proliferative diabetic retinopathy

增生性糖尿病视网膜病变
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较未治疗的增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)患者在手术室(OR)进行的标准全视网膜光凝(PRP)与在临床进行的外周PRP的长期结果。方法:回顾性分析2017年至2022年的连续病例。排除标准包括以前的PRP,在初次PRP时进行的平坦部玻璃体切除术,PRP在初始治疗后3个月内在其他环境中进行,在初始治疗时记录未来PRP的计划,和不到3年的随访。使用负二项回归比较两组之间的后续干预次数,并进行t检验以比较视力(VA)结果。结果:在筛查的679例患者的961只眼中,53例患者的82只眼符合纳入标准。最初的PRP在38例患者的57只眼的OR(OR队列)和15例患者的25只眼的临床(临床队列)中进行。OR队列平均有0.4次后续手术和0.8次后续PRP治疗和临床队列,0.8次后续手术(P<0.05)和1.8次后续PRP治疗(P<0.05)。在长期随访中,VA结果没有发现显著的组间差异(平均值,44.2个月)。结论:在OR中进行的外周PRP比临床上的标准PRP导致更少的后续干预措施,并且可以更好地控制PDR。
    Purpose: To compare the long-term outcomes of standard panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) performed in the operating room (OR) with peripheral PRP performed in the clinic in treatment-naïve patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Methods: Consecutive cases from 2017 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Exclusion criteria included previous PRP, pars plana vitrectomy performed at the time of the initial PRP, PRP performed in another setting within 3 months of the initial treatment, a documented plan for future PRP at the time of the initial treatment, and less than 3 years of follow-up. Negative binomial regressions were used to compare the number of subsequent interventions between the 2 groups and t tests to compare the visual acuity (VA) outcomes. Results: Of the 961 eyes of 679 patients screened, 82 eyes of 53 patients met the inclusion criteria. The initial PRP was performed in the OR (OR cohort) in 57 eyes of 38 patients and in the clinic (clinic cohort) in 25 eyes of 15 patients. The OR cohort had a mean of 0.4 subsequent surgeries and 0.8 subsequent PRP treatments and the clinic cohort, 0.8 subsequent surgeries (P < .05) and 1.8 subsequent PRP treatments (P < .05). No significant between-group difference was found in the VA outcomes over the long-term follow-up (mean, 44.2 months). Conclusions: Peripheral PRP performed in the OR resulted in fewer subsequent interventions than standard PRP in the clinic and may afford better control of PDR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    描述糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)和葡萄膜炎患者的临床特征和并发症,并根据原发炎症部位得出关联,DR阶段,和每个并发症。
    单中心,横断面观察性研究。
    66例DR和葡萄膜炎并存的患者。
    评估了66例此类病例的电子病历。人口统计数据,糖尿病状态,临床特征,并记录最终随访时DR和葡萄膜炎的并发症。
    最佳矫正视力(BCVA),不同阶段的患病率,以及有或没有葡萄膜炎的DR并发症,以及增生性和非增生性眼炎症强度和原发部位之间的相关性。
    在132只眼睛中,所有患者均有DR,97只眼有葡萄膜炎(单侧35例,双侧31例).患者平均年龄为53.4±8.7岁,糖尿病病程为10.5±6.9年,葡萄膜炎的持续时间为61.3±68.8个月。葡萄膜炎患者,54.6%患有前葡萄膜炎(AU),20.6%有中间,10.3%后,和14.4%的全葡萄膜炎。49分5%的眼睛有增生性DR(PDR)变化。前路PDR病例比例较高(56.6%),后(70%),和全葡萄膜炎(64.3%),AU病例差异接近统计学意义(P=0.067)。相反,显著(P<0.001)中度葡萄膜炎病例出现非增生性改变(80%).葡萄膜炎组的最终BCVA明显较差(P=0.045)。纤维血管增生的比例,牵引分离。和虹膜新生血管在增生性视网膜病变眼葡萄膜炎(14.6%,18.8%,和12.5%)高于没有葡萄膜炎的(5.3%,10.5%,和5.3%)。葡萄膜炎病例中,58.5%的眼睛发展为白内障,44.3%有后粘连,12.3%发展为继发性青光眼,4.1%有视网膜前膜,4.1%有带状角膜病变,1.0%出现黄斑新生血管。
    同时存在DR和葡萄膜炎的眼睛具有较高的新生血管性和葡萄膜炎并发症的患病率,以及较差的视力结果的风险。治疗应旨在限制炎症的持续时间和强度。严格的血糖控制对于炎症控制和防止DR进展到更晚期阶段至关重要。
    专有或商业披露可在本文末尾的脚注和披露中找到。
    UNASSIGNED: To describe the clinical profile and complications of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and uveitis in patients with coexisting conditions and to derive associations based on site of primary inflammation, stage of DR, and complications of each.
