OBJECTIVE: Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) is a frequent cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study aimed to determine the prevalence of ATTR-CA in HFpEF patients in a multicenter nationwide study.
METHODS: Consecutive ambulatory or hospitalized patients aged ≥ 50 years with HFpEF and left ventricle hypertrophy ≥ 12 mm were studied at 20 Spanish hospitals. Screening for CA was initiated according to the usual clinical practice at each center. Positive scintigraphs were analyzed centrally.
RESULTS: A total of 422 patients were included, of whom 387 underwent further screening for CA. Sixty-five patients (16.8%) were diagnosed with ATTR-CA, and none was younger than 75 years. Prevalence increased with age. Among these patients, 60% were men, with a mean age of 85.3 ± 5.2 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 60.3 ± 7.6%, and a mean maximum left ventricular wall thickness of 17.2 (range, 12-25) mm. Most of the patients were in New York Heart Association class II (48.4%) or III (46.8%). In addition to being older than patients without ATTR-CA, patients with ATTR-CA had higher median NT-proBNP levels (3801 [2266-7132] vs 2391 [1141-4796] pg/mL; P = .003). There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of ATTR-CA by sex (19.7% in men and 13.8% in women, P = .085). A genetic variant (ATTRv) was found in approximately 7% (4/56) of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter nationwide study found that the prevalence of ATTR-CA was 16.8%, confirming it as a significant contributor to HFpEF in patients of both sexes with left ventricular hypertrophy older than 75 years.

BACKGROUND: While the prognostic value of six-minute walking test (6MWT) in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction has been firmly established, there are few or no data correlating the distance walked during 6MWT (6MWD) with mortality in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) METHODS: We studied 482 patients with HFpEF who had been admitted to inpatients cardiac rehabilitation. The primary outcome was 3-year all-cause mortality. The association between 6MWD and the primary outcome was assessed using multivariable models. Established risk markers were incorporated into the models.
RESULTS: 174 patients died during the 3-year follow-up. Taking the highest tertile of 6MWD (≥360 m) as reference, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of the primary outcome was 2.23 (95 % CI 1.31-3.78; p = .003) for the patients in the intermediate tertile (241-359 m) and 4.94 (95 % CI 2.90-8.39; p < .001) for those in the lowest tertile (≤240 m). The annual mortality rate was 25.0 % in the lowest tertile, 10.9 % in the intermediate tertile, and 5.3 % in the highest tertile. When the distance walked was normalized for age, sex, and body mass index and expressed as percent-of-predicted walking distance, the adjusted HR was 1.30 (95 % CI 0.76-2.22; p = .331) for the patients in the intermediate tertile (58.2 % to 77.6 %) and 3.52 (95 % CI 2.12-5.85; p < .001) for those in the lowest tertile (≤58.1 %).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that measuring functional capacity by evaluating the distance that a patient can walk over a period of 6 min provides important prognostic information in HFpEF.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is frequently observed in elderly physically deconditioned subjects, mainly women with hypertension, obesity, glucose intolerance/diabetes, atrial fibrillation, anaemia, coronary artery disease, chronic pulmonary disease, and chronic renal insufficiency. In practice, these conditions represent the majority of cardiac diseases we deal with in our daily clinical practice. For this reason, the HFpEF disease does not exist as a single entity and, as such, no specific unifying therapy could be found. New classification attempts still do not consider the multifaceted aspect of the HF syndrome and appear rather as an artefactual attempt to categorize a condition which is indeed not categorizable. The aim of the present article is to critically review the construction of the concept of the HFpEF syndrome and propose the return of a pathophysiological approach in the evaluation and treatment of patients. Considering the huge economic efforts employed up to date to run awfully expensive trials and research in this field, it is time to call action and redirect such resources towards more specific pathophysiological classifications and potential specific therapeutic targets.

Heart failure (HF) is a chronic, progressive, and inexorable syndrome affecting worldwide billion of patients (equally distributed among men and women), with prevalence estimate of 1-3% in developed countries. HF leads to enormous direct and indirect costs, and because of ageing population, the total number of HF patients keep rising, approximately 10% in patients > 65 years old. Exercise training (ET) is widely recognized as an evidence-based adjunct treatment modality for patients with HF, and growing evidence is emerging among elderly patients with HF. We used relevant data from literature search (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE) highlighting the epidemiology of HF; focusing on central and peripheral mechanisms underlying the beneficial effect of ET in HF patients; and on frail HF elderly patients undergoing ET. Since many Countries ordered a lockdown in early stages pandemic trying to limit infections, COVID-19 pandemic, and its limitation to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation operativity was also discussed. ET exerts both central and peripheral adaptations that clinically translate into anti-remodeling effects, increased functional capacity and reduced morbidity and mortality. Ideally, ET programs should be prescribed in a patient-tailored approach, particularly in frail elderly patients with HF. In conclusion, given the complexity of HF syndrome, combining, and tailoring different ET modalities is mandatory. A procedural algorithm according to patient\'s baseline clinical characteristics [i.e., functional capacity, comorbidity, frailty status (muscle strength, balance, usual daily activities, hearing and vision impairment, sarcopenia, and inability to actively exercise), logistics, individual preferences and goals] has been proposed. Increasing long-term adherence and reaching the frailest patients are challenging goals for future initiatives in the field.

