preventive health services

预防性卫生服务
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    保持独立对老年人很重要,但是关于实施哪些社区卫生和护理服务的指导不足。
    为了综合根据干预成分分组的老年人的社区服务维持独立的有效性的证据,并检查虚弱是否会减轻影响。
    系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
    研究:随机对照试验或成群随机对照试验。参与者:老年人(平均年龄65岁以上)居住在家里。干预措施:基于社区的复杂干预措施,以维持独立性。比较:常规护理,安慰剂或其他复杂的干预措施。
    住在家里,日常生活的工具活动,日常生活的个人活动,1年的护理安置和服务/经济成果。
    我们搜索了MEDLINE(1946-),Embase(1947-),CINAHL(1972-),PsycINFO(1806-),从成立到2021年8月,中央和试验登记处不受限制,和扫描的参考列表。
    干预被编码,总结和分组。研究人群按虚弱分类。使用随机效应网络荟萃分析。我们评估了试验结果的偏倚风险(CochraneRoB2),网络荟萃分析的不一致性和证据的确定性(建议评估的分级,网络荟萃分析的开发和评估)。
    我们纳入了129项研究(74,946名参与者)。十九个干预部分,包括“多因素行动”(多领域评估和管理/个性化护理计划),在63个组合中确定。除非另有说明,以下结果具有低的确定性。住在家里,与没有干预/安慰剂相比,支持的证据:多因素行动和药物审查审查(比值比1.22,95%置信区间0.93至1.59;中等确定性)多因素行动与药物审查(比值比2.55,95%置信区间0.61至10.60)认知训练,药物审查,营养和运动(比值比1.93,95%置信区间0.79至4.77)和日常生活训练活动,营养和运动(比值比1.79,95%置信区间0.67至4.76)。四种干预组合可能会减少在家生活。对于日常生活的工具性活动,证据支持多因素行动和药物审查审查(标准化平均差0.11,95%置信区间0.00~0.21;中等确定性).两种干预措施可能会减少日常生活的工具性活动。对于日常生活的个人活动,证据支持锻炼,多因素行动和药物审查和自我管理审查(标准化平均差0.16,95%置信区间-0.51至0.82)。对于家庭护理接受者,有证据支持增加多因素行动和药物审查(标准化平均差0.60,95%置信区间0.32~0.88).养老院安置和服务/经济调查结果尚无定论。
    大多数结果的高偏倚风险和不精确的估计意味着大多数证据的确定性较低或非常低。很少有研究对每次比较做出了贡献,阻碍对不一致和脆弱的评价。研究多种多样;研究结果可能不适用于所有情况。
    评估的许多干预组合的结果在很大程度上是小且不确定的。然而,最有可能维持独立性的组合包括多因素作用,药物审查和患者的持续审查。一些组合可能会降低独立性。
    需要进一步的研究来探索行动机制以及与上下文的互动。证据合成的不同方法可能会进一步阐明。
    本研究注册为PROSPEROCRD42019162195。
    该奖项由美国国家卫生与护理研究所(NIHR)卫生技术评估计划(NIHR奖参考:NIHR128862)资助,并在《卫生技术评估》中全文发表;卷。28号48.有关更多奖项信息,请参阅NIHR资助和奖励网站。
    由于缺乏有力的证据,大多数类型的社区服务对老年人的益处和风险尚不清楚.个性化护理计划,在调整药物治疗和定期随访的地方,可能有助于人们留在家里。有许多种类的老年人社区服务。例如,在某些服务中,每个人都得到锻炼和饮食建议或个性化护理计划。这些通常旨在帮助老年人独立衰老。在以后的生活中保持独立是很重要的。我们想找出哪些社区服务效果最好:帮助人们留在家里,独立做日常活动。我们回顾了以前测试老年人不同社区服务的研究结果。我们结合了这些发现,并相互比较了不同类型的服务。我们评价了我们对证据的信心。我们发现了129项研究,涉及74,946人。我们发现已经研究了63种不同的服务。这些研究是在世界各地的不同人群中进行的。个性化护理计划,在调整药物治疗和定期随访的地方,可以帮助人们独立衰老。这可能会稍微增加呆在家里的机会。它也可以帮助做日常活动非常轻微。锻炼和饮食建议也可以帮助人们留在家里。然而,有一些证据表明,某些服务可能会降低独立性。我们不知道大多数服务会产生什么影响。我们通常对证据缺乏信心,因为研究规模很小,信息丢失了.证据是截止到2021年8月的。
    UNASSIGNED: Sustaining independence is important for older people, but there is insufficient guidance about which community health and care services to implement.
