prediction model

预测模型
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在构建和验证胎龄<32周的早产儿出生后无创通气(NIV)失败的风险预测模型。
    方法:数据来自2019年1月至2021年12月的多中心回顾性研究计划-江苏省新生儿呼吸衰竭协作网。最终纳入的受试者为出生后使用NIV的早产儿,胎龄小于32周,入院年龄在72h内。随后招募了1436名婴儿,包括成功NIV组的1235名婴儿和失败NIV组的201名婴儿。
    结果:(1)孕龄,5分钟阿普加,NIV期间的最大FiO2,通过单因素和多因素分析选择NIV期间的FiO2波动值。(2)预测模型的曲线下面积在训练集中为0.807(95%CI:0.767-0.847),在测试集中为0.825(95%CI:0.766-0.883)。校准曲线显示预测概率和实际观察概率之间的良好一致性(训练集的平均绝对误差=0.008;测试集的平均绝对误差=0.012)。决策曲线分析表明,在培训和测试队列中,风险模型具有良好的临床有效性。
    结论:该模型在辨别维度上表现良好,校准,和临床有效性。该模型可以作为新生儿学家预测早产儿出生后是否会经历NIV失败的有用工具。
    OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to construct and validate a risk prediction model for non-invasive ventilation (NIV) failure after birth in premature infants with gestational age < 32 weeks.
    METHODS: The data were derived from the multicenter retrospective study program - Jiangsu Provincial Neonatal Respiratory Failure Collaboration Network from Jan 2019 to Dec 2021. The subjects finally included were preterm infants using NIV after birth with gestational age less than 32 weeks and admission age within 72 h. After screening by inclusion and exclusion criteria, 1436 babies were subsequently recruited in the study, including 1235 infants in the successful NIV group and 201 infants in the failed NIV group.
    RESULTS: (1) Gestational age, 5 min Apgar, Max FiO2 during NIV, and FiO2 fluctuation value during NIV were selected by univariate and multivariate analysis. (2) The area under the curve of the prediction model was 0.807 (95% CI: 0.767-0.847) in the training set and 0.825 (95% CI: 0.766-0.883) in the test set. The calibration curve showed good agreement between the predicted probability and the actual observed probability (Mean absolute error = 0.008 for the training set; Mean absolute error = 0.012 for the test set). Decision curve analysis showed good clinical validity of the risk model in the training and test cohorts.
    CONCLUSIONS: This model performed well on dimensions of discrimination, calibration, and clinical validity. This model can serve as a useful tool for neonatologists to predict whether premature infants will experience NIV failure after birth.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:非梗阻性无精子症(NOA)是男性不育的严重和常见原因。目前,NOA中精子回收成功的最可靠预测指标是组织病理学,但术前睾丸活检常增加取精手术的难度。本研究旨在探讨N6-甲基腺苷(m6A)在NOA患者中的修饰特征,并利用m6A相关基因探讨NOA病理诊断和治疗的潜在生物标志物和分子机制。
    方法:NOA相关数据集从GEO数据库下载。根据LASSO回归分析的结果,从差异表达的m6A相关基因建立了预测模型,并使用ROC曲线评估模型的预测性能。根据差异表达的m6A相关基因进行聚类分析,以评估不同m6A修饰模式在差异表达基因(DEGs)方面的差异,生物学特征,和免疫功能。
    结果:NOA样本与健康对照之间的8个m6A相关基因存在显着差异。ROC曲线显示了用ALKBH5和FTO构建的诊断模型的优异预测性能。两种m6A修饰亚型的DEGs表明m6A相关基因在NOA患者有丝分裂和减数分裂生物学过程中的影响,两种亚型之间存在显著的免疫差异。
    结论:用FTO和ALKBH5构建的NOA病理诊断模型具有良好的预测能力。我们已经确定了两种不同的m6A修饰亚型,这可能有助于预测NOA患者的精子提取成功率和治疗选择。
    OBJECTIVE: Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is a severe and common cause of male infertility. Currently, the most reliable predictor of sperm retrieval success in NOA is histopathology, but preoperative testicular biopsy often increases the difficulty of sperm retrieval surgery. This study aims to explore the characteristics of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification in NOA patients and investigate the potential biomarkers and molecular mechanisms for pathological diagnosis and treatment of NOA using m6A-related genes.
