pressure platform

压力平台
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)是指影响颞下颌关节的一组疾病,引起下颌关节和相关肌肉的疼痛和功能障碍。TMD的诊断通常涉及通过基于操作员的体格检查进行临床评估,自我报告问卷和影像学检查。为了客观地测量TMD,这项研究旨在调查使用机器学习算法的可行性,该算法结合了从低成本和便携式仪器收集的数据来识别成人受试者中TMD的存在.通过这个目标,实验方案涉及50名参与者,平均分布在TMD和健康受试者之间,作为对照组。TMD的诊断由熟练的操作者通过典型的临床量表进行。参与者通过使用压力矩阵进行了气压分析,并通过惯性传感器评估了颈椎的活动性。属于支持向量机的九种机器学习算法,比较了k近邻和决策树算法。基于余弦距离的k近邻算法被发现是性能最好的,精度达到0.94、0.94和0.08的性能,F1评分和G指数,分别。这些发现打开了使用这种方法来支持临床环境中TMD诊断的可能性。
    Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) refer to a group of conditions that affect the temporomandibular joint, causing pain and dysfunction in the jaw joint and related muscles. The diagnosis of TMDs typically involves clinical assessment through operator-based physical examination, a self-reported questionnaire and imaging studies. To objectivize the measurement of TMD, this study aims at investigating the feasibility of using machine-learning algorithms fed with data gathered from low-cost and portable instruments to identify the presence of TMD in adult subjects. Through this aim, the experimental protocol involved fifty participants, equally distributed between TMD and healthy subjects, acting as a control group. The diagnosis of TMD was performed by a skilled operator through the typical clinical scale. Participants underwent a baropodometric analysis by using a pressure matrix and the evaluation of the cervical mobility through inertial sensors. Nine machine-learning algorithms belonging to support vector machine, k-nearest neighbours and decision tree algorithms were compared. The k-nearest neighbours algorithm based on cosine distance was found to be the best performing, achieving performances of 0.94, 0.94 and 0.08 for the accuracy, F1-score and G-index, respectively. These findings open the possibility of using such methodology to support the diagnosis of TMDs in clinical environments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:跖骨头下方区域是脚部疼痛的常见部位,这通常与高足底压力有关。这项研究的目的是确定使用压力平台应用Morton\'s扩展对足部meta骨压力的影响。
    方法:本研究选择了25名没有肌肉骨骼病理学的受试者,以他们为实验对象,在应用莫顿延期之前和之后。将脚部区域划分为前脚(横向细分为与第一个区域相对应的六个区域,第二,第三,第四,第五跖骨头,和幻觉),中足,和后脚,然后在放置Morton's延伸之前和之后测量每个区域施加的最大和平均压力。
    结果:我们发现压力降低,p值小于(p<0.05),在静力学和动力学的第二和第三meta骨的头部。
    结论:我们可以得出结论,Morton的延伸在较小的meta骨上产生了足底压力的变化。Morton扩展的应用可能有利于前足病理学的管理。这项研究将帮助临床医生考虑各种工具来治疗前足疾病。NCT05879094(ClinicalTrial.gov(于2023年5月18日访问))。
    BACKGROUND: the area beneath the metatarsal heads is a common location of foot pain, which is often associated with high plantar pressures. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of the application of a Morton\'s extension on the pressure in the metatarsal bones of the foot using a pressure platform.
    METHODS: twenty-five subjects without musculoskeletal pathology were selected for this study, and an experiment was conducted with them as the subjects, before and after application of a Morton\'s extension. The foot regions were divided into the forefoot (transversely subdivided into six areas corresponding to the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth metatarsal heads, and the hallux), midfoot, and rearfoot, and then the maximum and average pressures exerted at each region were measured before and after placing a Morton\'s extension.
    RESULTS: we found a pressure reduction, with a p-value less than (p < 0.05), in the head of the second and third metatarsals in statics and dynamics.