    UNASSIGNED: To synthesise evidence of the effectiveness of community services to sustain independence for older people grouped according to their intervention components, and to examine if frailty moderates the effect.
    UNASSIGNED: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Studies: Randomised controlled trials or cluster-randomised controlled trials. Participants: Older people (mean age 65+) living at home. Interventions: community-based complex interventions for sustaining independence. Comparators: usual care, placebo or another complex intervention.
    UNASSIGNED: Living at home, instrumental activities of daily living, personal activities of daily living, care-home placement and service/economic outcomes at 1 year.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched MEDLINE (1946-), Embase (1947-), CINAHL (1972-), PsycINFO (1806-), CENTRAL and trial registries from inception to August 2021, without restrictions, and scanned reference lists.
    UNASSIGNED: Interventions were coded, summarised and grouped. Study populations were classified by frailty. A random-effects network meta-analysis was used. We assessed trial-result risk of bias (Cochrane RoB 2), network meta-analysis inconsistency and certainty of evidence (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation for network meta-analysis).
    UNASSIGNED: We included 129 studies (74,946 participants). Nineteen intervention components, including \'multifactorial-action\' (multidomain assessment and management/individualised care planning), were identified in 63 combinations. The following results were of low certainty unless otherwise stated. For living at home, compared to no intervention/placebo, evidence favoured: multifactorial-action and review with medication-review (odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.59; moderate certainty) multifactorial-action with medication-review (odds ratio 2.55, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 10.60) cognitive training, medication-review, nutrition and exercise (odds ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 4.77) and activities of daily living training, nutrition and exercise (odds ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 4.76). Four intervention combinations may reduce living at home. For instrumental activities of daily living, evidence favoured multifactorial-action and review with medication-review (standardised mean difference 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.00 to 0.21; moderate certainty). Two interventions may reduce instrumental activities of daily living. For personal activities of daily living, evidence favoured exercise, multifactorial-action and review with medication-review and self-management (standardised mean difference 0.16, 95% confidence interval -0.51 to 0.82). For homecare recipients, evidence favoured the addition of multifactorial-action and review with medication-review (standardised mean difference 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.88). Care-home placement and service/economic findings were inconclusive.
    UNASSIGNED: High risk of bias in most results and imprecise estimates meant that most evidence was low or very low certainty. Few studies contributed to each comparison, impeding evaluation of inconsistency and frailty. Studies were diverse; findings may not apply to all contexts.
    UNASSIGNED: Findings for the many intervention combinations evaluated were largely small and uncertain. However, the combinations most likely to sustain independence include multifactorial-action, medication-review and ongoing review of patients. Some combinations may reduce independence.
    UNASSIGNED: Further research is required to explore mechanisms of action and interaction with context. Different methods for evidence synthesis may illuminate further.
    UNASSIGNED: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019162195.