    UNASSIGNED: Single-center, cross-sectional observational study.
    UNASSIGNED: Sixty-six patients with coexisting DR and uveitis.
    UNASSIGNED: Electronic medical records of 66 such cases were evaluated. The demographic data, diabetic status, clinical characteristics, and complications of DR and uveitis on the final follow-up were recorded.
    UNASSIGNED: Associations between best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), prevalence of various stages, and complications of DR among eyes with and without uveitis, and correlation between the intensity and primary sites of inflammation among eyes with proliferative and nonproliferative changes.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 132 eyes, all had DR and 97 eyes had uveitis (35 unilateral and 31 bilateral cases). Mean age of patients was 53.4 ± 8.7 years, duration of diabetes was 10.5 ± 6.9 years, and duration of uveitis was 61.3 ± 68.8 months. Of uveitis patients, 54.6% had anterior uveitis (AU), 20.6% had intermediate, 10.3% posterior, and 14.4% panuveitis. Forty-nine point five percent of eyes had proliferative DR (PDR) changes. There was a higher proportion PDR cases among anterior (56.6%), posterior (70%), and panuveitis (64.3%), with difference in AU cases approaching statistical significance (P = 0.067). Conversely, significant (P < 0.001) intermediate uveitis cases had nonproliferative changes (80%). Final BCVA was significantly poorer in the group with uveitis (P = 0.045). The proportion of fibrovascular proliferations, tractional detachments. and iris neovascularization among proliferative retinopathy eyes with uveitis (14.6%, 18.8%, and 12.5% respectively) was higher than those without uveitis (5.3%, 10.5%, and 5.3%). Among uveitis cases, 58.5% eyes developed cataracts, 44.3% had posterior synechiae, 12.3% developed secondary glaucoma, 4.1% had epiretinal membrane, 4.1% had band-shaped keratopathy, and 1.0% developed macular neovascularization.
    UNASSIGNED: Eyes with coexisting DR and uveitis have a higher prevalence of neovascular and uveitis complications along with a risk of poorer visual outcomes. Treatment should aim at limiting the duration and intensity of inflammation. Strict glycemic control is essential for inflammation control and preventing the progression of DR to more advanced stages.
