■混合方法方法有望对心理治疗过程有深刻的理解。本研究使用住院期间每日日记条目和每日自我评估的定性和定量数据。该研究的目的是深入了解两种类型的数据之间的异同,以及它们如何代表心理治疗中的自组织模式转变。虽然预计结果不会完全相关,我们预计会从这两个角度观察放大模式和辅助模式。
■每日,五名MDD患者撰写日记并使用治疗过程问卷完成自我评估,用于监测心理治疗变化动态的问卷。数据是使用协同导航系统收集的,实时监控的在线工具。患者的日记条目描述了他们在日常生活中的经历。采用混合扎根理论进行定性分析,它提供了代表患者正在进行的转变和停滞经历的类别。使用动态复杂度算法和模式转换检测算法对时间序列数据进行分析。将定性和定量分析的结果合并并进行比较。在数据三角化过程之后,主导视角来自自组织理论。除了展示所有五名患者的总体结果外,我们更详细地研究两个具体案例。
■将5名患者的特定且高度多样化的日记条目分为感知模式稳定性类别,注意到改进,拓宽视角,临界不稳定性,经历凯罗斯的时刻。患者报告的问题不仅与他们的疾病有关(例如,缺乏能量和绝望),但也需要改变的阶段和步骤,这可能与自组织理论有关(例如,问题吸引子,临界波动,模式转换,和Kairos)。定性和定量分析提供了重要的补充结果,而不是多余的或相同的。
■数据三角测量允许对治疗变化动态的全面和多视角理解。日记条目中表达的不同主题尤其有助于遵循微观心理过程,这远非对干预的简单反应。患者体验自己处于稳定或不稳定,停滞或转变的方式令人惊讶地接近复杂系统中自组织过程的一般特征。
UNASSIGNED: Mixed-methods approaches promise a deep understanding of psychotherapeutic processes. This study uses qualitative and quantitative data from daily diary entries and daily self-assessments during inpatient treatment. The aim of the study is to get an insight into the similarities and differences between both types of data and how they represent self-organized pattern transitions in psychotherapy. While a complete correlation of results is not expected, we anticipate observing amplifying and subsidiary patterns from both perspectives.
UNASSIGNED: Daily, five MDD patients wrote diaries and completed self-assessments using the Therapy Process Questionnaire, a questionnaire for monitoring the change dynamics of psychotherapy. The data were collected using the Synergetic Navigation System, an online tool for real-time monitoring. Diary entries of the patients described their experiences in everyday life. The qualitative text analysis was conducted using Mixed Grounded Theory, which provided categories representing the patients\' ongoing experiences of transformation and stagnation. The time series data was analyzed using the dynamic complexity algorithm and the pattern transition detection algorithm. Results from qualitative and quantitative analyses were combined and compared. Following the process of data triangulation, the leading perspective came from the theory of self-organization. In addition to presenting the overall results for all five patients, we delve into two specific case examples in greater detail.
UNASSIGNED: Specific and highly diversified diary entries of 5 patients were classified into the categories of perceived pattern stability, noticing improvement, broadening the perspective, critical instability, and experiencing moments of Kairos. Patients reported problems not only related to their disorder (e.g., lack of energy and hopelessness) but also to phases and steps of change, which could be related to the theory of self-organization (e.g., problem attractors, critical fluctuations, pattern transitions, and Kairos). Qualitative and quantitative analysis provide important supplementary results without being redundant or identical.
UNASSIGNED: Data triangulation allows for a comprehensive and multi-perspective understanding of therapeutic change dynamics. The different topics expressed in the diary entries especially help to follow micro-psychological processes, which are far from being a simple reaction to interventions. The way patients experience themselves being in stability or instability and stagnation or transformation is surprisingly close to the general features of self-organizing processes in complex systems.