prescription pain reliever

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)人群滥用处方止痛药(PPR)的患病率和风险知之甚少。这项研究探讨了PPR滥用与TGD成年人在医疗保健中的各种社会人口统计学特征和歧视经验之间的关系。
    2018年招募了TGD参与者(n=595),通过便利抽样参加了全州横断面的跨健康调查。进行了独立性和逻辑回归的卡方检验,以探讨曾滥用PPR的人的社会人口统计学与歧视经历之间的关联,或者在过去一年中滥用PPRs的人。
    社会人口统计学,例如性别认同(比值比[OR]=0.44,p=0.01),种族/民族(OR=0.14,p<0.001),性取向影响TGD个体滥用PPR的可能性(OR=0.40,p<0.001)。值得注意的是,那些曾经被诊断为焦虑的人与那些从未被诊断的人相比,终生PPR滥用的可能性更高(OR=2.05,p=0.05),那些在精神卫生保健机构中由于性别认同而报告过去一年歧视的人报告过去一年滥用的可能性是那些报告未经历滥用的人的两倍多(OR=2.43,p=0.004).
    TGD个体的某些亚群可能存在PPR误用的高风险。必须承认多重身份的影响以及TGD社区内各种身份和经验之间的差异,同时努力解决非PPR滥用问题。
    UNASSIGNED: Little is known about the prevalence and risks associated with transgender and gender diverse (TGD) persons\' misuse of prescription pain relievers (PPRs). This study explores the relationship between PPR misuse and various sociodemographic identities and experiences of discrimination in health care among TGD adults.
    UNASSIGNED: TGD participants (n=595) were recruited in 2018 to participate in a cross-sectional statewide trans health survey through convenience sampling. Chi-square tests of independence and logistic regressions were conducted to explore associations between sociodemographics and experiences of discrimination among persons who had ever misused PPRs, or who had misused PPRs in the past year.
    UNASSIGNED: Sociodemographics such as gender identity (odds ratio [OR]=0.44, p=0.01), race/ethnicity (OR=0.14, p<0.001), and sexual orientation influence TGD individuals likeliness of misusing PPRs (OR=0.40, p<0.001). Notably, those who were ever diagnosed with anxiety had a higher likeliness of having lifetime PPR misuse compared with those who were never diagnosed (OR=2.05, p=0.05), and those reporting past-year discrimination within the mental health care setting because of their gender identity were more than twice as likely to report past-year misuse than those who reported not experiencing it (OR=2.43, p=0.004).
    UNASSIGNED: Certain subpopulations of TGD individuals may be at elevated risk of PPR misuse. It is imperative to acknowledge the impact of multimarginalized identities as well as differences across various identities and experiences within the TGD community while working to address non-PPR misuse.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经评估:阿片类药物在美国持续流行。阿片类药物的使用通常通过索赔数据进行评估,但可能被低估了。
    UNASSIGNED:我们从一项全国调查中评估了阿片类和非阿片类止痛药使用的时间趋势。
    UNASSIGNED:使用2001年至2018年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据,我们调查了50,201名20岁或以上的受访者在过去30天内使用处方镇痛药的情况.Joinpoint回归用于检验阿片类镇痛药与非阿片类镇痛药的统计学有意义的趋势。
    UNASSIGNED:在过去30天内使用止痛药的患者中,阿片类药物的平均百分比为6.4%(5.3%-7.1%),非阿片类镇痛药的平均百分比为11.3%(9.0%-14.8%)。国内阿片类药物和非阿片类药物处方的可用性保持稳定,除了2005年至2018年无癌患者中阿片类药物的略有下降。最常用的阿片类镇痛药包括氢可酮/对乙酰氨基酚,曲马多,和氢可酮。
    UNASSIGNED:我们独特地测量了在美国家中使用阿片类药物和非阿片类药物止痛药的比例,并补充了以前主要从索赔数据获得的处方率知识。
    UNASSIGNED: The opioid epidemic persists in the United States. The use of opioid medications is often assessed by claims data but potentially underestimated.
    UNASSIGNED: We evaluated the temporal trend in the use of opioid and nonopioid pain medications from a national survey.
    UNASSIGNED: Using data from the 2001 to 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), we examined the current use of prescription analgesics in the past 30 days among 50,201 respondents aged 20 years or older. Joinpoint regressions were used to test statistically meaningful trends of opioid vs nonopioid analgesics.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean percentage of people who had pain medications in the past 30 days was 6.4% (5.3%-7.1%) for opioid and 11.3% (9.0%-14.8%) for nonopioid analgesics. The availability of opioid and nonopioid prescriptions at home has remained stable, except for the slight decline of opioids among cancer-free patients in 2005 to 2018. The most frequently used opioid analgesic medications included hydrocodone/acetaminophen, tramadol, and hydrocodone.