    UNASSIGNED: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    通过使用皮肤电极和RETevalTM系统的视网膜电描记术(ERG)在接受了带有硅油(SO)填塞的平坦部玻璃体切除术(PPV)的眼睛中确定视网膜的生理状态。玻璃体切除术用于视网膜脱离和增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)。
    回顾性病例系列。
    使用RETevalTM系统记录ERG(LKCTechnologiesInc.Gaithersburg,医学博士;韦尔奇·阿林,公司。Skaneateles瀑布,NY)从SO去除之前和之后的八只眼睛进行PDR。将去除SO之前的ERG的a波和b波的振幅和隐含时间与去除SO之后的振幅和隐含时间进行比较。
    在去除SO之前和之后,可以在四只眼睛中记录ERG,并且在去除SO之后,三只眼睛中的a和b振幅有所改善,而一只眼睛中的a和b振幅恶化。在剩下的四只眼睛里,在SO移除之前和之后,ERG都是不可记录的。
    这些结果表明,通过皮肤电极拾取的ERG可用于评估具有SO填塞物的眼睛中视网膜的生理学。SO填充的眼睛中的平坦ERG表明存在弥漫性视网膜损伤,这在SO去除后由平坦ERG证实。
    关于使用带有皮肤电极的视网膜电图(ERG)评估视网膜功能的报道越来越多。该系统的主要优点是能够用不接触角膜和眼表的皮肤电极记录ERG。这降低了感染的风险,尤其是在术后期间和怀疑感染的临床情况下。此外,只有少数报道通过ERG评估SO填充眼的视网膜功能。我们用RETeval(LKCTechnologiesInc.Gaithersburg,医学博士;WelchAllynInc.SkaneatelesFalls,NY)装置,一种相对较新的ERG记录系统,使用皮肤电极,侵入性较小。我们记录了八只患有增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)的SO填充眼睛的ERG。在4个如此充满的眼睛里,SO去除后,三只眼睛的振幅增加。在其他四只眼睛里,在SO移除之前和之后,ERG是不可记录的。这些结果表明,使用皮肤电极的RETeval系统可用于评估SO填塞的PDR眼的视网膜功能。我们建议SO填充的眼睛中没有ERG不是由于SO的非导电作用,而是可能表明存在弥漫性视网膜损伤,这在SO去除后得到了证实。
    UNASSIGNED: To determine the physiological status of the retina by electroretinography (ERG) using skin electrodes and the RETevalTM system in eyes that had undergone pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with silicone oil (SO) tamponade. The vitrectomy was performed for a retinal detachment and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective case series.
    UNASSIGNED: ERGs were recorded with the RETevalTM system (LKC Technologies Inc. Gaithersburg, MD; Welch Allyn, Inc. Skaneateles Falls, NY) from eight eyes with PDR before and after the SO removal. The amplitudes and implicit times of the a- and b-waves of the ERGs before the SO removal were compared to that after the SO removal.
    UNASSIGNED: ERGs were recordable in four eyes before and after the SO removal and the a- and b-amplitudes improved in three eyes and worsened in one eye after the SO removal. In the remaining four eyes, ERGs were non-recordable both before and after the SO removal.
    UNASSIGNED: These results indicate that ERGs picked up by skin electrodes can be used to assess the physiology of the retina in eyes with a SO tamponade. The flat ERGs in the SO-filled eye indicated the presence of diffuse retinal damage which was confirmed by the flat ERGs after the SO removal.
    There has been an increasing number of reports on evaluating the retinal function using electroretinography (ERG) with skin electrodes. The main advantage of this system is the ability to record ERGs with a skin electrode that does not touch the cornea and ocular surface. This reduces the risk of infection especially in the postoperative period and in clinical situations where infection is suspected. In addition, there have been only a few reports evaluating the function of the retina by ERG in SO-filled eyes. We recorded ERGs with the RETeval (LKC Technologies Inc. Gaithersburg, MD; Welch Allyn Inc. Skaneateles Falls, NY) device, a relatively new ERG recording system that uses skin electrodes and is less invasive. We recorded ERGs from eight SO-filled eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). In 4 SO filled eyes, the amplitudes increased in three eyes after the SO removal. In the other four eyes, ERGs were non-recordable before and after the SO removal. These results suggest that the RETeval system that uses skin electrodes can be used to assess the retinal function in PDR eyes with a SO tamponade. We suggest that the absence of ERGs in the SO filled eyes was not due to the electrical non-conductive effects of SO but may indicate the presence of diffuse retinal damage which was confirmed after the SO removal.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:在严重的增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)中,纤维血管膜(FVM)引起黄斑牵引性视网膜脱离(MTRD),威胁视力并最终导致失明。在这里,我们介绍了牵拉性视网膜裂孔中内部和外部视网膜之间分离的情况,术中诱导FVM分层。
    方法:一名68岁女性右眼出现PDR,以FVM和视网膜脱离为特征,为此进行了玻璃体切除术。多个孔,延伸到所有象限的大视网膜脱离,在手术过程中发现了带有FVM的白色衬里血管。当进行膜分层时,由于视网膜裂孔和多个视网膜孔,它误入视网膜内层和外层之间的空间而没有被注意到。移除FVM并分离出内部视网膜后,进行流体-气体和光凝术。手术后成功实现视网膜复位,术后视力改善并维持26个月。
    结论:当FVM引起的牵拉性视网膜裂孔与牵拉性视网膜脱离(TRD)中的视网膜裂孔合并时,必须注意防止分层在分离过程中偏离视网膜裂孔。
    BACKGROUND: In severe Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR), fibrovascular membrane (FVM) causes macular tractional retinal detachment (MTRD) which threatens vision and eventually leads to blindness. Here we present a case of separation between the inner and outer retina in tractional retinoschisis, induced during intraoperative FVM delamination.
