UNASSIGNED: Though popular after joint replacement surgery, progressive resistance training (PRT) has controversial safety and efficacy claims. Therefore, PRT\'s effect on early postoperative muscle strength and functional capacity following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) must be thoroughly investigated. Between May 12, 2020, and February 12, 2002, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Medline databases containing pertinent literature were thoroughly reviewed for this investigation.
UNASSIGNED: Out of 704 studies, 9 (TKA) met inclusion criteria for meta-analysis, involving 1021 adult patients. The analysis encompassed various post-TKA indicators at 1, 3, and 12 months, including the 6-Minute Walk Test (6-WMT), Stair Climbing Performance (SCP), leg extension strength, Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and Sit-to-Stand (ST) repetitions.
UNASSIGNED: In TKA patients, 6-WMT within 1 month (95 % CI = -0.41, 1.53), 3 months (95 % CI = -0.27, 0.76), and 12 months (95 % CI = -0.29, 0.66) did not show any significant differences. There were no discernible changes in ST at various time intervals, SCP, leg extension strength, and TUG at 1 month (95 % CI = -1.75, 0.77), 3 months (95 % CI = -0.48, 0.33), and 12 months (95 % CI = -0.44, 0.35). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups (95 % CI = -0.01, 0.10).
UNASSIGNED: Early post-TKA PRT demonstrated no significant differences compared to Standard Rehabilitation (SR) regarding functional capacity, muscle strength recovery, and adverse event incidence. Therefore, PRT is a feasible option for promoting swift recovery post-total knee arthroplasty.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of a preoperative combined with postoperative moderate-intensity progressive resistance training (PRT) of the operative side in patients with hip osteoarthritis (HOA) who are undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). The study seeks to evaluate the impact of this combined intervention on muscle strength, gait, balance, and hip joint function in a controlled, measurable, and objective manner. Additionally, the study aims to compare the outcomes of this combined intervention with those of preoperative or postoperative muscle strength training conducted in isolation.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 90 patients with HOA scheduled for unilateral primary THA were randomly assigned to three groups: Pre group (preoperative PRT), Post group (postoperative PRT), and Pre& Post group (preoperative combined with postoperative PRT) focusing on hip flexion, extension, adduction, and abduction of operated side. Muscle strength, gait parameters, balance, and hip function were assessed at specific time points during a 12-month follow-up period.
UNASSIGNED: All three groups showed significant improvements in muscle strength, with the Pre& Post group demonstrating the most pronounced and sustained gains. Gait velocity and cadence were significantly improved in the Pre& Post group at 1-month and 3-month postoperative follow-ups compared to the other groups. Similarly, the Pre& Post group exhibited superior balance performance at 3-month and 12-month postoperative follow-ups. The Harris Hip Score also showed better outcomes in the Pre& Post group at all follow-up intervals.
UNASSIGNED: Preoperative combined with postoperative moderate-intensity PRT in HOA patients undergoing THA led to superior improvements in muscle strength, gait, balance, and hip joint function compared to preoperative or postoperative PRT alone. This intervention shows significant promise in optimizing postoperative rehabilitation and enhancing patient outcomes following THA.

UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a self-designed progressive resistance exercise training program for preventing the development of lower limb lymphedema.
UNASSIGNED: An open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients who underwent radical surgery for cervical cancer treatment in our department between October 7, 2019, and October 7, 2021. The participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: progressive resistance exercise training, graduated compression stocking, and control group.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 267 patients were enrolled (89 in each group). The incidence of lower limb lymphedema was 9.0% (n = 8) in the progressive resistance exercise training group, 28.1% (n = 25) in the graduated compression stocking group, and 42.7% (n = 38) in the control group. Over the 2-year follow-up period, the risk of lower limb lymphedema was significantly lower in the progressive resistance exercise training group than in the control group, with a hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 0.156 (0.073-0.335). The study was underpowered to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in risk in the graduated compression stocking group, with an HR (95% CI) of 0.624 (0.376-1.033).