    UNASSIGNED: We uniquely measured the proportion of people who had opioid and nonopioid pain medications at home in the United States and supplemented the previous knowledge of prescription rates mainly obtained from claims data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阿片类药物危机在美国被广泛感受到。学术界对危机的关注集中在宏观层面的过程上,而在很大程度上忽略了中观层面的解释,例如阿片类药物使用行为的家庭结构。我们假设已婚成年人和有共同居住儿童的成年人滥用处方止痛药(PPR)的风险较低,使用海洛因,相对于来自其他家庭结构的成年人,使用针头注射海洛因。
    我们使用2002-2018年的全国药物使用和健康数据调查,用多变量逻辑回归检验我们的假设。
    我们发现,在整个研究期间,已婚成年人相对于未婚成年人,每种阿片类药物使用行为的预测概率较低。我们还发现,儿童的存在与所有三种结果的减少有关,尤其是对于从未结婚的成年人。
    来自所有家庭结构的个体都容易受到阿片类药物危机的影响,但从未结婚的成年人没有共同居住的孩子(“断断续续的成年人”)特别容易受到时间波动的影响,并推动PPR滥用和海洛因使用的时间趋势。这些发现表明,由于从美国社会安全网撤资,持续的人口趋势可能会导致未来阿片类药物使用障碍和死亡率上升。未来的研究应该研究美国政策的作用,这些政策使脱节的成年人特别容易患阿片类药物使用障碍。
    The opioid crisis is widely felt in the United States. Scholarly attention to the crisis focuses on macro-level processes and largely neglects meso-level explanations such as family structure for opioid use behaviors. We hypothesize that married adults and adults with coresident children are at lower risk of misusing prescription pain relievers (PPR), using heroin, and using needles to inject heroin relative to adults from other family structures.
    We used National Survey on Drug Use and Health data from 2002-2018 to test our hypotheses with multivariable logistic regression.
    We found that married adults have a lower predicted probability of each opioid use behavior relative to nonmarried adults across the study period. We also found that the presence of children is associated with reductions in all three outcomes especially for never married adults.
    Individuals from all family structures are vulnerable to the opioid crisis, but never married adults without coresident children (\"disconnected adults\") are especially susceptible to temporal fluctuations and drive the temporal trends in PPR misuse and heroin use. These findings suggest that ongoing demographic trends where disconnected adults are a growing population may result in future rises in opioid use disorders and mortality because of divestment from U.S. social safety nets. Future research should examine the role of U.S. policies that make disconnected adults especially vulnerable to developing opioid use disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    迄今为止,老年人的处方阿片类药物滥用很少受到关注。处方阿片类药物滥用的特征和动机的潜在年龄差异尚未得到充分表征,但对防止转移和滥用具有重要意义。
    为了检查(1)滥用处方阿片类止痛药的来源的年龄特定模式和滥用动机,以及(2)与阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的年龄特定和来源特定的关联,海洛因的使用,苯二氮卓类药物误用,和OUD处理利用率。
    使用全国药物使用和健康调查的3波(2015-2017年)的横断面研究(平均应答率68%)参与者:12岁及以上的过去一年处方阿片类止痛药滥用的受访者(n=8228)主要措施:最近滥用的处方止痛药的来源(分类为医疗,社会,或非法/其他),最后一集滥用的动机,OUD,海洛因的使用,苯二氮卓类药物误用,和OUD治疗。
    50岁及以上的成年人约占报告过去一年处方阿片类药物滥用的所有个体的25%。50岁以下的人最常见的是社会来源,而50岁及以上的人最常见的是医疗来源。最常见的滥用动机是“减轻身体疼痛”;这种反应的频率在年龄组中增加了(12-17岁的47%至65岁的87%)。在50岁及以上滥用处方阿片类药物的成年人中,17%符合OUD标准,15%报告过去一年苯二氮卓类药物滥用,3%的人报告过去一年使用海洛因。
    医生仍然是滥用处方阿片类药物的直接来源,特别是对于老年人。除了有效的非阿片类药物疼痛管理策略外,还需要有关最佳阿片类药物处方实践的持续临床举措。临床举措还应包括筛查成人和青少年患者的处方阿片类药物的非医疗用途,以及改善所有年龄段的个人获得OUD治疗的机会。
    Prescription opioid misuse among older adults has received little attention to date. Potential age variation in characteristics of and motivations for prescription opioid misuse has not been fully characterized yet has important implications for preventing diversion and misuse.
    To examine (1) age-specific patterns of source of misused prescription opioid pain relievers and motives for misuse and (2) age-specific and source-specific associations with opioid use disorder (OUD), heroin use, benzodiazepine misuse, and OUD treatment utilization.
    Cross-sectional study using 3 waves (2015-2017) of the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (68% average response rate) PARTICIPANTS: Respondents aged 12 and older with past-year prescription opioid pain reliever misuse (n = 8228) MAIN MEASURES: Source for the most-recently misused prescription pain reliever (categorized as medical, social, or illicit/other), motive for last episode of misuse, OUD, heroin use, benzodiazepine misuse, and OUD treatment.
    Adults 50 and older comprised approximately 25% of all individuals reporting past-year prescription opioid misuse. A social source was most common for individuals under age 50 while a medical source was most common for individuals 50 and older. The most commonly reported motive for misuse was to \"relieve physical pain\"; the frequency of this response increased across age groups (47% aged 12-17 to 87% aged 65+). Among adults age 50 and older with prescription opioid misuse, 17% met criteria for OUD, 15% reported past-year benzodiazepine misuse, and 3% reported past-year heroin use.
    Physicians continue to be a direct source of prescription opioids for misuse, particularly for older adults. Ongoing clinical initiatives regarding optimal opioid prescribing practices are needed in addition to effective non-opioid strategies for pain management. Clinical initiatives should also include screening adult and adolescent patients for non-medical use of prescription opioids as well as improving access to OUD treatment for individuals of all ages.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号