    METHODS: NOA-related datasets were downloaded from the GEO database. Based on the results of LASSO regression analysis, a prediction model was established from differentially expressed m6A-related genes, and the predictive performance of the model was evaluated using ROC curves. Cluster analysis was performed based on differentially expressed m6A-related genes to evaluate the differences in different m6A modification patterns in terms of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), biological features, and immune features.
    RESULTS: There were significant differences in eight m6A-related genes between NOA samples and healthy controls. The ROC curves showed excellent predictive performance for the diagnostic models constructed with ALKBH5 and FTO. DEGs of two m6A modification subtypes indicated the influence of m6A-related genes in the biological processes of mitosis and meiosis in NOA patients, and there were significant immune differences between the two subtypes.
    CONCLUSIONS: The NOA pathological diagnostic models constructed with FTO and ALKBH5 have good predictive ability. We have identified two different m6A modification subtypes, which may help predict sperm retrieval success rate and treatment selection in NOA patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对于经历过反复妊娠丢失(RPL)的女性,不仅治疗它们,而且评估复发的风险也是至关重要的。该研究旨在开发一种风险预测模型,以根据孕前数据预测患有RPL的女性随后的早期妊娠丢失(EPL)。
    方法:前瞻性,动态人群队列研究在兰州大学第二医院进行。从2019年9月到2022年12月,共有1050名非妊娠RPL妇女参加。到2023年12月,605名妇女有随后的妊娠结局,并按3:1的比例随机分为训练和验证组。在训练组中,对具有随后EPL结局的RPL患者进行单变量筛查.利用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归和多变量逻辑回归来选择变量,分别。采用广义线性模型(GLM)构建后续EPL预测模型,梯度增压机(GBM),随机森林(RF),深度学习(DP)然后建立LASSO回归和多变量logistic回归选择的变量,并使用最佳预测模型进行比较。AUC,校正曲线,和决策曲线(DCA)进行评估,以评估最佳模型的预测性能。使用验证组验证了最佳模型。最后,根据最佳预测特征建立列线图.
    结果:在训练组中,GBM模型以最高的AUC(0.805)达到最佳性能。通过LASSO回归(16变量)和逻辑回归(9变量)模型筛选的变量之间的AUC没有显着差异(AUC:0.805vs.0.777,P=0.1498)。同时,9变量模型在验证组中表现出良好的判别性能,AUC值为0.781(95CI0.702,0.843)。DCA显示该模型表现良好,对于做出有益的临床决策是可行的。校准曲线揭示了模型预测值与实际值之间的拟合优度,Hosmer-Lemeshow检验为7.427,P=0.505。
    结论:使用GBM模型预测RPL患者的后续EPL具有重要的临床意义。需要未来的前瞻性研究来验证其临床适用性。
    背景:本研究在中国临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为ChiCTR2000039414(2020年10月27日)。
    BACKGROUND: For women who have experienced recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), it is crucial not only to treat them but also to evaluate the risk of recurrence. The study aimed to develop a risk predictive model to predict the subsequent early pregnancy loss (EPL) in women with RPL based on preconception data.
    METHODS: A prospective, dynamic population cohort study was carried out at the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University. From September 2019 to December 2022, a total of 1050 non-pregnant women with RPL were participated. By December 2023, 605 women had subsequent pregnancy outcomes and were randomly divided into training and validation group by 3:1 ratio. In the training group, univariable screening was performed on RPL patients with subsequent EPL outcome. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariate logistic regression were utilized to select variables, respectively. Subsequent EPL prediction model was constructed using generalize linear model (GLM), gradient boosting machine (GBM), random forest (RF), and deep learning (DP). The variables selected by LASSO regression and multivariate logistic regression were then established and compared using the best prediction model. The AUC, calibration curve, and decision curve (DCA) were performed to assess the prediction performances of the best model. The best model was validated using the validation group. Finally, a nomogram was established based on the best predictive features.
