding its effectiveness. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in treating AUD amongadolescents and young adults.
    UNASSIGNED: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, articles were searched from EMBASE, PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Scopus. Also, articles were retrieved from gray literature. The quality of articles has been assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 12 randomized controlled trials were included. Integrated family and CBT, CBT, guided self-change, and ecologically based family therapy had a mild effect in reducing alcohol use frequency. On the other hand, integrated motivational enhancement therapy and CBT (-0.71 [95% CI: -0.97, -0.45]) and common elements treatment approaches (4.5 [95% CI: 6.9, 2.2]) had the highest effect size for reducing alcohol use frequency and amount, respectively. In conclusion, most of the interventions had no significant effect on different drinking outcomes. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of combined interventions surpassed that of the single interventions. The effect of psychosocial interventions on abstinence was inconclusive. Therefore, future studies will explore alternative, newly emerged third-wave therapeutic approaches.
    UNASSIGNED: PROSPERO, CRD42023435011, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=435011.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:城市化正在全球范围内发生,精神疾病的发病率正在上升。人们对“自然”以及它如何有益于心理健康和福祉越来越感兴趣。
    目的:了解文献如何定义自然;自然干预的特征是什么;正在测量的心理健康和福祉结果;以及证据表明,关于自然如何影响儿童和青少年的心理健康和福祉。
    方法:进行了荟萃综述,在三个数据库中搜索相关的主要和次要研究,使用关键搜索字词,包括“自然”和“心理健康”和“心理健康”。纳入标准包括已发表的关于儿童和青少年人口的英语研究。作者从符合纳入标准的研究中确定了最高质量的证据。使用描述性内容分析提取和分析数据。
    结果:16篇系统综述,纳入了2项范围评价和5项高质量队列研究.“自然”沿着连续体(“自然研究框架”)被概念化为三类:人类设计的具有自然元素的环境;人类设计的自然环境;和自然环境。“干预”的性质分为三个领域(“自然干预框架”):访问、与自然接触和参与,与所有地区相关的自然数量和质量。心理健康和幸福结果符合一个连续体,一端有“混乱”,另一端有“幸福”。大自然似乎有有益的影响,但我们不能肯定.
    结论:自然似乎对儿童和青少年的心理健康和福祉有有益的影响。缺乏临床人群的证据,种族不同的人口和中低收入国家的人口。我们的结果应该考虑到纳入研究的局限性和对结果的信心来解释。
    BACKGROUND: Urbanisation is taking place worldwide and rates of mental illness are rising. There has been increasing interest in \'nature\' and how it may benefit mental health and well-being.
    OBJECTIVE: To understand how the literature defines nature; what the characteristics of the nature intervention are; what mental health and well-being outcomes are being measured; and what the evidence shows, in regard to how nature affects the mental health and well-being of children and adolescents.
    METHODS: A meta-review was conducted, searching three databases for relevant primary and secondary studies, using key search terms including \'nature\' and \'mental health\' and \'mental well-being\'. Inclusion criteria included published English-language studies on the child and adolescent population. Authors identified the highest quality evidence from studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted and analysed using descriptive content analysis.
    RESULTS: Sixteen systematic reviews, two scoping reviews and five good quality cohort studies were included. \'Nature\' was conceptualised along a continuum (the \'nature research framework\') into three categories: a human-designed environment with natural elements; a human-designed natural environment; and a natural environment. The nature \'intervention\' falls into three areas (the \'nature intervention framework\'): access, exposure and engagement with nature, with quantity and quality of nature relevant to all areas. Mental health and well-being outcomes fit along a continuum, with \'disorder\' at one end and \'well-being\' at the other. Nature appears to have a beneficial effect, but we cannot be certain of this.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nature appears to have a beneficial effect on mental health and well-being of children and adolescents. Evidence is lacking on clinical populations, ethnically diverse populations and populations in low- and middle-income countries. Our results should be interpreted considering the limitations of the included studies and confidence in findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    边缘性人格障碍和饮食失调经常在年轻人中同时发生。这些疾病出现在青春期,在建立独立的自我意识和与社区联系的能力的关键发展时期。由于边缘性人格障碍和饮食失调的发展和精神病理学的核心差异,当这些疾病同时发生时,在治疗这些疾病时需要进行调整。很少有既定的治疗方法可以同时解决这些疾病。边缘性人格障碍的循证心理治疗,如辩证行为疗法和基于心理的治疗,已经适应了这两种疾病的共同弱点和特征。然而,这些方法是专门的,密集,而且很长,因此不适合在一般的精神病或初级保健中实施,提供大多数一线精神卫生保健的地方。通才方法可以填补这一公共卫生空白,指导非专业人员为这些损害性,有时甚至是致命的疾病制定知情的临床管理。在本概述中,作者描述了对患有边缘性人格障碍的青少年进行良好(或一般)精神病管理(GPM)的调整,以纳入饮食失调治疗的主流最佳实践.调整后的治疗依赖于大多数临床医生已经使用的干预措施(诊断披露,心理教育,专注于治疗之外的生活,管理病人的自我毁灭行为,和保守的精神药理学,积极治疗合并症)。调整治疗的局限性,以及为患者提供专业和一般医疗服务以及让他们接受初级普通精神病治疗的指南,正在讨论。
    Borderline personality disorder and eating disorders frequently co-occur among youths. These disorders emerge in adolescence, during the critical developmental period of building an independent sense of self and the capacity to relate to one\'s community. Because of core differences in the development and psychopathology of borderline personality disorder and eating disorders, adjustments are required when treating these disorders when they co-occur. Few established treatment approaches can address these disorders simultaneously. Evidence-based psychotherapies for borderline personality disorder, such as dialectical behavior therapy and mentalization-based treatment, have been adapted to accommodate the shared vulnerabilities and features of the two disorders. However, these approaches are specialized, intensive, and lengthy and are therefore poorly suited to implementation in general psychiatric or primary health care, where most frontline mental health care is provided. Generalist approaches can fill this public health gap, guiding nonspecialists in structuring informed clinical management for these impairing and sometimes fatal disorders. In this overview, the authors describe the adjustment of good (or general) psychiatric management (GPM) for adolescents with borderline personality disorder to incorporate the prevailing best practices for eating disorder treatment. The adjusted treatment relies on interventions most clinicians already use (diagnostic disclosure, psychoeducation, focusing on life outside treatment, managing patients\' self-destructive behaviors, and conservative psychopharmacology with active management of comorbid conditions). Limitations of the adjusted treatment, as well as guidelines for referring patients to specialized and general medical treatments and for returning them to primary generalist psychiatric care, are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号