    UNASSIGNED: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128862) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 48. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
    Due to a lack of robust evidence, the benefits and risks of most types of community services for older people are unclear. Individualised care planning, where medication is adjusted and there are regular follow-ups, probably helps people stay living at home. There are many kinds of community services for older people. For example, in some services, everyone is given exercise and dietary advice or an individualised care plan. These often aim to help older people age independently. Maintaining independence is important in later life. We wanted to find out which community services work best: to help people stay living at home, and to do day-to-day activities independently. We reviewed findings from previous studies that have tested different community services for older people. We combined these findings and compared different types of service with one another. We rated our confidence in the evidence. We found 129 studies with 74,946 people. We found 63 different kinds of service have been studied. The studies were carried out in diverse populations around the world. Individualised care planning, where medication is adjusted and there are regular follow-ups, may help people age independently. It probably increases the chance of staying at home slightly. It may also help with doing day-to-day activities very slightly. Exercise and dietary advice may also help people stay living at home. However, there was some evidence that some services may reduce independence. We do not know what effect most services have. We generally had little confidence in the evidence because studies were small, and information was missing. The evidence is up to date to August 2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在调查迁移背景与预防性医疗保健服务利用之间的关系。
    方法:2014年第5波的横截面数据,样本量为7684人,是从具有全国代表性的德国老龄化调查中提取的。这项调查包括40岁及以上的社区居民,以迁移背景为主要自变量。测量的结果包括参与癌症筛查,流感疫苗接种,和例行健康检查。使用多种逻辑回归来检查迁移背景与预防性医疗服务之间的关联。
    结果:回归表明,存在具有个人迁移经历的迁移背景(与没有迁移背景相比)与使用预防性医疗保健服务的可能性较低有关。更确切地说,与没有移民背景的人相比,具有移民背景和个人移民经历的个人进行常规健康检查的可能性较低(OR=0.76,95%CI:0.61至0.95),流感疫苗接种(OR=0.75,95%CI:0.59至0.95)和癌症筛查(OR=0.71,95%CI:0.57至0.89)。相比之下,没有个人迁移经历的迁移背景(与没有迁移背景相比)与预防性医疗服务的使用之间没有显著关联.
    结论:结论:结果显示,在使用预防性医疗保健服务方面,没有移民背景的个体和有移民背景(以及有个人移民经验)的个体之间存在差异。在使用预防性医疗保健服务方面,专门针对具有迁移背景(和迁移经验)的个人可能会有所帮助。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between migration background and the utilization of preventive healthcare services.
    METHODS: Cross-sectional data from wave 5 in the year 2014, with a sample size of 7,684 individuals, were extracted from the nationally representative German Ageing Survey. The survey included community-dwelling individuals aged 40 years and above, with migration background serving as the primary independent variable. The outcomes measured included participation in cancer screenings, flu vaccinations, and routine health check-ups. Multiple logistic regressions were used to examine the association between migration background and preventive healthcare services.
    RESULTS: Regressions showed that the presence of a migration background with personal migration experience (compared with not having a migration background) was associated with a lower likelihood of using preventive healthcare services. More precisely, compared to individuals not having a migration background, individuals with a migration background and personal migration experience had a lower likelihood of routine health check-ups (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.95), flu vaccinations (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.59 to 0.95) and cancer screenings (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.89). In contrast, there was no significant association between the presence of a migration background without personal migration experience (compared with not having a migration background) and the use of preventive healthcare services.
    CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, results showed differences between individuals without migration background and individuals with migration background (and with personal migration experience) in terms of using preventive healthcare services. It may be helpful to specifically address individuals with migration background (and with migration experience) in terms of using preventive healthcare services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究人员将Lindsay-Dennis的黑人女性主义-女性主义研究范式应用于Andersen的健康服务行为模型,以指导有关美国黑人女性预防健康行为的初步研究。
    方法:本文重点介绍了此应用程序,使用解释性现象学分析对定性问题进行评估,以评估40名黑人女大学生如何定义健康及其在医疗保健方面的经验。这是2022年横截面在线调查中更大的聚合并行混合方法方法的一部分。
    结果:参与者将健康定义为涉及健康素养的概念,身心健康,没有健康状况或疾病。关于健康相关的生活经历,负面经验的报告频率高于正面经验.然而,许多参与者报告了积极和消极的医疗保健相关经历.易感,启用,和需求因素都存在于定性响应中。
    结论:本文强调了黑人女权主义者-女性主义者研究范式与安徒生模型的契合,以更好地了解黑人女性的健康经历,并说明了医学上不信任的方式,健康素养,过去的医疗保健经验会影响医疗服务的使用。还讨论了有关预防保健障碍和促进者的未来研究领域以及对减少健康差异的影响。
    OBJECTIVE: The researchers applied Lindsay-Dennis\' Black Feminist-Womanist research paradigm to Andersen\'s Behavioral Model for Health Service Use to guide initial research about Black American women\'s preventive health behaviors.