    RESULTS: In the training group, the GBM model achieved the best performance with the highest AUC (0.805). The AUC between the variables screened by the LASSO regression (16-variables) and logistic regression (9-variables) models showed no significant difference (AUC: 0.805 vs. 0.777, P = 0.1498). Meanwhile, the 9-variable model displayed a well discrimination performance in the validation group, with an AUC value of 0.781 (95%CI 0.702, 0.843). The DCA showed the model performed well and was feasible for making beneficial clinical decisions. Calibration curves revealed the goodness of fit between the predicted values by the model and the actual values, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was 7.427, and P = 0.505.
    CONCLUSIONS: Predicting subsequent EPL in RPL patients using the GBM model has important clinical implications. Future prospective studies are needed to verify the clinical applicability.
    BACKGROUND: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with the registration number of ChiCTR2000039414 (27/10/2020).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在开发并内部验证一个列线图模型,以评估接受电视胸腔镜(VATS)肺叶切除术的患者术中低体温的风险。本研究为回顾性研究。选取2022年1月至2023年12月在武汉某三级医院行胸腔镜肺叶切除术的530例患者。根据术中是否发生低体温分为低体温组(n=346)和非低体温组(n=184)。套索回归用于筛选自变量。采用Logistic回归分析术中低体温的危险因素,建立了列线图模型。Bootstrap方法用于内部验证列线图模型。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价模型的区分度。使用校准曲线和HosmerLemeshow测试来评估模型的准确性。采用决策曲线分析法(DCA)评价模型的临床实用性。530例VATS肺叶切除术患者中有346例术中低体温(65.28%)。Logistic回归分析显示,年龄,血清总胆红素,吸入地氟醚,麻醉持续时间,术中输液量,术中出血量和体重指数是VATS肺叶切除术患者术中低体温的危险因素(P<0.05)。ROC曲线下面积为0.757,95%CI(0.714-0.799)。最佳截断值为0.635,灵敏度为0.717,特异度为0.658。这些结果表明该模型具有很好的判别性。校准曲线表明,实际值通常与预测值一致。Hosmer-Lemeshow检验显示χ2=5.588,P=0.693,表明该模型具有较好的准确性。DCA结果证实该模型具有较高的临床实用性。本研究中构建的列线图模型显示出良好的区分度,预测术中低体温患者的准确性和临床实用性,为医护人员筛查VATS肺叶切除术患者术中低体温的高危因素提供参考。
    This study aimed to develop and internally validate a nomogram model for assessing the risk of intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy. This study is a retrospective study. A total of 530 patients who undergoing VATS lobectomy from January 2022 to December 2023 in a tertiary hospital in Wuhan were selected. Patients were divided into hypothermia group (n = 346) and non-hypothermia group (n = 184) according to whether hypothermia occurred during the operation. Lasso regression was used to screen the independent variables. Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors of hypothermia during operation, and a nomogram model was established. Bootstrap method was used to internally verify the nomogram model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the discrimination of the model. Calibration curve and Hosmer Lemeshow test were used to evaluate the accuracy of the model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of the model. Intraoperative hypothermia occurred in 346 of 530 patients undergoing VATS lobectomy (65.28%). Logistic regression analysis showed that age, serum total bilirubin, inhaled desflurane, anesthesia duration, intraoperative infusion volume, intraoperative blood loss and body mass index were risk factors for intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy (P < 0.05). The area under ROC curve was 0.757, 95% CI (0.714-0.799). The optimal cutoff value was 0.635, the sensitivity was 0.717, and the specificity was 0.658. These results suggested that the model was well discriminated. Calibration curve has shown that the actual values are generally in agreement with the predicted values. Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that χ2 = 5.588, P = 0.693, indicating that the model has a good accuracy. The DCA results confirmed that the model had high clinical utility. The nomogram model constructed in this study showed good discrimination, accuracy and clinical utility in predicting patients with intraoperative hypothermia, which can provide reference for medical staff to screen high-risk of intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    分析老年患者髋关节置换术后谵妄的危险因素并构建预测模型。
    回顾性收集2021年11月至2023年2月在武汉市第四医院创伤骨科行髋关节置换术的248例老年患者的临床资料。采用Logistic回归分析确定髋关节置换术后谵妄的危险因素。并使用R4.1.2软件的RMS软件包构建了列线图预测模型。基于Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度测试和接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线评估了模型的准确性和稳定性。
    年龄,夜间睡眠,麻醉方法,术中失血,低氧血症,C反应蛋白(CRP)水平均为髋关节置换术后谵妄的危险因素(P<0.05)。这些因素用于构建使用Bootstrap方法进行内部验证的列线图预测模型。预测模型的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.980(95%CI:0.964-0.996),提示其对术后谵妄有一定的预测价值。当选择最佳截止值时,敏感性和特异性分别为92.7%和92.3%,分别,表明预测模型是有效的。
    年龄,短暂的夜间睡眠,全身麻醉,术中大量失血,低氧血症,高CRP水平是髋关节置换术后谵妄的独立危险因素。基于这些危险因素构建的列线图预测模型可有效预测老年患者髋关节置换术后谵妄。
    UNASSIGNED: To analyze the risk factors of delirium in elderly patients after hip arthroplasty and to construct a prediction model.
