目的:本研究的目的是评估闭塞对身体姿势和足弓压力的影响。
方法:观察性分析,以分析阻塞对足底压力和体位的影响。
方法:共选择30名无症状受试者进行研究,包括18名女性和12名男性,年龄在22至28岁之间,平均年龄为24.83岁。使用数字咬合分析仪(T-ScanIII)对每位受试者在MIP处的闭塞进行评估。在这一点上,让受试者站在由大型姿势平台传感器和显示足底压力数据的计算机组成的垫子扫描上。连接到T扫描的计算机显示咬合压力分析。然后使用姿势网格对身体姿势进行评估,并使用APECS-姿势分析应用程序对正面和侧面照片进行评估。
方法:Windows版本22.0的社会科学统计包(SPSS)2013年发布,Armonk,NY:IBM公司,用于进行统计分析。对定性变量应用卡方检验以找到关联。采用配对t检验比较睁眼和闭眼条件下定量参数的变化。显著性水平设定为5%。
结果:从结果中观察到,40%的受试者闭塞,其中n=12,在右侧占主导地位。23.3%的受试者闭塞,其中n=7,在左侧占主导地位。然而,36.7%的科目,其中n=11,两侧的压力分布几乎相等。23.3%的受试者的身体姿势倾斜,其中n=7,朝向右侧。50%的受试者身体姿势的倾斜度,其中n=11,朝向左侧。And,26.7%的受试者身体姿势倾斜,其中n=8,是中性的,即,在右侧和左侧平衡。6.7%的受试者的足底压力,其中n=2,在右侧占主导地位。36.7%的受试者的足底压力,其中n=11,在左侧占主导地位。然而,56.7%的受试者,其中n=17,两侧的足底压力分布几乎相等。
结论:关于将三个参数相关联,发现大多数受试者的遮挡在右侧占主导地位,而身体姿势和足底压力在对侧占主导地位,即,左侧。
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of occlusion on body posture and plantar arch
pressure.
METHODS: An Observational analysis to Analyze the Influence of Occlusion on Plantar
Pressure and Body Posture.
METHODS: A total of 30 asymptomatic subjects were selected for the study including 18 females and 12 males from age group 22 years to 28 years with a mean age of 24.83 years. Each subject underwent evaluation of occlusion at MIP using a Digital Occlusal analyzer (T-Scan III). At this point, the subjects were made to stand on a mat scan which consisted of a large postural platform sensor and a computer that displayed the plantar pressure data. The computer connected to the T Scan displayed the occlusal
pressure analysis. This was followed by an evaluation of body posture using a posture grid where the photographs were taken and an evaluation of the frontal and lateral photos was done using the APECS - posture analysis app.
METHODS: Statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) for windows version 22.0 Released 2013, Armonk, N Y: IBM Corp., was used to perform Statistical Analysis. A chi-square test was applied for qualitative variables to find the association. Paired t-test was applied to compare the changes in the quantitative parameters in eye-open and eye-closed conditions. The level of significance was set at 5%.
RESULTS: As observed from the results, occlusion for 40% of the subjects, where n = 12, was dominant on the right side. Occlusion for 23.3% of subjects, where n = 7, was dominant on the left side. Whereas, for 36.7% of subjects, where n = 11, the pressure distribution was almost equal on both sides. The inclination of body posture for 23.3% of subjects, where n = 7, was towards the right side. The inclination of body posture for 50% of subjects, where n = 11, was towards the left side. And, the inclination of body posture for 26.7% of subjects, where n = 8, was neutral i.e., balanced on the right and left side. Plantar
pressure for 6.7% of subjects, where n = 2, was dominant on the right side. Plantar
pressure for 36.7% of subjects, where n = 11, was dominant on the left side. Whereas, for 56.7% of subjects, where n = 17, the plantar pressure distribution was almost equal on both sides.
CONCLUSIONS: On correlating the three parameters, it was found that occlusion for most of the subjects dominated on the right side, while body posture and plantar pressure dominated on the contralateral i.e., left side.