    METHODS: This article highlights this application, using interpretive phenomenological analysis for qualitative questions assessing how 40 Black college women define health and their experiences in health care. This was part of a larger convergent parallel mixed-methods approach in a 2022 cross-sectional online survey.
    RESULTS: Participants defined health as a concept involving health literacy, physical and mental health, and being free from health conditions or disease. Regarding health-related lived experiences, negative experiences were more frequently reported than positive experiences. However, many participants reported both positive and negative health care related experiences. Predisposing, enabling, and need factors were all present in qualitative responses.
    CONCLUSIONS: This article highlights the fit of a Black Feminist-Womanist research paradigm to Andersen\'s model to better understand Black women\'s health experiences and illustrates ways that medical mistrust, health literacy, and past experiences with health care can influence health service use. Areas for future research on barriers and facilitators to preventive care and implications for reducing health disparities are also discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景许多难民妇女和寻求庇护的妇女抵达高收入国家,其预防性性健康和生殖健康(SRH)护理需求未得到满足。初级医疗保健提供者(HCP)通常是难民和寻求庇护者的第一护理点。这项研究旨在确定与启动对话相关的HCP特征,并在其他健康互动中机会主义地讨论SRH。方法在全国范围内对卫生专业组织和初级卫生网络的代表进行匿名在线调查。分层逻辑回归分析了包括HCP人口统计学在内的因素,知识和意识,模型中包括了对难民妇女的培训和专业经验的感知需求。结果在163个HCP中,开始对话的比例为27.3%(避孕护理)至35.2%(宫颈筛查).机会性讨论的范围从26.9%(乳房筛查)到40.3%(避孕护理)。正相关因素包括为难民妇女或寻求庇护的妇女提供至少每2个月一次的护理7.64(95%CI2.41;24.22,PPPPPP结论直接专业经验,提供服务的频率,多年的实践,和兼职工作对HCPsSRH护理实践产生积极影响。加强双语卫生工作者计划,外展,教育,和支持性健康和文化能力培训对于改善对难民妇女和寻求庇护的妇女的预防性性健康护理至关重要。
    Background Many refugee women and women seeking asylum arrive in high-income countries with unmet preventive sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care needs. Primary healthcare providers (HCPs) are usually refugee and asylum seekers\' first point of care. This study aimed to identify HCP characteristics associated with initiating conversations and discussing SRH opportunistically during other health interactions. Methods An anonymous online survey was distributed nationally to representatives of health professional organisations and Primary Health Networks. Hierarchical logistic regression analysed factors including HCP demographics, knowledge and awareness, perceived need for training and professional experience with refugee women were included in the models. Results Among 163 HCPs, those initiating conversations ranged from 27.3% (contraceptive care) to 35.2% (cervical screening). Opportunistic discussions ranged from 26.9% (breast screening) to 40.3% (contraceptive care). Positively associated factors included offering care to refugee women or women seeking asylum at least once every 2months 7.64 (95% CI 2.41;24.22, P P P P P P Conclusions Direct professional experience, frequency of service provision, years of practice, and part time work positively influence HCPs\' SRH care practices. Enhancing bilingual health worker programs, outreach, education, and support for SRH and cultural competency training are essential to improving the preventive SRH care of refugee women and women seeking asylum.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人工智能正在不断彻底改变生物医学研究和医疗保健管理。疾病共病是易感人群生活质量的主要威胁,尤其是中老年患者。多种慢性疾病的存在使得实现精确诊断具有挑战性,并给医疗保健系统和经济带来沉重负担。鉴于大量积累的健康数据,机器学习技术展示了他们处理这个难题的能力。本研究进行了回顾,以揭示当前在应用这些方法来理解合并症机制并考虑这些复杂模式进行临床预测方面的研究工作。对791份独特出版物的描述性元数据分析旨在捕捉2012年1月至2023年6月之间的总体研究进展。为了深入研究以合并症为重点的研究,对这些科学论文中的61篇进行了系统评估。检测到四个任务的预测分析:疾病共病数据提取,聚类,网络,和风险预测。据观察,一些机器学习驱动的应用程序解决了医疗保健数据集中的固有数据缺陷,并提供了一个模型解释,可以识别合并症发展的重要风险因素。基于见解,技术和实用,从相关文献中获得,本研究旨在指导合并症研究的未来兴趣,并得出具有管理意义的慢性病预防和诊断结论。