    UNASSIGNED: Clinical data of 248 elderly patients who underwent hip arthroplasty in the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics at Wuhan Fourth Hospital were retrospectively collected from November 2021 to February 2023. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors of delirium after hip arthroplasty, and a nomogram prediction model was constructed using the RMS package of R4.1.2 software. The accuracy and stability of the model was evaluated based on the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
    UNASSIGNED: Age, nighttime sleep, anesthesia method, intraoperative blood loss, hypoxemia, and C-reactive protein (CRP) level were all risk factors of delirium after the hip arthroplasty (P<0.05). These factors were used to construct a nomogram prediction model that was internally validated using the Bootstrap method. The prediction model had the area under ROC curve (AUC) of 0.980 (95% CI: 0.964-0.996), indicating that it has certain predictive value for postoperative delirium. When the optimal cut off value was selected, the sensitivity and specificity were 92.7% and 92.3%, respectively, indicating that the prediction model is effective.
    UNASSIGNED: Age, short nighttime sleep, general anesthesia, high intraoperative blood loss, hypoxemia, and high CRP levels are independent risk factors for delirium after hip arthroplasty. The nomogram prediction model constructed based on these risk factors can effectively predict delirium in elderly patients after hip arthroplasty.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究旨在建立基于影像学和基因组特征的早期非小细胞肺癌通过空气间隙(STAS)传播的预测模型。
    方法:回顾性收集了2021年1月至2021年12月在金陵医院接受手术治疗的204例非小细胞肺癌患者(47例STAS+和157例STAS-)。他们的术前CT图像,基因检测数据(包括其他医院的下一代测序数据),收集临床资料。患者被随机分为训练和测试队列(7:3)。
    结果:本研究共纳入204名符合条件的患者。在47例(23.0%)患者中发现了STAS,157例(77.0%)患者未发现STAS。接受者工作特征曲线表明,影像组学模型,临床基因组学模型,和混合模型具有良好的预测性能(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.85;AUC=0.70;AUC=0.85)。
    结论:基于影像组学和基因组学特征的预测模型对STAS具有良好的预测性能。
    BACKGROUND: This study was aimed to establish a prediction model for spread through air spaces (STAS) in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer based on imaging and genomic features.
    METHODS: We retrospectively collected 204 patients (47 STAS+ and 157 STAS-) with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent surgical treatment in the Jinling Hospital from January 2021 to December 2021. Their preoperative CT images, genetic testing data (including next-generation sequencing data from other hospitals), and clinical data were collected. Patients were randomly divided into training and testing cohorts (7:3).
    RESULTS: The study included a total of 204 eligible patients. STAS were found in 47 (23.0%) patients, and no STAS were found in 157 (77.0%) patients. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that radiomics model, clinical genomics model, and mixed model had good predictive performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.85; AUC = 0.70; AUC = 0.85).