    METHODS: A 68-year-old woman presented with PDR in the right eye, characterized by a combined FVM and retinal detachment, for which a vitrectomy was performed. Multiple holes, large retinal detachment extending to all quadrants, and white-lined blood vessels with FVM were found during the procedure. When membrane delamination was performed, it strayed into the space between the inner and outer retinal layers without being noticed due to retinoschisis and multiple retinal holes. After removing the FVM and detaching the separated inner retina, fluid-gas and photocoagulation were performed. Retinal reattachment was successfully achieved after surgery, and the postoperative visual acuity was improved and maintained for 26 months postoperatively.
    CONCLUSIONS: When tractional retinoschisis due to FVM is combined with retinal holes in tractional retinal detachment (TRD), care must be taken to prevent delamination from straying into retinoschisis during separation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:该研究假设,由于严重的炎症和葡萄糖控制不足,一些糖尿病性新生血管性青光眼(NVG)患者对经巩膜(TSC)睫状体光凝(CPC)没有完全反应。目的:该研究旨在确定基线血液中细胞间黏附分子-1(ICAM-1)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平对TSCCPC治疗糖尿病NVG患者的影响。方法:这项开放性前瞻性研究包括70名患有疼痛性NVG的糖尿病患者(75只眼;年龄63.0岁)和20名健康个体(年龄61.5岁)作为免疫对照。所有患者均接受二极管激光TSCPC。测定血液样品中的基线HbA1c水平和ICAM-1表达。随访12个月。结果:TSCCPC后一个月,与基线相比,IOP降低了28%。随访12个月后,激光治疗的有效性为63%,眼压降低了46%。在NVG患者中,ICAM-1的初始水平比对照组高2.5倍。对第一次TSCCPC没有完全反应的患者(30只眼),需要额外的激光手术,具有高的初始HbA1c(9.5%)和高的ICAM-1表达值(609.0细胞/μL)。结论:在NVG糖尿病患者中,高IOP的TSCCPC重复操作与外周血中ICAM-1表达的高初始值和高HbA1c相关。糖尿病NVG患者的管理策略应针对强化血糖控制和局部抗炎治疗。缩写:PDR=增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变,DR=糖尿病视网膜病变,NVG=新生血管性青光眼,TSCCPC=经巩膜睫状体光凝,ICAM-1=细胞间粘附分子-1,HbA1c=糖化血红蛋白,IOP=眼内压。
    Introduction: The study hypothesizes that some patients with diabetic neovascular glaucoma (NVG) do not fully respond to transscleral (TSC) cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) due to significant inflammation and insufficient glucose control. Objective: The study aimed to determine the effect of baseline blood levels of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) on the management of patients with diabetic NVG by TSC CPC. Methods: This open prospective study included 70 diabetic patients (75 eyes; aged Ме 63.0 years) with painful NVG and 20 healthy individuals (aged Ме 61.5 years) as an immunological control. All patients underwent TSC СPC with a diode laser. Baseline HbA1c levels and ICAM-1 expression in blood samples were determined. Follow-up was 12 months. Results: One month after TSC CPC, IOP decreased by 28% compared to baseline. The effectiveness of laser treatment after 