    Artificial intelligence is constantly revolutionizing biomedical research and healthcare management. Disease comorbidity is a major threat to the quality of life for susceptible groups, especially middle-aged and elderly patients. The presence of multiple chronic diseases makes precision diagnosis challenging to realize and imposes a heavy burden on the healthcare system and economy. Given an enormous amount of accumulated health data, machine learning techniques show their capability in handling this puzzle. The present study conducts a review to uncover current research efforts in applying these methods to understanding comorbidity mechanisms and making clinical predictions considering these complex patterns. A descriptive metadata analysis of 791 unique publications aims to capture the overall research progression between January 2012 and June 2023. To delve into comorbidity-focused research, 61 of these scientific papers are systematically assessed. Four predictive analytics of tasks are detected: disease comorbidity data extraction, clustering, network, and risk prediction. It is observed that some machine learning-driven applications address inherent data deficiencies in healthcare datasets and provide a model interpretation that identifies significant risk factors of comorbidity development. Based on insights, both technical and practical, gained from relevant literature, this study intends to guide future interests in comorbidity research and draw conclusions about chronic disease prevention and diagnosis with managerial implications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:既往有妊娠相关心血管风险指标的女性,包括妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)和妊娠期高血压疾病(HDP),未来心血管疾病(CVD)的风险增加。尽管建议在产后早期开始进行CVD筛查和预防性护理,某些障碍限制了对此类服务的访问。我们计划对文献进行范围审查,以探索和总结有GDM和HDP病史的女性产后CVD预防服务的障碍和促进因素的证据。
    方法:此范围审查将根据Arksey和O'Malley\(2005)的方法框架和JoannaBriggs研究所指导进行系统范围审查,并将遵循政策和实践信息证据以及教育研究所的协调中心指南。审查结果将使用系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的荟萃分析扩展(PRISMA-ScR)清单进行报告。我们将搜索以下数据库:Medline,Embase和CINAHL。我们将对注册论文和论文进行灰色文献检索。纳入和排除标准将保持广泛。将包括以英语或法语发表的定性和定量研究,这些研究调查并报告了先前患有GDM和HDP的妇女对产后CVD筛查和预防性护理的障碍或促进者。个人,人际关系,组织,和系统级因素将被报告。定性结果将被叙述性地总结,定量结果将使用多源综合方法吸收到主题中。
    背景:这篇综述代表了渥太华健康科学网络研究伦理委员会(QI-184)审查的更大项目的一个目标。我们将通过开放获取出版物传播本次审查产生的知识,关于女性心血管健康的演讲/公共论坛,妇女心血管疾病预防论坛和社交媒体。我们还将在加拿大妇女心脏健康联盟的年会上介绍这项审查的结果。
    BACKGROUND: Women with previous pregnancy-related cardiovascular risk indicators, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), have an increased risk of future cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although CVD screening and preventive care beginning in the early postpartum period are recommended, certain barriers limit access to such services. We plan to conduct a scoping review of the literature to explore and summarise evidence on the barriers and facilitators of postpartum CVD preventive services in women with a history of GDM and HDP.