    CONCLUSIONS: The prediction model based on radiomics and genomics features has a good prediction performance for STAS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:全髋关节置换术(THA)仍然是老年股骨颈骨折的主要治疗选择。本研究旨在探讨与术后异体输血相关的危险因素,并建立动态预测模型来预测术后输血需求。这将为围手术期体液管理和医疗资源的合理配置提供更准确的指导。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了2017年1月至2023年8月在三家三甲医院接受全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的829例患者的数据。来自一家医院的患者数据用于模型开发,而其他两家医院的数据用于外部验证.采用Logistic回归分析筛选与输血相关的特征亚群。各种机器学习算法,包括逻辑回归,SVA(支持向量机),K-NN(k-最近邻),MLP(多层感知器),天真的贝叶斯,决策树,随机森林,和梯度增强,用于处理数据和构建预测模型。10倍交叉验证算法有助于比较模型的预测性能,从而为开发开源计算程序选择性能最佳的模型。
    结果:BMI(体重指数),手术时间,IBL(术中失血),抗凝病史,氨甲环酸的利用率,Pre-Hb,模型中包括Pre-ALB以及独立危险因素。每个模型的平均曲线下面积(AUC)值如下:逻辑回归(0.98);SVA(0.91);k-NN(0.87)MLP,(0.96);朴素贝叶斯(0.97);决策树(0.87);随机森林(0.96);梯度提升(0.97)。基于最佳模型的Web计算器可在以下网址获得:(https://nomo99。shinyapps.io/dynomapp/)。
    结论:利用计算机算法,建立了判别精度高(AUC>0.5)的预测模型。逻辑回归模型表现出优越的区分度和可靠性,从而成功通过外部验证。该模型的强泛化性和适用性对临床医生有重要意义,帮助识别术后输血高危患者。
    OBJECTIVE: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains the primary treatment option for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. This study aims to explore the risk factors associated with allogeneic blood transfusion after surgery and to develop a dynamic prediction model to predict post-operative blood transfusion requirements. This will provide more accurate guidance for perioperative humoral management and rational allocation of medical resources.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 829 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures at three third-class hospitals between January 2017 and August 2023. Patient data from one hospital were used for model development, whereas data from the other two hospitals were used for external validation. Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the characteristic subsets related to blood transfusion. Various machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, SVA (support vector machine), K-NN (k-nearest neighbors), MLP (multilayer perceptron), naive Bayes, decision tree, random forest, and gradient boosting, were used to process the data and construct prediction models. A 10-fold cross-validation algorithm facilitated the comparison of the predictive performance of the models, resulting in the selection of the best-performing model for the development of an open-source computing program.
    RESULTS: BMI (body mass index), surgical duration, IBL (intraoperative blood loss), anticoagulant history, utilization rate of tranexamic acid, Pre-Hb, and Pre-ALB were included in the model as well as independent risk factors. The average area under curve (AUC) values for each model were as follows: logistic regression (0.98); SVA (0.91); k-NN (0.87) MLP, (0.96); naive Bayes (0.97); decision tree (0.87); random forest (0.96); and gradient boosting (0.97). A web calculator based on the best model is available at: (https://nomo99.shinyapps.io/dynnomapp/).
    CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing a computer algorithm, a prediction model with a high discrimination accuracy (AUC > 0.5) was developed. The logistic regression model demonstrated superior differentiation and reliability, thereby successfully passing external validation. The model\'s strong generalizability and applicability have significant implications for clinicians, aiding in the identification of patients at high risk for postoperative blood transfusion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胆结石病(GSD)是世界范围内发病率较高的常见消化道疾病之一。GSD对患者的影响包括但不限于恶心症状,呕吐,和GSD直接引起的胆绞痛。此外,越来越多的证据来自队列研究,将GSD与其他疾病联系起来,比如心血管疾病,胆道癌,还有结直肠癌.早期识别GSD高风险患者可能有助于改善疾病的预防和控制。一系列研究试图建立GSD的预测模型,但是由于预测因素不完整,这些模型不能完全应用于普通人群,小样本量,以及外部验证的局限性。设计一个普遍适用的一般人群GSD风险预测模型,采取个体化干预措施预防GSD的发生至关重要。本研究旨在开展一项涉及90000多人的多中心调查,构建并验证一个完整、简化的GSD风险预测模型。
