practice effects

实践效果
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在建立重测信度,并研究Mindmore认知评估工具的实践效果。为自我管理设计的传统铅笔和纸测试的数字改编。此外,得出了最常用测试的规范变化分数。共有149名健康的瑞典成年人(20-79岁)完成了两次测试电池,相隔一个月。电池评估注意力和处理速度,记忆,语言,视觉空间功能,和执行功能。重测可靠性,用ICC和Spearman系数衡量,并估计了22个主要分数和33个子分数的练习效果。回归模型用于评估绩效变化,同时控制人口统计,计算机设备,测试位置(在线或实验室)和12个主要分数和9个子分数的基线性能。重测信度为11个主要分数(≥0.70),5人满意(0.60-0.69),最低6(<0.60),尽管有3个具有令人满意的子分数。在具有主要速度分量的测试中观察到实践效果,但不是反应时间,持续关注,口头记忆和命名(替代形式),也不是视觉空间功能。触控板对一个测试的变化产生负面影响。人口统计和测试位置没有显着影响变化分数。我们的研究为Mindmore认知评估工具的重测可靠性和实践效果提供了支持,与传统测试相当。这些发现,连同规范变化分数,可以帮助研究人员和临床医生解释测试结果,并区分表现的正常变化和指示临床损害的变化。
    The present study aimed to establish test-retest reliability and investigate practice effects of the Mindmore cognitive assessment tool, a digital adaptation of traditional pencil and paper tests designed for self-administration. Additionally, normative change scores for the most frequently used tests were derived. A total of 149 healthy Swedish adults (aged 20-79) completed the test battery twice, 1 month apart. The battery assessed attention and processing speed, memory, language, visuospatial functions, and executive functions. Test-retest reliability, measured by ICC and Spearman coefficients, and practice effects were estimated for 22 main-scores and 33 sub-scores. Regression models were used to assess change in performance while controlling for demographics, computer equipment, testing location (online or in-laboratory) and baseline performance for 12 main-scores and nine sub-scores. Test-retest reliability was good for 11 main-scores (≥0.70), satisfactory for five (0.60-0.69), and minimal for six (<0.60) albeit three having satisfactory sub-scores. Practice effects were observed for tests with a major speed component, but not for reaction time, sustained attention, verbal memory and naming (alternate forms), nor visuospatial functions. Trackpad negatively influenced change for one test. Demographics and testing location did not significantly affect the change scores. Our study provides support for test-retest reliability and practice effects of the Mindmore cognitive assessment tool which were comparable to those of traditional tests. These findings, together with the normative change scores, can aid researchers and clinicians in interpreting test results and distinguishing between normal variations in performance and changes indicative of clinical impairment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究得出了两种新颖的认知测量的综合得分,无实践效应(NPE)电池和迈阿密计算机功能技能评估和培训系统,用于早期阿尔茨海默病(AD)临床试验。将其心理测量特性以及与AD风险标志物的关联与已建立的指标进行了比较。
    方法:对于291名认知健康或早期轻度认知障碍的老年人,探索性因子分析用于确定NPE的因子结构。检查了因子和总分的心理测量特性以及与AD风险生物标志物的关联。
    结果:新的认知和功能测量的综合得分显示出更好的心理测量特性(分布和重测可靠性)以及与AD相关的人口统计学更强的关联,遗传,和大脑风险标志物比既定的措施,讨论:这些新的措施有可能用作早期AD临床试验的主要认知和功能结果。
    结论:完善的认知测试可能无法准确检测到细微的认知变化。无实践效果(NPE)和计算机功能技能评估和培训是旨在改善心理测量特性的新颖措施。NPE具有执行功能,认知控制/速度,和情景记忆域。与既定措施相比,新措施具有更好的心理测量特性。通过新的措施发现了与阿尔茨海默病生物标志物的显着关联。
    BACKGROUND: This study derived composite scores for two novel cognitive measures, the No Practice Effect (NPE) battery and the Miami Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training system for use in early-stage Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) clinical trials. Their psychometric properties and associations with AD risk markers were compared to those of well-established measures.