    METHODS: This scoping review will be conducted in line with the Arksey and O\'Malley\'s (2005) methodological framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for conducting a systematic scoping review and will follow the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and the Coordinating Centre at the Institute of Education guidelines. The review results will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. We will search the following databases: Medline, Embase and CINAHL. We will conduct grey literature searches for registered dissertations and theses. Inclusion and exclusion criteria will be kept broad. Qualitative and quantitative studies published in English or French that investigated and reported percieved barriers or facilitators to postpartum CVD screening and preventive care among women with previous GDM and HDP will be included. Individual, interpersonal, organizational, and system level factors will be reported. Qualitative findings will be summarised narratively, and quantitative findings will be absorbed within the themes using the multisource synthesis method.
    BACKGROUND: This review represents one objective of a larger project that was reviewed by the Ottawa Health Sciences Network Research Ethics Board (QI-184). We will disseminate knowledge emanating from this review through open-access publication, presentation/public forums on women\'s cardiovascular health, women\'s CVD prevention forums and social media. We will also present the findings of this review at the annual meeting of the Canadian Women\'s Heart Health Alliance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管进行了20年的癌症生存研究,政策,和宣传,美国的初级保健尚未将生存护理完全纳入其通才角色。该手稿描述了初级保健医生在生存护理中所采用的创新角色,以及这些角色是如何出现的。
    方法:我们对10名美国初级保健医生在生存护理领域的创新者的滚雪球样本进行了定性深入访谈。访谈被记录并专业转录。我们的团队每周都会在面试完成时开会,以审查成绩单并撰写摘要。我们使用浸渍结晶过程分析数据。
    结果:创新者没有接受正式的生存培训,而是通过经验和自我指导教育获得知识。所有在学术初级保健和/或癌症中心工作;背景强烈影响角色操作。我们沿着光谱描绘了4种主要角色类型,一端是初级保健通才取向,另一端是癌症通才取向。初级保健通才在定期访视期间应用生存指南(“GENERALISTS+”)或在临床受阻期间关注其他合并症中的癌症治疗效果(“肿瘤发生者”)。癌症通才专注于治疗期间和治疗后与癌症相关的后遗症;一些为幸存者提供连续性护理(“肿瘤发生者”),而其他人则将未满足的初级保健需求纳入生存咨询(“OCOgeneralists”)。
    结论:美国的学术初级保健和癌症中心正在发生初级保健创新。超越个人创新者的工作,需要系统的投资来支持采用这种创新。为了将幸存者护理更广泛地扩散到社区初级保健中,需要采取包括初级保健生存教育和劳动力发展在内的其他策略,以促进风险分层和共享护理模式.
    BACKGROUND: Despite 2 decades of cancer survivorship research, policy, and advocacy, primary care in the United States has not fully integrated survivorship care into its generalist role. This manuscript describes innovative roles primary care physicians have adopted in survivorship care and how these roles emerged.
    METHODS: We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with a snowball sample of 10 US primary care physician innovators in survivorship care. Interviews were recorded and professionally transcribed. Our team met weekly as interviews were completed to review transcripts and write summaries. We analyzed data using an immersion-crystallization process.
    RESULTS: Innovators did not receive formal survivorship training but gained knowledge experientially and through self-guided education. All worked in academic primary care and/or cancer centers; context strongly influenced role operationalization. We delineated 4 major role-types along a spectrum, with primary care generalist orientations at one end and cancer generalist orientations at the other. Primary care generalists applied survivorship guidelines during regular visits (\"GENERALISTS+\") or focused on cancer treatment effects amid other comorbidities during blocked clinic time (\"oncoGENERALISTS\"). Cancer generalists focused on cancer-related sequalae during and after treatment; some provided continuity care to survivors (\"ONCOGENERALISTS\"), while others incorporated unmet primary care needs into survivorship consults (\"ONCOgeneralists\").