    2015年1月至2020年12月,共有123634名参与者被纳入研究,其中43929人来自重庆医科大学附属第一医院(重庆,中国),11907来自济宁市第一人民医院(山东,中国),1538人来自天津医科大学肿瘤研究所和医院(天津,中国),66260来自开州区人民医院(重庆市,中国)。排除临床医学资料不完整的患者后,将来自重庆医科大学附属第一医院的35976名患者分为训练数据集(n=28781,80%)和验证数据集(n=7195,20%)。采用Logistic回归分析探讨GSD的相关危险因素,构建了完整的风险预测模型。得分高的因素,主要根据完整模型的列线图,被保留以简化模型。在验证数据集中,使用校准曲线验证了这些模型的诊断准确性和临床表现,接收器工作特性曲线的曲线下面积(AUC),和决策曲线分析(DCA)。此外,这两种模型的诊断准确性在另外三家医院得到了验证.最后,我们建立了一个使用预测模型的在线网站(完整的模型可以在https://wenqiyu访问。shinyapps.io/Completemodel/,而简化的模型可以在https://wenqiyu访问。shinyapps.io/简体/)。
    排除临床医疗数据不完整的患者后,最终共有96426名参与者被纳入本研究(35876名来自重庆医科大学附属第一医院,济宁市第一人民医院9289,1522年来自天津医科大学肿瘤研究所,和49639来自开州区人民医院)。女性性别,高龄,较高的体重指数,空腹血糖,尿酸,总胆红素,γ-谷氨酰转肽酶,脂肪肝与GSD风险呈正相关。此外,胆囊息肉,总胆固醇,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇,天冬氨酸转氨酶与GSD风险呈负相关。根据完整模型的列线图,包括性别在内的简化模型,年龄,身体质量指数,胆囊息肉,和脂肪肝的构造。所有校准曲线在预测和观察到的概率之间表现出良好的一致性。此外,DCA表明,完整模型和简化模型均显示出比全部治疗和无治疗更好的净收益。根据校准图,DCA,和完整模型的AUC(内部验证数据集中的AUC=74.1%[95%CI:72.9%-75.3%],山东AUC=71.7%[95%CI:70.6%-72.8%],天津市AUC=75.3%[95%CI:72.7%-77.9%],和开州的AUC=72.9%[95%CI:72.5%-73.3%])和简化模型(内部验证数据集中的AUC=73.7%[95%CI:72.5%-75.0%],山东的AUC=71.5%[95%CI:70.4%-72.5%],天津市AUC=75.4%[95%CI:72.9%-78.0%],开州的AUC=72.4%[95%CI:72.0%-72.8%]),我们得出的结论是,完整和简化的GSD风险预测模型表现出优异的性能。此外,我们检测到两种模型的性能之间没有显着差异(P>0.05)。我们还根据这项研究的结果建立了两个在线网站,用于GSD风险预测。
    这项研究创新性地使用了来自四家医院的96426名患者的数据,以建立GSD风险预测模型,并对四个队列中的内部和外部验证数据集进行风险预测分析。GSD风险预测的简化模型,其中包括性别变量,年龄,身体质量指数,胆囊息肉,脂肪肝疾病,也表现出良好的辨别力和临床表现。尽管如此,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和天冬氨酸转氨酶在胆囊结石形成中的作用有待进一步研究。完整模型的验证结果在一定程度上优于简化模型,即使在大样本中,差异也不显著。与完整模型相比,简化模型使用的变量较少,产生的预测和临床影响相似.因此,我们建议应用简化模型,以提高实践中筛查高危人群的效率。简化模型的使用有利于提高一般人群的自我防控意识和对GSD的早期干预。
    UNASSIGNED: Gallstone disease (GSD) is one of the common digestive tract diseases with a high worldwide prevalence. The effects of GSD on patients include but are not limited to the symptoms of nausea, vomiting, and biliary colic directly caused by GSD. In addition, there is mounting evidence from cohort studies connecting GSD to other conditions, such as cardiovascular diseases, biliary tract cancer, and colorectal cancer. Early identification of patients at a high risk of GSD may help improve the prevention and control of the disease. A series of studies have attempted to establish prediction models for GSD, but these models could not be fully applied in the general population due to incomplete prediction factors, small sample sizes, and limitations in external validation. It is crucial to design a universally applicable GSD risk prediction model for the general population and to take individualized intervention measures to prevent the occurrence of GSD. This study aims to conduct a multicenter investigation involving more than 90000 people to construct and validate a complete and simplified GSD risk prediction model.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 123634 participants were included in the study between January 2015 and December 2020, of whom 43929 were from the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (Chongqing, China), 11907 were from the First People\'s Hospital of Jining City (Shandong, China), 1538 were from the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (Tianjin, China), and 66260 were from the People\'s Hospital of Kaizhou District (Chongqing, China). After excluding patients with incomplete clinical medical data, 35976 patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were divided into a training data set (n=28781, 80%) and a validation data set (n=7195, 20%). Logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the relevant risk factors of GSD, and a complete risk prediction model was constructed. Factors with high scores, mainly according to the nomograms of the complete model, were retained to simplify the model. In the validation data set, the diagnostic accuracy and clinical performance of these models were validated using the calibration curve, area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Moreover, the diagnostic accuracy of these two models was validated in three other hospitals. Finally, we established an online website for using the prediction model (The complete model is accessible at https://wenqianyu.shinyapps.io/Completemodel/, while the simplified model is accessible at https://wenqianyu.shinyapps.io/Simplified/).
