psychological performance

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一些研究表明,单次经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)具有调节健康和运动员运动表现的潜力。据我们所知,先前发表的系统评价既没有全面调查tDCS对身体和心理参数运动表现的影响,也没有调查tDCS对高水平运动员的影响。我们检查了所有可用的研究测试,耐力,运动特定的表现,情绪状态和认知表现,以便更好地应用于国家或国际水平运动员的比赛和赛前训练。在PubMed进行了系统的搜索,WebofScience,EBSCO,Embase,和Scopus直到2023年6月。当参与者至少在州和国家级比赛中有运动经验时,研究就有资格。在没有额外干预的情况下接受了一次tDCS,对照组接受假tDCS或不接受干预。从18篇文章中纳入了20项实验研究(224名参与者)。结果表明,在18项研究中,有12项研究中,一次tDCS会话改善了身体和心理参数。其中,六指TDCS在运动系统上的应用(运动皮层,运动前皮质,小脑),五个在背外侧前额叶皮层,两个在颞叶皮层。对tDCS最敏感的是力量,耐力,和情绪状态,提高了67%,75%,75%的研究,分别。不到一半的研究表明,运动特定任务(40%)和认知表现(33%)有所改善。我们建议tDCS是一种有效的工具,可用于比赛和赛前训练,以提高国家或国际水平运动员的运动成绩。进一步的研究将探索各种参数(运动类型,大脑区域,刺激方案,运动员水平,和测试任务)和提高tDCS干预效果的神经机制研究。系统审查注册:https://www。crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?ID=CRD4202236989,标识符CRD4202236989。
    Some studies showed that a single session of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has the potential of modulating motor performance in healthy and athletes. To our knowledge, previously published systematic reviews have neither comprehensively investigated the effects of tDCS on athletic performance in both physical and psychological parameters nor investigated the effects of tDCS on high-level athletes. We examined all available research testing a single session of tDCS on strength, endurance, sport-specific performance, emotional states and cognitive performance for better application in competition and pre-competition trainings of national- or international-level athletes. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, Embase, and Scopus up until to June 2023. Studies were eligible when participants had sports experience at a minimum of state and national level competitions, underwent a single session of tDCS without additional interventions, and received either sham tDCS or no interventions in the control groups. A total of 20 experimental studies (224 participants) were included from 18 articles. The results showed that a single tDCS session improved both physical and psychological parameters in 12 out of the 18 studies. Of these, six refer to the application of tDCS on the motor system (motor cortex, premotor cortex, cerebellum), five on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and two on temporal cortex. The most sensitive to tDCS are strength, endurance, and emotional states, improved in 67%, 75%, and 75% of studies, respectively. Less than half of the studies showed improvement in sport-specific tasks (40%) and cognitive performance (33%). We suggest that tDCS is an effective tool that can be applied to competition and pre-competition training to improve athletic performance in national- or international-level athletes. Further research would explore various parameters (type of sports, brain regions, stimulation protocol, athlete level, and test tasks) and neural mechanistic studies in improving efficacy of tDCS interventions. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022326989, identifier CRD42022326989.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The coronavirus-disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak precipitated prolonged lock-down measures. The subsequent social distancing, isolation, and reduction in mobility increased psychological stress, which may worsen Parkinson\'s disease (PD). Therefore, telemedicine has been proposed to provide care to PD patients. To evaluate the effects of lock-down on motor and nonmotor symptoms in PD patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and the feasibility of telemedicine. Motor and nonmotor aspects were longitudinally assessed using structured questionnaires at baseline (in-person, February 2020) and at follow-up (remote web-based video, lock-down) evaluation. Of the seventeen PD patients evaluated at baseline, fourteen agreed to participate in, and completed follow-up evaluations. There was an impairment of nonmotor aspects measured with the MDS-UPDRS part I (p < 0.001) during lock-down. Nine patients participated independently in the telemedicine evaluation while five needed help from relatives. Our preliminary findings suggest an impairment of nonmotor symptoms in PD patients and support the feasibility and need for telemedicine in monitoring PD patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, to guarantee optimal assistance with reducing the burden of infection. Our findings also suggest that movement disorder clinics should be carefully considering socio-demographics and clinical features when developing telemedicine programs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:内脏超敏反应和心理表现是肠易激综合征(IBS)的主要病理生理机制。