    CONCLUSIONS: Primary care survivorship innovations are occurring in academic primary care and cancer centers settings in the US. To move beyond the work of individual innovators, systematic investments are needed to support adoption of such innovations. For wider diffusion of survivorship care into community primary care, additional strategies that include primary care survivorship education and workforce development are needed to facilitate risk-stratified and shared-care models.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:内分泌干扰化学物质(EDC)干扰激素系统,可能导致新陈代谢,生殖,和神经问题,以及激素相关的癌症。在日常产品中发现,随着时间的推移,EDC在身体组织中积累,副作用取决于暴露的剂量和持续时间。本研究旨在探讨沙特公民与EDC暴露相关的行为,以评估进一步降低风险干预措施的必要性。
    方法:这项横断面研究采用了经过验证的,自我管理的在线问卷,以评估与EDC暴露相关的日常生活行为。共有563名参与者通过在线平台进行了方便的采样。
    结果:研究显示,绝大多数参与者年龄在18-25岁(48.67%,n=274)。平均而言,参与者对潜在的EDC暴露的得分最高为60,得分为32.78,分数从13到54分不等。多数(85.26%,n=480)属于中等潜在暴露类别,而少数(4.26%,n=24)根据他们报告的日常习惯表现出很高的潜在风险,主要是男性参与者(95.83%,n=23)。占绝大多数(72.65%,n=409)表明有可能改变生活方式以减少有害物质的暴露。
    结论:本研究揭示了沙特阿拉伯普通人群中与内分泌干扰物暴露相关的多种行为模式。有趣的是,参与者表现出积极的态度和改变危险行为的意愿。这些发现强调了旨在解决知识差距的教育计划和公共卫生运动的必要性。鼓励公众采取减少暴露的行为对于最大程度地减少EDC的潜在长期影响至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) interfere with hormonal systems, potentially causing metabolic, reproductive, and neurological issues, as well as hormone-related cancers. Found in everyday products, EDCs accumulate in body tissues over time, with adverse effects depending on the dose and duration of exposure. This study aims to explore behaviors related to EDC exposure among Saudi citizens to assess the need for further risk reduction interventions.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study employed a validated, self-administered online questionnaire to assess daily life behaviors associated with EDC exposure. A total of 563 participants were recruited using convenient sampling through online platforms.
    RESULTS: The study revealed that a significant majority of participants were aged 18-25 years (48.67%, n=274). On average, participants scored 32.78 out of a maximum of 60 for potential EDC exposure, with scores ranging from 13 to 54 points. The majority (85.26%, n=480) fell into the moderate potential exposure category, while a small minority (4.26%, n=24) exhibited high potential risk based on their reported daily habits, predominantly among male participants (95.83%, n=23). A significant majority (72.65%, n=409) indicated a likelihood of adopting lifestyle changes to reduce exposure to harmful substances.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals diverse behavioral patterns linked to endocrine disruptor exposure among the general population in Saudi Arabia. Interestingly, the participants showed a positive attitude and willingness to change their risky behaviors. These findings underscore the necessity for educational programs and public health campaigns aimed at addressing gaps in knowledge. Encouraging the public to adopt behaviors that reduce exposure is essential to minimizing the potential long-term effects of EDCs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    青年运动员人群中与棒球有关的伤害的患病率和严重程度继续升级,尽管卫生保健专业人员和体育组织努力平息这一趋势。本文回顾了当前的研究,这些研究调查了年轻棒球运动员最常见的伤害的危险因素和可能的预防策略。包括加强计划,音高计数指南,和投掷分析。
    The prevalence and severity of baseball-related injuries in the youth athlete population continue to escalate, despite efforts by health care professionals and sports organizations to quell this trend. This article reviews current research that has investigated the risk factors and possible prevention strategies for the most common injuries in young baseball players, including strengthening programs, pitch count guidelines, and throwing analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号