12 months of follow-up was 63% with IOP decrease by 46%. In patients with NVG, the initial level of ICAM-1 was 2.5 times higher than in the control group. Patients who did not fully respond to the first TSC CPC (30 eyes) and required additional laser procedure, had high initial HbA1c (9.5%) and high expression values of the ICAM-1 (609.0 cells/μL). Conclusions: Repeated procedures of TSC CPC at high IOP in diabetic patients with NVG are associated with high initial values of expression of ICAM-1 in peripheral blood and high HbA1c. The strategy of management of patients with diabetic NVG should be aimed at intensive glucose control and local anti-inflammatory treatment. Abbreviations: PDR = proliferative diabetic retinopathy, DR = diabetic retinopathy, NVG = neovascular glaucoma, TSC CPC = transscleral cyclophotocoagulation, ICAM-1 = intercellular adhesion molecule-1, HbA1c = glycated haemoglobin, IOP = intraocular pressure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:目的是通过将机器学习算法应用于常规收集的血液和尿液实验室检查结果,预测非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)和拉丁裔(LA)患者的增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)。
    方法:分析了2019年1月至12月在布朗克斯保健医院眼科诊所接受治疗的1124例2型糖尿病患者的电子病历。收集的数据包括人口统计信息(种族,年龄和性别),血液(空腹血糖,血红蛋白A1C[HbA1c]高密度脂蛋白[HDL],低密度脂蛋白[LDL],血清肌酐和估计的肾小球滤过率[eGFR])和尿液(白蛋白与肌酐比值[ACR])测试结果以及视网膜病变状态的结局指标。评估并比较了不同机器学习模型的有效性。采用Shapley加法扩张(SHAP)分析来评估每个特征对模型预测的贡献。
    结果:平衡随机森林模型在预测NHB和LA队列的PDR方面超过了其他模型,获得83%的AUC(曲线下面积)。关于性,该模型在洛杉矶女性人群中表现出卓越的表现,AUC为87%。SHAP分析显示PDR相关因素对NHB和LA患者的影响不同,性别差异更明显。此外,这些因素的最佳临界值显示了基于性别和种族的差异.
    结论:本研究通过利用血常规和尿常规检测结果,证明了机器学习在识别PDR高危个体方面的潜力。它允许临床医生优先考虑有风险的个人,以便及时进行评估。此外,研究结果强调,在分析2型糖尿病患者PDR的危险因素时,考虑种族和性别的重要性.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective was to predict proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and Latino (LA) patients by applying machine learning algorithms to routinely collected blood and urine laboratory results.
    METHODS: Electronic medical records of 1124 type 2 diabetes patients treated at the Bronxcare Hospital eye clinic between January and December 2019 were analysed. Data collected included demographic information (ethnicity, age and sex), blood (fasting glucose, haemoglobin A1C [HbA1c] high-density lipoprotein [HDL], low-density lipoprotein [LDL], serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) and urine (albumin-to-creatinine ratio [ACR]) test results and the outcome measure of retinopathy status. The efficacy of different machine learning models was assessed and compared. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was employed to evaluate the contribution of each feature to the model\'s predictions.
