目的:基于改进的Wright学习曲线模型,预测参加标准化牙科住院医师培训的研究生在体模头模拟器上上颌中切牙所有陶瓷冠的牙齿预备学习曲线,然后对学习曲线进行分析和应用。
方法:选择参加标准化牙科住院医师培训的12名研究生,在体模头模拟器上制备树脂上颌中切牙,用于所有陶瓷冠4次。3名具有至少10年经验的假肢专家对制备结果进行了评估,轮廓,锥度,肩膀,终点线,边距位置,邻牙损伤,和牙齿准备的准备时间。通过4次牙齿预备的分数计算牙齿预备的学习率。基于修正的Wright学习曲线模型,对牙齿预备的学习曲线进行预测。根据北京市牙科住院医师规范化培训技能考试标准,80分作为合格标准分。计算满足合格标准分数(80)的牙齿预备的最小训练时间,分析学习曲线的特点,评价牙体预备的有效性。
结果:4颗牙齿预备的得分分别为64.03±7.80、71.40±6.13、74.33±5.96和75.98±4.52。学习率为(106±4)%,这表明学习曲线呈上升趋势。第5制备至第13制备的牙齿制备合格标准评分与预测评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。第14制剂的预测得分高于合格标准得分(P<0.05)。
结论:参加口腔住院医师规范化培训的研究生体模头模拟器上颌中切牙全瓷冠的牙体预备学习曲线趋势向上,预测最低训练次数高于合格标准分数为14次。
OBJECTIVE: To predict the learning curve of tooth preparation for all ceramic crowns of maxillary central incisors on phantom head simulators for graduate students participating in standardized dental resident training based on the modified Wright learning curve model, then to analyze and applicate the learning curve.
METHODS: Twelve graduate students participating in standardized dental resident training were selected to prepare the resin maxillary central incisors on phantom head simulators for all ceramic crowns 4 times. The results of preparation were evaluated by 3 prosthetic experts with at least 10 years\' experience focusing on the reduction, contour, taper, shoulder, finish line, margin placement, adjacent tooth injury, and preparation time for tooth preparation. The learning rate of tooth preparation was calculated by scores of tooth preparation of 4 times. The learning curve of tooth preparation was predicted based on the modified Wright learning curve model. According to the criteria of standardized training skill examinations for dental residents in Beijing, 80 was taken as the qualified standard score. The minimum training times for tooth preparation to satisfy the qualified standard score (80) was calculated, to analyze the characteristics of learning curve and evaluate the effectiveness of tooth preparation.
RESULTS: The scores of 4 tooth preparation were 64.03±7.80, 71.40±6.13, 74.33±5.96, and 75.98±4.52, respectively. The learning rate was (106±4)%, which showed the learning curve an upward trend. There were no significant differences between the qualified standard score and the predicted scores of tooth preparation from the 5th preparation to the 13th preparation (P > 0.05). The predicted score of the 14th preparation was higher than the qualified standard score (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The trend of the learning curve of tooth preparation for all ceramic crowns of maxillary central incisors on phantom head simulators for graduate students participating in standardized dental resident training is upward, which predicts the minimum training times higher than the qualified standard score is 14 times.