UNASSIGNED: Progressive resistance exercise training is an effective strategy for preventing lower limb lymphedema after pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. It imposes no additional economic burden and can be performed conveniently without the need for dedicated exercise facilities. This makes it particularly accessible to patients in developing countries, allowing them to exercise at their convenience.
UNASSIGNED: ChiCTR1800014905.

BACKGROUND: Selection of a suitable training modality according to the status of upper limb function can maximize the effects of robotic rehabilitation; therefore, it is necessary to identify the optimal training modality.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare robotic rehabilitation approaches incorporating either resistance training (RET) or active-assisted training (AAT) using the same rehabilitation robot in people with stroke and moderate impairment.
METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, we randomly allocated 34 people with stroke who had moderate impairment to either the experimental group (RET, n = 18) or the control group (AAT, n = 16). Both groups performed robot-assisted therapy for 30 min, 5 days per week, for 4 weeks. The same rehabilitation robot provided resistance to the RET group and assistance to the AAT group. Body function and structure, activity, and participation outcomes were evaluated before, during, and after the intervention.
RESULTS: RET led to greater improvements than AAT in terms of smoothness (p = 0.006). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)-upper extremity (p < 0.001), FMA-proximal (p < 0.001), Action Research Arm Test-gross movement (p = 0.011), and kinematic variables of joint independence (p = 0.017) and displacement (p = 0.011) also improved at the end of intervention more in the RET group.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic RET was more effective than AAT in improving upper limb function, structure, and activity among participants with stroke who had moderate impairment.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of low-load blood flow restricted resistance training (BFR-RT) versus high-load resistance training (HL-RT) on muscle strength, muscle mass, physical function, patient-reported outcomes, and adherence to training in clinical musculoskeletal populations.
METHODS: Web of Science, Cochrane Central, Medline, Embase, SportDiscus was searched on the 30th May 2022.
METHODS: This study was conducted as a systematic review and meta-analysis. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) were included if they (i) included patients, (ii) comprised of a BFR-RT intervention protocol and a group who performed HL-RT (≥ 70%1RM) for at least eight exercise sessions, and (iii) involved at least 1 exercise that targeted the lower limbs. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. The meta-analyses were performed using a random effects model with an adjustment to the confidence interval.
RESULTS: Seven RCTs comprising 303 participants (BFR-RT: n = 151; HL-RT: n = 152) were identified. HL-RT and BFR-RT showed similar gains in dynamic (1-10RM) knee extensor strength and leg press strength, quadriceps cross sectional area, sit-to-stand performance, and patient reported pain and function. There was a moderate effect favoring BFR-RT for increasing maximal isometric knee extensor strength. The grading of certainty in evidence was low-to-very low for all outcome variables.
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis extends our current knowledge about BFR-RT and HL-RT as equally effective exercise methods for inducing gains in maximal muscle strength in healthy populations, by now also comprising patients suffering from various clinical musculoskeletal conditions. The certainty in the estimates was low-to-very low, prompting the inclusion of future higher-quality trials.
BACKGROUND: PROSPERO ID (CRD42022337173). Registered June 18th 2022.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the effect of twice-weekly, moderate-to-high intensity progressive resistance training (PRT) for 1 year on lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in individuals with low BMD, compared to attention control. Secondary analyses will examine if resistance training improves other health outcomes; if high intensity is more effective than moderate intensity resistance training for all outcomes; the cost of intervention versus benefit; the willingness to pay; and harms.