UNASSIGNED: Heart failure is prevalent worldwide. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are effective in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction, whether SGLT2i are effective in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains to be determined.
UNASSIGNED: All relevant citations in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were identified from inception to September, 2022. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). A subgroup analysis was performed according to diabetes mellitus status and the ejection fraction. Secondary endpoints were cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure and all cause death.
UNASSIGNED: Seven studies involving 11,604 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors reduced the incidence of the primary outcome by 24%, with an odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 [0.69, 0.84]. For secondary outcomes, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors were associated with a lower incidence of hospitalization for heart failure, but not cardiovascular or all-cause death; the OR and 95% CI were 0.73 [0.66, 0.82], 0.92 [0.81, 1.04], 0.96 [0.88, 1.05], respectively.
UNASSIGNED: This study proves the clinical efficacy of SGLT2i for treatment of HFpEF patients with or without diabetes, which was mainly driven by prevention of HHF rather than cardiovascular or all-cause death.

BACKGROUND: Exercise training is a well-established intervention for patients with heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction. Still, the evidence of its effects on mortality, hospitalization, and quality of life needs to be more conclusive. We aim to evaluate exercise training clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
METHODS: We searched five databases and three clinical trial registries for RCTs that compared exercise training plus usual care versus usual care alone in congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. We extracted data on all-cause mortality, hospital admission, heart failure hospitalization, and health-related quality of life measured by the Minnesota Living with HF questionnaire (MLHFW) and other scales. We pooled the data using random-effects or fixed-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity of the outcomes. We performed subgroup analyses for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
RESULTS: We included 61 RCTs with 9062 participants. There was no mortality benefit, but exercise training improved health-related quality of life, reduced hospital admission at 12 months and longer follow-up, and reduced heart failure hospitalization. We observed substantial enhancement in health-related quality of life and a greater decrease in hospital admissions in the HFpEF group compared to the HFrEF group.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of mortality benefit, exercise training is a beneficial intervention for CHF patients, improving health-related quality of life and reducing hospitalization.

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is commonly employed to confirm the diagnosis of acute myocarditis (AM). However, the impact of atrial and ventricular function in AM patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF) deserves further investigation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the incremental diagnostic value of combining atrial and strain functions using CMR in patients with AM and preserved EF. This retrospective study collected CMR scans of 126 consecutive patients with AM (meeting the Lake Louise criteria) and with preserved EF, as well as 52 age- and sex-matched control subjects. Left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) strain functions were assessed using conventional cine-SSFP sequences. In patients with AM and preserved EF, impaired ventricular and atrial strain functions were observed compared to control subjects. These impairments remained significant even in multivariable analysis. The combined model of atrial and ventricular functions proved to be the most effective in distinguishing AM patients with preserved ejection fraction from control subjects, achieving an area under the curve of 0.77 and showing a significant improvement in the likelihood ratio. These findings suggest that a combined analysis of both atrial and ventricular functions may improve the diagnostic accuracy for patients with AM and preserved EF.

UNASSIGNED: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is the predominant form of HF in older adults. It represents a heterogenous clinical syndrome that is less well understood across different ethnicities.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to compare the clinical presentation and assess the diagnostic performance of existing HFpEF diagnostic tools between ethnic groups.
UNASSIGNED: A validated Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithm was applied to the electronic health records of a large London hospital to identify patients meeting the European Society of Cardiology criteria for a diagnosis of HFpEF. NLP extracted patient demographics (including self-reported ethnicity and socioeconomic status), comorbidities, investigation results (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, H2FPEF scores, and echocardiogram reports), and mortality. Analyses were stratified by ethnicity and adjusted for socioeconomic status.
UNASSIGNED: Our cohort consisted of 1,261 (64%) White, 578 (29%) Black, and 134 (7%) Asian patients meeting the European Society of Cardiology HFpEF diagnostic criteria. Compared to White patients, Black patients were younger at diagnosis and more likely to have metabolic comorbidities (obesity, diabetes, and hypertension) but less likely to have atrial fibrillation (30% vs 13%; P < 0.001). Black patients had lower N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels and a lower frequency of H2FPEF scores ≥6, indicative of likely HFpEF (26% vs 44%; P < 0.0001).
UNASSIGNED: Leveraging an NLP-based artificial intelligence approach to quantify health inequities in HFpEF diagnosis, we discovered that established markers systematically underdiagnose HFpEF in Black patients, possibly due to differences in the underlying comorbidity patterns. Clinicians should be aware of these limitations and its implications for treatment and trial recruitment.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a major healthcare problem that is raising in prevalence. There has been a shift in HpEF management towards early diagnosis and phenotype-specific targeted treatment. However, the diagnosis of HFpEF remains a challenge due to the lack of universal criteria and patient heterogeneity. This review aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the diagnostic workup of HFpEF, highlighting the role of echocardiography in HFpEF phenotyping.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling (RVPAC) refers to the relationship between right ventricular systolic force and afterload. The ratio of echocardiograph-derived tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) has been proposed as a noninvasive measurement of RVPAC and reported as an independent prognostic parameter of heart failure. However, it has not been adequately in detail evaluated in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We hypothesized that RVPAC may be used and proposed as an expression of key risk factors in patients with HFpEF.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed TAPSE/PASP of 648 HFpEF patients hospitalized in Chongqing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2017. All eligible patients were followed up for 5 years. The correlation between TAPSE/SPAP index and clinical indicators and outcomes was evaluated.
RESULTS: The final analysis included 414 patients. Nonsurvivors had significantly lower TAPSE, TAPSE/PASP and higher PASP compared with survivors (p < 0.0001). ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff of TAPSE, PASP, and RVPAC to predict all-cause death were 16.5 mm, 37.5 mmHg, and 0.45 mm/mmHg, respectively. In multivariate Cox regression analyses adjusted for gender showed a significant, independent association of the RVPAC with the composite endpoint of all-cause death or HF-related recurrent hospitalization (HR: 0.006; 95% CI 0.001-0.057, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: RVPAC, defined by the ratio of TAPSE to PASP, is the expression of a key risk factor in HFpEF patients, which is independently associated with the composite endpoint of all-cause death or HF-related recurrent hospitalization.