    METHODS: For 291 older adults with healthy cognition or early mild cognitive impairment, Exploratory factor analyses were used to identify the factor structure of the NPE. Factor and total scores were examined for their psychometric properties and associations with AD risk biomarkers.
    RESULTS: Composite scores from the novel cognitive and functional measures demonstrated better psychometric properties (distribution and test-retest reliability) and stronger associations with AD-related demographic, genetic, and brain risk markers than well-established measures, DISCUSSION: These novel measures have potential for use as primary cognitive and functional outcomes in early-stage AD clinical trials.
    CONCLUSIONS: Well-established cognitive tests may not accurately detect subtle cognitive changes. No Practice Effect (NPE) and Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training are novel measures designed to have improved psychometric properties. NPE had Executive Function, Cognitive Control/Speed, and Episodic Memory domains. Novel measures had better psychometric properties compared to established measures. Significant associations with Alzheimer\'s disease biomarkers were found with novel measures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    成功的音乐制作需要精确的感觉运动同步,在个人(独奏)和联合(合奏)社会环境中。我们调查了与时间上规则的旋律(独奏条件)同步的个人练习如何影响两个伴侣之间的后续同步(联合条件)。受过音乐训练的成年人通过点击键盘练习制作旋律;每次点击都会产生旋律中的下一个音调。首先,在基线联合同步任务中,这对夫妇与他们的伴侣同步了旋律作品。然后,每个伙伴在独奏干预条件下分别将其旋律与计算机生成的伙伴旋律记录同步,该条件在偶尔(25%)随机放置的音调位置呈现正常(时间规则)听觉反馈或延迟反馈(30-70ms)。然后,这些对在联合条件下再次与他们的伙伴同步。接下来,他们执行了第二个Solo状态(正常或延迟的听觉反馈),然后再次执行关节状态。使用延迟耦合振荡器模型对联合同步性能进行建模,以评估伙伴之间的耦合强度。在延迟反馈条件下,单独干预任务中的绝对异步大于正常反馈条件。在遵循Solo正常反馈的联合条件下,模型估计产生的伙伴之间的耦合值大于Solo延迟反馈。值得注意的是,联合条件下的异步小于独奏条件下的异步。这些发现表明,可以通过个人同步实践来改善两个或多个表演者的环境中的耦合交互。
    Successful music-making requires precise sensorimotor synchronization, both in individual (solo) and joint (ensemble) social settings. We investigated how individual practice synchronizing with a temporally regular melody (Solo conditions) influences subsequent synchronization between two partners (Joint conditions). Musically trained adults practiced producing a melody by tapping on a keypad; each tap generated the next tone in the melody. First, the pairs synchronized their melody productions with their partner in a baseline Joint synchronization task. Then each partner separately synchronized their melody with a computer-generated recording of the partner\'s melody in a Solo intervention condition that presented either Normal (temporally regular) auditory feedback or delayed feedback (by 30-70 ms) in occasional (25%) randomly placed tone positions. Then the pairs synchronized again with their partner in a Joint condition. Next, they performed the second Solo condition (normal or delayed auditory feedback) followed again by the Joint condition. Joint synchronization performance was modeled with a delay-coupled oscillator model to assess the coupling strength between partners. Absolute asynchronies in the Solo Intervention tasks were greater in the Delayed feedback condition than in the Normal feedback condition. Model estimates yielded larger coupling values between partners in Joint conditions that followed the Solo Normal feedback than the Solo Delayed feedback. Notably, the asynchronies were smaller in the Joint conditions than in the Solo conditions. These findings indicate that coupled interactions in settings of two or more performers can be improved by individual synchronization practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    大多数人从脑震荡中迅速康复;然而,患有多次脑震荡的青少年可能有长期认知障碍的风险.此案例研究检查了一名13岁头部受伤的男性的神经心理学表现。在他参与研究期间的第一次脑震荡(总体上是第四次受伤)后,观察到一些改进,可能是由于实践效果,然而,在经历了两年后的另一次脑震荡之后,观察到视觉结构的下降,口头记忆,和智力功能。在系列重新评估中,他的词汇知识下降了,在考虑系列实践效应时,观察到的改进比预期的要少,强调多次脑震荡可能的累积影响。