    CONCLUSIONS: we can conclude that the Morton\'s extension produces a variation in plantar pressures on the lesser metatarsals. The application of a Morton\'s extension may be beneficial for the management of forefoot pathology. This study will help clinicians consider various tools to treat forefoot disorders. NCT05879094 (ClinicalTrial.gov (accessed on 18 May 2023)).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    需要鞋内模型来扩展当前赤脚多段动力学模型的临床应用,以研究足部矫形器的效果。迄今为止的工作仅解决了用于可靠运动学分析的标记放置问题。这项研究的目的是解决使用可用传感器记录接触力的困难。十名参与者穿着两种不同类型的鞋类行走5次,方法是踩在压力平台(地面接触力)上,同时穿着鞋内压力传感器(脚底接触力)。通过考虑接触细胞的前后位置来分割压力数据,并用于计算脚关节的3D力矩。绘制每个装置每个鞋条件的平均值和95%置信区间。每个参与者和试验在每种条件下计算力和力矩的峰值和时间,并使用混合效应试验进行比较。通过组内相关系数分析了重测可靠性。两种设备的曲线轮廓相似,meta趾关节的器械鞋垫具有较高的关节力矩(〜26%),较低的踝关节(~8%)和骨中关节(~15%),尽管差异不显著。与以前的研究相比,不考虑摩擦力会导致踝关节力矩的峰值降低约20%。它采用了测力板。该设备以相同的方式影响了两种鞋子的状况,这表明与一个或另一个设备测量关节力矩的互换性。这一假设得到了组内相关系数的加强,峰值更高,虽然只有中等到良好。总之,这两种考虑的替代方案都有缺点。只有带仪表的鞋底提供了有关脚接触力的直接信息,但它是不完整的(由设备之间的脚踝力矩差异证明)。然而,记录地面反作用力的优点是能够考虑接触摩擦力(使用串联的测力板,或结合压力平台和测力板来估计摩擦力和扭矩),其比器械鞋垫侵入性更小(可能影响受试者的步态)。
    In-shoe models are required to extend the clinical application of current multisegment kinetic models of the bare foot to study the effect of foot orthoses. Work to date has only addressed marker placement for reliable kinematic analyses. The purpose of this study is to address the difficulties of recording contact forces with available sensors. Ten participants walked 5 times wearing two different types of footwear by stepping on a pressure platform (ground contact forces) while wearing in-shoe pressure sensors (foot sole contact forces). Pressure data were segmented by considering contact cells\' anteroposterior location, and were used to compute 3D moments at foot joints. The mean values and 95% confidence intervals were plotted for each device per shoe condition. The peak values and times of forces and moments were computed per participant and trial under each condition, and were compared using mixed-effect tests. Test-retest reliability was analyzed by means of intraclass correlation coefficients. The curve profiles from both devices were similar, with higher joint moments for the instrumented insoles at the metatarsophalangeal joint (~26%), which were lower at the ankle (~8%) and midtarsal (~15%) joints, although the differences were nonsignificant. Not considering frictional forces resulted in ~20% lower peaks at the ankle moments compared to previous studies, which employed force plates. The device affected both shoe conditions in the same way, which suggests the interchangeability of measuring joint moments with one or the other device. This hypothesis was reinforced by the intraclass correlation coefficients, which were higher for the peak values, although only moderate-to-good. In short, both considered alternatives have drawbacks. Only the instrumented in-soles provided direct information about foot contact forces, but it was incomplete (evidenced by the difference in ankle moments between devices). However, recording ground reaction forces offers the advantage of enabling the consideration of contact friction forces (using force plates in series, or combining a pressure platform and a force plate to estimate friction forces and torque), which are less invasive than instrumented insoles (which may affect subjects\' gait).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    步态周期可以分为四个功能摇臂单元。尽管OptoGait(OG)系统和Freemed(FM)平台的广泛使用,其准确性尚未经过测试。对18名健康志愿者完成了一项观察性研究,以确定OG和FM用于地面行走步态分析的准确性。从OG获得的数据之间的成对比较,FM和高速视频分析显示,大多数测量值存在显着差异(p<0.05)。ICC显示,与视频分析相比,OG系统的所有测量值之间的绝对一致性(ICC>0.94)。当考虑FM与视频分析,ICC对摇杆1(ICC=0.86)和3(ICC=0.82)显示出良好的绝对一致性,对于摇杆2(ICC=0.93)和较差(ICC<0.5)摇杆4。Bland-Altman图(95%的一致性极限)揭示了脚摇杆的所有变量中OG的误差异方差性(r2>0.1),而使用FM(r2<0.1)时没有发现误差异方差性。这项研究表明,以恒定速度行走时,OG系统和FM平台可以提供一致的脚摇杆值。评估的系统与其协议和一致性值之间的差异建议不要互换使用。