    RESULTS: The balanced random forest model surpassed other models in predicting PDR for both NHB and LA cohorts, achieving an AUC (area under the curve) of 83%. Regarding sex, the model exhibited remarkable performance for the female LA demographic, with an AUC of 87%. The SHAP analysis revealed that PDR-related factors influenced NHB and LA patients differently, with more pronounced disparity between sexes. Furthermore, the optimal cut-off values for these factors showed variations based on sex and ethnicity.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the potential of machine learning in identifying individuals at higher risk for PDR by leveraging routine blood and urine test results. It allows clinicians to prioritise at-risk individuals for timely evaluations. Furthermore, the findings emphasise the importance of accounting for both ethnicity and sex when analysing risk factors for PDR in type 2 diabetes individuals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是长期2型糖尿病(T2DM)的重要微血管并发症,如果不正确诊断和治疗,将导致失明。它可以在糖尿病诊断前7年发展。指甲折叠毛细管镜检查(NFC)是一种观察毛细血管微血管的非侵入性技术,很少有研究探索NFC在糖尿病患者中的应用。目的研究2型糖尿病合并糖尿病视网膜病变患者的指甲皱褶改变,并与健康对照进行比较。次要目标是将NFC结果与糖尿病的持续时间相关联,血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)水平和DR的严重程度。材料和方法这项横断面观察性研究纳入了200名患者-100名患有糖尿病性视网膜病变的T2DM患者(根据美国糖尿病协会标准和糖尿病性视网膜病变严重程度量表)和100名健康年龄和性别匹配的对照。所有患者均接受NFC和眼科评估。结果NFC显示DR患者表现出明显较高的曲折频率,扩张,浓密,蜿蜒,成角度的毛细血管,与健康对照组相比,无血管区域和微出血(p<0.05)。在增殖性DR(PDR)中,曲折的频率,浓密的毛细血管,与非增生性DR相比,无血管区域在统计学上较高,毛细血管密度降低。病程较长(>20年)的DR患者出现毛细血管曲折的频率明显较高,无血管区域,蜿蜒,成角度和扩张的毛细血管。弯曲的频率,无血管区域,血糖控制不良(HbA1c>11)的患者中,浓密区域明显更高。局限性对于不同人口统计学人群的更大样本量研究可能提供了具有DRDM的T2DM患者的NFC变化的更广泛图片。讨论NFC可以作为DM患者视网膜受累的替代标记,应定期进行。结论NFC是一种快速,简单,安全,和非侵入性方法来评估糖尿病患者的毛细血管镜改变,这反过来可以帮助评估DR的严重程度。
    Background Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is an important microvascular complication of long-term type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) leading to blindness if not properly diagnosed and managed. It can develop as early as 7 years before the diagnosis of diabetes. Nail fold capillaroscopy (NFC) is a non-invasive technique for observing capillary microvasculature and there are few studies which have explored the use of NFC in diabetes mellitus patients. Objective To study the nail fold capillaroscopic alterations in patients with T2DM having diabetic retinopathy and compare them to healthy controls. The secondary objective was to correlate the NFC findings with the duration of diabetes, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and the severity of DR. Materials and methods This cross-sectional observational study enrolled 200 patients - 100 cases with T2DM having diabetic retinopathy (as per the American Diabetes Association criteria and Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale) and 100 healthy age and sex-matched controls. All patients were subjected to NFC and ophthalmological assessment. Results NFC revealed that patients with DR showed significantly higher frequencies of tortuous, dilated, bushy, meandering, angulated capillaries, avascular areas and micro-haemorrhages as compared to healthy controls (p < 0.05). In proliferative DR (PDR), the frequency of tortuous, bushy capillaries, and avascular areas was statistically high and the capillary density was reduced as compared to non-proliferative DR. The DR patients with longer disease duration (>20) years had a significantly higher frequency of tortuous capillaries, avascular areas, meandering, angulated and dilated capillaries. The frequency of tortuosity, avascular areas, and bushy areas was significantly higher in patients with poor glycaemic control (HbA1c >11). Limitations A larger