先前的研究发现,胆囊收缩素(CCK)可以增强结肠运动,5-羟色胺转运体(SERT)是一种对5-羟色胺具有高亲和力的跨膜转运蛋白,能迅速再摄取5-羟色胺,进而调节其作用时间和强度。我们推测SERT和CCK可能通过影响内脏敏感性和脑-肠轴在腹泻型IBS(IBS-D)的发病机制中发挥作用。
    目的:确定使用罗马IV标准诊断的IBS-D患者的SERT和CCK水平,并分析其与腹痛的关系。内脏过敏和心理表现。
    方法:本研究收集了2017年9月至2018年4月中日友好医院40例IBS-D患者和18例健康对照者的数据。腹痛的严重程度,在IBS-D患者和健康对照中评估内脏敏感性和心理表现,评估血浆和结肠黏膜中SERT和CCK的水平,并分析了它们之间的相关性。
    结果:初始感觉阈值存在显着差异(31.00±8.41mLvs52.22±8.09mL,P<0.001),排便感觉阈值(51.75±13.57mLvs89.44±8.73mL,P<0.001)和最大容许阈值(97.25±23.64mLvs171.11±20.83mL,两组之间P<0.001)。与健康对照组相比,IBS-D患者的焦虑(7.78±2.62vs2.89±1.02,P<0.001)和抑郁(6.38±2.43vs2.06±0.73,P<0.001)症状更严重。两组粘膜CCK(2.29±0.30vs1.66±0.17,P<0.001)和SERT(1.90±0.51vs3.03±0.23,P<0.001)也存在显着差异。疼痛评分与粘膜CCK呈显著正相关(r=0.96、0.93、0.94,P<0.001)。焦虑之间呈显著负相关(r=-0.98;P<0.001),抑郁(r=-0.99;P<0.001),疼痛评估(r=-0.96,-0.93,-0.95,P<0.001)和粘膜SERT。
    结论:IBS-D患者有心身疾病和内脏高敏感性。SERT和CCK可能通过调节脑-肠轴和影响内脏敏感性参与IBS-D的发病。这为识别更具体和有效的治疗靶标提供了新的潜在方法。
    BACKGROUND: Visceral hypersensitivity and psychological performance are the main pathophysiological mechanisms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Previous studies have found that cholecystokinin (CCK) can enhance colon movement and that serotonin transporter (SERT) is a transmembrane transport protein with high affinity for 5-hydroxytryptamine, which can rapidly reuptake 5-hydroxytryptamine and then regulate its action time and intensity. We speculate that SERT and CCK might play a role in the pathogenesis of diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) by affecting visceral sensitivity and the brain-gut axis.
    OBJECTIVE: To determine SERT and CCK levels in IBS-D patients diagnosed using Rome IV criteria and to analyze their associations with abdominal pain, visceral hypersensitivity and psychological performance.
    METHODS: This study collected data from 40 patients with IBS-D at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital from September 2017 to April 2018 and 18 healthy controls. The severity of abdominal pain, visceral sensitivity and psychological performance were evaluated in IBS-D patients and healthy controls, the levels of SERT and CCK in plasma and colonic mucosa were evaluated, and the correlations between them were analyzed.
    RESULTS: There were significant differences in the initial sensation threshold (31.00 ± 8.41 mL vs 52.22 ± 8.09 mL, P < 0.001), defecating sensation threshold (51.75 ± 13.57 mL vs 89.44 ± 8.73 mL, P < 0.001) and maximum tolerable threshold (97.25 ± 23.64 mL vs 171.11 ± 20.83 mL, P < 0.001) between the two groups. IBS-D patients had more severe anxiety (7.78 ± 2.62 vs 2.89 ± 1.02, P < 0.001) and depressive (6.38 ± 2.43 vs 2.06 ± 0.73, P < 0.001) symptoms than healthy controls. Significant differences were also found in mucosal CCK (2.29 ± 0.30 vs 1.66 ± 0.17, P < 0.001) and SERT (1.90 ± 0.51 vs 3.03 ± 0.23, P < 0.001) between the two groups. There was a significant positive correlation between pain scores and mucosal CCK (r = 0.96, 0.93, 0.94, P < 0.001). Significant negative correlations between anxiety (r = -0.98; P < 0.001), depression (r = -0.99; P < 0.001), pain evaluation (r = -0.96, -0.93, -0.95, P < 0.001) and mucosal SERT were observed.
    CONCLUSIONS: IBS-D patients had psychosomatic disorders and visceral hypersensitivity. SERT and CCK might be involved in the pathogenesis of IBS-D by regulating the brain-gut axis and affecting visceral sensitivity. This provides a new potential method for identifying a more specific and effective therapeutic target.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号