    UNASSIGNED: After excluding patients with incomplete clinical medical data, a total of 96426 participants were finally included in this study (35876 from the First Affiliated Hospital of the Chongqing Medical University, 9289 from the First People\'s Hospital of Jining City, 1522 from the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute, and 49639 from the People\'s Hospital of Kaizhou District). Female sex, advanced age, higher body mass index, fasting plasma glucose, uric acid, total bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and fatty liver disease were positively associated with risks for GSD. Furthermore, gallbladder polyps, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and aspartate aminotransferase were negatively correlated to risks for GSD. According to the nomograms of the complete model, a simplified model including sex, age, body mass index, gallbladder polyps, and fatty liver disease was constructed. All the calibration curves exhibited good consistency between the predicted and observed probabilities. In addition, DCA indicated that both the complete model and the simplified model showed better net benefits than treat-all and treat-none. Based on the calibration plots, DCA, and AUCs of the complete model (AUC in the internal validation data set=74.1% [95% CI: 72.9%-75.3%], AUC in Shandong=71.7% [95% CI: 70.6%-72.8%], AUC in Tianjin=75.3% [95% CI: 72.7%-77.9%], and AUC in Kaizhou=72.9% [95% CI: 72.5%-73.3%]) and the simplified model (AUC in the internal validation data set=73.7% [95% CI: 72.5%-75.0%], AUC in Shandong=71.5% [95% CI: 70.4%-72.5%], AUC in Tianjin=75.4% [95% CI: 72.9%-78.0%], and AUC in Kaizhou=72.4% [95% CI: 72.0%-72.8%]), we concluded that the complete and simplified risk prediction models for GSD exhibited excellent performance. Moreover, we detected no significant differences between the performance of the two models (P>0.05). We also established two online websites based on the results of this study for GSD risk prediction.
    UNASSIGNED: This study innovatively used the data from 96426 patients from four hospitals to establish a GSD risk prediction model and to perform risk prediction analyses of internal and external validation data sets in four cohorts. A simplified model of GSD risk prediction, which included the variables of sex, age, body mass index, gallbladder polyps, and fatty liver disease, also exhibited good discrimination and clinical performance. Nonetheless, further studies are needed to explore the role of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and aspartate aminotransferase in gallstone formation. Although the validation results of the complete model were better than those of the simplified model to a certain extent, the difference was not significant even in large samples. Compared with the complete model, the simplified model uses fewer variables and yields similar prediction and clinical impact. Hence, we recommend the application of the simplified model to improve the efficiency of screening high-risk groups in practice. The use of the simplified model is conducive to enhancing the self-awareness of prevention and control in the general population and early intervention for GSD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:延迟联合,malunion,骨不连是骨折愈合的严重并发症。预测手术前后骨不连的风险是具有挑战性的。
    目的:比较临床实践中使用的骨不连最普遍的预测评分,以确定预测骨不连的最准确评分。
    方法:我们收集了2016年1月至2020年12月在三家不同创伤医院接受手术的胫骨干骨折患者的数据。在这项回顾性多中心研究中,我们只考虑用髓内钉治疗骨折。我们计算了胫骨骨折预测愈合天数(FRACTING)评分,不愈合风险判定评分,明确固定时的利兹-热那亚骨不连指数(LEG-NUI)评分。
    结果:在130名患者中,89例(68.4%)在9个月内愈合,并归类为工会。其余患者(n=41,31.5%)在超过9个月后愈合或接受其他外科手术,并被归类为骨不连。计算了三个分数后,LEG-NUI和FRACTING在预测愈合方面最准确。
    结论:LEG-NUI和FRACTING通过准确预测愈合和骨不愈合表现最佳。
    BACKGROUND: Delayed union, malunion, and nonunion are serious complications in the healing of fractures. Predicting the risk of nonunion before or after surgery is challenging.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the most prevalent predictive scores of nonunion used in clinical practice to determine the most accurate score for predicting nonunion.