sample size study with different demographic populations could have provided a broader picture of NFC changes in T2DM patients with DR. Discussion NFC may act as a surrogate marker of retinal involvement in patients with DM and should be performed at regular intervals. Conclusion NFC is a quick, simple, safe, and non-invasive method to assess the capillaroscopic alterations in diabetic patients which inturn can help in assessing the severity of DR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究评估了在美国现实世界临床实践中,抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗对非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)患者的增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)发展的影响。
    方法:这是一项对具有基线NPDR的眼睛的电子病历(VestrumHealth;2013年1月至2019年6月)的回顾性分析,没有DME,并在DR指数诊断时首次接受抗VEGF治疗。在PDR发展之前在研究过程中接受抗VEGF和/或激光治疗的眼睛构成治疗组群,而剩余的包括用激光治疗的那些构成抗VEGF初始组群。通过Kaplan-Meier方法进行生存分析,通过基线NPDR严重程度评估DME和PDR发展时间,以抗VEGF治疗为审查变量。使用Cox多元回归分析影响PDR发展的基线因素,审查抗VEGF治疗。
    结果:在抗VEGF幼稚的眼睛中,轻度眼DME的累积发病率(n=70,050),中等(n=39,116),基线时重度NPDR(n=10,692)为27.1%,51.2%,和60.6%。多变量回归分析确定基线NPDR严重程度是48个月内PDR发展的最重要预测因素(中度与轻度NPDR的风险比[HR][95%置信区间{CI}]为2.69(2.65-2.72),重度与轻度NPDR的风险比为6.51(6.47-6.55))。PDR的累积发生率(95%CI)为7.9%(7.4%-8.3%),20.9%,(20.0%-21.7%)和46.8%(44.4%-49.2%)超过48个月的轻度眼睛,中度,基线时严重的NPDR,分别。在基线严重NPDR的治疗眼睛中,在接受激光治疗的眼中,48个月时PDR的累积发生率为50.1%(n=546;HR[95%CI]vs未治疗:0.8[0.7-1.0]),用抗VEGF治疗的眼睛中27.4%(n=923;HR[95%CI]:0.4[0.4-0.5]),用抗VEGF加激光治疗的眼为25.6%(n=293;HR[95%CI]:0.5[0.4-0.7]),而未治疗的眼为49.9%(n=8930)。
    结论:DME和PDR发展率随着基线NPDR严重程度的增加而增加。在美国临床实践中,大约一半的患有严重NPDR的抗VEGF幼稚眼睛在4年内发展为PDR。抗VEGF治疗与不治疗相比,从严重NPDR到PDR的进展率大约减半。
    BACKGROUND: This study evaluated impact of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment on proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) development among patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) in US real-world clinical practice.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records (Vestrum Health; January 2013 to June 2019) of eyes with baseline NPDR, without DME, and naïve to anti-VEGF treatment at index DR diagnosis. Eyes that received anti-VEGF and/or laser treatment over the course of study before development of PDR constituted the treated cohort while the remaining including those treated with laser constituted the anti-VEGF naïve cohort. Survival analysis via Kaplan-Meier method evaluated time to DME and PDR development by baseline NPDR severity, with anti-VEGF treatment as censoring variable. Baseline factors affecting PDR development were analyzed using Cox multivariable regression, censoring for anti-VEGF treatment.
    RESULTS: Among anti-VEGF-naive eyes, cumulative incidence of DME in eyes with mild (n = 70,050), moderate (n = 39,116), and severe NPDR (n = 10,692) at baseline was 27.1%, 51.2%, and 60.6%. Multivariable regression analysis identified baseline NPDR severity as the most significant predictor of PDR development over 48 months (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval {CI}] of 2.69 (2.65-2.72) for moderate vs mild NPDR and 6.51 (6.47-6.55) for severe vs mild NPDR). Cumulative incidence (95% CI) of PDR was 7.9% (7.4%-8.3%), 20.9%, (20.0%-21.7%) and 46.8% (44.4%-49.2%) over 48 months in eyes with mild, moderate, and severe NPDR at baseline, respectively. Among treated eyes with baseline severe NPDR, cumulative incidence of PDR at 48 months was 50.1% in eyes treated with laser (n = 546; HR [95% CI] vs no treatment: 0.8 [0.7-1.0]), 27.4% in eyes treated with anti-VEGF (n = 923; HR [95% CI]: 0.4 [0.4-0.5]), and 25.6% in eyes treated with anti-VEGF plus laser (n = 293; HR [95% CI]: 0.5 [0.4-0.7]) compared with 49.9% in eyes with no treatment (n = 8930).