    The gait cycle can be divided into four functional rocker units. Although the widespread use of the OptoGait (OG) system and the Freemed (FM) platform, their accuracy has not been tested. An observational study was completed with eighteen healthy volunteers to determine the accuracy of OG and FM for overground walking gait analysis. The pairwise comparison between data obtained from OG, FM and high-speed video analysis revealed significant differences for most of the measurements (p < 0.05). ICCs revealed an excellent absolute agreement between measurements (ICCs > 0.94) for all measures for OG systems compared to video-analysis. When considering FM vs. video-analysis, ICCs showed good absolute agreement for rocker 1 (ICC = 0.86) and 3 (ICC = 0.82), excellent for rocker 2 (ICC = 0.93) and poor (ICC < 0.5) for rocker 4. Bland-Altman plots (95% limits of agreement) revealed heteroscedasticity of error for OG in all variables for foot rockers (r2 > 0.1) while no heteroscedasticity of error was found when using FM (r2 < 0.1). This study indicates that the OG system and the FM platform can provide consistent foot rockers values when walking at a constant velocity. The differences between the systems assessed and their agreement and consistency values advise against their interchangeable use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Determine the concordance between two methods of obtaining the plantar footprint (pedigraph and pressure platform).
    METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional, observational study of prevalence was carried out in the social center of Cariño (Coruña), Spain (n = 65 participants). Older people without amputations or the presence of dysmetria were included. The variables studied were: sociodemographic (age, sex), anthropometric (body mass index) and footprint measurement variables. These measurements were made by obtaining the plantar footprint using two methods: pedigraph and pressure platform.
    RESULTS: The mean age of the sample was 37.42 ± 15.05 years, with a predominance of the female gender (61.54%). Positive linear correlation between pedigraph and platform was observed in both feet in the Chippaux and Staheli indices (correlation coefficient > 0.3, p < 0.001 in each comparison). The reliability was good or moderate in relation with the Chippaux and Staheli index. Slightly lower coefficients were observed in the dimensions of the foot.
    CONCLUSIONS: A positive linear correlation between pedigraph and platform was observed in both feet in the Chippaux and Staheli indices. Significant differences were observed between pedigraph and platform in relation to the width and length of the foot. It is probably due to the fact that the pressure platform provides more exhaustive, detailed and accurate information of the foot.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腿部长度差异(LLD)对动态步态参数的影响已得到广泛讨论。波次成像是对脚到地面压力分布的研究。它已用于测试可以揭示病理学的足底足迹偏差。
    目的:本研究的目的是确定模拟LLD对健康受试者用压力平台测量的动态步态参数的影响。
    方法:37名健康受试者参与观察性横断面研究。在五种不同的模拟LLD条件下进行程序以捕获每个参与者的动态参数。支持时间,平均压力,和峰值压力测量记录在3项试验中,每足和每个疗程的LLD水平.进行重复测量的方差分析(ANOVA)测试以检查不同模拟LLD水平之间的差异。
    结果:短腿站立时间无明显变化。长腿的站立时间增加了3.51%(p<0.001),短腿的平均压力增加了1.23%(p=0.005),长腿下降5.89%(p<0.001)。短腿的峰值压力降低了2.58%(p=0.031),长腿的峰值压力降低了12.11%(p<0.001)。
    结论:这项研究表明,增加LLD会导致不对称的足部负荷模式,随着较长肢平均和峰值压力的降低,因此,短边过载。此外,LLD的增加导致长腿站立时间增加。
    BACKGROUND: The effect of Leg-Length Discrepancy (LLD) on dynamic gait parameters has been extensively discussed. Podobarography is the study of foot-to-ground pressure distribution. It has been used to test plantar footprint deviations that could reveal pathology.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the effects of simulated LLD on dynamic gait parameters measured with a pressure platform in healthy subjects.
