背景:在越南,关键人群(KP)面临获得艾滋病毒服务的障碍。可以利用虚拟平台来增加KP的访问权限,包括艾滋病毒自我检测(HIVST)。这项研究比较了越南从试点到扩大规模的基于网络的HIVST干预措施的范围和有效性。
方法:混合方法解释性顺序设计使用横截面和主题分析。该试点项目于2020年11月在CanTho启动,随后于2021年4月在河内和NgheAn启动。扩大规模包括CanTho和NgheAn,2022年4月至12月有21个新颖的省份。风险评估后,参与者在网站上注册,通过快递接收HIVST(OraQuick®),同伴教育者或自我捡拾者。鼓励报告测试结果并完成满意度调查。干预范围是通过访问测试的数字来衡量的,按人口统计分类,以及注册后报告自我测试的个人比例。有效性是通过报告自检结果的数字来衡量的,测试呈阳性并与护理挂钩,并检测为阴性,并使用HIVST管理暴露前预防(PrEP)的使用。满意度调查对自由文本回答的主题内容分析综合了定量结果。
结果:总计,17,589名参与者在HIVST网站上注册;11,332人订购了13,334项测试。参与者通常很年轻,年龄<25岁(4309/11,332,38.0%),男性(9418/11,332,83.1%)和男男性行为者(6437/11,332,56.8%)。近一半是首次测试人员(5069/11,332,44.9%)。扩大参与者在出生时被分配为女性的可能性是女性的两倍(扩大;1595/8436,与飞行员相比,18.9%;392/3727,10.5%,p<0.001)。与试点相比,按比例放大报告的测试结果较少(试点:3129/4140,75.6%,扩大规模:5811/9194,63.2%,p<0.001)。所有测试的6.3%是反应性的(中试:176/3129,与放大:385/5811相比,反应性为5.6%,反应性为6.6%,p=0.063);其中与护理最相关(509/522,97.5%)。五分之一的测试阴性的参与者开始或继续进行PrEP(试点;19.8%,扩大规模;18.5%,p=0.124)。专题分析表明,社区交付模式增加了方案覆盖面。实时聊天也可能是员工支持的合适代理,以增加结果报告。
结论:在越南,基于网络的自我检测覆盖了艾滋病毒风险升高的人群,促进抗逆转录病毒治疗的摄取,并与PrEP初始直接联系。进一步的创新,如使用社交网络测试服务和整合人工智能驱动的功能,可以提高该方法的有效性和效率。
BACKGROUND: In Viet Nam, key populations (KPs) face barriers accessing HIV services. Virtual platforms can be leveraged to increase access for KPs, including for HIV self-testing (HIVST). This study compares reach and effectiveness of a web-based HIVST intervention from pilot to scale-up in Viet Nam.
METHODS: A mixed-methods explanatory sequential design used cross-sectional and thematic analysis. The pilot launched in Can Tho in November 2020, followed by Hanoi and Nghe An in April 2021. Scale-up included Can Tho and Nghe An, with 21 novel provinces from April to December 2022. After risk assessment, participants registered on the website, receiving HIVST (OraQuick®) by courier, peer educator or self-pick-up. Test result reporting and completing satisfaction surveys were encouraged. Intervention reach was measured through numbers accessing the testing, disaggregated by demographics, and proportion of individuals reporting self-testing post-registration. Effectiveness was measured through numbers reporting self-test results, testing positive and linking to care, and testing negative and using HIVST to manage pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use. Thematic content analysis of free-text responses from the satisfaction survey synthesized quantitative outcomes.
RESULTS: In total, 17,589 participants registered on the HIVST website; 11,332 individuals ordered 13,334 tests. Participants were generally young, aged <25 years (4309/11,332, 38.0%), male (9418/11,332, 83.1%) and men who have sex with men (6437/11,332, 56.8%). Nearly half were first-time testers (5069/11,332, 44.9%). Scale-up participants were two times more likely to be assigned female at birth (scale-up; 1595/8436, 18.9% compared to pilot; 392/3727, 10.5%, p < 0.001). Fewer test results were reported in scale-up compared with pilot (pilot: 3129/4140, 75.6%, scale-up: 5811/9194, 63.2%, p < 0.001). 6.3% of all tests were reactive (pilot: 176/3129, 5.6% reactive compared to scale-up: 385/5811, 6.6% reactive, p = 0.063); of which most linked to care (509/522, 97.5%). One-fifth of participants with a negative test initiated or continued PrEP (pilot; 19.8%, scale-up; 18.5%, p = 0.124). Thematic analysis suggested that community delivery models increased programmatic reach. Live chat may also be a suitable proxy for staff support to increase result reporting.
CONCLUSIONS: Web-based self-testing in Viet Nam reached people at elevated risk of HIV, facilitating uptake of anti-retroviral treatment and direct linkage to PrEP initiations. Further innovations such as the use of social-network testing services and incorporating features powered by artificial intelligence could increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the approach.