    Most individuals recover quickly from a concussion; however, youth who sustain multiple concussions may be at risk for long-term cognitive impairments. This case study examines the neuropsychological performance of a 13-year-old malewith five head injuries. After his first concussion during study participation (fourth injury overall), several improvements were observed, likely due to practice effects, yet after sustaining another concussion <2 years later,declines were observed in visuoconstruction, verbal memory, and intellectual functioning. Across serial re-evaluation, his vocabulary knowledge declined, and fewer improvements were observed than anticipated when accounting for serial practice effects, highlighting the possible cumulative impact of multiple concussions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)的认知测试的实践效果仍未得到充分研究,特别是它们与AD生物标志物的比较。
    当前的研究试图增加这种不断增长的文献。
    认知完整的老年人(n=68),那些患有失忆MCI的人(n=52),轻度AD患者(n=45)在基线和一周后再次完成了简短的认知测试,他们还完成了基线淀粉样蛋白PET扫描,基线MRI,和基线抽血以获得APOEº4状态。
    完整的参与者在总体综合指标上表现出比其他两组明显更大的基线认知得分和实践效果。MCI患者的基线评分和实践效果明显高于AD参与者。对于淀粉样蛋白沉积,完整的参与者有明显较少的示踪剂摄取,而MCI和AD参与者具有可比性。对于海马总体积,三组在预期方向(完整>MCI>AD)均有显著差异.对于APOE4,完整的4的拷贝明显少于MCI和AD。基线认知得分和实践效果的效果大小是可比的,在9个比较中的7个中,它们显著大于生物标志物的效应大小。
    基线认知和短期实践效应似乎是晚年认知障碍的敏感标志,因为它们比AD中常用的生物标志物更好地分离组。基线认知和短期实践效果的进一步发展,作为临床诊断的工具,预后指征,和临床试验的丰富似乎是有必要的。
    UNASSIGNED: Practice effects on cognitive testing in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) remain understudied, especially with how they compare to biomarkers of AD.
    UNASSIGNED: The current study sought to add to this growing literature.
    UNASSIGNED: Cognitively intact older adults (n = 68), those with amnestic MCI (n = 52), and those with mild AD (n = 45) completed a brief battery of cognitive tests at baseline and again after one week, and they also completed a baseline amyloid PET scan, a baseline MRI, and a baseline blood draw to obtain APOE ɛ4 status.
    UNASSIGNED: The intact participants showed significantly larger baseline cognitive scores and practice effects than the other two groups on overall composite measures. Those with MCI showed significantly larger baseline scores and practice effects than AD participants on the composite. For amyloid deposition, the intact participants had significantly less tracer uptake, whereas MCI and AD participants were comparable. For total hippocampal volumes, all three groups were significantly different in the expected direction (intact > MCI > AD). For APOE ɛ4, the intact had significantly fewer copies of ɛ4 than MCI and AD. The effect sizes of the baseline cognitive scores and practice effects were comparable, and they were significantly larger than effect sizes of biomarkers in 7 of the 9 comparisons.
    UNASSIGNED: Baseline cognition and short-term practice effects appear to be sensitive markers in late life cognitive disorders, as they separated groups better than commonly-used biomarkers in AD. Further development of baseline cognition and short-term practice effects as tools for clinical diagnosis, prognostic indication, and enrichment of clinical trials seems warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文提供了飞利浦IntelliSpaceCognition(ISC)平台的重测可靠性和可靠变化指数(RCI),其中包含了完善的神经心理学测试的数字化版本。
    147名参与者(年龄在19至88岁之间)在ISC平台或同一测试电池的纸笔版本中,在两次单独的访问中完成了数字认知测试电池。分别计算ISC和模拟测试版本的组内相关系数(ICC),以比较给药方式之间的可靠性。使用实践调整的RCI和基于回归的标准化(SRB)方法计算数字测试的RCI。
    ISC测试的测试-重测可靠性范围从中等到优异,并且与纸笔测试的测试-重测可靠性相当。基线测试性能,重测间隔,年龄,教育学预测第2次访视时的测试表现,基线测试表现是所有结局指标的最强预测指标。对于大多数结果衡量标准,两种计算RCI的方法都对是否观察到可靠的变化表示同意。
    数字测试的RCI使临床医生能够确定评估之间的测量变化是由于实际改善还是下降。一起,这有助于为ISC平台的临床实用性提供越来越多的证据.