    METHODS: Thirty-seven healthy subjects participated in observational cross-sectional research. A procedure was performed to capture the dynamic parameters of each participant under five different simulated LLD conditions. Support time, mean pressure, and peak pressure measures were registered on three trials for each foot and LLD level per session. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) test for repeated measures was performed to check for differences between the different simulated LLD levels.
    RESULTS: The stance time of the short leg had no significant changes. The stance time of the long leg increased by 3.51% (p < 0.001), mean pressure of the short leg increased by 1.23% (p = 0.005), and decreased by 5.89% in the long leg (p < 0.001). Peak pressure of the short leg decreased by 2.58% (p = 0.031) and the long leg decreased by 12.11% (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that increasing LLD causes an asymmetrical foot-loading pattern, with decreased mean and peak pressure on the longer limb, and consequently an overload on the short side. Furthermore, an increasing LLD causes increased stance time on the long leg.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Impaired sitting balance is common in persons with stroke, affecting postural control in different directions. However, studies seldomly investigate sitting balance in severely affected non-ambulatory persons with stroke and precise assessment including the diagonal directions are scarce.
    Are measurements of maximal voluntary weight-shifts decreased in severely affected persons with stroke in comparison to healthy controls, and is there a relationship with clinical measurements of trunk control, sitting and standing balance?
    14 Persons with stroke were recruited in the rehabilitation phase along with 32 healthy controls. A clinical pressure platform (RM Ingénierie, France) evaluated the weight-distribution during static sitting and measurements of maximal voluntary weight-shifts, by centre of pressure displacements in six directions. Clinical measurements included Trunk Control Test, Trunk Impairment Scale and Berg Balance Scale.
    The persons with stroke had a mean (SD) age of 69 (17) years, including 5 females and 9 males and were on average 57 (40) days post stroke. No patient was able to walk without manual support and median (IQR) Berg Balance Scale score was 17 (6-33) out of 56 points. Measurements showed that the centre of pressure distance was significantly smaller in all directions in persons with stroke compared to healthy controls (p < 0.05). The clinical measurements demonstrated moderate to very high correlations with centre of pressure distance in the diagonal forward, diagonal backward and lateral directions (r = 0.54 - 0.89).
    This study reveals that measurements of maximal voluntary weight-shifts are feasible and show clinically relevant deficits in severely affected non-ambulatory persons with stroke. Especially the lateral and diagonal directions can be of interest to investigate further as they are most strongly correlated with clinical measurements of balance. Reaching exercises in these directions could be considered a core element of rehabilitation for this group of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Low back pain (LBP) is a common recurrent pathology among assembly chain workers. This population tends to spend most of the workday in a static standing posture and handling loads, with balance being essential for correct job performance. LBP is related to poorer postural control, so balance could be affected in this condition.
    The purpose of the present study is to analyze the deterioration of static balance generated by work activity in a prolonged standing position. We assess sway with a pressure platform at three moments of the workday (before, during, and after work), comparing the different balance parameters in 22 manufacturing plant workers with (17) and without (5) LBP.
    In the pre-work capture, an independent t-test showed no significant differences between the pain and non-pain groups\' static balance parameters. Between the pre- and mid-workday captures, a two-way ANOVA with repeated measures showed a significant decrease in the medial-lateral center of pressure displacement with open eyes in workers with LBP.