METHODS: For this study, 324 men or postmenopausal women aged ≥50 years with a femoral neck, total hip, or lumbar spine BMD T-score of ≤-1, or a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool probability of ≥20% for major osteoporotic fracture or ≥ 3% for hip fracture are being recruited to participate in a randomized controlled trial with 1:1:1 randomization. Participants will be stratified by site (3 centers) to twice-weekly, supervised PRT at moderate intensity (about 10 repetitions maximum), to high intensity PRT (≤6 repetitions maximum), or to a home posture and balance exercise program (attention control) for 1 year (resistance training to comparator allocation ratio of 2:1). The primary outcome is lumbar spine BMD via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Secondary outcomes include trabecular bone score, proximal femur and total hip BMD and structure, bone-free and appendicular lean mass, physical functioning, falls, fractures, glucose metabolism, cost per life-year gained, adverse events, and quality of life. Between-group differences will be tested in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses using analysis of covariance, chi-square tests, or negative binomial or logistic regression, adjusting for site and baseline values.
CONCLUSIONS: The Finding the Optimal Resistance Training Intensity For Your Bones trial will support decision making on resistance training for people at risk of fracture.

UNASSIGNED: Early rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial in functional outcomes. However, considering improvements in the first six months, there may be benefits to continuing rehabilitation beyond three months postoperatively to achieve maximum functionality and strength.
UNASSIGNED: The aim was to compare: (a) effectiveness of late-phase clinic-based and home-based progressive resistance training (PRT) in female patients with TKA; and (b) crude cost of both interventions and explore feasibility.
UNASSIGNED: Thirty-two patients were assigned to clinic-based PRT (n = 16) and home-based PRT (n = 16) groups. A training program was performed at the clinic or at home for eight weeks. Pain, quadriceps and hip abductor strength, patient-reported and performance-based outcomes, knee range of motion (ROM), joint awareness, quality of life (QoL) were assessed at baseline (three months postoperatively) and after 8-week intervention (five months postoperatively). Feasibility and crude cost were examined.
UNASSIGNED: Exercise adherence was 100% in clinic-based PRT and 90.6% in the home-based PRT group. Both interventions improved quadriceps and hip abductor muscle strength, performance-based and patient-reported outcomes, knee ROM, and joint awareness without side effects (p < .05). Clinic-based PRT showed better results in: activity pain (p = .004, ES = -0.888); knee flexion (p = .002, ES = 0.875) and extension ROM (p = .004, ES = -1.081); chair sit-to-stand test (p = .013, ES = 0.935); joint awareness (p = .008, ES = 0.927); and QoL than home-based PRT (p < .05).
UNASSIGNED: Late-phase clinical-based and home-based PRT interventions may be beneficial in improving muscle strength and functionality in patients with TKA. Late-phase PRT is feasible, cost-effective, and recommended for rehabilitation after TKA.

To explore the effect of progressive resistance exercise (PRE) on impairment, activity and participation of people with cerebral palsy (CP). Also, to determine which programme parameters provide the most beneficial effects.
Electronic databases searched from the earliest available time.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) implementing PRE as an intervention in people with cerebral palsy were included.
Methodological quality of trials was assessed with the PEDro scale. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were completed.
We included 20 reports of 16 RCTs (n = 504 participants). Results demonstrated low certainty evidence that PRE improved muscle strength (pooled standardised mean difference (SMD)= 0.59 (95%CI: 0.16-1.01; I²=70%). This increase in muscle strength was maintained an average of 11 weeks after training stopped. Τhere was also moderate certainty evidence that it is inconclusive whether PRE has a small effect on gross motor function (SMD= 0.14 (95%CI: -0.09 to 0.36; I²=0%) or participation (SMD= 0.26 (95%CIs: -0.02 to 0.54; I²=0%). When PRE was compared with other therapy there were no between-group differences. Meta-regression demonstrated no effect of PRE intensity or training volume (frequency x total duration) on muscle strength (p > 0.5). No serious adverse events were reported. There is lack of evidence of the effectiveness of PRE in adults and non-ambulatory people with CP.
PRE is safe and increases muscle strength in young people with CP, which is maintained after training stops. The increase in muscle strength is unrelated to the PRE intensity or dose. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.