    UNASSIGNED: This article provides the test-retest reliability and Reliable Change Indices (RCIs) of the Philips IntelliSpace Cognition (ISC) platform, which contains digitized versions of well-established neuropsychological tests.
    UNASSIGNED: 147 participants (ages 19 to 88) completed a digital cognitive test battery on the ISC platform or paper-pencil versions of the same test battery during two separate visits. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated separately for the ISC and analog test versions to compare reliabilities between administration modalities. RCIs were calculated for the digital tests using the practice-adjusted RCI and standardized regression-based (SRB) method.
    UNASSIGNED: Test-retest reliabilities for the ISC tests ranged from moderate to excellent and were comparable to the test-retest reliabilities for the paper-pencil tests. Baseline test performance, retest interval, age, and education predicted test performance at visit 2 with baseline test performance being the strongest predictor for all outcome measures. For most outcome measures, both methods for the calculation of RCIs show agreement on whether or not a reliable change was observed.
    UNASSIGNED: RCIs for the digital tests enable clinicians to determine whether a measured change between assessments is due to real improvement or decline. Together, this contributes to the growing evidence for the clinical utility of the ISC platform.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted two empirical studies (in a cross-sectional and a longitudinal design) with the aim at establishing normative data (including norms for strategy use [i.e., clustering and switching strategies] and performance over time), and examining the convergent validity, the test-retest reliability (3-4 wks interval) and the changes in performance with practice (1 year interval) of the different verbal fluency (VF) quantitative and qualitative scores in Spanish-speaking children and adolescents.
    UNASSIGNED: In S1 (n = 620 6- to 15-year-old Spanish-speaking children and adolescents), MANCOVA and Pearson\'s correlations were employed. In S2 (n = 148 6- to 12-year-old Spanish-speaking children), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), paired t-tests, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were used.
    UNASSIGNED: S1 results showed an age effect on all VF measures (quantitative and qualitative). The number of switches/clusters was more related to total word productivity and to executive functions (EF) than the mean cluster size. In S2, a significant increase in phonological VF performance was observed on number of switches and word productivity scores from baseline (Time 1) to repeat testing at Time 2. Practice effects were observed at Time 3 on all measures except for semantic and phonological mean cluster size. Test-retest reliability coefficients at Time 2 for number of clusters and switches, but not for mean cluster size, fell in the moderate range, ranging from ICCs .61 to ICCs .81. Test-retest reliability coefficients for total word productivity were higher (ICCs above .80) and stronger when testing as a unity with CFA methods (ϕ=.94, p < .001).
    UNASSIGNED: These data may be relevant for informing the neuropsychological assessment of spontaneous cognitive flexibility in children with typical development (TD) and those with developmental or acquired disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    认知功能下降是阿尔茨海默病(AD)临床研究的关键结果。
    为了确定总体淀粉样蛋白负荷以及海马和基底前脑体积对纵向速率的影响,以及通过重复测试AD频谱中特定域认知变化的实践效果,考虑队列中的非线性效应和异质性。
    我们包括来自三个队列的1,514例病例,ADNI,AIBL,和DELCODE,范围从认知正常的人到主观认知能力下降和轻度认知障碍(MCI)的人。我们使用广义贝叶斯混合效应分析淀粉样蛋白和体积效应的线性和多项式模型。使用贝叶斯随机效应荟萃分析确定跨队列效应的稳健性。
    我们发现淀粉样蛋白和海马体积具有一致的作用,但不是基底前脑容量,meta分析中三个队列的记忆变化率。淀粉样蛋白和体积标志物对执行功能的影响更为异质。我们发现实践对淀粉样蛋白阴性认知正常对照和MCI病例的记忆和执行表现有影响,但在淀粉样蛋白阳性对照中只有较小的程度,而在淀粉样蛋白阳性MCI病例中根本没有。
    我们发现了队列之间的异质性,特别是对执行功能的影响。淀粉样蛋白阴性的认知表现的初始增加,但在淀粉样蛋白阳性的MCI病例和对照中没有,这可能反映了重复测试的实践效果,这些重复测试随着脑淀粉样蛋白水平的升高而丢失。
    UNASSIGNED: Cognitive decline is a key outcome of clinical studies in Alzheimer\'s disease (AD).