    METHODS: We collected data from patients with tibial shaft fractures undergoing surgery from January 2016 to December 2020 in three different trauma hospitals. In this retrospective multicenter study, we considered only fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. We calculated the tibia FRACTure prediction healING days (FRACTING) score, Nonunion Risk Determination score, and Leeds-Genoa Nonunion Index (LEG-NUI) score at the time of definitive fixation.
    RESULTS: Of the 130 patients enrolled, 89 (68.4%) healed within 9 months and were classified as union. The remaining patients (n = 41, 31.5%) healed after more than 9 months or underwent other surgical procedures and were classified as nonunion. After calculation of the three scores, LEG-NUI and FRACTING were the most accurate at predicting healing.
    CONCLUSIONS: LEG-NUI and FRACTING showed the best performances by accurately predicting union and nonunion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:PREDICT是一种基于网络的预测乳腺癌预后的工具。PREDICT3.0版本最近发布。本研究旨在为中国大陆的大量人口验证此工具,并将v3.0与v2.2进行比较。
    方法:选择温州医科大学附属第一医院2010-2020年接受非转移性原发性浸润性乳腺癌手术治疗的女性。比较了v3.0和v2.2的预测和观察到的5年总生存率(OS)。使用接受者-操作者曲线和DeLong检验比较了辨别。使用校准图和卡方检验评估校准。大于5%的差异被认为是临床相关的。
    结果:共纳入5424例患者,中位随访时间为58个月(IQR38-89个月)。与v2.2相比,v3.0对5年OS的辨别准确性没有提高(AUC:0.756vs0.771),与ER阳性和ER阴性患者相同。然而,在v3.0中,校准显着改善,预测的5年OS偏离了整个队列的-2.0%,ER阳性患者为-2.9%,ER阴性患者为-0.0%,与-7.3%相比,在v2.2中-4.7%和-13.7%。在v3.0中,75岁以上的患者的5年OS被低估了9.0%,微转移患者为5.8%。诊断后远处转移的患者被高估了10.6%。
    结论:PREDICTv3.0可靠地预测了大多数中国乳腺癌患者的5年OS。PREDICTv3.0显着提高了ER阴性组的预测准确性。此外,对于70岁以上的患者,诊断后有微转移或转移的患者,应谨慎解释5年OS。
    BACKGROUND: PREDICT is a web-based tool for forecasting breast cancer outcomes. PREDICT version 3.0 was recently released. This study aimed to validate this tool for a large population in mainland China and compare v3.0 with v2.2.
    METHODS: Women who underwent surgery for nonmetastatic primary invasive breast cancer between 2010 and 2020 from the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University were selected. Predicted and observed 5-year overall survival (OS) for both v3.0 and v2.2 were compared. Discrimination was compared using receiver-operator curves and DeLong test. Calibration was evaluated using calibration plots and chi-squared test. A difference greater than 5% was deemed clinically relevant.
    RESULTS: A total of 5424 patients were included, with median follow-up time of 58 months (IQR 38-89 months). Compared to v2.2, v3.0 did not show improved discriminatory accuracy for 5-year OS (AUC: 0.756 vs 0.771), same as ER-positive and ER-negative patients. However, calibration was significantly improved in v3.0, with predicted 5-year OS deviated from observed by -2.0% for the entire cohort, -2.9% for ER-positive and -0.0% for ER-negative patients, compared to -7.3%, -4.7% and -13.7% in v2.2. In v3.0, 5-year OS was underestimated by 9.0% for patients older than 75 years, and 5.8% for patients with micrometastases. Patients with distant metastases postdiagnosis was overestimated by 10.6%.
    CONCLUSIONS: PREDICT v3.0 reliably predicts 5-year OS for the majority of Chinese patients with breast cancer. PREDICT v3.0 significantly improved the predictive accuracy for ER-negative groups. Furthermore, caution is advised when interpreting 5-year OS for patients aged over 70, those with micrometastases or metastases postdiagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号