    workers with low back pain do not show a greater deterioration in static balance than workers without pain during the workday.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:跌倒是老年人的主要健康问题。通过多重用药可以增加跌倒的风险,视力障碍,高血压,家庭环境的危害,害怕跌倒,以及与衰老相关的肌肉骨骼和感觉系统功能的变化。此外,以前经历过跌倒的人风险较高。然而,可以通过筛查已知的危险因素来预防跌倒。
    目的:我们研究的目的是开发一种多因素,仪表化,跌倒风险筛查工具,根据跌倒的关键风险因素,在葡萄牙社区居住的50岁或以上的成年人中,并前瞻性地验证跌倒风险预测模型。
    方法:这项前瞻性研究,遵循方便的示例方法,将招募50岁或以上的社区居民,在教区议会中有或没有助行器的情况下独立站立和行走,物理治疗诊所,高级大学,以及葡萄牙大陆不同地区的其他设施。FallSensing筛查工具是一种用于跌倒风险筛查的技术解决方案,包括软件,一个压力平台,和2个惯性传感器。筛查包括有关人口统计和人体测量数据的问题,健康和生活方式行为,关于完成6项功能测试(握力、定时和去,30秒坐着站着,阶跃测试,4阶段平衡测试“已修改,\“和10米的步行速度),3份关于家庭环境危害的问卷,以及与运动和自我效能感相关的活动和参与概况。
    结果:2016年6月开始招生,我们预计2018年底完成研究。
    结论:FallSensing筛查工具是一种多因素且以证据为基础的评估,可识别导致跌倒风险的因素。建立风险预测模型将允许实施预防性策略,潜在的下降率。
    RR1-10.2196/10304。
    BACKGROUND: Falls are a major health problem among older adults. The risk of falling can be increased by polypharmacy, vision impairment, high blood pressure, environmental home hazards, fear of falling, and changes in the function of musculoskeletal and sensory systems that are associated with aging. Moreover, individuals who experienced previous falls are at higher risk. Nevertheless, falls can be prevented by screening for known risk factors.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to develop a multifactorial, instrumented, screening tool for fall risk, according to the key risk factors for falls, among Portuguese community-dwelling adults aged 50 years or over and to prospectively validate a risk prediction model for the risk of falling.
    METHODS: This prospective study, following a convenience sample method, will recruit community-dwelling adults aged 50 years or over, who stand and walk independently with or without walking aids in parish councils, physical therapy clinics, senior\'s universities, and other facilities in different regions of continental Portugal. The FallSensing screening tool is a technological solution for fall risk screening that includes software, a pressure platform, and 2 inertial sensors. The screening includes questions about demographic and anthropometric data, health and lifestyle behaviors, a detailed explanation about procedures to accomplish 6 functional tests (grip strength, Timed Up and Go, 30 seconds sit to stand, step test, 4-Stage Balance test \"modified,\" and 10-meter walking speed), 3 questionnaires concerning environmental home hazards, and an activity and participation profile related to mobility and self-efficacy for exercise.
    RESULTS: The enrollment began in June 2016 and we anticipate study completion by the end of 2018.
    CONCLUSIONS: The FallSensing screening tool is a multifactorial and evidence-based assessment which identifies factors that contribute to fall risk. Establishing a risk prediction model will allow preventive strategies to be implemented, potentially decreasing fall rate.
    UNASSIGNED: RR1-10.2196/10304.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:研究姿势及其由于多种起源的运动能力缺陷而引起的修改的有用性已在人类中得到广泛证明。为了评估其在犬类中的适用性,通过使用压力平台,对患有单侧肘部发育不良和颅交叉韧带破裂的跛脚犬进行了静态体位造影和动态足电极造影。有了这个目标,状态动力学图和稳定图,四肢之间压力分布的百分比,爪区,平均压力,和峰值压力,是从跛脚和健全的狗获得的。将这些数据与源自相同记录会话中的力平台的峰值垂直力值进行比较。
    结果:在有声和跛脚的狗和四肢之间,在上述参数中发现了显着差异。
    结论:姿势描记术和足电极描记术对于监测犬的前肢和后肢跛行是有用且可靠的,为跛行检测提供了一套新的参数。
    BACKGROUND: The usefulness of studying posture and its modifications due to locomotor deficiencies of multiple origins has been widely proven in humans. To assess its suitability in the canine species, static posturography and dynamic pedobarography were performed on lame dogs affected with unilateral elbow dysplasia and cranial cruciate ligament rupture by using a pressure platform. With this objective, statokinesiograms and stabilograms, the percentage of pressure distribution between limbs, paw area, mean pressure, and peak pressure, were obtained from lame and sound dogs. These data were compared with Peak Vertical Force values originated from a force platform in the same recording sessions.
    RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the parameters mentioned above between sound and lame dogs and limbs.
    CONCLUSIONS: Posturography and pedobarography are useful and reliable for the monitoring of fore and hindlimb lameness in dogs, providing a new set of parameters for lameness detection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号