    UNASSIGNED: To determine effects of global amyloid load as well as hippocampus and basal forebrain volumes on longitudinal rates and practice effects from repeated testing of domain specific cognitive change in the AD spectrum, considering non-linear effects and heterogeneity across cohorts.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 1,514 cases from three cohorts, ADNI, AIBL, and DELCODE, spanning the range from cognitively normal people to people with subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We used generalized Bayesian mixed effects analysis of linear and polynomial models of amyloid and volume effects in time. Robustness of effects across cohorts was determined using Bayesian random effects meta-analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: We found a consistent effect of amyloid and hippocampus volume, but not of basal forebrain volume, on rates of memory change across the three cohorts in the meta-analysis. Effects for amyloid and volumetric markers on executive function were more heterogeneous. We found practice effects in memory and executive performance in amyloid negative cognitively normal controls and MCI cases, but only to a smaller degree in amyloid positive controls and not at all in amyloid positive MCI cases.
    UNASSIGNED: We found heterogeneity between cohorts, particularly in effects on executive functions. Initial increases in cognitive performance in amyloid negative, but not in amyloid positive MCI cases and controls may reflect practice effects from repeated testing that are lost with higher levels of cerebral amyloid.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然练习一个任务通常有利于以后在同一任务上的表现,实践效果存在个体差异。对这种差异进行建模的一种途径来自研究,该研究表明大脑网络从临界附近的操作中提取了功能优势,大脑网络活动更加无标度的状态。我们假设功能磁共振成像数据的无标度信号更高,用赫斯特指数(H)测量,表示更接近临界状态。我们测试了在重复任务执行过程中具有较高H的个体是否会表现出更大的实践效果。在研究1中,参与者在MRI期间执行了两次双n-back任务(DNB)(n=56)。在研究2中,我们使用了来自HumanConnectome项目样本的两次n-back任务(NBK)数据(n=599)。在研究3中,参与者在六次运行中执行了单词完成任务(CAST)(n=44)。在所有三项研究中,多变量分析用于检验较高的H是否与更大的实践相关的表现改善相关。支持我们的假设,我们发现,在所有三项研究中,较高的H模式与更大的表现改善可靠相关.然而,预测的大脑区域是不同的,这表明特定的空间H^模式不是一般任务。
    Although practicing a task generally benefits later performance on that same task, there are individual differences in practice effects. One avenue to model such differences comes from research showing that brain networks extract functional advantages from operating in the vicinity of criticality, a state in which brain network activity is more scale-free. We hypothesized that higher scale-free signal from fMRI data, measured with the Hurst exponent (H), indicates closer proximity to critical states. We tested whether individuals with higher H during repeated task performance would show greater practice effects. In Study 1, participants performed a dual-n-back task (DNB) twice during MRI (n = 56). In Study 2, we used two runs of n-back task (NBK) data from the Human Connectome Project sample (n = 599). In Study 3, participants performed a word completion task (CAST) across six runs (n = 44). In all three studies, multivariate analysis was used to test whether higher H was related to greater practice-related performance improvement. Supporting our hypothesis, we found patterns of higher H that reliably correlated with greater performance improvement across participants in all three studies. However, the predictive brain regions were distinct, suggesting that the specific spatial H↑ patterns are not task-general.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号