    CONCLUSIONS: DME and PDR development rates increased with increasing baseline NPDR severity. Approximately half of anti-VEGF‒naive eyes with severe NPDR progressed to PDR within 4 years in US clinical practice. The progression rate from severe NPDR to PDR was approximately halved with anti-VEGF versus no treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:糖尿病患者患各种癌症的风险明显更高,这两种疾病之间潜在的生物学联系还没有完全了解。
    方法:这是一项全国范围的纵向回顾性队列研究,一项研究设计,使我们能够以大量的样本量在延长的时间内检查癌症发展的自然过程。最初,3,111,975和22,208,395名年龄≥20岁的糖尿病患者,分别,按年龄匹配,性别,和Charlson合并症指数.最终,每组选择1,751,457例患者。分析了糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)(n=380,822)和无DR(n=380,822)以及增殖性DR(PDR)(n=141,150)和非增殖性DR(NPDR)(n=141,150)的分层人群在这项研究中。主要结果指标是在随访期间首次诊断出癌症。
    结果:我们观察到癌症总发病率[风险比(HR),1.20;p<0.001]在糖尿病队列与非糖尿病队列中。对于肝癌和胰腺癌观察到最高的HR。口服观察到风险适度增加,结肠,胆囊,生殖(女性),肾,和脑癌。此外,胃病风险显著增加,皮肤,软组织,女性乳房,尿路癌(肾癌除外)以及淋巴和造血系统恶性肿瘤。分层分析显示,DR队列中的总癌症发病率明显高于非DR队列(HR,1.31;p<0.001),与NPDR队列相比,PDR队列的风险有临界增加(HR,1.13;p=0.001)。
    结论:这项研究提供了大规模,全国范围内,基于人群的证据表明,糖尿病与随后发展为总癌症和特定部位癌症的风险增加独立相关。值得注意的是,当DR发展时,这种风险可能会进一步增加.
    BACKGROUND: Individuals with diabetes have a significantly higher risk of developing various forms of cancer, and the potential biological links between these two diseases are not completely understood.
    METHODS: This was a longitudinal retrospective nationwide cohort study, a study design that allows us to examine the natural course of cancer development over an extended period of time with a large sample size. Initially, 3,111,975 and 22,208,395 eligible patients aged ≥ 20 years with and without diabetes, respectively, were matched by age, sex, and the Charlson comorbidity index. Ultimately, 1,751,457 patients were selected from each group. Stratified populations for diabetic retinopathy (DR) (n = 380,822) and without DR (n = 380,822) as well as proliferative DR (PDR) (n = 141,150) and non-proliferative DR (NPDR) (n = 141,150) were analyzed in this study. The main outcome measure was the first-time diagnosis of cancer during the follow-up period.
    RESULTS: We observed a 20% higher risk of total cancer incidence [hazard ratios (HR), 1.20; p < 0.001] in the diabetes cohort compared to the non-diabetes cohort. The highest HR was observed for liver and pancreas cancers. Moderately increased risks were observed for oral, colon, gallbladder, reproductive (female), kidney, and brain cancer. Furthermore, there was a borderline significantly increased risk of stomach, skin, soft tissue, female breast, and urinary tract (except kidney) cancers and lymphatic and hematopoietic malignancies. The stratified analysis revealed that the total cancer incidence was significantly higher in the DR cohort compared to the non-DR cohort (HR, 1.31; p < 0.001), and there was a borderline increased risk in the PDR cohort compared to the NPDR cohort (HR, 1.13; p = 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides large-scale, nationwide, population-based evidence that diabetes is independently associated with an increased risk of subsequent development of total cancer and cancer at specific sites. Notably, this risk may further increase when DR develops.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号