Older and frail patients with cancer are at high risk of physical and functional decline during chemotherapy. Exercise interventions can often counteract chemotherapy related toxicity and may help patients to improve or retain physical function and quality of life. Studies evaluating feasibility and the effect of exercise in older patients are lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and effect of an exercise intervention in older frail patients during chemotherapy for colorectal cancer (CRC).
This is a secondary analysis from the GERICO study investigating the effect of geriatric interventions in frail patients ≥70 years receiving chemotherapy for CRC. All patients in the present analysis were patients randomized to geriatric interventions and who were found physically frail (low handgrip strength or slow 10 m gait speed) and therefore offered referral to the exercise program for twelve weeks. We evaluated reasons for dropping out and feasibility of an individually tailored exercise program twice a week for twelve weeks. Each 60 min session comprised warm-up followed by progressive resistance training and cool-down followed by an oral protein supplement. Baseline characteristics and the effect of exercise for patients with high and low adherence (attendance of <50% of exercise sessions) were compared.
Of 71 patients in the intervention group, 47 (66%) were found physically frail and were offered referral to the exercise program. Seven patients were referred to municipal physiotherapy before study start. In the remaining population (N = 40) 19 had exercise adherence >50% and 21 had no or low exercise adherence. Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with high and low/no adherence, except for sex (68% and 33% were men in high and low/ no adherence group, respectively). Patients with >50% attendance had significant improvements in physical tests after twelve weeks of exercise.
Low adherence to the exercise program was seen due to lack of energy and/or treatment related adverse events. Patients with high adherence benefitted from exercise during chemotherapy but did not differ from patients with low adherence at baseline. Consequently, exercise should be offered to all older frail patients receiving chemotherapy for CRC.

Children with spastic cerebral palsy often present with muscle weakness, resulting from neural impairments and muscular alterations. While progressive resistance training (PRT) improves muscle weakness, the effects on muscle morphology remain inconclusive. This investigation evaluated the effects of a PRT program on lower limb muscle strength, morphology and gross motor function. Forty-nine children with spastic cerebral palsy were randomized by minimization. The intervention group (nparticipants = 26, age: 8.3 ± 2.0 years, Gross Motor Function Classification System [GMFCS] level I/II/III: 17/5/4, nlegs = 41) received a 12-week PRT program, consisting of 3-4 sessions per week, with exercises performed in 3 sets of 10 repetitions, aiming at 60%-80% of the 1-repetition maximum. Training sessions were performed under supervision with the physiotherapist and at home. The control group (nparticipants = 22, age: 8.5 ± 2.1 year, GMFCS level I/II/III: 14/5/3, nlegs = 36) continued usual care including regular physiotherapy and use of orthotics. We assessed pre- and post-training knee extension, knee flexion and plantar flexion isometric strength, rectus femoris, semitendinosus and medial gastrocnemius muscle morphology, as well as functional strength, gross motor function and walking capacity. Data processing was performed blinded. Linear mixed models were applied to evaluate the difference in evolution over time between the control and intervention group (interaction-effect) and within each group (time-effect). The α-level was set at p = 0.01. Knee flexion strength and unilateral heel raises showed a significant interaction-effect (p ≤ 0.008), with improvements in the intervention group (p ≤ 0.001). Moreover, significant time-effects were seen for knee extension and plantar flexion isometric strength, rectus femoris and medial gastrocnemius MV, sit-to-stand and lateral step-up in the intervention group (p ≤ 0.004). Echo-intensity, muscle lengths and gross motor function showed limited to no changes. PRT improved strength and MV in the intervention group, whereby strength parameters significantly or close to significantly differed from the control group. Although, relative improvements in strength were larger than improvements in MV, important effects were seen on the maintenance of muscle size relative to skeletal growth. In conclusion, this study proved the effectiveness of a home-based, physiotherapy supervised, PRT program to improve isometric and functional muscle strength in children with SCP without negative effects on muscle properties or any serious adverse events. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03863197.